Risk of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the cervical esophagus and efficacy of local steroid injection for stricture prevention.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a high incidence of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for cervical esophageal cancer. We aimed to elucidate the risk factors for stricture and evaluate the efficacy of steroid injection for stricture prevention in the cervical esophagus. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who underwent ESD for cervical esophageal cancer to: (1) identify the factors associated with stricture among patients who did not receive steroid injection; (2) compare the incidence of stricture between patients with and without steroid injection. RESULTS: Among 48 patients who did not receive steroid injection, there were significant differences in tumor size (P = .026), resection time (P = .028), and circumferential extent of the mucosal defect (P = .005) between patients with stricture (n = 5) and without stricture (n = 43). Compared with patients without steroid injection, patients with steroid injection had a significantly lower incidence of stricture when the post-ESD mucosal defect was < 3/4 and ≥ 1/2 (40% versus 8%, P = .039). As for the patients with a post-ESD mucosal defect of ≥ 3/4 (n = 13), local steroid injection was performed for all the patients, and 6 patients (46%) developed stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent ≥ 1/2 circumferential resection were at high risk of cervical esophageal stricture. Steroid injection had a stricture-prevention effect in patients with < 3/4 and ≥ 1/2 circumferential resection, but seemed to be insufficient in preventing stricture in patients with ≥ 3/4 circumferential resection.

Predictors of technical difficulty for trainees in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically challenging, especially for trainees, and requires a safe training system. This study aimed to identify predictors of technical difficulty facing trainees performing esophageal ESD to establish such system. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent ESD performed by trainees between January 2010 and August 2022. Technical difficulties were defined as muscularis propria exposure and long procedure time (≥ 90 min). Factors associated with these technical difficulties were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 798 lesions in 721 patients were evaluated. Muscularis propria exposure occurred in 298 lesions (37.3%), including 10 perforations (1.3%). The procedure time was ≥ 90 min in 134 lesions (16.8%). In the multivariate analysis, tumor size ≥ 20 mm, tumors ≥ 1/2 of the circumference, and those close to previous treatment scars significantly increased the incidence of both difficulties, whereas tumors in the upper esophagus significantly decreased this incidence. Furthermore, female sex and tumors in the left wall were independent predictors of muscularis propria exposure, and elevated morphology was an independent predictor of long procedure time. Muscularis propria exposure and long procedure time occurred in more than half of the cases with three or more predictors of each difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: Large tumors and tumors close to previous treatment scars increase technical difficulties for trainees in esophageal ESD. Conversely, tumors in the upper esophagus reduce these difficulties. These results enable us to predict the difficulty level preoperatively and select appropriate cases in stepwise training.

Efficacy and Safety of Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Placement for Malignant Esophageal Fistula.

Patients with malignant esophageal fistulas often experience dysphagia and infection, resulting in poor prognoses. Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is a palliative treatment option; however, its efficacy and safety are unclear. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of SEMS placement for malignant esophageal fistulas. We retrospectively investigated patients who underwent SEMS placement for malignant esophageal fistulas between 2013 and 2022 at the Cancer Institute Hospital. Dysphagia scores (DSs) before and after SEMS placement, adverse events, and overall survival from SEMS placement until death were evaluated. A total of 17 patients underwent SEMS placement, including 12 and 5 patients with esophageal and lung cancers, respectively. Prior treatments included chemoradiotherapy (n = 11), radiotherapy (n = 4), and chemotherapy (n = 4); two patients underwent palliative radiotherapy after chemotherapy. All procedures were technically successful. After SEMS placement, 14 (82.4%) patients were able to consume semisolid or solid food (DS ≤ 2). Major adverse events were encountered in only one case. The median survival time after SEMS placement was 71 days (range 17-247 days). SEMS placement allowed most patients to resume oral intake with a low rate of major adverse events. SEMS placement is a reasonable palliative treatment option for patients with malignant fistulas who have poor prognoses.