Key factors for sustainable integration of pharmacists in team-based primary care physician practices.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) identify strategies for financial justification of pharmacists integrated into team-based primary care, (2) describe the payment models currently used for integration of pharmacists into team-based primary care, and (3) elicit key factors facilitating sustainable pharmacist-provided patient care services in the primary care setting. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis using semistructured interviews. SETTING: Nonacademic outpatient primary care physician practices throughout the United States from January to April 2014. PARTICIPANTS: Pharmacists responsible for leadership of clinical pharmacists in primary care practices whose positions are supported through nondispensing patient care services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current payment model, infrastructure, documentation strategies, and methods of quality assessment. RESULTS: Twelve interviews were conducted. Practices included a combination of single- and mixed-payer models in integrated and nonintegrated health systems. Various billing strategies were used, particularly in nonintegrated models, to sustain pharmacists in primary care practices utilizing both fee-for-service (FFS) and value-based incentives payments. Five main themes were elicited: (1) Pharmacists are integrated and valuable members of health care teams; (2) pharmacists are documenting in an accessible electronic health record; (3) data tracking is a facilitator for justifying and adapting practice; (4) systematized processes for pharmacist integration exist in each practice; and (5) pharmacists' responsibilities on the team have grown and evolved over time. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists' contributions to improving patients' medication-related care are the same regardless of payment model. Financially sustainable integration of pharmacists on the team involves using a combination of FFS and value-based incentive payments, consistent documentation, meaningful collection of pharmacists' contributions to improve the quality of care, and a firm understanding of the practice's needs and financial structure. These themes can be used as a guide for pharmacists as they establish themselves in an FFS environment and adapt to a future in value-based care.

Pharmacist integration into the medical home: qualitative analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the acceptance and attitudes of family medicine physicians, clinical and nonclinical office staff, pharmacists, and patients during pharmacist integration into a medical home. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Pittsburgh, PA, area from August 2009 to June 2010. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians, staff, pharmacists, and patients at four single-specialty family medicine office practices functioning as medical homes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Attitudes, acceptance, barriers, and problems identified by participants. RESULTS: A total of 84 interviews were conducted: 21 interviews with family medicine physicians, 26 with patient care staff, 9 with nonclinical staff, 13 with patients, 6 with pharmacists, and 8 with office managers. Five main themes emerged from each group regarding the integration of a pharmacist, including positive overall feeling; clinical, educational, and time-saving benefits to the various groups; challenges understanding the role of the pharmacist; improved workflow and integration resulting from pharmacist flexibility and motivation; and suggestions to increase the pharmacists' time in each office. Pharmacists felt that they were accepted within 6 months of the integration process and that time management was a challenge. CONCLUSION: Participants felt that inclusion of a pharmacist into their practice improves the quality of patient care, provides a valuable resource for all providers and staff, and empowers patients. The initial concerns of the clinical and nonclinical staff disappeared within the first months of pharmacist integration. These results provide guidance to clinicians and insight into strategies for building a pharmacist-integrated medical home team.

Pharmacist-Delivered Comprehensive Medication Management Within Family Medicine Practices An Evaluation of the SCRIPT Project.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pharmacist inclusion in patient-centered medical home (PCMH) teams has been shown to benefit both patients and practices. However, pharmacists' inclusion on these teams is not widespread, partly because the work they do is not well known. The Successful Collaborative Relationships to Improve PatienT care (SCRIPT) project was started in August 2009 to understand the clinical and economic impact of pharmacists providing direct patient care. The objective of this study was to describe the work of pharmacists practicing as integrated members of the patient care team within PCMHs through retrospective analysis of their patient care documentation over a 4-year time frame. Two pharmacists were placed into four suburban medical home practices in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to perform comprehensive medication management (CMM). These pharmacists documented their CMM encounters in an electronic health record and a database for reporting purposes. METHODS: This study is a retrospective, descriptive analysis of pharmacist-documented CMM encounters from February 2010 through February 2014. Pharmacists' work-including patient demographics, disease states, and medication therapy problems-was recorded in a Microsoft Access database and tabulated. RESULTS: The pharmacists conducted 11,206 CMM encounters with 3,777 unique patients during the study period. The pharmacists identified 9,375 medication therapy problems (MTPs) and performed 14,092 interventions. Pharmacists most commonly worked with patients with diabetes, hypertension, pain, and hyperlipidemia. Physician and patient acceptance of the pharmacists' work was high. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists working in family medicine offices contribute to patient care through identification and resolution of MTPs and also by collaborating with PCMH teams.

The SMARxT Media Literacy Program: Improving Evidence-Based Prescribing among Medical Students.

Media literacy may help medical trainees optimize evidence-based decision-making. Many prescriptions written are not evidence-based, resulting in unnecessary morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to assess feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of a media literacy prescribing program. We recruited 30 medical students, who completed animated video modules about pharmaceutical marketing and prescribing. We used a process evaluation and open-ended items to assess feasibility and acceptability, and knowledge tests before and after the intervention to assess efficacy. The program was feasible to implement and well-accepted by participants. After the educational intervention, knowledge and attitude targets around evidence-based prescribing and drug marketing improved.

An innovative, residency-based, interprofessional faculty development program.

PURPOSE: The impact of an interprofessional faculty development fellowship (FDF) on pharmacy graduates' careers is described. SUMMARY: The FDF instructional approach is a longitudinal acquisition and application of knowledge, skills, and attitudes fostered by clinical care delivery, teaching experiences, structured reflection, the giving and receiving of feedback, research and scholarly projects, and leadership development and exercises. Interprofessional FDF fellows teach, learn, and provide care together in both inpatient and outpatient clinical settings as a part of the evidence-based medicine curriculum, providing educational sessions for medical students, pharmacy students, medical residents, attending family medicine physicians, and clinical pharmacy faculty throughout the year. Twenty-seven of the 30 pharmacist graduates of the fellowship (90% response rate) responded to an electronic survey about the influence of the FDF on their careers. Overall, pharmacy graduates were very satisfied with the fellowship. The fellowship fostered a clear pattern of continued, collaborative learning. While additional training beyond a pharmacy residency program is not necessary for a successful clinical career, 41% of graduates pursued additional training after completing the fellowship. Open-ended responses for motivations for completing the FDF and influences the FDF had on their careers fell unforced into the FDF curriculum domains, which reinforced the belief that these are the right areas to target for development. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy residents participated in a broad, interprofessional faculty development curriculum, which fostered teaching, scholarship, leadership, professional development, and clinical skills. Pharmacist graduates indicated that the experience significantly influenced their careers and professional development.