Graph transformation for enzymatic mechanisms.

MOTIVATION: The design of enzymes is as challenging as it is consequential for making chemical synthesis in medical and industrial applications more efficient, cost-effective and environmentally friendly. While several aspects of this complex problem are computationally assisted, the drafting of catalytic mechanisms, i.e. the specification of the chemical steps-and hence intermediate states-that the enzyme is meant to implement, is largely left to human expertise. The ability to capture specific chemistries of multistep catalysis in a fashion that enables its computational construction and design is therefore highly desirable and would equally impact the elucidation of existing enzymatic reactions whose mechanisms are unknown. RESULTS: We use the mathematical framework of graph transformation to express the distinction between rules and reactions in chemistry. We derive about 1000 rules for amino acid side chain chemistry from the M-CSA database, a curated repository of enzymatic mechanisms. Using graph transformation, we are able to propose hundreds of hypothetical catalytic mechanisms for a large number of unrelated reactions in the Rhea database. We analyze these mechanisms to find that they combine in chemically sound fashion individual steps from a variety of known multistep mechanisms, showing that plausible novel mechanisms for catalysis can be constructed computationally. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of the initial prototype of our approach is available at https://github.com/Nojgaard/mechsearch. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Reconciling qualitative, abstract, and scalable modeling of biological networks.

Predicting biological systems' behaviors requires taking into account many molecular and genetic elements for which limited information is available past a global knowledge of their pairwise interactions. Logical modeling, notably with Boolean Networks (BNs), is a well-established approach that enables reasoning on the qualitative dynamics of networks. Several dynamical interpretations of BNs have been proposed. The synchronous and (fully) asynchronous ones are the most prominent, where the value of either all or only one component can change at each step. Here we prove that, besides being costly to analyze, these usual interpretations can preclude the prediction of certain behaviors observed in quantitative systems. We introduce an execution paradigm, the Most Permissive Boolean Networks (MPBNs), which offers the formal guarantee not to miss any behavior achievable by a quantitative model following the same logic. Moreover, MPBNs significantly reduce the complexity of dynamical analysis, enabling to model genome-scale networks.

Publisher Correction: Reconciling qualitative, abstract, and scalable modeling of biological networks.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.