Can 3D-printing avoid discomfort-related implant removal in midshaft clavicle fractures? A four-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the variation in shape and curvature of the clavicle, plates often have to be adjusted during surgery to acquire a good fit. Poorly fitted plates can cause discomfort, eventually requiring implant removal. 3D-printed replicas of the fractured clavicle can assist in planning of the surgical approach, plate selection and, if necessary, adjustment of the plate prior to surgery. We hypothesized this method of preoperative preparation would reduce implant-related discomfort resulting in a reduced reoperation rate MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, perioperative plate handling and clavicle fixation were timed and follow-up data were collected from participants undergoing operative treatment for a midshaft clavicle fracture. The control group (n = 7) received conventional surgery with standard precontoured plates. For the intervention group (n = 7), 3D-printed replicas of the fractured clavicle and a mirrored version of the healthy contralateral clavicle were available prior to surgery for planning of the surgical approach, and for plate selection and contouring. Primary outcome was reoperation rate due to implant-related discomfort. Secondary outcomes were complications and time differences in the different surgical phases (reduction, fixation and overall operation time) RESULTS: More participants in the control group had the plate removed due to discomfort compared to the intervention group (5/7 vs. 0/6; P = 0.012). One participant was excluded from the intervention group due to a postoperative complication; an infection occurred at the implant site. No relevant time difference in surgical plate handling was found between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative preparation using 3D-printed replicas of the clavicle fracture may reduce implant removal caused by plated-related discomfort. No relevant effect on surgery time was found. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with 'toetsingonline.nl', trial number NL51269.075/14, 17-02-2015.

A longitudinal study of shoulder and arm morbidity in breast cancer survivors 7 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection.

Knowledge about long-term consequences of breast cancer treatment on shoulder and arm function and volume in stages I-II breast cancer survivors is limited. The effects of shoulder-arm function shortly after surgery on long-term function are unknown. One hundred and ninety-four women were examined pre-surgery (T0) and 6 weeks after surgery (T1). Of those, 110 were re-examined 7 years later (T2). Thirty-four women underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and 76 underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Differences between affected and unaffected side were calculated for four ranges of motion functions, three strength functions and arm volume. These were used to analyse time and group effects. Differences exceeding 20° in range of motion, 20 % in strength and 200 ml in arm volume were considered clinically relevant. Multivariate regression analyses examined the effect of shoulder-arm function at T1 on shoulder-arm function at T2. Additional predictor variables included were age, follow-up time, Body Mass Index, complications, chemotherapy, radiation, SLNB/ALND and type of breast surgery. At T2, range of motion (except external rotation), abduction strength and arm volume were impaired compared to T0. After ALND, women had significantly more forward flexion impairment, increased arm volume and clinically relevant impairments (70 %) than after SLNB (41 %). T1 external rotation, abduction-external rotation, grip strength and arm volume were the strongest predictors of these variables at T2. Age was the strongest predictor of the remaining four variables. ALND predicted arm volume only. Seven years after breast cancer surgery, two-fifth of the women after SLNB and seven out of ten women after ALND had impairments. Impairments were found in five of eight shoulder-arm functions. After SLNB, women have less forward flexion impairment and less arm volume increase than after ALND. Shoulder-arm function at 6 weeks after surgery and age are the strongest predictors of long-term shoulder-arm function.

A longitudinal comparison of arm morbidity in stage I-II breast cancer patients treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy, sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by completion lymph node dissection, or axillary lymph node dissection.

BACKGROUND: Long-term shoulder and arm function following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may surpass that following complete axillary lymph node dissection (CLND) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We objectively examined the morbidity and compared outcomes after SLNB, SLNB + CLND, and ALND in stage I/II breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients who had SLNB (n = 51), SLNB + CLND (n = 55), and ALND (n = 65) were physically examined 1 day before surgery (T0), and after 6 (T1), 26 (T2), 52 (T3), and 104 (T4) weeks. Differences in 8 parameters between the affected and unaffected arms were calculated. General linear models were computed to examine time, group, and interaction effects. RESULTS: All outcomes changed significantly, mostly nonlinearly, over time (T0-T4). Between T1 and T4, limitations decreased in abduction (all groups); anteflexion, abduction-exorotation, abduction strength (SLNB + CLND, ALND); flexion strength (SLNB + CLND); and arm volume (SLNB, SLNB + CLND). At T4, limitations in anteflexion (SLNB, ALND), abduction (SLNB + CLND, ALND), exorotation (ALND), abduction-exorotation (all groups), and volume (SLNB + CLND, ALND) increased significantly compared with T0. The SLNB group showed an advantage in anteflexion, abduction, abduction-exorotation, and volume. Groups changed significantly but differently over time in anteflexion, abduction, abduction/exorotation, abduction strength, flexion strength, and volume. Effect sizes varied from 0.19 to 0.00. CONCLUSION: Initial declines in range of motion and strength were followed by recovery, although not always to presurgery levels. Range of motion and volume outcomes were better for SLNB than ALND, but not strength. SLNB surpassed SLNB + CLND in 2 of the range of motion variables. The clinical relevance of these results is negligible.