Ductal carcinoma in situ and cause-specific mortality among younger and older postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Whether DCIS is associated with higher breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality is unclear with few studies in older women. Therefore, we examined DCIS and breast cancer-specific, cardiovascular (CVD)-specific, and all-cause mortality among Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Clinical Trial participants overall and by age (< 70 versus ≥ 70 years). METHODS: Of 68,132 WHI participants, included were 781 postmenopausal women with incident DCIS and 781 matched controls. Serial screening mammography was mandated with high adherence. DCIS cases were confirmed by central medical record review. Adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Kaplan Meier (KM) plots were used to assess 10-year and 20-year mortality rates. RESULTS: After 20.3 years total, and 13.2 years median post-diagnosis follow-up, compared to controls, DCIS was associated with higher breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 3.29; CI = 1.32-8.22, P = 0.01). The absolute difference in 20-year breast cancer mortality was 1.2% without DCIS and 3.4% after DCIS, log-rank P = 0.026. Findings were similar by age (< 70 versus ≥ 70 years) with no interaction (P interaction = 0.80). Incident DCIS was not associated with CVD-specific mortality (HR 0.77; CI-0.54-1.09, P = 0.14) or with all-cause mortality (HR 0.96; CI = 0.80-1.16, P = 0.68) with similar findings by age. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women, incident DCIS was associated with over three-fold higher breast cancer-specific mortality, with similar findings in younger and older postmenopausal women. These finding suggest caution in using age to adjust DCIS clinical management or research strategies.

Phase 2 prospective open label study of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab as neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 HER2+ breast cancer (HER2+ BC) to determine pathologic complete response (pCR), invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), and overall survival. METHODS: Forty-five patients with HER2+ BC Stages II-III were to be enrolled from 2013 to 2017. Patients were treated with weekly nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 intravenously), weekly trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose, then 2 mg/kg), and six cycles of pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, then 420 mg intravenously day 1 every 21 days). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 60 months (95% CI, 32.3-55.6) and pCR was 29/45 (64%). The 5-year iDFS for patients who achieved pCR (N = 29) was 96.3% (95% CI, 76.5-99.5) and non-pCR patients (N = 16) was 74.3% (95% CI, 39.1-91.0). The 5-year overall survival (N = 45) was 94.1% (95% CI, 77.6-98.5). Based on hormonal status, the 5-year iDFS for HR+ pCR patients (N = 14) was 92.3% (95% CI, 56.6-98.9) and for HR- (N = 15) was 100% (p = .3). CONCLUSIONS: This anthracycline/carboplatin-free regimen with nab-paclitaxel achieved a pCR rate of 64% in patients with HER2+ BC. The 5-year iDFS in patients with and without pCR was 96.3% and 74.3%, respectively. The pCR rate is comparable with docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab therapy in the NAT setting, but with fewer treatment-associated toxicities. This finding suggests the possibility of safe avoidance of anthracyclines and carboplatin as components of NAT in patients with HER2+ BC.

Predicting All-Cause Mortality in Women With and Without Breast Cancer Using the Schonberg Index: A Women's Health Initiative Study.

BACKGROUND: When treating older women with breast cancer, life expectancy is an important consideration. ASCO recommends calculating 10-year mortality probabilities to inform treatment decisions. One useful tool is the Schonberg index, which predicts risk-based all-cause 10-year mortality. We investigated the use of this index in women aged ≥65 years with breast cancer in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). METHODS: We calculated 10-year mortality risk scores for 2,549 WHI participants with breast cancer ("cases") and 2,549 age-matched breast cancer-free participants ("controls") using Schonberg index risk scoring. Risk scores were grouped into quintiles for comparisons. Risk-stratified observed mortality rates and 95% confidence intervals were compared across cases and controls. Observed 10-year mortality rates in cases and controls were also compared with Schonberg index-based predicted 10-year mortality rates. RESULTS: Compared with controls, cases were more often white (P=.005), had higher income and education levels (P<.001 for both), more often lived with their husband/partner (P<.001), scored higher on subjective health/happiness (P<.001), and needed less assistance in activities of daily living (P<.001). Participants with breast cancer had similar risk-stratified 10-year mortality rates compared with controls (34% vs 33%, respectively). Stratified results showed that cases had slightly higher mortality rates than controls in the lowest risk quintile and lower mortality rates in the 2 highest risk quintiles. Observed mortality rates in cases and controls were similar to Schonberg index-predicted mortality, with model c-indexes of 0.71 and 0.76, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among women aged ≥65 years with incident breast cancer, the Schonberg index-based risk-stratified 10-year mortality rates were similar to those in women without breast cancer, demonstrating a similar performance of the index among both populations. Along with other health measures, prognostic indexes can help predict survival among older women with breast cancer and support geriatric oncology guidelines that promote using life expectancy calculation tools for shared decision-making.

Emotional Distress and Financial Toxicity in Younger Adult Patients Undergoing Oncologic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: There has been an alarming increase in the number of young adults (YA) diagnosed with cancer. The emotional, psychosocial, and financial distress experienced by newly diagnosed YA undergoing cancer surgery remains largely unknown. METHODS: A validated biopsychosocial distress screening tool (SupportScreen) was administered to patients diagnosed with cancer before surgery between 2009 and 2017 in a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center. Patients were stratified into YA less than or equal to 45 years and older adults (OA) above 45 years. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to analyze distress outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 4297 patients were identified, with YA comprising 13.3% (n=573) of the cohort. YA reported higher emotional distress, including increased anxiety (33.8% vs 27.4%, P =0.002), greater fear of procedures (26.7% vs 22%, P =0.018), and difficulty managing emotions (26% vs 20.7%, P =0.006). YA struggled more frequently to manage work/school (29.5% vs 19.3%, P <0.001), finding resources (17.8% vs 11.8%, P <0.001), changes in physical appearance (22.2% vs 13.4%, P <0.001), fatigue (36% vs 27.3%, P <0.001), and ability to have children (18.4% vs 3%, P <0.001). Financial toxicity was significantly higher in the YA group (40.5% vs 28%, P <0.001). While income level was strongly protective against emotional distress and financial toxicity in OAs, it was less protective against the risk of financial toxicity in YA. Younger age was an independent predictor of financial toxicity in a model adjusted to income (odds ratio=1.52, P =0.020). CONCLUSIONS: YA in the prime of their personal and professional years of productivity require special attention when undergoing surgical evaluation for cancer. Resource allocation and counseling interventions should be integrated as part of their routine care to expedite their return to optimal physical and holistic health and mitigate psychosocial distress and financial toxicity.

A Cross-Sectional Study of Distress Levels in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: The Impact of Race, Ethnicity, and Language Preference.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to assess distress levels in female breast cancer patients as a function of race, ethnicity, and preferred language. We hypothesized minority patients and non-English screen-takers would report higher distress levels compared to English screen-takers and non-Hispanic whites. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of female breast cancer patients at an NCI designated cancer center from 2009 to 2016 who were administered a validated biopsychosocial distress screening questionnaire. Self-reported data on race and ethnicity was collected. RESULTS: A total of 3,156 patients were included in the analysis; mean age of 56.3 (SD 12.25) years. The racial/ethnic cohort distribution included 54% non-Hispanic white (NHW), 19% Hispanic, 16% Asian, 7% Black/African American, and 4% other. On multivariable analysis only Hispanic patients were significantly more likely to report overall distress compared to NHW (OR [1.39; CI [1.03-1.87; p=0.03). Asians were significantly less likely to report distress in the functional domain (OR 0.71, CI [0.58-0.88]; p=0.002), while Black patients were significantly more likely to report highest distress levels in the physical (OR 1.53, CI [1.11-2.12]; p=0.01) domain. Hispanic Spanish screen-takers reported significantly more distress compared to Hispanic English screen-takers across all four domains of distress (p<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Top sources of distress in female breast cancer patients vary as a function of race, ethnicity, and preferred language. Future studies should focus on identifying effective, culturally appropriate targeted interventions to mitigate emotional distress levels in ethnic and racial minorities as well as non-English speaking patients with breast cancer.

Cutaneous metastasectomy: Is there a role in breast cancer? A systematic review and overview of current treatment modalities.

Cutaneous metastases (CM) are neoplastic lesions involving the dermis or subcutaneous tissues, originating from another primary tumor. Breast cancer is commonest primary solid tumor, representing 24%-50% of CM patients. There is no "standard of care" on management. In particular, the role of surgery in the treatment of cutaneous metastases from breast carcinoma (CMBC) remains controversial. This systematic review evaluates the role of cutaneous metastasectomy in breast cancer and provides an overview of existing treatment types.

Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Carboplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In this phase II clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of the nonanthracycline combination of carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel in early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage II-III TNBC (n = 69) were treated with neoadjuvant carboplatin (area under the curve 6) every 28 days for four cycles plus nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 ) weekly for 16 weeks. Pathological complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB) were analyzed with germline mutation status, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), TNBC molecular subtype, and GeparSixto immune signature (GSIS). RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were evaluable for safety and response. Fifty-three (79%) patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events, including grade 3 anemia (43%), neutropenia (39%), leukopenia (15%), thrombocytopenia (12%), fatigue (7%), peripheral neuropathy (7%), neutropenia (16%), and leukopenia (1%). Twenty-four patients (35%) had at least one dose delay, and 50 patients (72%) required dose reduction. Sixty-three (94%) patients completed scheduled treatment. The responses were as follows: 32 of 67 patients (48%) had pCR (RCB 0), 10 of 67 (15%) had RCB I, 19 of 67 (28%) had RCB II, 5 of 67 (7%) had RCB III, and 1 of 67 (2%) progressed and had no surgery. Univariate analysis showed that immune-hot GSIS and DNA repair defect (DRD) were associated with higher pCR with odds ratios of 4.62 (p = .005) and 4.76 (p = .03), respectively, and with RCB 0/I versus RCB II/III with odds ratio 4.80 (p = .01). Immune-hot GSIS was highly correlated with DRD status (p = .03), TIL level (p < .001), and TNBC molecular subtype (p < .001). After adjusting for age, race, stage, and grade, GSIS remained associated with higher pCR and RCB class 0/I versus II/III with odds ratios 7.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01-25.68; p = .002) and 8.95 (95% CI, 2.09-38.23; p = .003), respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel for early stage high-risk TNBC showed manageable toxicity and encouraging antitumor activity. Immune-hot GSIS is associated with higher pCR rate and RCB class 0/1. This study provides an additional rationale for using nonanthracycline platinum-based therapy for future neoadjuvant trials in early stage TNBCs. Clinical trial identification number: NCT01525966 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Platinum is an important neoadjuvant chemotherapy agent for treatment of early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this study, carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel were well tolerated and highly effective in TNBC, resulting in pathological complete response of 48%. In univariate and multivariate analyses adjusting for age, race, tumor stage and grade, "immune-hot" GeparSixto immune signature (GSIS) and DNA repair defect (DRD) were associated with higher pathological complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden class 0/1. The association of immune-hot GSIS with higher pCR holds promise for de-escalating neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early stage TNBC. Although GSIS is not routinely used in clinic, further development of this immune signature into a clinically applicable assay is indicated.

Insurance Status Predicts Survival in Women with Breast Cancer: Results of Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program in California.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program (BCCTP) Act, passed by Congress in 2000, provides time-limited coverage to uninsured breast or cervical cancer patients. We examine survival differences between BCCTP cases and insured controls. METHODS: Stage I-III breast cancer patients, covered under California's BCCTP from 2005 to 2009 (N = 6343), were 1:1 matched with California Cancer Registry controls on age, race/ethnicity, and cancer stage. Overall and disease-specific (OS and DSS) survival were compared using multivariate regression. RESULTS: BCCTP cases were more often unmarried [odds ratio (OR) 2.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.30-2.66], with poorly/undifferentiated tumors (OR 1.26, CI 1.13-1.40), classified as ER negative (OR 1.10, CI 1.02-1.20) and/or PR negative (OR 1.09, CI 1.01-1.17). Cases were more likely to undergo mastectomy (OR 1.13, CI 1.05-1.21) or no surgery (OR 1.64, CI 1.31-2.05) versus lumpectomy. Cases were also more likely to undergo radiation (OR 1.11, CI 1.03-1.19). Endocrine therapy rates were marginally lower in cases (OR 0.93, CI 0.86-1.00). OS and DSS were shorter in BCCTP cases on multivariate analysis (HR 1.29, CI 1.17-1.42 and HR 1.27, CI 1.14-1.42, respectively). When stratified by socioeconomic status (SES), cases had significantly shorter OS and DSS except in the lowest quintile. When stratified by stage, cases had significantly shorter OS and DSS, except for stage I. CONCLUSIONS: The BCCTP provides uninsured breast cancer patients with comprehensive and timely care. Although our results suggest that BCCTP delivers quality care, BCCTP patients have shorter survival rates, even after accounting for SES and stage differences. Further assistance to vulnerable populations is warranted, including longer duration of treatment coverage, and surveillance adhering to NCCN compliant surveillance programs.

The Impact of Obesity on Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Obesity is a recognized risk factor for the development of breast cancer and recurrence even when patients are treated appropriately. We reviewed the literature that addresses the impact of obesity on diagnosis and the individual therapeutic interventions, and present a summary of the findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Compared to non-obese women with breast cancer, obese women with breast cancer have a worse disease-free and overall survival despite appropriate local and systemic therapies. In brief, obese breast cancer patients experience more complications related to surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Further, obese patients are at increased risk for local recurrence compared to normal-weight women. Similarly, systemic chemotherapy is less effective, even when dosed appropriately on the basis of actual weight. Overall, endocrine therapy is less effective in obese women, and there is a suggestion that aromatase inhibitors may be selectively less effective than tamoxifen. Obese women are less likely to undergo breast reconstruction than normal-weight women, and those who do have surgery experience more surgical complications. The efficacy of cancer treatments is significantly lower in obese breast cancer survivors, posing greater challenges in patient care and disease management in this patient population. Further investigations are warranted to assess the effects on treatment outcomes and optimize therapeutic mechanisms in order to successfully target breast cancer associated with obesity.

Time to Treatment: Measuring Quality Breast Cancer Care.

BACKGROUND: To optimize breast cancer care, several organizations have crafted guidelines to define best practices for treating breast cancer. In addition to recommended therapies, 'timeliness of treatment' has been proposed as a quality metric. Our study evaluates time to surgical treatment and its effect on overall survival (OS). METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to identify women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2004 and 2012. Time from diagnosis to surgical treatment was calculated and grouped according to predetermined time intervals. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess patient and treatment factors related to OS. RESULTS: Overall, 420,792 patients initially treated with surgery were identified. Increased time to surgical treatment >12 weeks was associated with decreased OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.14, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.20]. When stratified by pathologic stage, stage I patients treated at 8 to <12 weeks (HR 1.07, 95 % CI 1.02-1.13) and >12 weeks (HR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.11-1.28), as well as stage II patients treated at >12 weeks (HR 1.16, 95 % CI 1.08-1.25), had decreased OS compared with patients treated at <4 weeks. Other variables associated with decreased survival were treatment at a community cancer program, Medicaid or Medicare insurance, Black race, increasing age, mastectomy, moderately and poorly differentiated tumor grade, increasing T and N stage, and higher Charlson Index Group. CONCLUSION: The survival benefit of expedited time to initial surgical treatment varies by stage and appears to have the greatest impact in early-stage disease. Prior to establishing standard metrics, further quantification of the impact on patient outcomes is needed.

Predictors of Antiestrogen Recommendation in Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

BACKGROUND: Antiestrogen (anti-e) use in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been shown to reduce the incidence of noninvasive and invasive breast cancer. Few studies have evaluated factors associated with anti-e recommendation in ER+ DCIS. METHODS: The California Cancer Registry was queried for female patients diagnosed with ER+ DCIS and treated with lumpectomy or unilateral mastectomy from 2004 to 2011. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics were analyzed for association with anti-e recommendation. RESULTS: Of 5,527 patients identified, 76.4% patients underwent lumpectomy and 23.6% underwent unilateral mastectomy. Of the total cohort, 31.6% patients were recommended anti-e therapy, 60.4% were not, and the remaining 8.0% were recommended anti-e, but administration was not documented. Performance of lumpectomy predicted anti-e use compared with mastectomy (odds ratio [OR], 2.08; 95% CI, 1.77-2.43). Asian/Pacific Islanders were more often recommended anti-e therapy when compared with whites (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.49). Patients younger than 70 years were more often recommended anti-e (age, 18-49 years: OR, 1.38; CI, 1.12-1.71; and age, 50-69 years: OR, 1.43; CI, 1.20-1.71). CONCLUSIONS: Despite current guidelines to consider the use of anti-e therapy, recommendation of anti-e after surgical treatment of DCIS is low, having been recommended to 40% of patients, and used by fewer than one-third. Significant predictors include lumpectomy compared with unilateral mastectomy, Asian/Pacific Islander race, younger age, and number of comorbidities. Further work is merited to understand patterns of anti-e therapy recommendation by providers in patients with DCIS.

Addressing psychosocial needs of partners of breast cancer patients: a pilot program using social workers to improve communication and psychosocial support.

INTRODUCTION: Psychosocial (PsySoc) distress in caregivers is a well-described entity, with some caregivers experiencing more distress than patients themselves. The American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer mandates that psychosocial services be provided to all cancer patients and their caregivers, through the entire continuum of cancer care. METHODS: We developed a program for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and their partners. Both were screened for biopsychosocial stressors. The couple was then paired with two clinican-educators trained in communication and gender differences, who educated the couple in communication-based problem solving and provided referrals to supportive services. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients and 82 partners returned surveys. Compared to partners, patients were more likely to report feeling anxious or fearful (59 vs. 38%, p = 0.014), report difficulty in managing their emotions (46 vs. 11%, p = 0.003), and experience distress over being unable to take care of themselves (37 vs. 6%, p = 0.000). Interestingly, there was no difference between patients and partners in feeling unsupported by their partner (6 vs. 5%, p = 0.85) or in feeling down or depressed (29 vs. 30%, p = 0.96). DISCUSSION: Both patients and partners experience significant distress after a breast cancer diagnosis. We found that partners are equally likely to feel unsupported by their partner (patient) and feel down or depressed. Further study is needed to learn about both patients' and partners' significant distress over lack of support. Partner-focused PsySoc interventions should be initiated in all cancer centers to address the emotional needs of both breast cancer patients and their partners.

Regulation of adipose tissue T cell subsets by Stat3 is crucial for diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance.

Dysregulated inflammation in adipose tissue, marked by increased proinflammatory T-cell accumulation and reduced regulatory T cells (Tregs), contributes to obesity-associated insulin resistance. The molecular mechanisms underlying T-cell-mediated inflammation in adipose tissue remain largely unknown, however. Here we show a crucial role for signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) in T cells in skewing adaptive immunity in visceral adipose tissue (VAT), thereby contributing to diet-induced obesity (DIO) and insulin resistance. Stat3 activity is elevated in obese VAT and in VAT-resident T cells. Functional ablation of Stat3 in T cells reduces DIO, improves insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, and suppresses VAT inflammation. Importantly, Stat3 ablation reverses the high Th1/Treg ratio in VAT of DIO mice that is likely secondary to elevated IL-6 production, leading in turn to suppression of Tregs. In addition, Stat3 in T cells in DIO mice affects adipose tissue macrophage accumulation and M2 phenotype. Our study identifies Stat3 in VAT-resident T cells as an important mediator and direct target for regulating adipose tissue inflammation, DIO, and its associated metabolic dysfunctions.

Skin/nail infections with the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based chemotherapy.

We report a series of breast cancer patients with invasive skin and nail infections with Staphylococcus species that we attribute to the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based therapy. With the suspicion of an increased incidence of cutaneous infection in patients treated with pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based chemotherapy, treating medical oncologists identified patients receiving therapy who experienced infection. Between March and October 2014, 18 patients treated with pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based chemotherapy were found to have 21 separate skin/nail infections. Treatment was administered as neoadjuvant therapy in 12 (67%) patients, adjuvant therapy in four (22%) patients, and for metastatic disease in two (11%) patients. Granulocyte growth factors were administered in 11 (61%) patients and no patients were documented to be neutropenic. New skin and nail lesions developed as early as cycle 1 and as late as 8 months from initial therapy. The 21 separate infections documented were folliculitis and "bite-like" lesions (10), abscess (6), paronychia (3), and cellulitis (2). The appearance of these lesions was distinct from typical EGFR-associated skin changes. When cultures were obtained, Staphylococcus species were isolated. Quantitative immunoglobulins were assessed in 14 (78%) patients and were abnormally low in six (43%) of these patients. The skin infections resulted in treatment delay in two (11%) patients and premature discontinuation of therapy in one patient. We believe that the skin/nail infections reported here in patients treated with the combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab represent a previously unrecognized toxicity of adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based therapies.

Survival analysis of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a question of selection bias.

BACKGROUND: Rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in women with breast cancer have increased, but most studies fail to show a survival benefit. We evaluated survival among CPM patients compared to patients undergoing single mastectomy (SM). METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify unilateral breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy with/without CPM from 1998 to 2010. Case-control analysis was performed with CPM cases matched to SM controls on the basis of age group, race/ethnicity, extent of surgery, grade, T classification, N classification, estrogen receptor status, and propensity score. Survival analyses included Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate proportional hazard models to determine factors associated with disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 26,526 CPM patients were identified. On multivariate regression analysis, increasing age, greater extent of surgery, increasing T and N stage, African American race, Hispanic ethnicity, poorly differentiated grade, and estrogen receptor negativity were associated with increased risk of death. CPM was associated with improved DSS (HR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.79-0.93) and even greater OS (HR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.71-0.81) compared with SM. Contralateral breast cancer (CBC) occurred in 1.6 % of women in the cohort. Removing CBC cases from analysis had little impact on CPM DSS (HR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.79-0.93) and OS (0.77, 95 % CI 0.72-0.82) suggesting that prevention of CBC by CPM does not explain the observed survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: CPM rates continue to rise. The improved DSS and OS observed with CPM support selection bias. Prospective trials are needed to determine cohorts of patients most likely to benefit from CPM.

Tumor response ratio predicts overall survival in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is commonly used to treat locally advanced breast cancer. Pathologic complete response (pCR) predicts improved overall survival (OS); however, prognosis of patients with partial response remains unclear. We evaluated whether tumor response ratio (TRR) is a better predictor of OS than current staging methods. METHODS: Using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Breast Cancer Outcomes Database, we identified patients with stage I-III breast cancer who had NAC and pretreatment imaging at City of Hope (1997-2010). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and OS were analyzed. TRR was calculated as residual in-breast disease divided by size on pre-NAC imaging. Four TRR groups were stratified; TRR 0 (pCR), TRR > 0-0.4 (strong partial response, SPR), TRR > 0.4-1.0 (weak partial response, WPR), or TRR > 1.0 (tumor growth, TG). OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and tested by the log-rank test. Cox regression was performed to evaluate associations between OS and TRR in a multivariable analysis while controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: There were 218 eligible patients identified; 59 (27 %) had pCR, 61 (28 %) SPR, 72 (33 %) WPR, and 26 (12 %) TG. Five-year OS decreased continuously with increasing TRR:pCR (90 %), SPR (79 %), WPR (66 %), and TG (60 %). TRR was the only measure that significantly predicted OS (p = 0.0035); pathologic stage (p = 0.23) and pre-NAC clinical tumor stage (cT) (p = 0.87) were not significant. TRR continued to be statistically significant by multivariable analysis (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: TRR takes into account both pretreatment and residual disease and more accurately predicts OS than pathologic stage and pre-NAC cT. TRR may be useful to more accurately assess prognosis and OS in breast cancer patients undergoing NAC.

Effects of vitamin D supplementation on a deep learning-based mammographic evaluation in SWOG S0812.

Deep learning-based mammographic evaluations could noninvasively assess response to breast cancer chemoprevention. We evaluated change in a convolutional neural network-based breast cancer risk model applied to mammograms among women enrolled in SWOG S0812, which randomly assigned 208 premenopausal high-risk women to receive oral vitamin D3 20 000 IU weekly or placebo for 12 months. We applied the convolutional neural network model to mammograms collected at baseline (n = 109), 12 months (n = 97), and 24 months (n = 67) and compared changes in convolutional neural network-based risk score between treatment groups. Change in convolutional neural network-based risk score was not statistically significantly different between vitamin D and placebo groups at 12 months (0.005 vs 0.002, P = .875) or at 24 months (0.020 vs 0.001, P = .563). The findings are consistent with the primary analysis of S0812, which did not demonstrate statistically significant changes in mammographic density with vitamin D supplementation compared with placebo. There is an ongoing need to evaluate biomarkers of response to novel breast cancer chemopreventive agents.

Utilization of mastectomy and reconstruction in the outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction rates after mastectomy have been reported to range from 25-40%; however, most studies have focused on patients treated in an inpatient setting. We sought to determine the utilization of outpatient mastectomy and use of breast reconstruction in Southern California. METHODS: Postmastectomy reconstruction rates were determined from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database from 2006-2009 using CPT codes and similarly from an inpatient database using ICD-9 codes. Reconstruction rates were compared between the inpatient and outpatient setting. For the outpatient setting, univariate and multivariate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for relative odds of immediate reconstruction versus mastectomy alone. RESULTS: The percentage of patients undergoing outpatient mastectomy ranged from 20.4 to 23.9% of the total number of all patients undergoing mastectomy. Whereas immediate inpatient reconstruction increased from 29.2 to 41.6% (overall rate 35.5%), the proportion of outpatients undergoing reconstruction only increased from 7.7 to 10.3% (overall rate 9.1%). Similar to the inpatient setting, in multivariate analysis, age, insurance status, race/ethnicity, and type of hospital were significantly associated with the use of reconstruction in the outpatient setting. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients undergo outpatient mastectomy with low rates of reconstruction. Although the choice of an outpatient mastectomy may certainly represent a selection bias for those not choosing reconstruction, an increase in the use of outpatient mastectomy may result in decreases in the use of postmastectomy reconstruction.