A Simple Risk Score for Predicting Neurologic Outcome in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients After Targeted Temperature Management.

OBJECTIVES: Although several risk factors for outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients have been identified, the cumulative risk of their combinations is not thoroughly clear, especially after targeted temperature management. Therefore, we aimed to develop a risk score to evaluate individual out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient risk at early admission after targeted temperature management regarding poor neurologic status at discharge. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Two large academic medical networks in the United States. PATIENTS: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors treated with targeted temperature management with age of 18 years old or older. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Based on the odds ratios, five identified variables (initial nonShockable rhythm, Leucocyte count < 4 or > 12 K/µL after targeted temperature management, total Adrenalin [epinephrine] ≥ 5 mg, lack of oNlooker cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and Time duration of resuscitation ≥ 20 min) were assigned weighted points. The sum of the points was the total risk score known as the SLANT score (range 0-21 points) for each patient. Based on our risk prediction scores, patients were divided into three risk categories as moderate-risk group (0-7), high-risk group (8-14), and very high-risk group (15-21). Both the ability of our risk score to predict the rates of poor neurologic outcomes at discharge and in-hospital mortality were significant under the Cochran-Armitage trend test (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of poor neurologic outcomes and in-hospital mortality of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors after targeted temperature management is easily assessed using a risk score model derived using the readily available information. Its clinical utility needed further investigation.

Burden of mental disorders in children in the general population and in health facilities: discrepancies in years lived with disability based on national prevalence estimates between populations receiving care or not.

Little is known about the discrepancies in the burden of child mental disorders based on differences in prevalence between populations with and without care. Identifying such discrepancies may help to elucidate the unmet needs related to child mental disorders. We compared the years lived with disability (YLD) between children with and without care for mental disorders using a representative national survey, Taiwan's National Epidemiological Study of Child Mental Disorders (TNESCMD), and a national health facility database, the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (TNHIRD). The comorbidity-adjusted YLD rate ratio (RR) was reported to quantify the YLD discrepancy. The overall YLD rate for all mental disorders in the TNESCMD was 9.05 times higher than that in the TNHIRD with the lowest and highest YLD RRs for autism spectrum disorder (RR 3.51) and anxiety disorders (RR 360.00). Unlike the YLD proportion explained by attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder, the proportions explained by anxiety disorders and conduct disorder/oppositional defiant disorder relative to the total YLD were relatively lower in the TNHIRD than in TNESCMD and the Global Burden of Disease 2016. The discrepancies in YLD between populations with and without care in child mental disorders ranged from ± 55% to 99% and had an overall value of ± 80.1%. High YLD discrepancies in child mental disorders between estimates based on the general population and those in health facilities suggest significant unmet needs for care in child mental disorders and that estimates of disease burden that rely heavily on a single source may result in unreliable results.

Mortality of major cardiovascular emergencies among patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have found a so-called weekend effect that patients admitted at the weekends had worse clinical outcomes than patients admitted at the weekdays. We performed this retrospective cohort study to explore the weekend effect in four major cardiovascular emergencies in Taiwan. METHODS: The Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database between 2005 and 2015 was used. We extracted 3811 incident cases of ruptured aortic aneurysm, 184,769 incident cases of acute myocardial infarction, 492,127 incident cases of ischemic stroke, and 15,033 incident cases of pulmonary embolism from 9,529,049 patients having at least one record of hospitalization in the NHI claims database within 2006 ~ 2014. Patients were classified as weekends or weekdays admission groups. Dates of in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality were obtained from the Taiwan National Death Registry. RESULTS: We found no difference in in-hospital mortality between weekend group and weekday group in patients with ruptured aortic aneurysm (45.4% vs 45.3%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.17, p = 0.93), patients with acute myocardial infarction (15.8% vs 16.2%, adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, p = 0.10), patients with ischemic stroke (4.1% vs 4.2%, adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.03, p = 0.71), and patients with pulmonary embolism (14.6% vs 14.6%, adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.92-1.15, p = 0.66). The results remained for 1 year in all the four major cardiovascular emergencies. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in either short-term or long-term mortality between patients admitted on weekends and patients admitted on weekdays in four major cardiovascular emergencies in Taiwan.

Quality of life of breast cancer survivors following breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a multicenter study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of surgical procedures and quality-of-care (QoC) on quality-of-life (QoL) among breast cancer survivors who underwent breast-conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy, and to identify provider- and patient-related factors pertaining to QoL. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, structured-questionnaires were distributed among breast cancer survivors in 19 hospitals. QoL was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the breast cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-BR23). QoC is indicated by adherence to the core measures stipulated for the treatment of breast cancer. Multiple regression and hierarchical linear modeling were used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 544 female survivors of Stage 0-III breast cancer were included, among whom 217 (39.9%) underwent BCT and 327 (60.1%) underwent mastectomy. Surgical modality does not appear to have a notable impact on any QoL domains except body image; i.e. patients who underwent BCT reported better body image (diff = 11.20, P < 0.001), particularly at 1-5 years after the initial treatment. Independent factors including age, education, employment, marital status, income, chemotherapy, duration since treatment, recurrence status, primary hospital accreditation level and location all appear to be correlated to QoL. CONCLUSION: Patients with breast cancer should be informed of differences in QoL when discussing treatment options. Furthermore, physicians should recognize that the impact of surgical treatment modality on QoL may vary according to patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Risk of ischemic stroke during the initiation period of α-blocker therapy among older men.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-blockers are notorious for their first-dose effect of acute hypotension during the early initiation period. Because acute cerebral hypoperfusion may precipitate an episode of ischemic stroke, we aimed to provide a quantitative estimate of the risk of ischemic stroke during the early initiation period of α-blocker therapy, using a self-controlled case series design. METHODS: We identified all men aged 50 years or more as of 2007 who were incident users of α-blockers and had a diagnosis of ischemic stroke during the 2007-2009 study period using claims data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database. The first day on which the α-blocker was prescribed was the index date. We partitioned different risk periods according to their relationship to the index date (pre-exposure risk periods 1 and 2 = ≤ 21 d and 22-60 d before index date, respectively; post-exposure risk periods 1 and 2 = ≤ 21 d and 22-60 d after index date, respectively); the remainder of the study period was defined as the unexposed period. We estimated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of ischemic stroke in each risk period relative to the unexposed period using a conditional Poisson regression model. RESULTS: A total of 7502 men were included. Compared with the risk in the unexposed period, the risk of ischemic stroke was increased in post-exposure risk period 1 among all patients in the study population (adjusted IRR 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.61) and among patients without concomitant prescriptions for other antihypertensive agents (adjusted IRR 2.11, 95% CI 1.73-2.57). INTERPRETATION: Alpha-blocker therapy was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke during the early initiation period, especially among patients who were not taking other antihypertensive agents.

Risk of hip/femur fractures during the initiation period of α-adrenoceptor blocker therapy among elderly males: a self-controlled case series study.

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of hip/femur fractures during the initiation period of α-adrenoceptor blocker therapy using the National Health Insurance claims database, Taiwan, with a self-controlled case series design. METHODS: All male beneficiaries aged over 50 years as of 2007, who were incident users of α-adrenoceptor blockers and also had a diagnosis of hip/femur fracture within the 2007-2009 study period were identified. The first day when the α-adrenoceptor blocker was prescribed was set as the index date. We partitioned the initial 21 day period following the index date as the post-exposure risk period 1, days 22-60 after the index date as the post-exposure risk period 2, the 21 day period prior to the index date as the pre-exposure risk period 1 and days 22-60 prior to the index date as the pre-exposure risk period 2. The remainder of the study period was defined as the unexposed period. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of hip/femur fractures within each risk period compared with the unexposed period was estimated using a conditional Poisson regression model. RESULTS: A total of 5875 men were included. Compared with the unexposed period, the IRR of hip/femur fractures was 1.36 (95% confidence interval 1.06, 1.74, P = 0.017) within the post-exposure risk period 1 for patients without concomitant prescriptions of anti-hypertensive agents. CONCLUSIONS: Use of α-adrenoceptor blockers was associated with a small but significant increase in the risk of hip/femur fractures during the early initiation period in patients without concomitant prescriptions of anti-hypertensive agents.

Young patients with colorectal cancer have increased risk of second primary cancers.

OBJECTIVE: Because the number of long-term survivors of colorectal cancer has increased, second primary cancer has become an important issue. However, previous studies were heterogeneous in design, and few data for Asia-Pacific area were available. METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based study conducted using the national database of the Taiwan Cancer Registry. Patients who have histology-proven primary colon cancer and rectal cancer from 1995 to 2005 were enrolled in this study. All second primary cancer events had to be histology proven. The standardized incidence ratio of second primary cancer was used as an indicator. Standardized incidence ratio was counted as the number of observed second primary cancer divided by the expected number of cancer cases in the general population. RESULTS: A total of 65 648 eligible index patients were enrolled, and 3810 second primary cancer events were identified. The standardized incidence ratio for all of the patients was 1.03 (95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.06), which implied that the risk of second primary cancer was not significantly elevated in the index patients compared with that of the general population. The standardized incidence ratio for the patients aged <50, 50-70 and >70 years was 2.52 (95% confidence interval: 2.28-2.78), 1.18 (95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.23) and 0.80 (95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.84), respectively. In young patients (aged <50 years), the standardized incidence ratio increase was statistically significant and persisted for over 10 years and this significantly increased across all subgroups. The small intestine, the large intestine, the female genital organs and the lungs were the most common sites of second primary cancer in young patients. CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with colorectal cancer have an increased risk of developing second primary cancer.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with increased mortality in Chinese patients receiving curative surgery for colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and the prognosis of patients with early colon cancer who had undergone curative surgery. METHODS: From three national databases of patients in Taiwan, we selected a cohort of colon cancer patients who had been newly diagnosed with stage I or stage II colon cancer between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2008 and had undergone curative surgery. We collected information regarding DM (type 2 DM only), the use of antidiabetic medications, other comorbidities, and survival outcomes. The colon cancer-specific survival (CSS) and the overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with and without DM. RESULTS: We selected 6,937 colon cancer patients, among whom 1,371 (19.8%) had DM. The colon cancer patients with DM were older and less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy but had a similar tumor stage and grade, compared with colon cancer patients without DM. Compared with colon cancer patients without DM, patients with DM had significantly shorter OS (5-year OS: 71.0% vs. 81.7%) and CSS (5-year CSS: 86.7% vs. 89.2%). After adjusting for age, sex, stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, and comorbidities in our multivariate analysis, DM remained an independent prognostic factor for overall mortality (adjusted hazards ratio: 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-1.49), but not for cancer-specific mortality. Among the colon cancer patients who had received antidiabetic drug therapy, patients who had used insulin had significantly shorter CSS and OS than patients who had not. CONCLUSION: Among patients who receive curative surgery for early colon cancer, DM is a predictor of increased overall mortality.

Mortality among acute myocardial infarction patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays in Taiwan.

Weekend effect has been considered to be associated with poorer quality of care and patient's survival. For acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, the question of whether patients admitted during off-hours have worse outcomes as compared with patients admitted during on-hours is still inconclusive. We conducted this study to explore the weekend effect in AMI patients, using a nationwide insurance database in Taiwan. Using Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database, we designed a retrospective cohort study, and extracted 184,769 incident cases of AMI through the NHI claims database between January 2006 and December 2014. We divided the patients into weekend admission group and weekday admission group. Patients were stratified as ST elevation/non-ST elevation AMI and receiving/not receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We used a logistic regression model to examine the relative risk of in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality which were obtained from the Taiwan National Death Registry between study groups. We found no difference between weekend group and weekday group for risk of in-hospital mortality (15.8% vs 16.2%, standardized difference 0.0118) and risk of 1-year mortality (30.2% vs 30.9%, standardized difference 0.0164). There was no statistically significant difference among all the comparisons through the multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for all the covariates and stratifying by the subtypes of AMI and whether or not executing PCI during hospitalization. As for AMI patients in Taiwan, admission on weekends or weekdays did not have a significant impact on either in-hospital mortality or 1-year cumulative mortality.

Survival following surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: an east asian population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Asian ethnicity is associated with a distinct molecular etiology, treatment response, and survival outcome among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study examines the survival impact of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for Asian patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC. METHODS: This study recruited patients aged ≥18 years with histologically proven stage IA-IIIA NSCLC registered in the Taiwan Cancer Registry database in January 2004 to December 2007. Platinum-containing adjuvant chemotherapy had to be started within 90 days of the primary surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to assess the influence of various risk factors on survival time. RESULTS: This study included 2,231 patients with stage IA-IIIA NSCLC who underwent primary surgery with a clear surgical margin. The percentages of all causes of death were significantly lower for the chemotherapy group for both stage II and stage IIIA patients. Multivariate analysis identified platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor for the overall survival outcome of stage II (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.94; p = .024) and IIIA (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.96; p = .029) patients. Among these patients, those who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a superior overall survival outcome for both genders, for the subgroup of patients aged ≥70 years, and for those with adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in the treatment plan for Asian patients with resected stage II and stage IIIA NSCLC.

Differences in patient reports on the quality of care in a diabetes pay-for-performance program between 1 year enrolled and newly enrolled patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the quality of care from the perspective of patients who participated in the diabetes pay-for-performance (P4P) program in Taiwan. DESIGN: A cross-sectional telephone interview to measure the quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus. SETTING: A stratified sampling according to the level and region of the health-care providers in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1796 patients with diabetes mellitus responded to the telephone survey. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were divided into two groups according to the length of time they had participated in the program: (1) the case group, who had received comprehensive care for at least 1 year and (2) the control group, who were newly enrolled in the diabetes mellitus P4P program for <3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The compliance of diabetes self-care and the level of satisfaction with the quality of care from the perspective of the patients. RESULTS: After controlling for the characteristics of the health-care providers involved, pattern of diabetes treatment, self-reported health status and other patient characteristics, the case group performed better in exercise, had regular medication and better foot care and showed overall compliance with diabetes self-care and perceived better quality of care than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The patients who had received comprehensive care for 1 year showed better compliance with self-care and were more satisfied with the quality of care they had received. The P4P program appears to be associated with this enhanced care.

Is quality of colorectal cancer care good enough? Core measures development and its application for comparing hospitals in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Although performance measurement for assessing care quality is an emerging area, a system for measuring the quality of cancer care at the hospital level has not been well developed. The purpose of this study was to develop organization-based core measures for colorectal cancer patient care and apply these measures to compare hospital performance. METHODS: The development of core measures for colorectal cancer has undergone three stages including a modified Delphi method. The study sample originated from 2004 data in the Taiwan Cancer Database, a national cancer data registry. Eighteen hospitals and 5585 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in this study. We used indicator-based and case-based approaches to examine adherences simultaneously. RESULTS: The final core measure set included seventeen indicators (1 pre-treatment, 11 treatment-related and 5 monitoring-related). There were data available for ten indicators. Indicator-based adherence possesses more meaningful application than case-based adherence for hospital comparisons. Mean adherence was 85.8% (79.8% to 91%) for indicator-based and 82.8% (77.6% to 88.9%) for case-based approaches. Hospitals performed well (>90%) for five out of eleven indicators. Still, the performance across hospitals varied for many indicators. The best and poorest system performance was reflected in indicators T5-negative surgical margin (99.3%, 97.2%-100.0%) and T7-lymph nodes harvest more than twelve(62.7%, 27.6%-92.2%), both of which related to surgical specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide study, quality of colorectal cancer care still shows room for improvement. These preliminary results indicate that core measures for cancer can be developed systematically and applied for internal quality improvement.

Impact of Targeted Therapy on the Quality of End-of-Life Care for Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study in Taiwan.

CONTEXT: Targeted therapies with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been widely used in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little research has focused on the use of targeted therapies at the end of life (EOL). OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the determinants of receiving targeted therapy during the last month of life and how targeted therapies affect the quality of EOL care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based study using a cancer registry and National Health Insurance claims data among 42,678 Taiwanese NSCLC decedents in 2005-2012. Propensity score matching and generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate associations. RESULTS: We identified 3439 (21.3%) NSCLC patients who received targeted therapy within 30 days of death. Younger age, adenocarcinoma histology, postdiagnosis survival exceeding six months, and later year of death were associated with receiving targeted agents at EOL. The odds increased when patients were treated by pulmonologists or oncologists or in district hospitals or facilities with a higher case volume. Patients who were prescribed targeted therapy near death were significantly more likely to undergo aggressive EOL care (odds ratio = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.83-3.02) including multiple emergency department visits, hospitalization exceeding 14 days, admission to intensive care units, use of intubation and mechanical ventilation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and late hospice referrals. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted therapy at EOL should be considered a quality-of-care indicator. Guidance in the cessation of targeted therapy and the ongoing monitoring of practice initiatives are warranted. The decision-making processes associated with EOL care also require further investigation.

Differences in the outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer prescribed by physicians in different disciplines: a population-based study in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: One feature unique to the Taiwanese healthcare system is the ability of physicians other than oncologists to prescribe systemic chemotherapy. This study investigated whether the care paths implemented by oncologists and non-oncologists differ with regard to patient outcomes. SETTING: Data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Database were linked to identify patients with colon cancer who underwent colectomy as first treatment within 3 months of diagnosis and adjuvant chemotherapy between 2005 and 2009. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Postoperative patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. The exclusion criteria included patients with stage IV disease, a positive surgical margin and early disease recurrence. Among the patients presenting with multiple primary cancers, we also excluded patients who were diagnosed with colon cancer but for whom this was not the first primary cancer. The variables included sex, age, comorbidities, disease stage, chemotherapy cycle and changes in treatment regimen as well as the specialty of treatment providers and their case volume. Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to examine differences in outcomes in the matched cohorts. RESULTS: We examined 3534 patients who were prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy by physicians from different disciplines. In terms of 5-year disease-free survival, no significant difference was observed between the groups of oncologists or surgeons among patients with stage II (90.02%vs88.99%) or stage III (77.64%vs79.99%) diseases. Patients who were subjected to changes in their chemotherapy regimens presented recurrence rates higher than those who were not. CONCLUSIONS: The discipline of practitioners is seldom taken into account in most series. This is the first study to provide empirical evidence demonstrating that the outcomes of patients with colon cancer do not depend on the treatment path, as long as the selection criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy is appropriate. Further study will be required before making any further conclusions.

The relationship between smoking status and health-related quality of life among smokers who participated in a 1-year smoking cessation programme in Taiwan: a cohort study using the EQ-5D.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between smoking status and health-related quality of life 1 year after participation in a smoking cessation programme in Taiwan. DESIGN: A cohort study of smokers who voluntarily participated in a smoking cessation programme with two follow-up assessments of smoking status via telephone interview, conducted 6 months and 1 year after finishing the smoking cessation programme. SETTING: Hospitals and clinics providing smoking cessation services. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3514 participants completed both telephone interviews, which represents a response rate of 64%. After the interviews, participants were divided into four groups according to their smoking status: (1) long-term quitters: participants who had quit tobacco use for 1 year; (2) short-term quitters: participants who had been smoking for at least 6 months and then quit tobacco for 6 months after participating in the programme; (3) relapsed smokers: participants who relapsed into tobacco use after ceasing tobacco use for 6 months; and (4) continuing smokers: participants who failed to quit smoking for at least 1 year, despite participating in the programme. INTERVENTIONS: The Outpatient Smoking Cessation Service of Taiwan provides counselling and pharmacotherapy to individuals seeking to quit smoking. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: The health-related quality of life of the participants was measured using an approved Chinese version of the EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) descriptive system. RESULTS: After controlling for sex, age, education, marital status, job status, monthly income and disease status at baseline, our results revealed that long-term (OR=0.61 (0.48 to 0.77)) and short-term (OR=0.65 (0.54 to 0.79)) quitters experienced less anxiety and depression than did continuing smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence to support claims that all quitters, regardless of whether they stop smoking for 6 months or 1 year, have better quality of life with regard to anxiety or depression.

Clinical outcomes in low risk coronary artery disease patients treated with different limus-based drug-eluting stents--a nationwide retrospective cohort study using insurance claims database.

The clinical outcomes of different limus-based drug-eluting stents (DES) in a real-world setting have not been well defined. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of three different limus-based DES, namely sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) and everolimus-eluting stent (EES), using a national insurance claims database. We identified all patients who received implantation of single SES, E-ZES or EES between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2009 from the National Health Insurance claims database, Taiwan. Follow-up was through December 31, 2011 for all selected clinical outcomes. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. Secondary end-points included acute coronary events, heart failure needing hospitalization, and cerebrovascular disease. Cox regression model adjusting for baseline characteristics was used to compare the relative risks of different outcomes among the three different limus-based DES. Totally, 6584 patients were evaluated (n=2142 for SES, n=3445 for E-ZES, and n=997 for EES). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, we found no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality in three DES groups (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.38, p=0.20 in E-ZES group compared with SES group; adjusted HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.54-1.10, p=0.15 in EES group compared with SES group). Similarly, we found no difference in the three stent groups in risks of acute coronary events, heart failure needing hospitalization, and cerebrovascular disease. In conclusion, we observed no difference in all-cause mortality, acute coronary events, heart failure needing hospitalization, and cerebrovascular disease in patients treated with SES, E-ZES, and EES in a real-world population-based setting in Taiwan.

Comparative effectiveness of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy regimens for advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We compared the effectiveness of first-line chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: We searched the database of the Taiwan Cancer Registry for patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung SCC from 2004 to 2007. Medication prescription data were retrieved from the database of National Health Insurance, Taiwan. We identified patients who received standard first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, which was defined as chemotherapy with a platinum (P) compound (cisplatin or carboplatin) in addition to 1 of the 4 chemotherapy agents, including gemcitabine (G), docetaxel (D), paclitaxel (T), and vinorelbine (V). Deaths were identified by searching the National Death Registry. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who underwent different therapies. RESULTS: In total, 2790 patients were identified; 983 patients (35.2%) received standard first-line chemotherapy with P and G (58.1%), D (14.5%), T (11.6%), or V (15.8%). Older patients (age ≥ 70 years) were less likely to receive P + D than P + G, P + T, or P + V (P = .018). Patients who received P + G, P + D, P + T, or P + V had similar OS (median, 8.9, 7.9, 9.5, and 8.2 months; P = .816). In multivariate analyses adjusting for age, sex, and stage, the first-line chemotherapy regimen was not a predictor for OS. With P + G as the reference group, the adjusted hazard ratios of P + D, P + T, and P + V were 1.03, 0.90, and 1.02, respectively (P = .710). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced lung SCC, various regimens did not have a significant effect on survival outcomes.

Association of adjuvant antiviral therapy with risk of cancer progression and deaths in patients with hepatitis-B-virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma following curative treatment: a nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Limited information about tumor status and the time at which antiviral therapy was initiated may have influenced effect estimation in previous research. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of antiviral therapies on HBV-related HCC progression and deaths in patients receiving curative treatment based on clear clinical-pathological cancer status and the association of start time of adjuvant antiviral therapy initiation and outcomes. METHODOLOGY: A nationwide inception cohort study of newly diagnosed HCC patients who suffered from viral hepatitis B and received curative HCC therapy as the first course of treatment were identified from the Taiwan Cancer Registry between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2009. Matched Cox proportional hazards models based on propensity score matching and incorporated time-varying exposure were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). FINDINGS: Among 3,855 HCC patients with HBV, antiviral therapy was administered to 490 (12.7%) following curative treatment. Antiviral-treated patients had a higher percentage of young age, early stage, and smaller tumor size of HCC compared with untreated patients. After propensity score matching, treated patients demonstrated a higher risk of HCC progression (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95%CI, 1.20-1.69) and death from all causes (1.45; 1.15-1.82) than untreated patients. Similar results were also obtained in sub-cohort of patients who were alive with cancer-free status at least one year after receiving curative treatment and the sub-cohort of patients with liver resection. The interval length between initiation of antiviral therapy and first-line curative treatment did not show a significant association with all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that adjuvant antiviral therapy did not reduce the risk of HCC progression or mortality in HBV-related HCC patients after cancer status adjusting.

Radiofrequency ablation is superior to ethanol injection in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma irrespective of tumor size.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials suggest that radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be more effective than percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the survival advantage of RFA needs confirmation in daily practice. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using the Taiwan Cancer Registry, National Health Insurance claim database and National Death Registry data from 2004 through 2009. Patients receiving PEI or RFA as first-line treatment for newly-diagnosed stage I-II HCC were enrolled. RESULTS: A total of 658 patients receiving RFA and 378 patients receiving PEI treatment were included for final analysis. The overall survival (OS) rates of patients in the RFA and PEI groups at 5-year were 55% and 42%, respectively (p < 0.01). Compared to patients that received PEI, those that received RFA had lower risks of overall mortality and first-line treatment failure (FTF), with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.60 (0.50-0.73) for OS and 0.54 (0.46-0.64) for FTF. The favorable outcomes for the RFA group were consistently significant for patients with tumors > 2 cm as well as for those with tumors < 2 cm. Consistent results were also observed in other subgroup analyses defined by gender, age, tumor stage, and co-morbidity status. CONCLUSION: RFA provides better survival benefits than PEI for patients with unresectable stage I-II HCC, irrespective of tumors > 2 cm or ≤ 2 cm, in contemporary clinical practice.