Injection therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Various injectants are available for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different injection therapies in alleviating the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Various databases were searched for relevant studies from inception until May 10, 2023. Eligible studies were identified using the patient (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), and outcomes (O) model, which involved (P) participants with carpal tunnel syndrome, (I) an intervention based on injection therapy, (C) the use of placebo or another injectant as a control treatment, and (O) the measurement of clinical and electrodiagnostic outcomes of interest. A total of 18 studies were included in the analysis. The network meta-analysis revealed that platelet-rich plasma is effective in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome in terms of symptom and pain relief and functional improvement in both the short and long term, whereas steroids are effective only in the short term. Additionally, injections of dextrose solution may offer long-term pain relief as well as short- and long-term symptom alleviation and functional improvement. The study findings suggest that platelet-rich plasma should be used as the first-line treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, with dextrose and steroids serving as alternative treatment options.

Evaluation of a 3D-Printed Writing Assistive Device for People With Brain Injury.

Three-dimensional-printed assistive devices hold promise for improving writing abilities, yet factors influencing device selection and their impact on satisfaction and effectiveness remain unclear, especially in adults, as they are typically tested on children. The aim of this article is to assess the efficacy and satisfaction with a writing assistive device at different angles among individuals with brain injury and explore device selection factors. Twenty-six participants with brain injuries selected their preferred device angle. Writing speed, quality, and satisfaction were recorded. Immediate speed improvements were significant at 5° and 30° (p = .006, .013, respectively). Satisfaction scores did not significantly differ among angles. Normotonia in elbow (p < .001; odds ratio: 3.403) and wrist (p ≤ .001; odds ratio: 2.695) muscles increased the likelihood of selecting the 5° device. Immediate speed improvements at specific angles highlight the influence of muscle normotonia on device selection, vital for tailored brain injury rehabilitation.

Evaluation of a 3D-Printed Writing Assistive Device for People With Brain InjuryThis study, titled "Evaluation of a 3D-Printed Writing Assistive Device for People with Brain Injury," aimed to understand how 3D-printed devices could improve writing for individuals with brain injuries. The researchers explored the effectiveness and satisfaction of using these devices at different angles (5°, 20°, and 30°) among 26 participants with brain injuries. Participants chose the device angle that felt most comfortable to them, and the study measured their writing speed, quality, and satisfaction. The findings revealed that using 3D-printed writing devices significantly improved writing speed immediately, regardless of the chosen angle (5° or 30°). Satisfaction scores were similar across all angles. Interestingly, individuals with normal elbow and wrist muscle tone were more likely to prefer the 5° device. In summary, this study concludes that 3D-printed writing devices can promptly enhance writing for people with brain injuries. The specific angle of the device significantly affect outcomes, and participants generally find satisfaction with their choice. If you have normal elbow and wrist muscle tone, the 5° angle may be the optimal choice for you.

Effects of 3D-printed assistive device on daily life function in patients with neurological impairment: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: To explore the effects of customized 3D-printed assistive technology (AT) on functional performance and feasibility in patients with neurological impairment. METHODS: Patients with neurological impairment were recruited and randomized into customized 3D-printed assistive device group (group 1; n = 17) or standard device group (group 2; n = 14). The device was designed to assist their writing, spoon using, and typing. Each patient underwent 4-week intervention with the device (30 min per session, twice a week). RESULTS: We observed significant differences in shoulder abduction (p = .00), external rotation (p = .01), and internal rotation (p = .02) in group 1. And significant differences in abduction (p = .05) and external rotation (p = .05) between the 2 groups. Group 1 achieved significant improvements in writing without AT (p = .04) and with AT (p = .02), spoon use without AT (p = .02) and with AT (p = .03), and hemiplegia-side typing with AT (p = .00). Group 2 achieved significant improvements in writing without AT (p = .01), hemiplegia-side typing without AT (p = .01), and bil-side typing with AT (P = .05). Moreover, no significant differences were noted in other outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that customized 3D-printed AT can improve shoulder active motion for patients with neurological impairment. A positive effect in functional hand tasks after AT intervention. Offering customized AT with specific training could enhance the efficacy of interventions. The feasibility of using 3D printing technology to produce customized AT, which has the potential to be cost-effective and efficient.

3D-printed assistive device incorporating a splint can improve shoulder active motion compared to conventional assistive device for patients with neurological impairment.A positive effect in functional hand tasks after assistive device intervention.

Effects of a wearable sensor-based virtual reality game on upper-extremity function in patients with stroke.

BACKGROUND: PABLO is a virtual reality game where a motion sensor system is used. Few studies have investigated the effects of the PABLO system in stroke rehabilitation. We investigated the effects of upper-extremity virtual reality training with the PABLO system in patients with stroke. METHODS: Stroke patients were randomly assigned to the virtual reality (n = 19) or standard rehabilitation groups (n = 18). Total of 18 sessions were conducted twice per week. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity subscale. Secondary outcome measures included the active ranges of motion of the shoulder and elbow, the box and block test, hand grip strength, and the Stroke Impact Scale. Enjoyment of activities and side effects were also recorded. FINDINGS: No difference was observed between two groups in primary outcome. Virtual reality group exhibited greater improvements in the hand dexterity between groups (p = .05). In active motion, virtual reality group showed greater improvement in shoulder flexion between groups (p = .03). Virtual reality group also showed greater improvements in elbow pronation between groups (p = .03). The groups differed in their assessments of how enjoyment the rehabilitation activities were found (p = .01). No significant differences between groups were observed in any other tests. INTERPRETATION: Interventions based on the PABLO virtual reality system improved upper extremity hand function, shoulder and elbow movements, and elicited a higher degree of enjoyment from study participants, than did traditional treatment. TRIALS REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (No.NCT04296032).