The incidence of reoperation for pseudarthrosis after cervical spine surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Pseudarthrosis after cervical spine surgery represents an underreported and challenging complication. Using a large multi-center surgical database, we sought to: (1) report the incidence of cervical pseudarthrosis, (2) evaluate changes in rates of cervical pseudarthrosis, and (3) describe risk factors for suboptimal outcomes after cervical pseudarthrosis surgery. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2019 was used. The primary outcome was occurrence of a cervical fusion procedure with a prior diagnosis of pseudarthrosis. Fusion for pseudarthrosis was divided into anterior and posterior approaches. Post-operative complications were classified as major or minor. Prolonged LOS was defined as exceeding the 75th percentile for total hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 780 patients underwent cervical fusion for pseudarthrosis, and a significant increase in rates of surgery for pseudarthrosis was seen (0.25-1.2%, p < 0.001). The majority of cervical pseudarthrosis was treated with a posterior approach (66.5%). Postoperatively, 38 (4.9%) patients suffered a complication and 247 (31.7%) had a prolonged LOS. The three strongest risk factors for complications and extended LOS were > 10% weight loss preoperatively, congestive heart failure, and pre-operative bleeding disorder. CONCLUSION: Results from a large multi-center national database revealed that surgery to treat cervical pseudarthrosis has increased from 2012 to 2019. Most pseudarthrosis was treated with a posterior approach. Reoperation to treat cervical pseudarthrosis carried risk, with 5% having complications and 32% having an extended LOS. These results lay the groundwork for a future prospective study to discern the true incidence of cervical pseudarthrosis and how to best avoid its occurrence.

Establishing a Standardized Clinical Consensus for Reporting Complications Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Background and Objectives: Mitigating post-operative complications is a key metric of success following interbody fusion. LLIF is associated with a unique complication profile when compared to other approaches, and while numerous studies have attempted to report the incidence of post-operative complications, there is currently no consensus regarding their definitions or reporting structure. The aim of this study was to standardize the classification of complications specific to lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Materials and Methods: A search algorithm was employed to identify all the articles that described complications following LLIF. A modified Delphi technique was then used to perform three rounds of consensus among twenty-six anonymized experts across seven countries. Published complications were classified as major, minor, or non-complications using a 60% agreement threshold for consensus. Results: A total of 23 articles were extracted, describing 52 individual complications associated with LLIF. In Round 1, forty-one of the fifty-two events were identified as a complication, while seven were considered to be approach-related occurrences. In Round 2, 36 of the 41 events with complication consensus were classified as major or minor. In Round 3, forty-nine of the fifty-two events were ultimately classified into major or minor complications with consensus, while three events remained without agreement. Vascular injuries, long-term neurologic deficits, and return to the operating room for various etiologies were identified as important consensus complications following LLIF. Non-union did not reach significance and was not classified as a complication. Conclusions: These data provide the first, systematic classification scheme of complications following LLIF. These findings may improve the consistency in the future reporting and analysis of surgical outcomes following LLIF.

Impact of tumor-associated syrinx on outcomes following resection of primary ependymomas of the spinal cord.

PURPOSE: To interrogate the association of tumor-associated syrinxes with postoperative neurological and oncological outcomes in patients surgically treated for WHO grade 2 spinal ependymomas. METHODS: Adults treated for primary spinal intramedullary ependymomas between 2000 and 2020 were identified and data were gathered on preoperative neurological exam, radiographic characteristics, operative details, and postoperative neurological outcome. Neurological status was graded on the modified McCormick Scale (MMS). Neurological worsening immediately postoperatively and at last follow-up were defined by ≥ 1 MMS grade deterioration. Decision-tree analyses were also performed to identify independent predictors of new neurological deficits. RESULTS: Seventy patients were identified; mean age 45.4 ± 12.7; 60% male. Forty-eight patients (68.6%) had tumor-associated syrinxes, were more common among males (68.8%) and cervical lesions (68.8 vs. 31.8%; P = 0.005). Postoperatively patients with syrinxes had better MMS (P = 0.035) and were less likely to require a gait aid (39.6 vs. 81.8; P = 0.002). This latter difference persisted to last follow-up (22.9 vs. 59.1%; P = 0.006). On decision-tree analysis the strongest predictors of long-term neurological worsening were advanced age (≥ 63 years) and worse baseline neurological function. Worsened neurological status in the immediate postoperative period was best predicted by thoracic localization, the presence of a hemosiderin cap, and longer craniocaudal extension. CONCLUSION: For spinal ependymomas, tumor-associated syrinxes may portend decreased risk for immediate postoperative neurologic deficits but do not predict long-term neurological outcomes (MMS) or odds of successful gross total resection. Thoracic localization appears to best predict new immediate postoperative deficits, and worse baseline neurological function and advanced age best predict long-term deficits.

Learning curves in robot-assisted spine surgery: a systematic review and proposal of application to residency curricula.

OBJECTIVE: Spine robots have seen increased utilization over the past half decade with the introduction of multiple new systems. Market research expects this expansion to continue over the next half decade at an annual rate of 20%. However, because of the novelty of these devices, there is limited literature on their learning curves and how they should be integrated into residency curricula. With the present review, the authors aimed to address these two points. METHODS: A systematic review of the published English-language literature on PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies describing the learning curve in spine robotics. Included articles described clinical results in patients using one of the following endpoints: operative time, screw placement time, fluoroscopy usage, and instrumentation accuracy. Systems examined included the Mazor series, the ExcelsiusGPS, and the TiRobot. Learning curves were reported in a qualitative synthesis, given as the mean improvement in the endpoint per case performed or screw placed where possible. All studies were level IV case series with a high risk of reporting bias. RESULTS: Of 1579 unique articles, 97 underwent full-text review and 21 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria; 62 articles were excluded for not presenting primary data for one of the above-described endpoints. Of the 21 articles, 18 noted the presence of a learning curve in spine robots, which ranged from 3 to 30 cases or 15 to 62 screws. Only 12 articles performed regressions of one of the endpoints (most commonly operative time) as a function of screws placed or cases performed. Among these, increasing experience was associated with a 0.24- to 4.6-minute decrease in operative time per case performed. All but one series described the experience of attending surgeons, not residents. CONCLUSIONS: Most studies of learning curves with spine robots have found them to be present, with the most common threshold being 20 to 30 cases performed. Unfortunately, all available evidence is level IV data, limited to case series. Given the ability of residency to allow trainees to safely perform these cases under the supervision of experienced senior surgeons, it is argued that a curriculum should be developed for senior-level residents specializing in spine comprising a minimum of 30 performed cases.

Fluorescence guided surgery for pituitary adenomas.

PURPOSE: Resection of pituitary adenomas presents a number of unique challenges in neuro-oncology. The proximity of these lesions to key vascular and endocrine structures as well as the need to interpret neuronavigation in the context of shifting tumor position increases the complexity of the operation. More recently, substantial advances in fluorescence-guided surgery have been demonstrated to facilitate the identification of numerous tumor types and result in increased rates of complete resection and overall survival. METHODS: A review of the literature was performed, and data regarding the mechanism of the fluorescence agents, their administration, and intraoperative tumor visualization were extracted. Both in vitro and in vivo studies were assessed. The application of these agents to pituitary tumors, their advantages and limitations, as well as future directions are presented here. RESULTS: Numerous laboratory and clinical studies have described the use of 5-ALA, fluorescein, indocyanine green, and OTL38 in pituitary lesions. All of these drugs have been demonstrated to accumulate in tumor cells. Several studies have reported the successful use of the majority of the agents in inducing intraoperative tumor fluorescence. However, their sensitivity and specificity varies across the literature and between functioning and non-functioning adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: At present, numerous studies have shown the feasibility and safety of these agents for pituitary adenomas. However, further research is needed to assess the applicability of fluorescence-guided surgery across different tumor subtypes as well as explore the relationship between their use and postoperative clinical outcomes.

Postoperative outcomes following glioblastoma resection using a robot-assisted digital surgical exoscope: a case series.

INTRODUCTION: Maximal extent of resection (EOR) of glioblastoma (GBM) is associated with greater progression free survival (PFS) and improved patient outcomes. Recently, a novel surgical system has been developed that includes a 2D, robotically-controlled exoscope and brain tractography display. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes in a series of patients with GBM undergoing resections using this surgical exoscope. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for robotic exoscope assisted GBM resections between 2017 and 2019. EOR was computed from volumetric analyses of pre- and post-operative MRIs. Demographics, pathology/MGMT status, imaging, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. The relationship between these perioperative variables and discharge disposition as well as progression-free survival (PFS) was explored. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with GBM (median age = 57 years) met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 28 cases. Of these, 22 (79%) tumors were in eloquent regions, most commonly in the frontal lobe (14 cases, 50%). The median pre- and post-operative volumes were 24.0 cc and 1.3 cc, respectively. The median extent of resection for the cohort was 94.8%, with 86% achieving 6-month PFS. The most common neurological complication was a motor deficit followed by sensory loss, while 8 patients (29%) were symptom-free. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic exoscope is safe and effective for patients undergoing GBM surgery, with a majority achieving large-volume resections. These patients experienced complication profiles similar to those undergoing treatment with the traditional microscope. Further studies are needed to assess direct comparisons between exoscope and microscope-assisted GBM resection.

Non-routine discharge disposition is associated with post-discharge complications and 30-day readmissions following craniotomy for brain tumor resection.

Several studies have reported an association between high-volume brain tumor centers and greater rates of routine discharge disposition in the context of better outcomes. However, the relationship between in-hospital complications, discharge destination, and postoperative adverse events (AEs) remains unexplored. The purpose of this study was thus to use a large, prospectively collected database to examine the association between discharge destination, post-discharge complications, readmissions, and reoperations among patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor. The 2011-2014 National Surgical Quality Improvement (NSQIP) database was employed to identify all adult patients who underwent a craniotomy for brain tumor resection. Demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative variables were collected for each patient. Univariate statistics with subsequent binary logistic regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between these perioperative factors and postoperative events, including major post-discharge complications, minor post-discharge AEs, readmissions, and return to the operating room (ROR). Significant variables such as demographics, comorbidities, operative time, body mass index, ASA classification and pre-discharge complications were controlled for in each model. Of the 14,854 patients identified, 11,409 (77.9%) were discharged home. After controlling for comorbidities and in-hospital AEs, discharge to skilled rehabilitation was an independent predictor of major post-discharge complications (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.31-2.30, p < 0.001), minor post-discharge events (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.07-2.41, p = 0.024), and ROR (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.27-2.22, p < 0.001). Discharge to a care facility was predictive of major complications (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.19, p = 0.030) and ROR (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.46-2.80, p < 0.001). These factors may be considered in discharge planning and further outcomes studies for patients undergoing resection.

Fluorescence-guided surgery for high-grade gliomas.

5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is a prodrug that results in the fluorescence of high-grade gliomas relative to the surrounding brain parenchyma. 5-ALA has been increasingly utilized in fluorescence-guided surgery for these tumors, and its intraoperative use has been associated with a significantly improved extent of resection and progression-free survival. This review outlines the growing body of evidence that has culminated in the recent Food and Drug Administration approval of 5-ALA, as well as emerging applications for this agent.

The Attenuation Distribution Across the Long Axis of Breast Cancer Liver Metastases at CT: A Quantitative Biomarker for Predicting Overall Survival.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare attenuation distribution across the long-axis (ADLA) measurements, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, and Choi criteria for predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with bevacizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained HIPAA-compliant data from a prospective, multisite, phase 3 trial of bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. For patients with one or more liver metastases measuring 15 mm or larger at baseline, we evaluated up to two target liver lesions using RECIST, Choi criteria, and ADLA measurements, with the latter defined as the SD of the CT attenuation values of each pixel along the tumor long-axis diameter. The optimal percentage change threshold for defining an ADLA response was computed by cross-validation analysis in a Cox model. The log-rank test was applied to evaluate RECIST, Choi criteria, and ADLA for discriminating patients with superior OS. The predictive accuracies of all three techniques were compared using Brier scores and areas under the ROC curve (AUC). All analyses were performed separately using best overall response (BOR) and response at the first follow-up time point (FU1). RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. A 25% decrease in the ADLA measurement from baseline was the optimal ADLA response threshold for BOR and FU1. RECIST, Choi criteria, and ADLA successfully identified patients with superior OS when using BOR (RECIST, p = 0.02; Choi and ADLA, p < 0.001), but only Choi criteria and ADLA measurements were successful when using FU1 (RECIST, p = 0.43; Choi and ADLA, p < 0.001). In a direct comparison, ADLA measurements outperformed both RECIST and Choi criteria using BOR (95% CI for Brier score differences, ADLA-RECIST [-0.58 to -0.08] and ADLA-Choi [-0.55 to -0.06]; 95% CI for AUC differences, ADLA-RECIST [0.16-0.33] and ADLA-Choi [0.17-0.36]) as well as using FU1 (95% CI for Brier score differences, ADLA-RECIST [-0.77 to -0.08] and ADLA-Choi [-0.58 to -0.03]; 95% CI for AUC differences, ADLA-RECIST [0.22-0.39] and ADLA-Choi [0.01-0.22]). CONCLUSION: ADLA measurements may be a useful noninvasive indicator of cancer treatment response. Because ADLA measurements may be extracted relatively easily using existing radiologist workflows, further investigation of the ADLA technique is warranted.

Management of Femoral Defects Greater Than 5 cm Following Open Femur Fractures: A 12-Year Retrospective Review.

This study sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients with osseous defects exceeding 5 cm following open femur fractures. Size of the osseous defect, method of internal fixation (plate vs. intramedullary nail), patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and surgical complications were collected. Twenty-seven of the 832 open femur fracture patients had osseous defects exceeding 5 cm. Mean osseous defect size was 8 cm, and each patient had an average of four operations including initial debridement. Average time from injury to bone grafting was 123.7 days. The overall complication rate was 48.1% (n = 13). The most common complications were infection (26.0%, n = 7) and nonunion (41.0%, n = 11). Smoking, diabetes, ASA score, and defect size did not independently increase the risk of a complication. Management of open femur fractures with osseous defects greater than 5 cm is associated with high complication rate, driven primarily by infection and nonunion. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(3):203-208, 2018).

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Clinical Review.

Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is the most common form of spinal cord impairment in adults and results in disability and reduced quality of life. DCM can present with a wide set of clinical and imaging findings, including: 1) pain and reduced range of motion of the neck, and motor and sensory deficits on clinical exam, and 2) cord compression due to static and dynamic injury mechanisms resulting from degenerative changes of the bone, ligaments, and intervertebral discs on MRI. The incidence and prevalence of DCM has been estimated at a minimum of 4.1 and 60.5 per 100,000, respectively, but surgical trends and an aging population suggest these numbers will rise in the future. The diagnosis of DCM is based on clinical examination, with a positive Hoffmann's sign and hand numbness typically appearing in the upper limbs, and gait abnormalities such as difficulty with tandem gait serving as sensitive diagnostic findings. Loss of bladder function may also occur in patients with severe DCM. The degree of neurological impairment can be measured using the modified Japanese Association Scale (mJOA) or Nurick grade. Non-operative management has a limited role in the treatment, while surgical management has been shown to both be safe and effective for halting disease progression and improving neurological function. Predictors of surgical outcome include age and baseline severity, indicating that early recognition of DCM is important for ensuring an optimal surgical outcome.

Reducing liberal red blood cell transfusions at an academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: Educational and computerized interventions have been shown to reduce red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rates, yet controversy remains surrounding the optimal strategy needed to achieve sustained reductions in liberal transfusions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of clinician decision support (CDS) along with targeted education on liberal RBC utilization to four high-utilizing service lines compared with no education to control service lines across an academic medical center. Clinical data along with associated hemoglobin levels at the time of all transfusion orders between April 2014 and December 2015 were obtained via retrospective chart review. The primary outcome was the change in the rate of liberal RBC transfusion orders (defined as any RBC transfusion when the hemoglobin level is >7.0 g/dL). Secondary outcomes included the annual projected reduction in the number of transfusions and the associated decrease in cost due to these changes as well as length of stay (LOS) and death index. These measures were compared between the 12 months prior to the initiative and the 9-month postintervention period. RESULTS: Liberal RBC utilization decreased from 13.4 to 10.0 units per 100 patient discharges (p = 0.002) across the institution, resulting in a projected 12-month savings of $720,360. The mean LOS and the death index did not differ significantly in the postintervention period. CONCLUSION: Targeted education combined with the incorporation of CDS at the time of order entry resulted in significant reductions in the incidence of liberal RBC utilization without adversely impacting inpatient care, whereas control service lines exposed only to CDS had no change in transfusion habits.

Resident participation is not associated with postoperative adverse events, reoperation, or prolonged length of stay following craniotomy for brain tumor resection.

Prior studies exploring the impact of resident involvement on complication and mortality rates in neurosurgery have evaluated heterogeneous cohorts. Since brain tumor resection is characterized by significant operative complexity, variety, and morbidity, intraoperative resident involvement has the potential to impact patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was thus to explore the relationship between resident involvement and patient outcomes following craniotomy for brain tumor resection. Data for adult patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor resection were extracted from the 2008-2014 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Resident involvement was determined for all included cases, and evaluated for association with patient outcomes via multivariable, binary logistic regression modeling while controlling for perioperative variables. Outcomes included death, prolonged length of stay (LOS), readmission, reoperation, and pertinent complications. A total of 3587 cases met the inclusion criteria, 2926 (81.6%) of which were supratentorial tumors and 661 (18.4%) were infratentorial lesions. Residents were involved in 63.6% of cases. Resident participation was associated with a reduced incidence of prolonged LOS (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.86, P = 0.001) and urinary tract infection (UTI) (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.98, P = 0.038), and approached significance for reduced mortality rate (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39-1.03, P = 0.064). These associations were observed for patients with supratentorial tumors but not for those with infratentorial lesions. Resident involvement was not significantly associated with any of the other outcome metrics. Resident involvement was not a risk factor for any adverse events, and was associated with reduced incidence of prolonged LOS and UTI. The observed relationships may be impacted by institution-level factors.

The timing of retears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the time dependence of the failure rate of surgically repaired rotator cuffs. Retears are significant, as they are common and may lead to less satisfactory outcomes and additional operations. Their timing is critical foundational information for understanding failure mechanisms. However, this remains unclear. Currently, there exist a number of studies that have reported retear rates at specific time points. Combining data from these publications can reveal when cuffs retear, which will help inform expectations and guidelines for progression of activity after surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, and Embase were searched for studies relating to rotator cuff repair. Abstracts and articles were evaluated on the basis of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from those publications that satisfied all requirements, and regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Thirteen articles were included in the final meta-analysis. Retear rates for medium tears increased for approximately 15 months and leveled off at approximately 20%. Retear rates for large tears progressed steadily for about 12 months and approached an upper limit of approximately 40%. Retear rates for massive tears ranged from 20% to 60%, but the distribution of retear rate over time for these cuff tears is not clear from these data. CONCLUSION: Retear rates for medium and large tears generally increase until at least 10-15 months after surgery, after which they are likely to level off. Retear rates for massive tears are variable and may follow a time course different from that of other tear sizes. Retear rates depend on size of the original tear.

Higher Modified Charlson Index Scores Are Associated With Increased Incidence of Complications, Transfusion Events, and Length of Stay Following Revision Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (RHA) has been associated with greater morbidity and length of stay (LOS) compared to primary total hip arthroplasty. Despite this, few validated metrics exist for risk stratification in RHA cohorts. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) has been associated with complications in total hip arthroplasty, but its utility in revision surgery remains unexplored. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between preoperative CCI and a variety of outcome metrics following RHA. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify all patients undergoing aseptic RHA between 2006 and 2013. A variety of demographics and perioperative variables were collected. Modified CCI scores were computed for each patient based on a validated formula incorporating comorbidities found in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Outcome variables of interest included mortality, major postoperative complications, minor adverse events, incidence of transfusion, and prolonged LOS. Perioperative factors were tested for association with these outcomes using bivariate analysis and significant variables were then incorporated into a logistic regression model to explore the relationship between preoperative CCI scores and postoperative events. RESULTS: In a multivariable regression model controlling for the significant perioperative variables, operative time, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, higher CCI scores were significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-2.18, P < .001), major complications (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.20, P = .001), minor complications (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.39-1.69, P < .001), transfusions (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.20, P < .001), and prolonged LOS (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.26-1.39, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Higher preoperative CCI scores were independent risk factors for numerous complications. This highlights the potential utility of the CCI in risk stratification for RHA populations.

Predicting the post-operative length of stay for the orthopaedic trauma patient.

PURPOSE: Length of stay (LOS) is a major driver of cost and quality of care. A bundled payment system makes it essential for orthopaedic surgeons to understand factors that increase a patient's LOS. Yet, minimal data regarding predictors of LOS currently exist. Using the ACS-NSQIP database, this is the first study to identify risk factors for increased LOS for orthopaedic trauma patients and create a personalized LOS calculator. METHODS: All orthopaedic trauma surgery between 2006 and 2013 were identified from the ACS-NSQIP database using CPT codes. Patient demographics, pre-operative comorbidities, anatomic location of injury, and post-operative in-hospital complications were collected. To control for individual patient comorbidities, a negative binomial regression model evaluated hospital LOS after surgery. Betas (ß), were determined for each pre-operative patient characteristic. We selected significant predictors of LOS (p < 0.05) using backwards stepwise elimination. RESULTS: 49,778 orthopaedic trauma patients were included in the analysis. Deep incisional surgical site infections and superficial surgical site infections were associated with the greatest percent change in predicted LOS (ß = 1.2760 and 1.2473, respectively; p < 0.0001 for both). A post-operative LOS risk calculator was developed based on the formula: [Formula: see text]. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing a large prospective cohort of orthopaedic trauma patients, we created the first personalized LOS calculator based on pre-operative comorbidities, post-operative complications and location of surgery. Future work may assess the use of this calculator and attempt to validate its utility as an accurate model. To improve the quality measures of hospitals, orthopaedists must employ such predictive tools to optimize care and better manage resources.

Open treatment of ankle fracture as inpatient increases risk of complication.

BACKGROUND: Ankle fracture is one of the most common injuries treated by orthopaedic surgeons, and its incidence is only expected to rise with an aging population. It is also associated with often costly complications, yet there is little literature on risk factors, especially modifiable ones, driving these complications. The aim of this study is to reveal whether inpatient treatment after ankle fracture is associated with higher incidence of postoperative complications. As the USA moves towards a bundled payment healthcare system, it is imperative that orthopaedists maximize patient outcome and quality of care while also reducing overall costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to compare complication rates between inpatient and outpatient treatment of ankle fracture. We collected patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications from both groups, then compared treatments using a multinomial logistic regression model. RESULTS: We identified 7383 patients, with 2630 (36%) in the outpatient and 2630 (36%) in the inpatient group. Of these, 104 (4.0%) inpatients compared with 52 (2.0%) outpatients developed a complication (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Inpatients developed major complications including deep wound infection and pulmonary embolism, as well as minor complications such as pneumonia and urinary tract infection, at significantly greater rates. As reimbursement models begin to incorporate value-based care, orthopaedic surgeons need to be aware of factors associated with increased incidence of postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective comparative study.

Incidence and predictive risk factors of postoperative sepsis in orthopedic trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative sepsis is associated with high mortality and the national costs of septicemia exceed those of any other diagnosis. While numerous studies in the basic orthopedic science literature suggest that traumatic injuries facilitate the development of sepsis, it is currently unclear whether orthopedic trauma patients are at increased risk. The purpose of this study was thus to assess the incidence of sepsis and determine the risk factors that significantly predicted septicemia following orthopedic trauma surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 56,336 orthopedic trauma patients treated between 2006 and 2013 were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database. Documentation of postoperative sepsis/septic shock, demographics, surgical variables, and preoperative comorbidities was collected. Chi-squared analyses were used to assess differences in the rates of sepsis between trauma and nontrauma groups. Binary multivariable regressions identified risk factors that significantly predicted the development of postoperative septicemia in orthopedic trauma patients. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the overall rates of both sepsis and septic shock between orthopedic trauma (1.6%) and nontrauma (0.5%) patients (p < 0.001). For orthopedic trauma patients, ventilator use (OR = 15.1, p = 0.002), history of pain at rest (OR = 2.8, p = 0.036), and prior sepsis (OR = 2.6, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with septicemia. Statistically predictive, modifiable comorbidities included hypertension (OR = 2.1, p = 0.003) and the use of corticosteroids (OR = 2.1, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significantly greater incidence of postoperative sepsis in the trauma cohort. Clinicians should be aware of these predictive characteristics, may seek to counsel at-risk patients, and should consider addressing modifiable risk factors such as hypertension and corticosteroid use preoperatively. Level of evidence Level III.

Predictors of Adverse Events for Ankle Fractures: An Analysis of 6800 Patients.

Ankle fractures are one of the most common injuries seen by orthopedic surgeons. It is therefore essential to understand the risks associated with their treatment. Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program(®) database from 2006 to 2013, the patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day complications were collected for 5 types of ankle fractures. A bivariate analysis was used to compare the patient demographics, comorbidities, and complications across all Common Procedural Terminology codes. A multivariable logistic regression model was then used to assess the odds of minor and major postoperative complications within 30 days after open treatment. A total of 6865 patients were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 2507 (36.5%) had bimalleolar ankle fractures. The overall rate of adverse events for ankle fractures was low. Bimalleolar fractures had the greatest rate of major (2.6%, n = 64), minor (3.8%, n = 94), and total (5.7%, n = 143) complications. When controlling for individual patient characteristics, bimalleolar fractures were associated with 4.92 times the odds (95% confidence interval 1.80 to 13.5; p = .002) of developing a complication compared with those with a medial malleolar fracture. The risk factors driving postoperative complications for all ankle fractures were age >65 years, obesity, diabetes, American Society of Anesthesiologists score >2, and functional status (p < .05). Although the overall rate of adverse events for ankle fractures was low, bimalleolar fractures were associated with 5 times the odds of developing a complication compared with medial malleolar fractures. Orthopedic surgeons must be aware of the risk factors that increase the rate of ankle fracture complications to improve patients' quality of care.

The risk of adverse events in orthopaedic trauma varies by anatomic region of surgery: an analysis of fifty thousand four hundred and twenty one patients.

PURPOSE: Despite the high-risk nature of orthopaedic trauma, there is a dearth of data exploring adverse events following these interventions. With the current shift towards a reimbursement model grounded on episode-based payments, physicians may face financial penalties for higher rates of peri-operative complications and subsequent hospitalisations. The purpose of this study was thus to assess whether complication rates varied by anatomic region of surgery and to subsequently determine the pre-operative risk factors that elevated patients' chances of developing complications in these regions. METHODS: A total of 50,421 orthopaedic trauma patients treated between 2006 and 2013 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Minor and major complications, demographics, surgical variables and pre-operative comorbidities were collected. Chi-square analyses identified pre-operative differences between the three regions. Multivariate regressions identified risk factors that significantly predicted adverse events. RESULTS: Hip and pelvis (HP) patients were found to be approximately seven times more likely to develop a peri-operative complication than upper extremity (UE) patients [odds ratio (OR) 7.38, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 6.33-8.10, p < 0.001]. In addition, lower extremity (LE) patients were found to be almost three times as likely to develop any complication compared to UE patients (OR 2.80, 95 % CI 2.53-3.09, p < 0.001). Certain risk factors, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the presence of a bleeding disorder, were significantly correlated with the development of all adverse events for all anatomic regions (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant difference in complication rates between the three cohorts of orthopaedic trauma patients. In addition, the predictability of certain risk factors varied between the three regions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: prognostic level II.