Association of Catecholamine Dose, Lactate, and Shock Duration at Vasopressin Initiation With Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association of catecholamine dose, lactate concentration, and timing from shock onset at vasopressin initiation with in-hospital mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study using segmented and multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the associations of catecholamine dose, lactate concentration, and timing from shock onset at vasopressin initiation with in-hospital mortality. SETTING: Multiple hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Health System. PATIENTS: Adult patients who met criteria for septic shock based on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event definition. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received continuous infusion vasopressin as an adjunct to catecholamine vasopressors. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In total, 1,610 patients were included with a mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III 109.0 ± 35.1 and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment 14.0 ± 3.5; 41% of patients survived the hospital admission. At the time of vasopressin initiation, patients had median (interquartile range) lactate concentration 3.9 mmol/L (2.3-7.2 mmol/L), norepinephrine-equivalent dose 25 µg/min (18-40 µg/min), and 5.3 hours (2.1-12.2 hr) elapsed since shock onset. The odds of in-hospital mortality increased 20.7% for every 10 µg/min increase in norepinephrine-equivalent dose up to 60 µg/min at the time of vasopressin initiation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.09-1.34]), but no association was detected when the norepinephrine-equivalent dose exceeded 60 µg/min (adjusted odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.84-1.10]). There was a significant interaction between timing of vasopressin initiation and lactate concentration (p = 0.02) for the association with in-hospital mortality. A linear association between increasing in-hospital mortality was detected for increasing lactate concentration at the time of vasopressin initiation, but no association was detected for time elapsed from shock onset. CONCLUSIONS: Higher norepinephrine-equivalent dose at vasopressin initiation and higher lactate concentration at vasopressin initiation were each associated higher in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock who received vasopressin.

Hemodynamic Response to Vasopressin Dosage of 0.03 Units/Min vs. 0.04 Units/Min in Patients With Septic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is suggested as an adjunct to norepinephrine in patients with septic shock. Guidelines recommend an AVP dosage up to 0.03 units/min, but 0.04 units/min is commonly used in practice based on initial studies. This study was designed to compare the incidence of hemodynamic response between initial fixed-dosage AVP 0.03 units/min and AVP 0.04 units/min. METHODS: This retrospective, multi-hospital health system, cohort study included adult patients with septic shock receiving AVP as an adjunct to catecholamine vasopressors. Patients were excluded if they received an initial dosage other than 0.03 units/min or 0.04 units/min, or AVP was titrated within the first 6 hours of therapy. The primary outcome was hemodynamic response, defined as a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg and a decrease in catecholamine dosage at 6 hours after AVP initiation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on the propensity score for initial AVP dosage receipt was utilized to estimate adjusted exposure effects. RESULTS: Of the 1536 patients included in the observed data, there was a nearly even split between initial AVP dosage of 0.03 units/min (n = 842 [54.8%]) and 0.04 units/min (n = 694 [45.2%]). Observed patients receiving AVP 0.03 units/min were more frequently treated at the main campus academic medical center (96.3% vs. 52.2%, p < 0.01) and in a medical intensive care unit (87.4% vs. 39.8%, p < 0.01). The IPTW analysis included 1379 patients with achievement of baseline covariate balance. There was no evidence for a difference between groups in the incidence of hemodynamic response (0.03 units/min 50.0% vs. 0.04 units/min 53.1%, adjusted relative risk 1.06 [95% CI 0.94, 1.20]). CONCLUSIONS: Initial AVP dosing varied by hospital and unit type. Although commonly used, an initial AVP dosage of 0.04 units/min was not associated with a higher incidence of early hemodynamic response to AVP in patients with septic shock.

Captopril Versus Hydralazine-Isosorbide Dinitrate Vasodilator Protocols in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Transitioning From Sodium Nitroprusside.

BACKGROUND: The role of oral vasodilators in the management of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is not clearly defined. We evaluated the use of captopril vs hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate (H-ISDN) in the transition from sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in patients with ADHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective chart review was performed of 369 consecutive adult patients in the intensive care unit with ADHF and reduced ejection fraction, who received either a captopril or an H-ISDN protocol to transition from SNP. Captopril patients were matched 1:2 to H-ISDN patients, based on serum creatinine and race (Black vs non-Black). Baseline demographics, serum chemistry and use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were similar in both groups. Time to SNP discontinuation (46.9 vs 40.4 hours, P = 0.11) and length of hospital stay (9.86 vs 7.99 days, P = 0.064) were similar in both groups. Length of hospital stay in the intensive care unit was statistically shorter in the H-ISDN group (4.11 vs 3.96 days, P = 0.038). Fewer H-ISDN protocol patients were discharged on ACEis/ARBs (82.9 % vs 69.9%, P = 0.003) despite similar kidney function at time of discharge (serum creatinine 1.1 vs 1.2, P = 0.113). No difference was observed in rates of readmission (40.7% vs 50%, P = 0.09) or mortality (16.3% vs 17.5 %, P = 0.77) at 1 year postdischarge. CONCLUSION: Similar inpatient and 1-year outcomes were observed between patients using H-ISDN vs ACEi when transitioning from SNP, even though fewer H-ISDN protocol patients were discharged taking ACEis/ARBs despite similar kidney function.

Comparison of Single-Dose and Extended-Duration Empiric Aminoglycoside Combination Therapy in Patients With Septic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Empiric combination antimicrobial therapy is often used in patients with decompensating septic shock. However, the optimal duration of combination therapy is unknown. STUDY QUESTION: The goal of this study was to compare the clinical effects of a single dose of an aminoglycoside to an extended duration of aminoglycosides for combination therapy in patients with septic shock without renal dysfunction. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center evaluation of patients with septic shock who received empiric combination therapy with an aminoglycoside. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Two patient cohorts were evaluated: those who received a single dose of an aminoglycoside and those who received more than 1 dose of an aminoglycoside. The primary outcome was shock-free days at day 14. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of stay, clinical cure, and nephrotoxicity. A post hoc subgroup analysis including only patients who received more than 2 doses of an aminoglycoside compared with a single dose was conducted. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients were included in this evaluation, 94 in the single-dose aminoglycoside group and 57 in the extended duration group. There was no difference in shock-free days at day 14 between patients who received a single dose of an aminoglycoside or those who received an extended duration (12.0 vs. 11.6 days; P = 0.56). There were no differences in mortality, length of stay, clinical cure rates, or rates of nephrotoxicity between groups (28% for single dose vs. 26% for extended duration; P = 0.86). No differences in outcomes were detected when evaluating patients who received more than 2 doses of an aminoglycoside compared with a single dose. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with septic shock and normal renal function who received a single dose of an aminoglycoside for combination antimicrobial therapy had no differences detected in shock duration or nephrotoxicity development compared with those who received an extended duration of aminoglycoside combination therapy.

Balanced Crystalloids Versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: The optimal resuscitative fluid remains controversial. Objective: To assess the association between crystalloid fluid and outcomes in critically ill adults. Methods: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials were searched from inception through July 2019. Cohort studies and randomized trials of critically ill adults provided predominantly nonperioperative fluid resuscitation with balanced crystalloids or 0.9% sodium chloride (saline) were included. Results: Thirteen studies (n = 30 950) were included. Balanced crystalloids demonstrated lower hospital or 28-/30-day mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.75-0.99; I2 = 82%) overall, in observational studies (RR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.41-0.99; I2 = 63%), and approached significance in randomized trials (RR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.88-1.02; I2 = 0%). New acute kidney injury occurred less frequently with balanced crystalloids (RR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.85-0.98; I2 = 0%), though progression to renal replacement therapy was similar (RR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.79-1.04; I2 = 38%). In the sepsis cohort, odds of hospital or 28-/30-day mortality were similar, but the odds of major adverse kidney events occurring in the first 30 days were less with balanced crystalloids than saline (OR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.66-0.91; I2 = 42%). Conclusion and Relevance: Resuscitation with balanced crystalloids demonstrated lower hospital or 28-/30-day mortality compared with saline in critically ill adults but not specifically those with sepsis. Balanced crystalloids should be provided preferentially to saline in most critically ill adult patients.

Descriptive comparison of hospital formulary decisions with published oncology valuation methods.

INTRODUCTION: As cost of cancer therapy continues to increase, several organizations have developed rubrics to ascertain treatment. No studies have evaluated these methods for hospital formulary decision-making. We applied different value measurement tools to formulary decisions from one hospital system to assess their operational utility. METHODS: We evaluated four value systems: National Comprehensive Cancer Network Evidence Blocks, DrugAbacus drug pricing, European Society for Medical Oncology clinical benefit scale, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology net health benefit. Each value score or cost was assessed against our hospital formulary requests between 2012 and 2016. Formulary requests accepted and rejected were compared with respect to their relative numbers of National Comprehensive Cancer Network blocks, difference between DrugAbacus and actual cost, and European Society for Medical Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology scores. RESULTS: Twenty-two chemotherapy requests were included, with 20 approvals and 2 rejections. No correlation was observed between number of evidence blocks and formulary acceptance (p = 0.13). Most drugs had a higher actual price than the DrugAbacus suggested cost (p = 0.036). No significant differences were observed in European Society for Medical Oncology (p = 0.90) or American Society of Clinical Oncology (p = 0.70) scores between drugs that were accepted or rejected. When evaluating monthly cost per point of American Society of Clinical Oncology score, a numerical difference between groups was observed (median = $369.7 versus $1256.8 per point, p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Existing oncology value assessment systems only variably inform hospital formulary decisions. The American Society of Clinical Oncology net health benefit score deserves further study as a method to systematically quantify the clinical safety and efficacy of formulary medication addition relative to cost.

Comparison of Interventions Made in an Ambulatory Pharmacist-Managed Refill Model to Usual Physician Care.

Background: With the current practice model, there is less time for physicians to address refill authorization requests (RARs) while performing consistent quality care, which creates an opportunity for pharmacists to assist in refills. Currently, inadequate evidence is available to support this intervention. Objective: To compare the rate of medication management interventions (MMIs - drug therapy changes, laboratory monitoring ordered, or office visit scheduled) initiated by the pharmacist-managed authorization center (PMAC) to usual care. Methods: A retrospective, noninferiority study looked at 4000 RARs from 6 primary care centers from January 2016 through March 2017. The primary endpoint compared the rate of MMIs between PMAC and usual care. Noninferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the 95% CI of the difference in interventions was <2%. Secondary endpoints included total, type, and acceptance rate of PMAC recommendations. Results: A total of 3830 patients were included, with 4732 medications requested (2183 reviewed by PMAC and 2549 by usual care). MMIs occurred in 153 medications within PMAC (7.0%) versus 90 for usual care (3.5%). The difference in total MMIs between PMAC and usual care was -3.5% (95% confidence interval = -4.8% to -2.2%). Medications reviewed by PMAC had significantly higher number of laboratory monitoring (P = .036) and scheduled appointments (P < .001). There were 294 PMAC recommendations (13.5%) with a 52.0% acceptance rate. Conclusion and Relevance: This study showed that PMAC was superior to usual care for reviewing RARs. There was a statistically significant improvement in medication monitoring and patient follow-up, supporting the idea of including a pharmacist in the decision making.

Clinical and Microbiological Outcomes in Obese Patients Receiving Colistin for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection.

Carbapenem-resistant infections are associated with poor outcomes, and treatment options are limited. Colistin is one of few antibiotics which retain in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant pathogens. However, despite the availability of international consensus guidelines for the dosing of polymyxins, there are limited data on the effects of dosing on clinical outcomes among obese patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia. This retrospective study evaluated whether obesity was associated with day 7 global cure rates among patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia who were treated with an ideal body weight (IBW)-based colistin dosing regimen. Secondary outcomes included microbiological cure, clinical cure, length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and day 7 acute kidney injury. After screening to identify 167 patients, 77 (46.1%) and 90 (53.9%) were classified as obese and nonobese, respectively. Patient characteristics were well balanced at baseline, except that obese patients were more often female and received a higher daily dose per IBW (3.7 versus 2.9 mg/kg/day, P = 0.03). Global cure rates were similar between groups (44.2% for obese versus 55.6% for nonobese, P = 0.14). After adjusting for baseline differences, obesity was not a significant predictor of global cure (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 1.11; P = 0.10). Obesity was associated with a lower likelihood of microbiological clearance (72.7% versus 91.1%, P = 0.02). No other secondary outcome differences were observed, though each outcome was numerically worse among obese patients. Obesity was not associated with differences in global cure rates. However, the difference in microbiological clearance warrants further investigation.

Survival in Patients with Candida glabrata Bloodstream Infection Is Associated with Fluconazole Dose.

Robust pharmacodynamic indices that align fluconazole dose or exposure with outcomes in invasive candidiasis due to Candida glabrata remain elusive. The purpose of this retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate a cohort of 127 patients with C. glabrata fungemia treated with fluconazole, using adjusted analyses to identify risk factors for 28-day death. No significant correlations were found between fluconazole area under the curve (AUC), AUC/MIC ratio, or MIC and survival. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, however, higher average fluconazole dose (odds ratio [OR], 1.006 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001 to 1.010]; P = 0.008), average fluconazole dose of ≥400 mg (OR, 3.965 [95% CI, 1.509 to 10.418]; P = 0.005), and higher fluconazole dose on day 1 of therapy (OR, 1.007 [95% CI, 1.002 to 1.011]; P = 0.002) were found to be independent predictors of 28-day survival. Additionally, the presence of a central venous catheter at the time of infection was found to be a significant risk factor for death. In conclusion, we found fluconazole dose to be an independent predictor of 28-day survival for patients with C. glabrata fungemia, with doses of ≥400 mg/day being associated with 28-day survival rates approaching 90%. These data indicate the use and efficacy of fluconazole in the treatment of this serious infection. Aggressive dosing appears to be necessary when fluconazole is used for the treatment of C. glabrata fungemia, irrespective of MIC.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Procalcitonin-Guidance Versus Usual Care for Antimicrobial Management in Critically Ill Patients: Focus on Subgroups Based on Antibiotic Initiation, Cessation, or Mixed Strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have evaluated the use of procalcitonin guidance during different phases of antibiotics management (initiation, cessation, or a combination of both) in patients admitted to ICUs. Several meta-analyses have attempted to generate an overall effect of procalcitonin-guidance on patient outcomes. However, combining studies from different phases of antibiotics management may not be appropriate due to the risk of clinical heterogeneity. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of procalcitonin-guided strategies in different phases of antibiotics use. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until November 1, 2017. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated procalcitonin guidance compared with usual care for management of antibiotics in critically ill adult patients. DATA EXTRACTION: We extracted study details, patient characteristics, procalcitonin algorithm, and outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 15 studies, from 1,624 abstracts identified based on our search strategy (three initiation, nine cessation, and three mixed). The pooled risk ratio for short-term mortality for the initiation, cessation, and mixed procalcitonin strategies were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.86-1.15,;p = 0.91), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.98; p = 0.02), and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.80-1.29; p = 0.93), respectively. Procalcitonin for cessation and mixed strategies was associated with decrease antibiotics duration (-1.26 d [p < 0.001] and -3.10 d [p =0.04], respectively). No differences were observed in other outcome measures. CONCLUSION: When evaluating all studies of procalcitonin-guided antibiotics management in critically ill patients, no difference in short-term mortality was observed. However, when only examining procalcitonin-guided cessation of antibiotics, lower mortality was detected. Future studies should focus specifically on procalcitonin for the cessation of antibiotics in critically ill patients.

Inhaled Epoprostenol Through Noninvasive Routes of Ventilator Support Systems.

BACKGROUND: The administration of inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) through noninvasive routes of ventilator support systems has never been previously evaluated. OBJECTIVE: Describe the use of iEPO when administered through noninvasive routes of ventilator support systems. METHODS: Critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit who received iEPO through noninvasive routes were analyzed. Improvements in respiratory status and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated. Safety end points assessed included hypotension, rebound hypoxemia, significant bleeding, and thrombocytopenia. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients received iEPO through noninvasive routes: high-flow oxygen therapy through nasal cannula, n = 29 (81%) and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, n = 7 (19%). Sixteen patients had improvement in their respiratory status: mean decrease in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), 20% ± 13%; mean increase in partial pressure of arterial oxygen to FiO2 (PaO2/FiO2) ratio, 60 ± 50 mm Hg; and mean decrease in HFNC oxygen flow rate, 6 ± 3 liters per minute (LPM). Eight patients had declines in their respiratory status (mean increase in FiO2, 30% ± 20%; mean decrease in PaO2/FiO2 ratio, 38 ± 20 mm Hg; and mean increase in HFNC oxygen flow rate, 15 ± 10 LPM), and 12 patients had no change in their respiratory status. Conclusion and Relevance: This represents the first evaluation of the administration of iEPO through noninvasive routes of ventilator support systems and demonstrates that in critically ill patients, iEPO could be administered through a noninvasive route. Further evaluation is needed to determine the extent of benefit with this route of administration.

Statistics Myth Busters: Dispelling Common Misperceptions Held by Readers of the Biomedical Literature.

Proficiency in research design and statistical analysis is crucial to the success of a clinical pharmacist. However, new pharmacy graduates and residents may not have received adequate training and education in these areas. During the authors' tenure as clinical pharmacists, several statistical "myths" were consistently maintained by residents and new clinical practitioners. The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss and dispel several of these statistical fallacies. The myths discussed involve 3 common areas of consideration when evaluating any clinical study: assessing the risk of bias from confounding (propensity score analysis and multivariable modeling), interpretation of the main study findings ( P values and hypothesis testing), and secondary evaluations (subgroup analyses). Literature examples are used to illustrate each of the topics. The authors hope that the discussion will augment each pharmacist's knowledge of medical literature interpretation leading to improvements in patient care, education of future residents, and personal research endeavors.

Development of an Ambulatory Clinical Pharmacy Prioritization Prediction Model for Patients With Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Health care reform and the projected shortage of primary care physicians necessitate more efficient use of multidisciplinary collaboration. No studies, to date, have evaluated factors associated with treatment success among patients referred to a clinical pharmacist. OBJECTIVE: To develop a prediction model using patient factors to assist in selecting patients with diabetes most likely to benefit from pharmacy interventions. METHODS: A retrospective, nested case-control study was performed. A prediction model using multivariable logistic regression was developed, with model calibration and internal validation. Adult patients with diabetes who had a baseline hemoglobin A1C (A1C) ≥9%, who were consulted for collaborative pharmacy care between July 2009 and July 2014 were included. Success (cases) was defined as a decrease in A1C by 2% or a value of A1C <8% 1 year after the initial visit. Failures were those who did not achieve the A1C goal or were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 544 unique patients were included, with 243 (44.7%) classified as clinical successes and 301 as clinical failures. Independent factors associated with success included past medical history of cerebrovascular accident and higher baseline A1C, whereas use of short-acting insulin and higher number of classes of diabetic medications at baseline corresponded with failure. A prediction model for success using these factors had an optimism-adjusted C-statistics of 0.629, with good calibration. CONCLUSION: Referred patients with diabetes have baseline characteristics that are predictive of clinical success. A predictive model based on those factors performed well and might be utilized to improve pharmacist efficiency in the face of constrained resources.

Engaging in Collaborative Research: Focus on the Pharmacy Practitioner.

Research offers an opportunity for investigators to explore unanswered questions, highlight best practices, and engage in collaboration. Clinical research can engage health care professionals to identify treatments or procedures to enhance patient care, quality of life, and outcomes. Research may also include experiences in a unique practice site or teaching methodology of trainees, staff, or patients. The goal of research is to improve individual patient care via dissemination of knowledge through publications. This article aims to highlight the importance of pharmacist-led research in the academic or community medical center and the need for resident-based research and mentorship for the integration of collaborative research and achievement of organizational goals.

Influence of Colistin Dose on Global Cure in Patients with Bacteremia Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli.

The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) nosocomial infections accounts for increased morbidity and mortality of such infections. Infections with MDR Gram-negative isolates are frequently treated with colistin. Based on recent pharmacokinetic studies, current colistin dosing regimens may result in a prolonged time to therapeutic concentrations, leading to suboptimal and delayed effective treatment. In addition, studies have demonstrated an association between an increased colistin dose and improved clinical outcomes. However, the specific dose at which these outcomes are observed is unknown and warrants further investigation. This retrospective study utilized classification and regression tree (CART) analysis to determine the dose of colistin most predictive of global cure at day 7 of therapy. Patients were assigned to high- and low-dose cohorts based on the CART-established breakpoint. The secondary outcomes included microbiologic outcomes, clinical cure, global cure, lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, and 7- and 28-day mortalities. Additionally, safety outcomes focused on the incidence of nephrotoxicity associated with high-dose colistin therapy. The CART-established breakpoint for high-dose colistin was determined to be >4.4 mg/kg of body weight/day, based on ideal body weight. This study evaluated 127 patients; 45 (35%) received high-dose colistin, and 82 (65%) received low-dose colistin. High-dose colistin was associated with day 7 global cure (40% versus 19.5%; P = 0.013) in bivariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio [OR] = 3.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37 to 8.45; P = 0.008). High-dose colistin therapy was also associated with day 7 clinical cure, microbiologic success, and mortality but not with the development of acute kidney injury. We concluded that high-dose colistin (>4.4 mg/kg/day) is independently associated with day 7 global cure.

Dose Timing of Aminoglycosides in Hemodialysis Patients: A Pharmacology View.

Aminoglycosides for patients undergoing intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) have traditionally been dosed at half the normal dose administered at the end of a hemodialysis session. Several investigations have suggested that administering higher doses preceding or with the initiation of dialysis would more readily optimize pharmacodynamic parameters. However, the selection of an optimal aminoglycoside dosing strategy in patients receiving IHD is complex and requires consideration of numerous factors, precluding a singular approach. By reviewing aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, risks for toxicity and resistance development, and practical considerations, we derive indication- and setting- specific recommendations. We identify some areas (definitive therapy of gram-negative infections in patients receiving predictable hemodialysis sessions, for example) where dosing preceding or with the initiation of dialysis is optimal and feasible, and others (gram-positive synergy, unstable patients with poor/unpredictable vascular access) where postdialysis dosing remains preferred. Finally, given the dearth of data exploring the pharmacodynamics and clinical outcomes of IHD patients receiving aminoglycoside therapy, we identify several key questions in need of investigation.

Impact of combination antimicrobial therapy on mortality risk for critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant bacteremia.

There are limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections. Currently, there are suggestions in the literature that combination therapy should be used, which frequently includes antibiotics to which the causative pathogen demonstrates in vitro resistance. This case-control study evaluated risk factors associated with all-cause mortality rates for critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia. Adult patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit with sepsis and a blood culture positive for Gram-negative bacteria resistant to a carbapenem were included. Patients with polymicrobial, recurrent, or breakthrough infections were excluded. Included patients were classified as survivors (controls) or nonsurvivors (cases) at 30 days after the positive blood culture. Of 302 patients screened, 168 patients were included, of whom 90 patients died (53.6% [cases]) and 78 survived (46.4% [controls]) at 30 days. More survivors received appropriate antibiotics (antibiotics with in vitro activity) than did nonsurvivors (93.6% versus 53.3%; P < 0.01). Combination therapy, defined as multiple appropriate agents given for 48 h or more, was more common among survivors than nonsurvivors (32.1% versus 7.8%; P < 0.01); however, there was no difference in multiple-agent use when in vitro activity was not considered (including combinations with carbapenems) (87.2% versus 80%; P = 0.21). After adjustment for baseline factors with multivariable logistic regression, combination therapy was independently associated with decreased risk of death (odds ratio, 0.19 [95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.56]; P < 0.01). These data suggest that combination therapy with multiple agents with in vitro activity is associated with improved survival rates for critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia. However, that association is lost if in vitro activity is not considered.

Noninferiority of Inhaled Epoprostenol to Inhaled Nitric Oxide for the Treatment of ARDS.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled nitric oxide and inhaled epoprostenol have been evaluated for the management of hypoxemia in acute respiratory distress syndrome, with clinical trials demonstrating comparable improvements in oxygenation. However, these trials have several limitations, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the noninferiority and safety of inhaled epoprostenol compared with inhaled nitric oxide in mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients with a primary outcome of ventilator-free days from day 1 to day 28. METHODS: This was a retrospective, noninterventional, propensity-matched, noninferiority cohort study. Propensity score for receipt of inhaled nitric oxide was developed and patients were matched accordingly using a prespecified algorithm. Secondary objectives included evaluating day 28 intensive care unit-free days, changes in PaO2/FiO2 ratio after inhalation therapy initiation, and hospital mortality. Safety endpoints assessed included hypotension, methemoglobinemia, renal dysfunction, rebound hypoxemia, significant bleeding, and thrombocytopenia. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included, with 47 patients in each group. Patients were well-matched with similar baseline characteristics, except patients in inhaled nitric oxide group had lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Management of ARDS was similar between groups. Mean difference in ventilator-free days between inhaled epoprostenol and inhaled nitric oxide was 2.16 days (95% confidence interval = -0.61 to 4.9), with lower limit of 95% confidence interval greater than the prespecified margin, hence satisfying noninferiority. There were no differences in any secondary or safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled epoprostenol was noninferior to inhaled nitric oxide with regard to ventilator-free days from day 1 to day 28 in ARDS patients.

Real-world experience with echinocandin MICs against Candida species in a multicenter study of hospitals that routinely perform susceptibility testing of bloodstream isolates.

Reference broth microdilution methods of Candida echinocandin susceptibility testing are limited by interlaboratory variability in caspofungin MICs. Recently revised Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoint MICs for echinocandin nonsusceptibility may not be valid for commercial tests employed in hospital laboratories. Indeed, there are limited echinocandin susceptibility testing data from hospital laboratories. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 9 U.S., Australian, and New Zealand hospitals that routinely tested Candida bloodstream isolates for echinocandin susceptibility from 2005 to 2013. Eight hospitals used Sensititre YeastOne assays. The Candida spp. were C. albicans (n=1,067), C. glabrata (n=911), C. parapsilosis (n=476), C. tropicalis (n=185), C. krusei (n=104), and others (n=154). Resistance and intermediate rates were ≤1.4% and ≤3%, respectively, for each echinocandin against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis. Resistance rates among C. glabrata and C. krusei isolates were ≤7.5% and ≤5.6%, respectively. Caspofungin intermediate rates among C. glabrata and C. krusei isolates were 17.8% and 46.5%, respectively, compared to ≤4.3% and ≤4.4% for other echinocandins. Using CLSI breakpoints, 18% and 19% of C. glabrata isolates were anidulafungin susceptible/caspofungin nonsusceptible and micafungin susceptible/caspofungin nonsusceptible, respectively; similar discrepancies were observed for 38% and 39% of C. krusei isolates. If only YeastOne data were considered, interhospital modal MIC variability was low (within 2 doubling dilutions for each agent). In conclusion, YeastOne assays employed in hospitals may reduce the interlaboratory variability in caspofungin MICs against Candida species that are observed between reference laboratories using CLSI broth microdilution methods. The significance of classifying isolates as caspofungin intermediate and anidulafungin/micafungin susceptible will require clarification in future studies.