Adherence to Established Blood Pressure Targets and Associated Complications in Patients Presenting with Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists surrounding systolic blood pressure (SBP) control in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The 2022 American Heart Association and American Stroke Association guidelines recommend targeting a SBP of 140 mm Hg while maintaining the range of 130-150 mm Hg. The current practice at our health system is to titrate antihypertensives to a SBP goal of < 160 mm Hg, which aligns with previous recommendations. We hypothesized that the prior lack of guidance to a specific SBP target range predisposed patients to hypotension leading to an increased risk of brain and renal adverse events. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, single health system cohort study included adults admitted to the neurointensive care unit or intermediate unit with acute ICH from June 2019 to June 2021. The primary objective evaluated the frequency of time within SBP range (140-160 mm Hg) in the first 48 h. Secondary and safety end points included the frequency of time above and below the established SBP range, episodes of hypotension (defined as a decrease in SBP < 140 mm Hg prompting discontinuation in antihypertensive[s] or the initiation of vasopressor[s]), the incidence of new brain or renal adverse events within 7 days, and modified Rankin Scale at discharge. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients (59% men; median age 62 years) were included. The majority of ICHs in this cohort were intraparenchymal (70%). Nearly one third were attributed to systemic hypertension (31%). During the first 48 h of admission, the frequency of time spent above, within, and below the target SBP range were 6 h (12%), 16 h (34%), and 26 h (54%), respectively. Hypotension was associated with renal adverse events (odds ratio [OR] 3.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-11.44, p = 0.023). A relative SBP reduction > 20% in the first 48 h was associated with renal adverse events (OR 8.99, 95% CI 2.57-35.25, p < 0.001), brain ischemia (OR 22.5, 95% CI 1.92-300.11, p = 0.005), and an increased odd of a modified Rankin Scale of 4-6 at discharge (OR 11.79, 95% CI 2.79-57.02, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with nontraumatic/nonaneurysmal ICH, SBP measurements were observed to be < 140 mm Hg for > 50% of the initial 48 h following admission. Hypotension and relative SBP reduction > 20% were also independent predictors of renal adverse events. SBP reduction > 20% was also an independent predictor of brain ischemia. These data indicate that intensive SBP reduction following ICH predispose patients to secondary organ injury that may impact long-term outcomes. Our data suggest that a more modest lowering of the SBP within 48 h, as recommended in the most recent guidelines, may minimize the risk of further adverse events.

Antimicrobial resistance patterns and empiric antibiotic selections for patients admitted from post-acute care facilities.

PURPOSE: To characterize the susceptibilities of positive bacterial cultures and the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial regimens for patients admitted from post-acute care facilities (PACFs). METHODS: This was a retrospective quality improvement study. The study included patients admitted from a PACF to one of 2 tertiary care teaching hospitals within the University of Pennsylvania Health System, located in Philadelphia, PA, from August 2020 to December 2021. Patients were included if they had at least one positive culture within 72 hours of admission. RESULTS: A total of 167 patients and 230 isolates from the study period were evaluated. The majority of positive cultures were from a urinary source (114 of 230, 49.6%). Nineteen patients (11.4%) had a history of multidrug-resistant organisms. The most common empiric antibiotics used were vancomycin (61.7%) and cefepime (59.3%). Sixty-one patients (36.5%) received inappropriate empiric therapy based on the culture results. When comparing our hospitals' general antibiogram to that of only PACF patients, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae had at least a 20% difference in susceptibility to levofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and cefepime. Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase resistance was also higher in the PACF cohort (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-3.1). CONCLUSION: Clinically significant differences in antimicrobial susceptibility were found among patients admitted from PACFs compared to our health system's general antibiogram. The increased resistance rates identified in this study support the need for hospitals to evaluate this at-risk patient population, which may drive changes to empiric antibiotic prescribing practices.

Inadequate prophylaxis in patients with trauma: anti-Xa-guided enoxaparin dosing management in critically ill patients with trauma.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes significant morbidity in patients with trauma despite advances in pharmacologic therapy. Prior literature suggests standard enoxaparin dosing may not achieve target prophylactic anti-Xa levels. We hypothesize that a new weight-based enoxaparin protocol with anti-Xa monitoring for dose titration in critically injured patients is safe and easily implemented. Methods: This prospective observational study included patients with trauma admitted to the trauma intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2021 to September 2022. Enoxaparin dosing was adjusted based on anti-Xa levels as standard of care via a performance improvement initiative. The primary outcome was the proportion of subtarget anti-Xa levels (<0.2 IU/mL) on 30 mg two times per day dosing of enoxaparin. Secondary outcomes included the dosing modifications to attain goal anti-Xa levels, VTE and bleeding events, and hospital and ICU lengths of stay. Results: A total of 282 consecutive patients were included. Baseline demographics revealed a median age of 36 (26-55) years, and 44.7% with penetrating injuries. Of these, 119 (42.7%) achieved a target anti-Xa level on a starting dose of 30 mg two times per day. Dose modifications for subtarget anti-Xa levels were required in 163 patients (57.8%). Of those, 120 underwent at least one dose modification, which resulted in 78 patients (47.8%) who achieved a target level prior to hospital discharge on a higher dose of enoxaparin. Overall, only 69.1% of patients achieved goal anti-Xa level prior to hospital discharge. VTE occurred in 25 patients (8.8%) and major bleeding in 3 (1.1%) patients. Conclusion: A majority of critically injured patients do not meet target anti-Xa levels with 30 mg two times per day enoxaparin dosing. This study highlights the need for anti-Xa-based dose modification and efficacy of a pharmacy-driven protocol. Further optimization is warranted to mitigate VTE events. Level of evidence: Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Perioperative glucocorticoid prescribing habits in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a call for standardization.

IMPORTANCE: High-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) are routinely given to surgical patients with a history of GC exposure to prevent perioperative acute adrenal insufficiency, but this practice is not well supported. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the variability of perioperative GC dosing among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergoing major abdominal surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective study of 49 patients with IBD undergoing colorectal surgery at a single institution between July 2010 and August 2011. Data on patient comorbidities, intraoperative risk factors, surgical site infections, and 30-day readmission rates were prospectively collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Preoperative GC exposure at the time of the index admission and perioperative GC therapy during admission were collected by review of the medical records. Patients were divided into 3 groups at the time of surgery: (1) 1 week or more of prior GC exposure, not receiving maintenance therapy (n = 15); (2) currently receiving budesonide (n = 10); and (3) currently receiving oral prednisone (n = 24). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Perioperative GC exposure was the main outcome. Qualitative comparisons of perioperative exposure stratified by preoperative GC exposure were done. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine significant differences in surgical site infection and 30-day readmission rates among patients with and without perioperative GC exposure. RESULTS: Overall, 38 of 49 patients (78%) received perioperative GCs; intraoperative GCs were administered to 35 of 49 patients (71%), and 33 of 49 patients (67%) received postoperative GCs. Patients received intraoperative and postoperative GCs, respectively, as follows: 8 patients (53%) and 7 (47%) in group 1, 7 (70%) and 3 (30%) in group 2, and 20 (83%) and 23 (96%) in group 3. The median intraoperative GC dose was 100 mg (range, 50-267 mg of hydrocortisone or hydrocortisone equivalent for dexamethasone); the median total postoperative GC dose for the first 5 days after surgery was 485 mg (range, 50-890 mg of hydrocortisone or hydrocortisone equivalent for prednisone). The median duration of postoperative GC administration was 3 days for group 1, 6 days for group 2, and 7 days for group 3. No statistically significant difference in surgical site infection and 30-day readmission rates was detected in the GC exposure vs no-exposure groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Perioperative GC dosing among patients with IBD undergoing colorectal surgery is highly variable even within a single center. Additional studies are needed to define the risk of postoperative adrenal insufficiency and establish standardized practices for perioperative GC therapy, which may have the benefit of reducing GC overuse.