Comparing internal fixation constructs for scapular spine insufficiency fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited research on the surgical management techniques for scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). As such, the purpose of this in vitro biomechanical study was to compare 4 fixation constructs to stabilize scapular spine insufficiency fractures. METHODS: Twelve paired fresh-frozen cadaveric scapulae (N = 24) were randomized into 4 fixation groups: subcutaneous border plating (± hook) and supraspinatus fossa plating (± hook). A Levy type II fracture was simulated. Each specimen was cyclically loaded incrementally up to 700 N in 50 N steps or until failure. Between 50 and 200 N construct stiffness was measured, and stability failure was defined as displacement greater than 2.5 mm. RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent (19 of 24) of the specimens failed before the maximum load of 700 N. The average survival force with subcutaneous border plating was 480 ± 80 N compared with 380 ± 30 N for supraspinatus fossa plating (P = .3). Fixation construct failure was significantly more likely with fossa plating over subcutaneous plating (P = .012). The presence of the lateral plate hook was beneficial in preventing failure of the lateral acromion (P = .016). CONCLUSION: When appropriately surgically indicated, a dorsally applied plate to the subcutaneous border of the scapular spine with a lateral inferior supporting hook may be advantageous for internal fixation of type II scapular spine insufficiency fractures after RTSA.

Effect of Radial Lengthening on Distal Forearm Loading Following Simulated In Vitro Radial Shortening During Simulated Dynamic Wrist Motion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of radial length change on distal forearm loading during simulated dynamic wrist motion. METHODS: A custom-built adjustable radial implant was used to simulate up to 4 mm of distal radius shortening (-4 mm) and 3 mm of lengthening (+3 mm). Load cells were placed in the distal radius and ulna in cadavers to measure their respective axial loads. The specimens were mounted on a wrist motion simulator that produced active wrist motion via tendon actuation. To simulate radial lengthening osteotomy following radial shortening from malunion, the radius was sequentially lengthened by 1-mm intervals from -4 mm to +3 mm. Radial and ulnar loads were measured during simulated wrist flexion, ulnar deviation (UD), and flexion dart throw (DT) at each interval of radial lengthening up to +3 mm. RESULTS: During wrist flexion and UD, for each millimeter of radial lengthening from -4 mm to the native length, there was a significant increase in distal radial loads. No significant change in radial load was observed beyond the native length during flexion and UD. There was no change in distal radial loads during DT for each interval of radial lengthening from -4 mm to +3 mm. A sequential decrease in ulnar loads was observed as the radius was lengthened from -4 mm to +3 mm for all wrist motions evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Radial lengthening beyond the native length was not detrimental to radial loading and further reduced distal ulnar loading; achieving at least native ulnar variance seems to be appropriate to restore normal biomechanical loading based on this in vitro study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lengthening of the radius beyond native variance in the setting of ulnar impaction syndrome, distal radius malunion, or distal radioulnar instability may not result in excessive loading of the distal radius and further reduces loading on the distal ulna. Surgeons should obtain contralateral wrist x-rays to serve as a template when performing distal radius osteotomies.

An In Vitro Study to Determine the Effect of Ulnar Shortening on Distal Forearm Loading During Wrist and Forearm Motion: Implications in the Treatment of Ulnocarpal Impaction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of ulnar shortening on distal forearm loading following simulated dynamic motion. METHODS: Ulnar shortening was simulated using a custom-built adjustable implant to simulate up to 4 mm of ulnar shortening (-4 mm) in 9 cadaveric extremities. Load cells were placed in the distal ulna and radius to quantify axial loading. Using a wrist and forearm motion simulator, absolute and percentage loads were measured during dynamic flexion, ulnar deviation (UD), flexion dart throw (DT), and pronation. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in absolute and percentage distal ulnar loads at each interval of ulnar shortening during flexion, UD, DT, and pronation. The distal ulna bore no compressive loads, and in fact, tensile loads were measured in the ulna at 2 mm of ulnar shortening during DT and pronation, at 3 mm during flexion, and at 4 mm during UD. CONCLUSIONS: A progressive decrease in distal ulnar loads with generation of tensile loads was observed with sequential ulnar shortening. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ulnar shortening greater than 2 mm can result in tensile loading in the distal ulna. When managing ulnar impaction syndrome, excessive shortening may not be required to provide relief of symptoms.

Comparison of proximal humeral bone stresses between stemless, short stem, and standard stem length: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: The stem lengths of humeral components used in shoulder arthroplasty vary; however, the literature on these devices is limited. This finite element study investigates the effect of humeral component length on stresses in the proximal humerus. METHODS: Intact and 3 reconstructed (standard length, short, and stemless implants) finite element models were created from shoulder computed tomography scan data (N = 5). Loading was simulated at varying abduction angles (15°, 45°, and 75°). The average bone stress (represented as a percentage of intact values) was reported at 8 transverse slices. In addition, the overall average change in cortical and trabecular bone stresses was quantified. RESULTS: Cortical bone stresses in the most proximal slice for the standard (58% ± 12%) and short (78% ± 10%) stem models were significantly reduced compared with the intact (100%) and stemless (101% ± 6%) models (P = .005). These reductions persisted in the second cortical slice for the standard stem compared with the intact, stemless, and short models (P = .025). Interestingly, stresses in the trabecular bone within these proximal slices were significantly elevated when stemless implants were used compared with all other implants (P < .001), regardless of abduction angle. CONCLUSION: Reducing stem length produced humeral stresses that more closely matched the intact stress distribution in proximal cortical bone. Opposing trends presented in the proximal trabecular bone, probably because of differences in load transfer when shorter stems are used. Accordingly, the results suggest that implant stem length is 1 variable that can be modified in an attempt to better mimic intact bone stresses during humeral component insertion, provided stem fixation is adequate.

Mixed reality visualization in shoulder arthroplasty: is it better than traditional preoperative planning software?

BACKGROUND: Preoperative traditional software planning (TSP) is a method used to assist surgeons with implant selection and glenoid guide-pin insertion in shoulder arthroplasty. Mixed-Reality (MR) is a new technology that uses digital holograms of the preoperative plan and guide-pin trajectory projected into the operative field. The purpose of this study was to compare TSP to MR in a simulated surgical environment involving insertion of guide-pins into models of severely deformed glenoids. METHODS: Eight surgeons inserted guide-pins into eight randomized three-dimensional-printed severely eroded glenoid models in a simulated surgical environment using either TSP or MR. In total, 128 glenoid models were used and statistically compared. The outcomes compared between techniques included procedural time, difference in guide-pin start point, difference in version and inclination, and surgeon confidence via a confidence rating scale. RESULTS: When comparing traditional preoperative software planning to MR visualization as techniques to assist surgeons in glenoid guide pin insertion, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of mean procedure time (P=0.634), glenoid start-point (TSP = 2.2 ± 0.2 mm , MR = 2.1 ± 0.1 mm; P=0.760), guide-pin orientation (P=0.586), or confidence rating score (P=0.850). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that there were no significant differences between traditional preoperative software planning and MR visualization for guide-pin placement into models of eroded glenoids. A perceived benefit of MR is the real-time intraoperative visibility of the surgical plan and the patient's anatomy; however, this did not translate into decreased procedural time or improved guide-pin position. Level of evidence: Basic Science Study; Biomechanics.

How Much Scaphoid Can be Safely Resected? A Biomechanical Analysis of the Effects of Distal Scaphoid Resection.

BACKGROUND: Resection of the distal pole of the scaphoid has been advocated as a simple alternative to other wrist salvage procedures for scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse and scaphotrapezio-trapezoid arthritis. However, the extent of scaphoid that may be resected without adversely affecting carpal kinematics has never been clearly defined. METHODS: Seven cadaveric upper extremities were tested in a custom motion wrist simulator. A 3-stage sequential sectioning of the distal scaphoid protocol was performed in 25% increments then cyclic active wrist flexion-extension and dart thrower's motion trials were recorded. RESULTS: The extent of distal scaphoid resection had no effect on overall wrist range of motion. The lunate assumed a more extended position following resection of the distal scaphoid compared to intact. At 25%, 50%, and 75% of distal scaphoid resection, the lunate extended to 13.32° ± 9.4°, 23.43° ± 7.5°, and 15.81° ± 16.9°, respectively. The capitate migrated proximally with 25% and 50% distal scaphoidectomy, and proximally and radially with 75% of the scaphoid resected. Resection of 75% of the scaphoid resulted in unstable wrist kinematics. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of up to 25% of the distal scaphoid did not significantly influence carpal kinematics and induced mild lunate extension deformity. Resection of 50% of the scaphoid induced further and potentially clinically significant lunate extension and dorsal intercalated segment instability. Further removal of 75% of the distal scaphoid induced capitate migration radially and unpredictable wrist kinematics. Consequently, removal of over 25% of the scaphoid should be avoided or supplemented with partial wrist fusion.

Loading at the distal radius and ulna during active simulated dart throw motion.

Loading at the distal forearm during dart throw motion (DTM) has been examined under static loads but there is no consensus on how loading is affected by active motion. In this work two implants were designed to measure forearm loading in a cadaveric model of wrist motion. Loads through the radius and ulna were significantly greater in reverse DTM than forward DTM. Radius loads were greatest in extended and radial deviated positions, and ulnar loads were greatest in flexed and ulnar deviated position. This work gives insight into the biomechanics of loading of the forearm to guide further studies.

The effect of humeral polyethylene insert constraint on reverse shoulder arthroplasty biomechanics.

BACKGROUND: There is little information on the effects of altering reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) polyethylene constraint on joint load, load angle and deltoid force. The present biomechanical study aimed to investigate the effects of changing RSA polyethylene constraint on joint load, load angle, deltoid force and range of motion. METHODS: A custom RSA implant capable of measuring forces across the joint with varying polyethylene constraint was tested in six cadaveric shoulders. Standard-, low- and high-constraint (retentive) polyethylene liners were tested, and joint kinematics, loads and muscle forces were recorded. RESULTS: When polyethylene constraint was altered, joint load and load angle during active abduction were not affected significantly (p > 0.19). Additionally, the force required by the deltoid for active abduction was not affected significantly by cup constraint (p = 0.144). Interestingly, active abduction range of motion was also not affected significantly by changes in cup constraint (p > 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Altering polyethylene cup constraint in RSA to enhance stability does not significantly alter resultant joint loads and deltoid forces. Surprisingly, terminal abduction range of motion was also not significantly different with varying cup constraint, indicating that terminal impingement may be tuberosity related rather than polyethylene.