RESUMO
Objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a wide spectrum of clinical severity. A cytokine storm is associated with COVID-19 severity. Of these, IL-6 is significantly associated with higher mortality and is also a marker for predicting disease prognosis. IL-6 may act as a target for therapeutics and, a blockade of IL-6 function by Tocilizumab has been described as a treatment of the inflammatory process COVID-19-related. This study aims to describe our experience comparing two different methods, in detail Human IL-6 Instant ELISA and the Elecsys IL-6 based on ECLIA, for the IL-6 assessment. Design and methods: IL-6 levels from serum samples of 104 COVID-19 patients, admitted to the AOU Careggi (Hospital in Florence -Italy), were assessed by using the two above-mentioned methods, and the results were analysed through Passing-Bablok regression fit and Bland-Altman plot. Results: The regression exhibited a linear relation between the methods with a regression equation (y = - 0.13 + 0.63 x; 95 % C.I. intercept = - 0.13 to 4.55; 95 % C.I. slope = 1.03 to 1.26 with R2 = 0.89, p > 0.05), showing a positive slope. The agreement of the two methods reported a bias of -25.0 pg/mL. Thus, the two methods correlate but do not agree in terms of numeric results. Conclusions: The two assays showed good comparability. However, because of the extremely wide linear range of the ECLIA, its throughput and its capacity for immune profiling, it represents an interesting emerging technology in the immunology field.
RESUMO
Introduction: Recently, a flow cytometric (FC) based test has been developed for detection of circulating fetal cells to replace the less accurate and reproducible Kleihauer-Betke test.FC test is easier to perform, it can distinguish the origin of fetal cells, but it is expensive and available in highly specialized laboratories. We evaluated the introduction of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) approach as initial screening to identify patients who need an additional FC test to better discriminate the nature of haemoglobin-F (HbF) positive cells. Methods: Blood samples from 130 pregnant women suspected to have fetomaternal haemorrhage were analysed with HPLC and FC methods. The cut-off for HbF HPLC concentration was calculated. Statistical analyses for the evaluation of HPLC as a screening method were performed. The positivity cut-off of HbF to be used as decision-making value to continue the investigation was calculated. Results: An excellent agreement (R2 > 0.90) was observed between the percentage of HbF obtained by HPLC and the percentage of fetal cells detected by FC. Results obtained from each assay were compared to define the HPLC threshold below which it is not necessary to continue the investigations, confirming the maternal nature of the HbF positive cells detected. Our study demonstrated that a cut-off of 1.0 % HbF obtained by HPLC was associated with the lowest rate of false negative results in our patient cohort. Conclusions: This study provides a new FMH investigation approach that possibly leads to a reduction in times and costs of the analysis.