Absolute oral bioavailability and metabolic turnover of ß-sitosterol in healthy subjects.

The metabolic turnover, absolute oral bioavailability, clearance, and volume of distribution for ß-sitosterol were measured in healthy subjects. [(14)C]ß-Sitosterol was used as an isotopic tracer to distinguish pulse doses from dietary sources and was administered by both oral and intravenous routes. The administered doses of [(14)C]ß-sitosterol were in the region of 3 to 4 µg, sufficiently low as not to perturb the kinetics of ß-sitosterol derived from the diet. Because the plasma concentrations of [(14)C]ß-sitosterol arising from such low doses were anticipated to be very low, the ultrasensitive isotope ratio analytical method of accelerator mass spectrometry was used. The limit of quantification for [(14)C]ß-sitosterol was approximately 0.1 pg/ml, the oral absolute bioavailability was just 0.41%, clearance was 85 ml/h, volume of distribution was 46 L, and the turnover was 5.8 mg/day. Given the steady-state concentrations of ß-sitosterol (2.83 µg/ml), then the dietary load was calculated to be approximately 1400 mg/day.

A pharmacokinetic evaluation of five H(1) antagonists after an oral and intravenous microdose to human subjects.

AIMS: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of five H(1) receptor antagonists in human volunteers after a single oral and intravenous (i.v.) microdose (0.1 mg). METHODS: Five H(1) receptor antagonists, namely NBI-1, NBI-2, NBI-3, NBI-4 and diphenhydramine, were administered to human volunteers as a single 0.1-mg oral and i.v. dose. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h, and the parent compound in the plasma extract was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography and accelerator mass spectroscopy. RESULTS: The median clearance (CL), apparent volume of distribution (V(d)) and apparent terminal elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of diphenhydramine after an i.v. microdose were 24.7 l h(-1), 302 l and 9.3 h, and the oral C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) were 0.195 ng ml(-1) and 1.52 ng h ml(-1), respectively. These data were consistent with previously published diphenhydramine data at 500 times the microdose. The rank order of oral bioavailability of the five compounds was as follows: NBI-2 > NBI-1 > NBI-3 > diphenhydramine > NBI-4, whereas the rank order for CL was NBI-4 > diphenhydramine > NBI-1 > NBI-3 > NBI-2. CONCLUSIONS: Human microdosing provided estimates of clinical PK of four structurally related compounds, which were deemed useful for compound selection.

Positron emission tomography for use in microdosing studies.

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using microdoses of radiolabeled drug tracers is gaining increasing acceptance in modern clinical drug development. This approach is unique in that it allows for direct quantitative assessment of drug concentrations in the tissues targeted for treatment, thereby bridging the gap between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Current applications of PET in anticancer, anti-infective and central nervous system drug research are reviewed herein. Situated at the interface of preclinical and clinical drug testing, PET microdosing is a powerful and highly innovative tool for pharmaceutical development.

Biomedical accelerator mass spectrometry: recent applications in metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND: Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) is a sensitive isotope ratio technique used in drug development that allows for small levels of 14C-drug to be administered to humans, thereby removing regulatory hurdles associated with radiotracer studies. AMS uses innovative study designs to obtain pharmacokinetic and metabolism data. OBJECTIVE: This review addresses the metabolism and pharmacokinetics relevant to cases where therapeutic drug concentrations are achieved in humans. METHODS: The review focuses on two study designs: i) administration of tracer 14C-drug intravenously with a simultaneous non-labelled extravascular therapeutic dose to obtain the pharmacokinetic parameters of clearance, volume of distribution and absolute bioavailability without extensive intravenous toxicology safety studies or formulation development; and ii) use of low levels of 14C-drug during Phase I studies to investigate the quantitative metabolism of the drug in humans early in drug development, as required by the new FDA guideline issued in February 2008. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Early knowledge about a drug's clearance, volume of distribution, absolute bioavailability and metabolism can affect the development of a new drug candidate.

The utility of microdosing over the past 5 years.

BACKGROUND: Microdosing studies (human Phase 0) are used to select drug candidates for Phase I clinical trials on the basis of their pharmacokinetic properties, using subpharmacologic doses (maximum 100 microg). There are questions as to whether pharmacokinetic data obtained at these low doses will predict those at the clinically relevant dose. OBJECTIVE: To review the current literature on microdosing and assess how well microdose data have predicted the pharmacokinetics obtained at a therapeutic dose. METHODS: All data published in the peer reviewed literature comparing pharmacokinetics at a microdose with a therapeutic dose were reviewed, excluding those studies aimed at imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 18 drugs reported, 15 demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics within a factor of 2 between a microdose and a therapeutic dose. Therefore, data that support the utility of microdosing are beginning to emerge.

Big physics, small doses: the use of AMS and PET in human microdosing of development drugs.

The process of early clinical drug development has changed little over the past 20 years despite an up to 40% failure rate associated with inappropriate drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics of candidate molecules. A new method of obtaining human metabolism data known as microdosing has been developed which will permit smarter candidate selection by taking investigational drugs into humans earlier. Microdosing depends on the availability of two ultrasensitive 'big-physics' techniques: positron emission tomography (PET) can provide pharmacodynamic information, whereas accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) provides pharmacokinetic information. Microdosing allows safer human studies as well as reducing the use of animals in preclinical toxicology.

Use of microdosing to predict pharmacokinetics at the therapeutic dose: experience with 5 drugs.

OBJECTIVES: A volunteer trial was performed to compare the pharmacokinetics of 5 drugs--warfarin, ZK253 (Schering), diazepam, midazolam, and erythromycin--when administered at a microdose or pharmacologic dose. Each compound was chosen to represent a situation in which prediction of pharmacokinetics from either animal or in vitro studies (or both) was or is likely to be problematic. METHODS: In a crossover design volunteers received (1) 1 of the 5 compounds as a microdose labeled with radioactive carbon (carbon 14) (100 microg), (2) the corresponding (14)C-labeled therapeutic dose on a separate occasion, and (3) simultaneous administration of an intravenous (14)C-labeled microdose and an oral therapeutic dose for ZK253, midazolam, and erythromycin. Analysis of (14)C-labeled drugs in plasma was done by use of HPLC followed by accelerator mass spectrometry. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure plasma concentrations of ZK253, midazolam, and erythromycin at therapeutic concentrations, whereas HPLC-accelerator mass spectrometry was used to measure warfarin and diazepam concentrations. RESULTS: Good concordance between microdose and therapeutic dose pharmacokinetics was observed for diazepam (half-life [t((1/2))] of 45.1 hours, clearance [CL] of 1.38 L/h, and volume of distribution [V] of 90.1 L for 100 microg and t((1/2)) of 35.7 hours, CL of 1.3 L/h, and V of 123 L for 10 mg), midazolam (t((1/2)) of 4.87 hours, CL of 21.2 L/h, V of 145 L, and oral bioavailability [F] of 0.23 for 100 microg and t((1/2)) of 3.31 hours, CL of 20.4 L/h, V of 75 L, and F of 0.22 for 7.5 mg), and development compound ZK253 (F = <1% for both 100 microg and 50 mg). For warfarin, clearance was reasonably well predicted (0.17 L/h for 100 microg and 0.26 L/h for 5 mg), but the discrepancy observed in distribution (67 L for 100 microg and 17.9 L for 5 mg) was probably a result of high-affinity, low-capacity tissue binding. The oral microdose of erythromycin failed to provide detectable plasma levels as a result of possible acid lability in the stomach. Absolute bioavailability for the 3 compounds examined yielded excellent concordance with data from the literature or data generated in house. CONCLUSION: Overall, when used appropriately, microdosing offers the potential to aid in early drug candidate selection.

The use of isotopes in the determination of absolute bioavailability of drugs in humans.

Absolute bioavailability studies in humans are not routinely performed as part of the drug registration process. They tend to be reasonably demanding, not least because toxicology data are required to support intravenous administration of a drug. Moreover, the classical crossover design of an absolute bioavailability study can suffer from artefacts caused by concentration-dependent pharmacokinetics. Many of the problems associated with absolute bioavailability studies can be alleviated using isotopically labelled drugs. Stable isotopes have been used in the performance of absolute bioavailability studies in humans for > 30 years. More recently, the advantages of using radiolabelled drugs have been expanded by using the ultrasensitive technology of accelerator mass spectrometry. Isotopic labelling not only allows for the accurate and efficient determination of absolute bioavailability, but can also provide information on first-pass effects and other pharmacokinetic parameters.

Approaches to intravenous clinical pharmacokinetics: Recent developments with isotopic microtracers.

Obtaining pharmacokinetic data from the intravenous route for drugs intended for oral administration has traditionally been expensive and time consuming because of the toxicology requirements and challenges in intravenous formulations. Such studies are necessary, however, particularly when regulator agencies request absolute bioavailability data. A method has emerged whereby the drug administered intravenously is isotopically labeled and dosed at a maximum of 100 µg concomitantly with an oral administration given at a therapeutically relevant level. The intravenous administration has been termed a microtracer and obviates intravenous toxicology requirements as well as simplifying formulations. The study design also essentially removes issues of nonlinear pharmacokinetics that may occur when oral and intravenous doses are administered separately. This review examines the methodology and the literature to date, including those studies intended for regulatory submission. The method has been extended to the study of prodrug-to-active drug kinetics and to obtaining clearance, volume of distribution, and absolute bioavailability at steady-state conditions.

The application of accelerator mass spectrometry to absolute bioavailability studies in humans: simultaneous administration of an intravenous microdose of 14C-nelfinavir mesylate solution and oral nelfinavir to healthy volunteers.

The absolute bioavailability of nelfinavir was determined in 6 healthy volunteers following simultaneous administration of 1250 mg oral nelfinavir and an intravenous infusion of (14)C-nelfinavir mesylate on day 1 and at steady state. Nelfinavir oral bioavailability decreased from 0.88 to 0.47 over the 11-day study period. The moderate bioavailability of nelfinavir was due to significant first-pass metabolism rather than low absorption, limiting the potential of formulation improvement to decrease pill burden. Human absolute bioavailability studies with accelerator mass spectrometry microdosing, in which an intravenous microdose is given along with a conventional oral dose of the same drug, can differentiate between gastrointestinal absorption and the first-pass metabolism of new drug candidates. Accelerator mass spectrometry allowed a several thousand-fold dose reduction of (14)C-nelfinavir relative to that required for liquid scintillation counting. Accelerator mass spectrometry microdosing reduces potential safety issues around dosing radioactivity to humans and prevents the need to formulate high intravenous doses.

The use of accelerator mass spectrometry to obtain early human ADME/PK data.

There is an increasing recognition within the pharmaceutical industry of the importance of the ADME studies in drug registration. Consequently, there has been a drive in recent times to conduct the ADME studies as early as possible in the development programme. There are, however, regulatory barriers, particularly in the administration of radiotracers to human volunteers, which place limitations on the timing of the ADME studies. Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), a technology new to the pharmaceutical industry, is an ultrasensitive technique for measuring tracers such as (14)C. Using AMS, it is possible to lower the radioactive dose administered to humans to a point where many regulatory authorities consider it insignificant. With the removal of the regulatory hurdles, ADME data can be obtained much earlier in the development process. Tracers such as (14)C can be administered in minute amounts in the first in man studies (Phase I), or even in a preregulatory study known as microdosing (or human Phase 0). AMS also enables other studies such as absolute bioavailability to be conducted earlier if required.

The expanding utility of microdosing.

The concept of microdosing has been around for more than a decade. It consists of the subpharmacologic administration of an investigational drug (1% of the pharmacologic dose or 100 µg, whichever is lower) to human subjects to attain pre-phase 1 pharmacokinetics (PK) in humans. The major concern with microdosing has been the potential for nonlinear PK between doses, but methods are emerging to evaluate the potential for nonlinear PK prior to conducting a study. Currently, approximately 80% of drugs tested by the oral route and 100% by the intravenous route have exhibited scalable PK between a microdose and a therapeutic dose (within a factor of 2). Over the past few years microdosing has found utility in pediatrics, protein-based therapeutics, and a new application known as intra-arterial microdosing that focuses more on localized pharmacodynamics than PK. Compared with other PK predictive methods, such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, allometry, and in vitro-in vivo extrapolation, microdosing appears to provide a significantly better understanding of PK prior to phase 1, albeit within what is currently a limited database.

A historical perspective on radioisotopic tracers in metabolism and biochemistry.

Radioisotopes are used routinely in the modern laboratory to trace and quantify a myriad of biochemical processes. The technique has a captivating history peppered with groundbreaking science and with more than its share of Nobel Prizes. The discovery of radioactivity at the end of the 19th century paved the way to understanding atomic structure and quickly led to the use of radioisotopes to trace the fate of molecules as they flowed through complex organic life. The 1940s saw the first radiotracer studies using homemade instrumentation and analytical techniques such as paper chromatography. This article follows the history of radioisotopic tracers from meager beginnings, through to the most recent applications. The author hopes that those researchers involved in radioisotopic tracer studies today will pause to remember the origins of the technique and those who pioneered this fascinating science.

Chemical toxins and body defences.

Without realising it, we are all exposed to a wide range of toxins every day. Some are a natural part of our diet and environment and some are man-made. Over evolutionary time, biochemical pathways are developed that have allowed our bodies to cope with this onslaught. It is only in recent times, however, that we have really begun to understand how these mechanisms work.

Microdosing and drug development: past, present and future.

INTRODUCTION: Microdosing is an approach to early drug development where exploratory pharmacokinetic data are acquired in humans using inherently safe sub-pharmacologic doses of drug. The first publication of microdose data was 10 years ago and this review comprehensively explores the microdose concept from conception, over the past decade, up until the current date. AREAS COVERED: The authors define and distinguish the concept of microdosing from similar approaches. The authors review the ability of microdosing to provide exploratory pharmacokinetics (concentration-time data) but exclude microdosing using positron emission tomography. The article provides a comprehensive review of data within the peer-reviewed literature as well as the latest applications and a look into the future, towards where microdosing may be headed. EXPERT OPINION: Evidence so far suggests that microdosing may be a better predictive tool of human pharmacokinetics than alternative methods and combination with physiologically based modelling may lead to much more reliable predictions in the future. The concept has also been applied to drug-drug interactions, polymorphism and assessing drug concentrations over time at its site of action. Microdosing may yet have more to offer in unanticipated directions and provide benefits that have not been fully realised to date.

Predicting drug candidate victims of drug-drug interactions, using microdosing.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this crossover human male volunteer study was to investigate the utility of microdosing in the investigation of drug-drug interactions. METHODS: A mixture of midazolam, tolbutamide, caffeine and fexofenadine were administered as a microdose (25 µg each) before and after administration of a combined pharmacological dose of ketoconazole (400 mg) and fluvoxamine (100 mg) to inhibit P-glycoprotein and metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. RESULTS: When administered alone, pharmacokinetics for all four microdosed compounds scaled well with those reported for therapeutic doses and with previously performed microdose studies. The pharmacokinetics of each compound administered as a microdose were significantly altered after the administration of ketoconazole and fluvoxamine, showing statistically significant (p < 0.01) 12.8-, 8.1- and 3.2-fold increases in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) for midazolam, caffeine and fexofenadine, respectively. A 1.8-fold increase (not statistically significant) in AUC(∞) was observed for tolbutamide. The changes in pharmacokinetics mediated by ketoconazole and fluvoxamine were quantitatively consistent with previously reported, non-microdose, drug-drug interaction data from studies including the same compounds. CONCLUSION: The initial data reported here demonstrate the utility of microdosing to investigate the risk of development drugs being victims of drug-drug interactions.

Meeting the MIST regulations: human metabolism in Phase I using AMS and a tiered bioanalytical approach.

The metabolites in safety testing and ICH-M3 guidance documents emphasize the importance of metabolites when considering safety aspects for new drugs. Both guidances state that relevant metabolites should have safety coverage in humans (although the guidelines have different definitions of relevant metabolites). Not having safety coverage for important metabolites in humans may cause significant delay in the overall pharmaceutical development program. This article discusses the regulatory background regarding safety and metabolites, as well as outlines an integrated strategy taken by one pharmaceutical company, Lundbeck A/S. Lundbeck uses metabolite exposure data from first-in-man studies, obtained using an accelerator MS approach followed by a two-tiered bioanalytical investigation. This enables early availability of key data on this aspect and, overall, represents a powerful risk mitigation strategy.

AMS method validation for quantitation in pharmacokinetic studies with concomitant extravascular and intravenous administration.

A technique has emerged in the past few years that has enabled a drug's intravenous pharmacokinetics to be readily obtained in humans without having to conduct extensive toxicology studies by this route of administration or expand protracted effort in formulation. The technique involves the intravenous administration of a low dose of (14)C-labelled drug (termed a tracer dose) concomitantly with a non-labelled extravascular dose given at therapeutically levels. Plasma samples collected over time are analysed to determine the total parent drug concentration by LC-MS (which essentially measures that arising from the oral dose) and by LC followed by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) to determine the (14)C-drug concentration (i.e., that arising from the intravenous dose). There are currently no published accounts of how the principles of bioanalytical validation might be applied to intravenous studies using AMS as an analytical technique. The authors describe the primary elements of AMS when used with LC separation and how this off-line technique differs from LC-MS. They then discuss how the principles of bioanalytical validation might be applied to determine selectivity, accuracy, precision and stability of methods involving LC followed by AMS analysis.

An AMS method to determine analyte recovery from pharmacokinetic studies with concomitant extravascular and intravenous administration.

The absolute bioavailability, clearance and volume of distribution of a drug can be investigated by administering a very low dose of the (14)C-drug intravenously along with a therapeutic nonlabeled dose by the extravascular route (typically orally). The total drug concentration is measured by an assay such as LC-MS and the (14)C-drug is measured by accelerator MS (AMS). In another article in this issue, a method validation is proposed where AMS was used as the analytical assay. Part of the validation is to assess the recovery of the analyte being measured as this has a direct impact on its quantification. In this article, a method of internal standardisation is described where the UV response of the nonlabeled analyte, spiked in excess into the matrix being analysed, is used for internal standardization. The method allows for the recovery of analyte to be measured in each individual sample being analysed. It is important to know the recovery of a (14)C-labeled analyte when determining its mass concentration from (14)C:(12)C isotopic ratio data using AMS. A method is reported in this article that utilizes the UV response of the nonlabeled drug for internal standardization, so that the recovery for each individual sample analyzed can be ascertained.

A combined accelerator mass spectrometry-positron emission tomography human microdose study with 14C- and 11C-labelled verapamil.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In microdose studies, the pharmacokinetic profile of a drug in blood after administration of a dose up to 100 µg is measured with sensitive analytical techniques, such as accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). As most drugs exert their effect in tissue rather than blood, methodology is needed for extending pharmacokinetic analysis to different tissue compartments. In the present study, we combined, for the first time, AMS analysis with positron emission tomography (PET) in order to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of the model drug verapamil in plasma and brain of humans. In order to assess pharmacokinetic dose linearity of verapamil, data were acquired and compared after administration of an intravenous microdose and after an intravenous microdose administered concomitantly with an oral therapeutic dose. METHODS: Six healthy male subjects received an intravenous microdose [0.05 mg] (period 1) and an intravenous microdose administered concomitantly with an oral therapeutic dose [80 mg] of verapamil (period 2) in a randomized, crossover, two-period study design. The intravenous dose was a mixture of (R/S)-[14C]verapamil and (R)-[11C]verapamil and the oral dose was unlabelled racaemic verapamil. Brain distribution of radioactivity was measured with PET whereas plasma pharmacokinetics of (R)- and (S)-verapamil were determined with AMS. PET data were analysed by pharmacokinetic modelling to estimate the rate constants for transfer (k) of radioactivity across the blood-brain barrier. RESULTS: Most pharmacokinetic parameters of (R)- and (S)-verapamil as well as parameters describing exchange of radioactivity between plasma and brain (influx rate constant [K(1)] = 0.030 ± 0.003 and 0.031 ± 0.005 mL/mL/min and efflux rate constant [k(2)] = 0.099 ± 0.006 and 0.095 ± 0.008 min-1 for period 1 and 2, respectively) were not statistically different between the two periods although there was a trend for nonlinear pharmacokinetics for the (R)-enantiomer. On the other hand, all pharmacokinetic parameters (except for the terminal elimination half-life [t1/2;)]) differed significantly between the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers for both periods. The maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 24 hours (AUC(24)) and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞)) were higher and the total clearance (CL), volume of distribution (V(d)) and volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)) were lower for the (R)- than for the (S)-enantiomer. CONCLUSION: Combining AMS and PET microdosing allows long-term pharmacokinetic data along with information on drug tissue distribution to be acquired in the same subjects thus making it a promising approach to maximize data output from a single clinical study.