Positive Airway Pressure Adherence, Mortality, and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Sleep Apnea.

Rationale: Randomized controlled trials showed no effect of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on cardiovascular (CV) risk. However, patient selection and low PAP adherence preclude the generalization of their data to clinical samples. Objectives: To evaluate the association between hours of PAP use, mortality, and CV morbidity in real-life conditions. Methods: Data from the Pays de la Loire Cohort were linked to health administrative data to identify incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; a composite outcome of mortality, stroke, and cardiac diseases) in patients with OSA who were prescribed PAP. Cox proportional hazards analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between MACEs and quartiles of average daily PAP use over the study period. Measurements and Main Results: After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, 961 of 5,138 patients experienced MACEs. Considering nonadherent patients (0-4 h/night) as the reference group, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for MACEs were 0.87 (0.73-1.04) for the 4-6 h/night group, 0.75 (0.62-0.92) for the 6-7 h/night group, and 0.78 (0.65-0.93) for the ⩾7 h/night group (P = 0.0130). Sensitivity analyses using causal inference approaches confirmed the association of PAP use with MACEs. The association was stronger in male patients (P value for interaction = 0.0004), patients without overt CV disease at diagnosis (P < 0.0001), and those belonging to the excessively sleepy symptom subtype (P = 0.060). Conclusions: These real-life clinical data demonstrate a dose-response relationship between PAP adherence and incident MACEs in OSA. Patient support programs may help improve PAP adherence and CV outcomes in patients with OSA.

Cancer risk in patients with sleep apnoea following adherent 5-year CPAP therapy.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) contributes to cancer risk; however, limited data are available on the impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy on cancer incidence. We aimed to determine whether adherence to CPAP therapy is associated with a reduction in all-cancer incidence compared with nonadherent patients with OSA. METHODS: The study relied on data collected by the multicentre Pays de la Loire Sleep Cohort study, linked to health administrative data, so as to identify new-onset cancer. We included patients who were prescribed CPAP for OSA, with no history of cancer before the diagnostic sleep study or during the first year of CPAP. Patients with documented CPAP use for ≥4 h per night were defined as adherent. Those who discontinued or used CPAP <4 h per night constituted the nonadherent group. A propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed to assess the effect of CPAP adherence on cancer risk. RESULTS: After a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 5.4 (3.1-8.0) years, 437 (9.7%) out of 4499 patients developed cancer: 194 (10.7%) in the nonadherent group (n=1817) and 243 (9.1%) in adherent patients (n=2682). The final weighted model showed no significant impact of CPAP adherence on all-cause cancer risk (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.78-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to CPAP therapy in OSA patients was not associated with a reduction in all-cancer incidence. Whether adherent CPAP therapy of OSA might reduce the risk of specific cancer sites should be further evaluated.

Tracheal Sound Analysis.

Tracheal sound sensors provide multiple respiratory signals that are valuable for studying upper airway characteristics. This chapter reviews the original work and ongoing research on tracheal sound analysis in relation to upper airway obstruction during sleep. Past and current research suggest that being associated with other sleep study recording sensors and advanced signal processing techniques, tracheal sound analysis can extensively contribute to the diagnosis and assessment of sleep-disordered breathing.

Bilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation for treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnoea.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) decreases obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity via genioglossus muscle activation and decreased upper airway collapsibility. This study assessed the safety and effectiveness at 6 months post-implantation of a novel device delivering bilateral HNS via a small implanted electrode activated by a unit worn externally, to treat OSA: the Genio™ system. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, non-randomised, single-arm treatment study was conducted at eight centres in three countries (Australia, France and the UK). Primary outcomes were incidence of device-related serious adverse events and change in the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI). The secondary outcome was the change in the 4% oxygen desaturation index (ODI). Additional outcomes included measures of sleepiness, quality of life, snoring and device use. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03048604. RESULTS: 22 out of 27 implanted participants (63% male, aged 55.9±12.0 years, body mass index (BMI) 27.4±3.0 kg·m-2) completed the protocol. At 6 months BMI was unchanged (p=0.85); AHI decreased from 23.7±12.2 to 12.9±10.1 events·h-1, a mean change of 10.8 events·h-1 (p<0.001); and ODI decreased from 19.1±11.2 to 9.8±6.9 events·h-1, a mean change of 9.3 events·h-1 (p<0.001). Daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale; p=0.01) and sleep-related quality of life (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10; p=0.02) both improved significantly. The number of bed partners reporting loud, very intense snoring, or leaving the bedroom due to participant snoring decreased from 96% to 35%. 91% of participants reported device use >5 days per week, and 77% reported use for >5 h per night. No device-related serious adverse events occurred during the 6-month post-implantation period. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral HNS using the Genio™ system reduces OSA severity and improves quality of life without device-related complications. The results are comparable with previously published HNS systems despite minimal implanted components and a simple stimulation algorithm.

Heat-moulded versus custom-made mandibular advancement devices for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

RATIONALE: Custom-made mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are reported as providing higher efficacy rates compared with thermoplastic heat-moulded MADs but at the price of higher costs and treatment delays. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a thermoplastic heat-moulded titratable MAD (ONIRIS; ONIRIS SAS, Rueil Malmaison, France) is non-inferior to a custom-made acrylic titratable MAD (TALI; ONIRIS SAS, Rueil Malmaison, France) for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, open, randomised controlled trial of patients with OSA refusing or not tolerating continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Participants were randomly assigned to a thermoplastic heat-moulded titratable device or a custom-made acrylic device for 2 months with stratification by centre and OSA severity. The non-inferiority primary outcome was a ≥50% reduction in apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) or achieving AHI <10 events/hour at 2 months. The non-inferiority margin was preset as a difference between groups of 20% for the primary outcome in the per-protocol analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Of 198 patients (mean age 51 [SD, 12] years; 138 [72.6%] men; mean body mass index 26 [SD, 2.7] kg/m2; mean AHI 26.6/hour [SD, 10.4]), 100 received TALI and 98 ONIRIS. In per-protocol analysis, the response rate was 51.7% in the TALI group versus 53.6% in the ONIRIS group (absolute difference 1.9%; 90% CI: 11% to 15%, within the non-inferiority margin). Effectiveness was the same for severity, symptoms, quality of life and blood pressure reduction. Patients in ONIRIS group reported more side effects and adherence was slightly better with TALI. CONCLUSION: In patients with OSA refusing or not tolerating CPAP, the thermoplastic heat-moulded titratable MAD was non-inferior in the short-term to the custom-made acrylic MAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02348970.

Effect of mandibular advancement therapy on inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised controlled trial.

Systemic inflammation and metabolic disorders are among the mechanisms linking obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). In 109 patients with severe OSA and no overt CVD, biomarkers of inflammation (C reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-α and its receptors, adiponectin, leptin and P-selectin), glucose and lipid metabolism, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, were measured before and after 2 months of treatment with a mandibular advancement device (MAD) (n=55) or a sham device (n=54). MAD reduced the Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index (p<0.001) but had no effect on circulating biomarkers compared with the sham device, despite high treatment adherence (6.6 hour/night). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01426607.

Impact of Mandibular Advancement Therapy on Endothelial Function in Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

RATIONALE: Endothelial dysfunction, a major predictor of late cardiovascular events, is linked to the severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treatment with mandibular advancement device, the main alternative to continuous positive airway pressure, improves endothelial function in patients with severe OSA. METHODS: In this trial, we randomized patients with severe OSA and no overt cardiovascular disease to receive 2 months of treatment with either effective mandibular advancement device or a sham device. The primary outcome, change in reactive hyperemia index, a validated measurement of endothelial function, was assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. An embedded microsensor objectively measured treatment compliance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 150 patients (86% males; mean [SD] age, 54 [10] yr; median [interquartile range] apnea-hypopnea index, 41 [35-53]; mean [SD] Epworth sleepiness scale, 9.3 [4.2]) were randomized to effective mandibular advancement device (n = 75) or sham device (n = 75). On intention-to-treat analysis, effective mandibular advancement device therapy was not associated with improvement of endothelial function compared with the sham device. Office and ambulatory blood pressure outcomes did not differ between the two groups. Effective mandibular advancement device therapy was associated with significant improvements in apnea-hypopnea index (P < 0.001); microarousal index (P = 0.008); and symptoms of snoring, fatigue, and sleepiness (P < 0.001). Mean (SD) objective compliance was 6.6 (1.4) h/night with the effective mandibular advancement device versus 5.6 (2.3) h/night with the sham device (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In moderately sleepy patients with severe OSA, mandibular advancement therapy reduced OSA severity and related symptoms but had no effect on endothelial function and blood pressure despite high treatment compliance. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01426607).

Comparison of continuous positive airway pressure and bosentan effect in mildly hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: A randomized controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has only limited impact on blood pressure (BP). Alternative strategies for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA)-associated hypertension are therefore needed. Endothelin-1 has been demonstrated a key player in the deleterious cardiovascular consequences of OSA. In OSA, CPAP treatment has never been compared with endothelin receptor antagonist medications. Thus, we assessed the respective efficacy of CPAP and bosentan in reducing 24-h diastolic BP (DBP) in patients with OSA never treated by either therapy. METHODS: In a crossover pilot study, 16 mildly hypertensive patients (office systolic BP (SBP)/DBP: 142 ± 7/85 ± 8 mm Hg) with severe OSA (55 ± 8 years; body mass index, 29.6 ± 4.2 kg/m(2) ; apnoea-hypopnoea index, 40.8 ± 20.2/h) were randomized to either CPAP (n = 7) or bosentan (125 mg/day, n = 9) first for 4 weeks. After 2-weeks of washout, the second 4-week period consisted of the alternative treatment (in crossover). The primary outcome was the 24-h mean DBP change after treatment. RESULTS: In intention-to-treat analysis, the mean difference in 24-h DBP measurements between treatments was -3.1 (-6.9/0.7) mm Hg (median, 25th/75th percentiles) (P = 0.101) with bosentan having a greater effect. CONCLUSION: In this RCT, in mildly hypertensive patients with OSA, bosentan did not modify 24-h DBP but only reduced office BP suggesting that Endothelin-1 blockade does not play a major role in treatment of OSA-related hypertension.

Increased risk of narcolepsy in children and adults after pandemic H1N1 vaccination in France.

An increased incidence of narcolepsy in children was detected in Scandinavian countries where pandemic H1N1 influenza ASO3-adjuvanted vaccine was used. A campaign of vaccination against pandemic H1N1 influenza was implemented in France using both ASO3-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccines. As part of a study considering all-type narcolepsy, we investigated the association between H1N1 vaccination and narcolepsy with cataplexy in children and adults compared with matched controls; and compared the phenotype of narcolepsy with cataplexy according to exposure to the H1N1 vaccination. Patients with narcolepsy-cataplexy were included from 14 expert centres in France. Date of diagnosis constituted the index date. Validation of cases was performed by independent experts using the Brighton collaboration criteria. Up to four controls were individually matched to cases according to age, gender and geographic location. A structured telephone interview was performed to collect information on medical history, past infections and vaccinations. Eighty-five cases with narcolepsy-cataplexy were included; 23 being further excluded regarding eligibility criteria. Of the 62 eligible cases, 59 (64% males, 57.6% children) could be matched with 135 control subjects. H1N1 vaccination was associated with narcolepsy-cataplexy with an odds ratio of 6.5 (2.1-19.9) in subjects aged<18 years, and 4.7 (1.6-13.9) in those aged 18 and over. Sensitivity analyses considering date of referral for diagnosis or the date of onset of symptoms as the index date gave similar results, as did analyses focusing only on exposure to ASO3-adjuvanted vaccine. Slight differences were found when comparing cases with narcolepsy-cataplexy exposed to H1N1 vaccination (n=32; mostly AS03-adjuvanted vaccine, n=28) to non-exposed cases (n=30), including shorter delay of diagnosis and a higher number of sleep onset rapid eye movement periods for exposed cases. No difference was found regarding history of infections. In this sub-analysis, H1N1 vaccination was strongly associated with an increased risk of narcolepsy-cataplexy in both children and adults in France. Even if, as in every observational study, the possibility that some biases participated in the association cannot be completely ruled out, the associations appeared robust to sensitivity analyses, and a specific analysis focusing on ASO3-adjuvanted vaccine found similar increase.

Response to statin therapy in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

RATIONALE: Accumulated evidence implicates sympathetic activation as inducing oxidative stress and systemic inflammation, which in turn lead to hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and atherosclerosis in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Statins through their pleiotropic properties may modify inflammation, lipid profile, and cardiovascular outcomes in OSA. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the effects of atorvastatin 40 mg/day versus placebo over 12 weeks on endothelial function (the primary endpoint) measured by peripheral arterial tone (PAT). Secondary endpoints included office blood pressure (BP), early carotid atherosclerosis, arterial stiffness measured by pulse wave velocity (PWV), and metabolic parameters. RESULTS: 51 severe OSA patients were randomized. Key demographics for the study population were age 54 ± 11 years, 21.6% female, and BMI 28.5 ± 4.5 kg/m(2). In intention to treat analysis, mean PAT difference between atorvastatin and placebo groups was 0.008 (-0.29; 0.28), P = 0.979. Total and LDL cholesterol significantly improved with atorvastatin. Systolic BP significantly decreased with atorvastatin (mean difference: -6.34 mmHg (-12.68; -0.01), P = 0.050) whereas carotid atherosclerosis and PWV were unchanged compared to the placebo group. CONCLUSION: In OSA patients, 3 months of atorvastatin neither improved endothelial function nor reduced early signs of atherosclerosis although it lowered blood pressure and improved lipid profile. This trial is registered with NCT00669695.

Residual sleepiness in sleep apnea patients treated by continuous positive airway pressure.

Hypoxic brain damage might explain persistent sleepiness in some continuous positive airway pressure-compliant obstructive sleep apnea called residual excessive sleepiness. Although continuous positive airway pressure may not be fully efficient in treating this symptom, wake-promoting drug prescription in residual excessive sleepiness is no longer allowed by the European Medicines Agency. The aim of this study is to describe residual excessive sleepiness phenotypes in a large prospective sample of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Residual excessive sleepiness was defined by an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ≥ 11. Eligible patients from the French National Sleep Registry attending follow-up continuous positive airway pressure visits numbered 1047. Patients using continuous positive airway pressure < 3 h (n = 275), with residual apnea-hypopnea index > 15 h⁻¹ (n = 31) or with major depression were excluded (n = 150). Residual excessive sleepiness prevalence in continuous positive airway pressure-treated obstructive sleep apnea was 13% (18% for those with an initial Epworth Sleepiness Scale score > 11), and significantly decreased with continuous positive airway pressure use (9% in ≥ 6 h night⁻¹ continuous positive airway pressure users, P < 0.005). At the time of diagnosis, patients with residual excessive sleepiness had worse subjective appreciation of their disease (general health scale, Epworth Sleepiness Scale and fatigue score), and complained more frequently of continuous positive airway pressure side-effects. Residual excessive sleepiness prevalence was lower in severe obstructive sleep apnea than in moderate obstructive sleep apnea (11% when AHI > 30 h⁻¹ versus 18% when AHI 15-30, P < 0.005). There was no relationship between residual excessive sleepiness and body mass index, cardiovascular co-morbidities or diabetes. Continuous positive airway pressure improved symptoms in the whole population, but to a lower extent in patients with residual excessive sleepiness (fatigue scale: -5.2 versus -2.7 in residual excessive sleepiness- and residual excessive sleepiness+ patients, respectively, P < 0.001). Residual excessive sleepiness prevalence decreased with continuous positive airway pressure compliance. Hypoxic insult is unlikely to explain residual excessive sleepiness as obstructive sleep apnea severity does not seem to be critical. Residual symptoms are not limited to sleepiness, suggesting a true 'continuous positive airway pressure-resistant syndrome', which may justify treatment by wake-promoting drugs.

On treatment but still sleepy: cause and management of residual sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment effectively reduces sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients, some patients remain sleepy in spite of proper treatment. After exclusion or treatment of known causes of sleepiness, residual sleepiness may be diagnosed. Recent changes in approval for currently available wakefulness stimulants in Europe, development of new stimulants and questions about the reality of residual sleepiness prompted this review. RECENT FINDINGS: Prevalence of residual sleepiness is approximately 10% and clearly decreases with increased nightly use of CPAP. Before treatment, patients with residual sleepiness are younger, suffer from less severe OSA and have worse health perception and mood than patients who respond to CPAP. Residual sleepiness is accompanied by other residual symptoms (e.g. fatigue, poor quality of life), suggesting the existence of a 'CPAP resistant syndrome'. Pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. Stimulant medication may be beneficial in some patients and is well tolerated. SUMMARY: In spite of a substantial prevalence, residual sleepiness remains still poorly understood and may be difficult to treat. There remains a need for large prospective studies to better define predictive baseline characteristics and further research on causal mechanisms and pharmacological treatments, including large, long-term clinical trials of wakefulness stimulants, is needed.

Effect of switching from continuous to bilevel positive airway pressure on sleep quality in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: the prospective POP IN VAuto study.

Background: Issues with tolerability and side effects can decrease continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device usage and the benefits of therapy. Different positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy modes providing expiratory pressure relief or using a different pressure during inspiration vs. expiration (bilevel PAP) may alleviate some of these issues. This multicenter, prospective study evaluated the effects of switching from CPAP to bilevel PAP (VAuto mode) on respiratory parameters, device usage, side effects and patient-reported outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Eligible OSA patients had started CPAP ≥3 months previously, had good compliance (mean 6.1±2.0 h/night) and well-controlled OSA [residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 4.9±3.1/h] but had pressure tolerance issues or persistent side effects/discomfort. All were switched from CPAP to bilevel PAP (AirCurve 10 VAuto; ResMed). Effectiveness (residual AHI), sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, fatigue, therapy-related side effects, and patient satisfaction/preference were assessed after 3 months and 1 year. Results: Forty patients were analyzed (68% male, age 64±11 years, body mass index 30.7±5.8 kg/m2). At 3 months and 1 year after switching to bilevel PAP, median [interquartile range] residual AHI was 4/h [2-5.3] and 3.7/h [1.8-5], respectively, and device usage was 7.0 [4.9-7.5] and 6.4 [4.4-7.3] h/night, respectively. Device switch was associated with significant reductions from baseline in expiratory PAP {from 12 [11-13] to 8 [7-9] cmH2O at 3 months (P<0.001) and 9 [8-12] cmH2O at 1 year (P=0.005)}, 95th percentile pressure {from 14 [12-14] to 10 [9-11] and 10 [8-11] cmH2O; P<0.001 and P=0.001, respectively} and leak {from 1 [0-6] to 0 [0-1] and 0 [0-2] L/min; P=0.049 and P=0.033, respectively}. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score decreased significantly from baseline to 3 and 6 months [7.2±4.0 to 5.0±3.2 (P=0.005) and 4.5±2.7 (P<0.001), respectively]. CPAP-related mouth dryness, choking sensation and aerophagia were significantly improved one year after switching to bilevel PAP. Bilevel PAP was preferred over CPAP by 90% of patients. Conclusions: Switching to bilevel PAP had several benefits in patients struggling with CPAP, facilitating therapy acceptance and ongoing device usage.

Comparison of continuous positive airway pressure and valsartan in hypertensive patients with sleep apnea.

RATIONALE: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) reduces blood pressure (BP). CPAP treatment has never been compared with antihypertensive medications in an RCT. OBJECTIVES: To assess the respective efficacy of CPAP and valsartan in reducing BP in hypertensive patients with OSA never treated for either condition. METHODS: In this 8-week randomized controlled crossover trial, 23 hypertensive patients (office systolic BP/diastolic BP: 155 ± 14/102 ± 11 mm Hg) with OSA (age, 57 ± 8 yr; body mass index, 28 ± 5 kg/m(2); apnea-hypopnea index, 29 ± 18/h) were randomized first to either CPAP or valsartan (160 mg). The second 8-week period consisted of the alternative treatment (crossover) after a 4-week washout period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Office BP and 24-hour BP were measured before and at the end of the two active treatment periods. Twenty-four-hour mean BP was the primary outcome variable. There was an overall significant difference in 24-hour mean BP between treatments: the change in 24-hour mean BP was -2.1 ± 4.9 mm Hg (P < 0.01) with CPAP, and -9.1 ± 7.2 mm Hg with valsartan (P < 0.001), with a difference of -7.0 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -10.9 to -3.1 mm Hg; P < 0.001). The difference was significant not only during daytime but also during nighttime: the change in nighttime mean BP with CPAP was -1.3 ± 4.6 mm Hg (not significant), and -7.4 ± 8.4 mm Hg with valsartan (P < 0.001), with a difference of -6.1 mm Hg (P < 0.05) (95% confidence interval, -10.8 to -1.4 mm Hg). CONCLUSIONS: In an RCT, although the BP decrease was significant with CPAP treatment, valsartan induced a fourfold higher decrease in mean 24-hour BP than CPAP in untreated hypertensive patients with OSA. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00409487).

[Surviving sleep: when the heart and brain are damaged by apnea]. / Survivre au sommeil: mourir en dormant ou lorsque le coeur et le cerveau souffrent des apnées.

Sleep apnea generally results from pharyngeal collapse and leads to the so-called obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). OSAS is associated with excessive daytime sleepiness and chronic fatigue and has cardiovascular consequences. Acute hemodynamic changes during obstructive apnea are mainly due to sympathetic activation. These result from changes in blood oxygen and carbon dioxide content, as well as sleep fragmentation and intrathoracic pressure changes. Chronic consequences are linked to the sustained increase in sympathetic activity as well as endothelial dysfunction and vascular remodeling. These vascular changes seem to be a consequence of the oxidative stress and systemic inflammation associated with OSA. Metabolic impairment also plays a role. OSA increases the risk of hypertension, coronary heart disease, arrhythmias, sudden death and cardiovascular mortality. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been the first-line treatment for the last 30 years, and partly prevents the excess cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Multicomponent Therapy in Patients With Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic painful condition partly due to alterations in pain modulation by the central nervous system. Multicomponent therapy (MT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have both been reported as pain modulators in patients with FM. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of rTMS on pain with a combination of MT and rTMS versus MT alone. METHODS: Thirty-nine FM patients with visual analog scale (VAS) results for pain of ≥40 mm were randomized to active or sham rTMS (high-frequency, primary motor cortex M1) plus 12 weeks of MT (3 sessions per week combining aerobic training, pool-based exercises, and relaxation). Repetitive TMS was started 2 weeks prior to MT and maintained until the end of the program (week 14). Assessments were achieved at baseline, at week 14, and at 6 months (week 40) after completion of the program. The main criterion was pain reduction, as assessed by the weekly mean self-reported level of pain (reported daily). Secondary outcomes were cardiorespiratory fitness (graded maximal exercise test), cardiac autonomic adaptations, and FM impact (using scales for FM impact, depression, sleep efficiency, and pain catastrophizing). RESULTS: The reduction of the weekly mean of pain reported daily did not differ significantly between groups (using repeated measures of analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Two-way ANOVAs showed that pain VAS results, as well as cardiorespiratory fitness, quality of life, depression, and catastrophizing, improved significantly at week 14 and remained stable until week 40. Neither cardiac autonomic adaptations nor sleep efficiency changed significantly. CONCLUSION: Repetitive TMS did not reduce pain in patients with FM who followed the MT program.

Sleep apnoea and endothelial dysfunction: An individual patient data meta-analysis.

We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis to investigate the association between obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity and the reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) measured by peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT), a validated measurement of endothelial function, and a strong predictor of late cardiovascular (CV) events. Patients from 12 studies underwent PAT and overnight polysomnography or respiratory polygraphy for suspected OSA. Endothelial dysfunction was defined by a log-transformed RHI<0.51. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate this relationship in specific populations. Among 730 patients without overt CV disease, 387 (53.0%) had severe OSA (apnoea-hypopnea index ≥30) and 164 (22.5%) exhibited endothelial dysfunction. After adjustment for age, gender, diastolic blood pressure, obesity, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, endothelial dysfunction was associated with severe OSA (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval]: 2.27 [1.12-4.60]; p = 0.02), and nocturnal hypoxemia defined by >20 min with oxygen saturation <90% (OR: 1.83 [1.22-2.92]; p = 0.004) or mean oxygen saturation <92% (OR: 1.52 [1.17-1.96]; p = 0.002). On subgroup analyses, the association between severe OSA and endothelial dysfunction was not significant in patients with hypertension, obesity and/or diabetes. Among adults without overt CV disease, severe OSA is independently associated with an increased risk of endothelial dysfunction that may predispose to late CV events.