Closed system processing variables affect post-thaw quality characteristics of cryopreserved red cell concentrates.

BACKGROUND: Differences in manufacturing conditions using the Haemonetics ACP 215 cell processor result in cryopreserved red cell concentrates (RCCs) of varying quality. This work studied the effect of processing method, additive solution, and storage duration on RCC quality to identify an optimal protocol for the manufacture of cryopreserved RCCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RCCs were pooled-and-split and stored for 7, 14, or 21 days before cryopreservation. Units were glycerolized with the ACP 215 using a single or double centrifugation method. After thawing, the RCCs were deglycerolized, suspended in AS-3, SAGM, ESOL, or SOLX/AS-7, and stored for 0, 3, 7, 14, or 21 days before quality testing. Quality assessments included hemoglobin content, hematocrit, hemolysis, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), supernatant potassium, and mean cell volume. RESULTS: Both glycerolization methods produced RCCs that met regulatory standards for blood quality. Dual centrifugation resulted in higher hemoglobin content, fewer processing alerts, and a shorter deglycerolization time than single centrifugation processing. Units processed with AS-3 and ESOL met regulatory standards when stored for up to 21 days pre-cryopreservation and 21 days post-deglycerolization. However, ESOL demonstrated superior maintenance of ATP over RBCs in AS-3. Some RCCs suspended in SAGM and SOLX exceeded acceptable hemolysis values after 7 days of post-deglycerolization storage regardless of pre-processing storage length. CONCLUSIONS: When manufacturing cryopreserved RCCs using the ACP 215, dual centrifugation processing with AS-3 or ESOL additive solutions is preferred, with storage periods of up to 21 days both pre-processing and post-deglycerolization.

Current techniques and the future of lung preservation.

Although lung transplant remains the only option for patients suffering from end-stage lung failure, donor supply is insufficient to meet demand. Static cold preservation is the most common method to preserve lungs in transport to the recipient; however, this method does not improve lung quality and only allows for 8 h of storage. This results in lungs which become available for donation but cannot be used due to failure to meet physiologic criteria or an inability to store them for a sufficient time to find a suitable recipient. Therefore, lungs lost due to failure to meet physiological or compatibility criteria may be mitigated through preservation methods which improve lung function and storage durations. Ex situ lung perfusion (ESLP) is a recently developed method which allows for longer storage times and has been demonstrated to improve lung function such that rejected lungs can be accepted for donation. Although greater use of ESLP will help to improve donor lung utilization, the ability to cryopreserve lungs would allow for organ banking to better utilize donor lungs. However, lung cryopreservation research remains underrepresented in the literature despite its unique advantages for cryopreservation over other organs. Therefore, this review will discuss the current techniques for lung preservation, static cold preservation and ESLP, and provide a review of the cryopreservation challenges and advantages unique to lungs.