Thoracic ultrasound influences physiotherapist's clinical decision-making in respiratory management of critical care patients: a multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The potential influence of thoracic ultrasound on clinical decision-making by physiotherapists has never been studied. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of thoracic ultrasound on clinical decision-making by physiotherapists for critical care patients. METHODS: This prospective, observational multicentre study was conducted between May 2017 and November 2020 in four intensive care units in France and Australia. All hypoxemic patients consecutively admitted were enrolled. The primary outcome was the net reclassification improvement (NRI), quantifying how well the new model (physiotherapist's clinical decision-making including thoracic ultrasound) reclassifies subjects as compared with an old model (clinical assessment). Secondary outcomes were the factors associated with diagnostic concordance and physiotherapy treatment modification. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were included in the analysis. The NRI for the modification of physiotherapist's clinical decisions was-40% (95% CI (-56 to -22%), p=0.02). Among the cases in which treatment was changed after ultrasound, 41% of changes were major (n=38). Using a multivariate analysis, the physiotherapist's confidence in their clinical diagnosis was associated with diagnostic concordance (adjusted OR=3.28 95% CI (1.30 to 8.71); p=0.014). Clinical diagnosis involving non-parenchymal conditions and clinical signs reflecting abolished lung ventilation were associated with diagnostic discordance (adjusted OR=0.06 95% CI (0.01 to 0.26), p<0.001; adjusted OR=0.26 95% CI (0.09 to 0.69), p=0.008; respectively). CONCLUSION: Thoracic ultrasound has a high impact on the clinical decision-making process by physiotherapists for critical care patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02881814; https://clinicaltrials.gov.

Diaphragm function in patients with sepsis and septic shock: A longitudinal ultrasound study.

BACKGROUND: Previous literature on the determinants of diaphragm dysfunction in septic patients is limited. The goal of this study is to assess diaphragm dysfunction in terms of its prevalence and its potential associated factors in septic intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: This prospective and observational study was conducted between June 2015 and July 2019. Ultrasound measures of diaphragm thickness were performed daily on septic patients. The primary outcome was the prevalence of diaphragm dysfunction at baseline and during the ICU stay. The secondary outcome was the diaphragm thickness. Possible associated factors were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled in the study. The prevalence of diaphragm dysfunction was 58%. No diaphragm atrophy was found during the ICU stay. Diaphragm dysfunction was associated with the alteration of consciousness, intra-abdominal sepsis, hypnotics and opioids, and mechanical ventilation. Administration of hypnotics, opioids, and steroids was associated with a decreased diaphragm thickening fraction. Diaphragm dysfunction had no impact on patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal a high prevalence of diaphragm dysfunction in septic patients at the onset of sepsis. Administration of hypnotics, opioids, and steroids was associated with the alteration of diaphragm function as well as intra-abdominal sepsis.

Diagnostic accuracy of diaphragm ultrasound to predict weaning outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of diaphragm ultrasound for predicting weaning outcome is still debated, despite the publication of numerous studies evaluating this issue. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of diaphragm ultrasound for predicting weaning failure in critically ill patients. DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Science direct, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched. Two investigators independently selected studies that met the inclusion criteria, and three extracted data and performed a bias analysis using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 instrument. A bivariate model was used to estimate the pooled results for sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio. Sources of heterogeneity were explored, and subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were included in the systematic review, from which 16 studies (816 patients in total) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve were 0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.80), 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.91), and 0.82 (95% Cl 0.78-0.85) for diaphragm thickening fraction, respectively, and 0.71 (95% CI 0.61-0.79), 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.86), and 0.82 (95% Cl 0.79-0.86) for diaphragm excursion, respectively. There was substantial heterogeneity among the studies. Meta-regression highlighted significant effects of prevalence of extubation failure, cut-off and risk of bias in flow and timing of the study on diaphragm ultrasound accuracy. By excluding outlier and influential studies, sensitivity was lower and specificity higher for diaphragm thickening fraction. CONCLUSION: The specificity of diaphragm ultrasound for predicting the risk of extubation failure in critically ill patients was moderate-to-high. However, sensitivity was low because weaning is also affected by non-diaphragm-related factors. Further research in subgroups of critically ill patients applying a homogeneous definition of weaning and uniformly conducted measure is needed to assess the accuracy of diaphragm ultrasound. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO as CRD42017058028. Tweetable abstract: Diaphragm ultrasound predicts extubation failure with high specificity. Absence of diaphragm dysfunction does not imply no risk of extubation failure.

Thoracic ultrasound: Potential new tool for physiotherapists in respiratory management. A narrative review.

The use of diagnostic ultrasound by physiotherapists is not a new concept; it is frequently performed in musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Physiotherapists currently lack accurate, reliable, sensitive, and valid measurements for the assessment of the indications and effectiveness of chest physiotherapy. Thoracic ultrasound may be a promising tool for the physiotherapist and could be routinely performed at patients' bedsides to provide real-time and accurate information on the status of pleura, lungs, and diaphragm; this would allow for assessment of lung aeration from interstitial syndrome to lung consolidation with much better accuracy than chest x-rays or auscultation. Diaphragm excursion and contractility may also be assessed by ultrasound. This narrative review refers to lung and diaphragm ultrasound semiology and describes how physiotherapists could use this tool in their clinical decision-making processes in various cases of respiratory disorders. The use of thoracic ultrasound semiology alongside typical examinations may allow for the guiding, monitoring, and evaluating of chest physiotherapy treatments. Thoracic ultrasound is a potential new tool for physiotherapists.