Simultaneous chemoradiation with cisplatin in a patient with recurrent cervical cancer undergoing hemodialysis: analysis of cisplatin concentrations in serum and dialysate and therapy-related acute toxicity.

PURPOSE: To prove the feasibility and toxicity of platinum-based chemoradiation in a patient with recurrent cervical cancer undergoing concomitant hemodialysis. PATIENT AND METHODS: We report a patient with a renal transplant because of chronic renal failure who then underwent radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy due to cervical cancer FIGO stage IB1. One year after primary therapy, a 53 × 54 × 68 mm vaginal stump recurrence was treated by total translevatoric exenteration with lymphadenectomy, explantation of the transplant, and the right residual kidney. Because of microscopically involved margins, chemoradiation was recommended. Radiation was performed to the tumor region and pelvic lymph nodes up to 50.4 Gy. A boost was given to the clip-marked region to 66.6 Gy. Neurological, gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity was evaluated once a week, while hematological toxicity twice per week. Samples to evaluate cisplatin concentrations were taken from blood and dialysate. RESULTS: The patient completed chemoradiation with 5 cisplatin applications with a decreased dose (20 mg/m(2)) without any high grade toxicity. Hemodialysis was performed three times a week. Within 30 min after cisplatin application, the cisplatin serum concentration reached the highest level with 1,179.6 µg/l and showed nearly stable concentrations over 120 min. There was an accumulation of cisplatin from week 1 (100%) to week 5 of application (219%). The corresponding concentration in the dialysate also showed a rapid increase within the first hour of hemodialysis and decreased to 50% within 2 h. CONCLUSION: Cisplatin application with a modified dose (20 mg/m(2)) is feasible and safe in a patient with cervical carcinoma undergoing chemoradiation and hemodialysis.

5FU continuous infusion in heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the first- and secondline treatment of advanced breast cancer, optimal therapy thereafter remains controversial. Treatment of heavily pretreated patients is not standardized, often of low efficacy, and limited by comorbidity. In these patients, an effective treatment with low toxicity is needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all metastatic breast cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil as continuous infusion (CI-5FU) with daily doses of 150-300 mg/m(2). RESULTS: 43 patients were treated with CI-5FU until disease progression. The median number of metastatic sites was 3. Most patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 3 palliative chemotherapies (range 1-11). 42 patients were evaluable for objective response; among them 5 (12%) showed a partial response (PR) and 6 (15%) showed stable disease (SD) lasting at least 6 months, leading to a clinical benefit (CB) rate (complete response + PR + SD ≥ 6 months) of 27%. The median time to progression of patients with CB was 10 months (range 3-22). Overall survival of all patients from the start of CI-5FU was 8 months (range 1-75) and from the time of first metastases 42 months (range 9-281). Toxicity was low even in patients with hepatic insufficiency. CONCLUSION: CI-5FU showed a positive efficacy/toxicity ratio. Taking into account the high number of previous treatments, it results in a remarkable CB rate of 27%.

Biweekly Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (Caelyx) in Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase 2 Study.

BACKGROUND: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has shown to be as effective as conventional doxorubicin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer but provides a lower risk of cardiotoxicity. This phase 2 study in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer was initiated to evaluate a biweekly instead of a 4-week schedule of PLD in order to obtain a more flexible and tolerable regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 25 patients with 2 or more prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with PLD (25 mg/m2) at 2-week intervals for a maximum of 12 courses. Pretreatment with anthracyclines was allowed as long as the cumulative doxorubicin dose at study entry was below 400 mg/m2. Most patients were pretreated with anthracyclines, taxanes, vinorelbine, alkylating agents, and capecitabine. RESULTS: The clinical benefit rate, ie, objective response or stable disease, for at least 6 months was 22.7% for all patients and 22.2% in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients, respectively. Median duration of clinical benefit and median time to progression were 12.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.1-32.3) and 7 weeks (95% CI, 5.4-8.6), respectively. Median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% CI, 5.4-13.9). One- and 2-year survival rates were 38% and 4%, respectively. Myelosuppression was low, with no grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Most common nonhematologic toxicities were nausea, alopecia, asthenia, and hand-foot syndrome. The low rate of hematologic toxicity and hand-foot syndrome is clinically noteworthy. CONCLUSION: Biweekly PLD is an easily manageable schedule with a favorable toxicity profile. Efficacy was moderate in heavily pretreated patients.

Gemcitabine as prolonged infusion and vinorelbine in anthracycline and/or taxane pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine and vinorelbine are active agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine can result in higher levels of active metabolites compared to shorter administration. This phase II trial was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine as prolonged infusion in combination with vinorelbine in anthracycline and/or taxane pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had received one prior line of chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with gemcitabine (350 mg/m2 as 4 h infusion) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Of 26 patients enrolled, 84% had received prior anthracycline treatment and 50% prior taxane therapy. In total, one complete and six partial responses were achieved, accounting for an overall response rate of 30.4%. The clinical benefit rate was 47.8%. Median duration of response and median time to progression were 7.3 months and 4.6 months, respectively. Median overall survival was 14.5 months. Although the predominant toxicity was myelosuppression with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 42% of patients, few neutropenic complications resulted. Non-hematological toxicity was generally moderate. Most common non-hematologic toxicities were nausea, vomiting, alopecia, peripheral neuropathy and elevation of liver enzymes. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine as prolonged infusion and vinorelbine are a safe and effective combination treatment in anthracycline and/or taxane pretreated patients. Approximately 47.8% of patients derived clinical benefit from treatment. This regimen represents a therapeutic option for patients receiving second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Contrast-Enhancing Meningeal Lesions Are Associated with Longer Survival in Breast Cancer-Related Leptomeningeal Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a devastating complication of advanced cancer. Despite aggressive therapy survival is very poor. METHODS: Data of all breast cancer patients with LM were retrospectively analyzed (n = 27). RESULTS: Median survival was 9 weeks. Patients with contrast-enhancing meningeal lesions (n = 11) detected by MRI had a median survival of 33 weeks versus 8 weeks for patients without contrast-enhancing lesions (n = 9; p = 0.0407). Patients who received systemic chemotherapy (n = 18) had a median survival of 15 weeks versus 7 weeks (n = 9; p = 0.0106). Patients undergoing radiotherapy (n = 8) had a median survival of 17 weeks as compared to 5 weeks for patients without radiotherapy (n = 18; p = 0.0188). In a multiple Cox regression analysis, lack of systemic therapy (hazard ratio, HR 89.5; p = 0.002) and negative hormone receptor status (HR 4.2; p = 0.027) emerged as significant main risk factors, together with contrast-enhancing lesion as effect modifier for systemic therapy (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhancing meningeal lesions, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy were significantly associated with longer survival. Patients with contrast-enhancing lesions who were treated systemically had the longest survival. Evidence is increasing that systemic therapy plays an important role and should be applied in breast cancer patients with LM.