A New Noninvasive System for Clinical Pulse Wave Velocity Assessment: The Athos Device.

This paper presents a low cost, noninvasive, clinical-grade Pulse Wave Velocity evaluation device. The proposed system relies on a simultaneous acquisition of femoral and carotid pulse waves to improve estimation accuracy and correctness. The sensors used are two high precision MEMS force sensors, encapsulated in two ergonomic probes, and connected to the main unit. Data are then wirelessly transmitted to a standard laptop, where a dedicated graphical user interface (GUI) runs for analysis and recording. Besides the interface, the Athos system provides a Matlab algorithm to process the signals quickly and achieve a reliable PWV assessment. To better compare the results at the end of each analysis, a detailed report is generated, including all the relevant examination information (subject data, mean PTT, and obtained PWV). A pre-clinical study was conducted to validate the system by realizing several Pulse Wave Velocity measurements on ten heterogeneous healthy subjects of different ages. The collected results were then compared with those measured by a well-established and largely more expensive clinical device (SphygmoCor).

Accuracy of a new instrument for noninvasive evaluation of pulse wave velocity: the Arterial sTiffness faitHful tOol aSsessment project.

BACKGROUND: Large artery stiffness, assessed by carotid--femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), is a major risk factor for cardiovascular events, commonly used for risk stratification. Currently, the reference device for noninvasive cfPWV is SphygmoCor but its cost and technically challenging use limit its diffusion in clinical practice. AIM: To validate a new device for noninvasive assessment of cfPWV, ATHOS (Arterial sTiffness faitHful tOol aSsessment), designed in collaboration with the Politecnico di Torino, against the reference noninvasive method represented by SphygmoCor. METHODS: Ninety healthy volunteers were recruited. In each volunteer, we assessed cfPWV, using SphygmoCor (PWVSphygmoCor) and ATHOS (PWVATHOS) devices in an alternate fashion, following the ARTERY Society guidelines. The accuracy was assessed by Bland--Altman plot, and reproducibility was assessed by interoperator correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Mean PWVATHOS and mean PWVSphygmoCor were 7.88 ±â€Š1.96 and 7.72 ±â€Š1.95 m/s, respectively. Mean difference between devices was 0.15 ±â€Š0.56 m/s, with a high correlation between measurements (r = 0.959, P < 0.001). Considering only PWV values at least 8 m/s (n = 30), mean difference was 0.1 ±â€Š0.63 m/s. The ICC was 97.7% with ATHOS. CONCLUSION: ATHOS showed an excellent level of agreement with SphygmoCor, even at high PWV values, with a good reproducibility. Its simplicity of use could help increase clinical application of PWV assessment, improving patients' cardiovascular risk stratification.