Efficacy of rituximab in systemic manifestations of primary Sjogren's syndrome: results in 78 patients of the AutoImmune and Rituximab registry.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). METHODS: The AutoImmune and Rituximab registry has included 86 patients with pSS treated with rituximab, prospectivey followed up every 6 months for 5 years. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients with pSS (11 men, 67 women), who already had at least one follow-up visit, were analysed. Median age was 59.8 years (29-83), median duration of disease was 11.9 years (3-32). Indications for treatment were systemic involvement for 74 patients and only severe glandular involvement in four patients. The median European Sjögren's Syndrome disease activity index (ESSDAI) was 11 (2-31). 17 patients were concomitantly treated with another immunosuppressant agent. Median follow-up was 34.9 months (6-81.4) (226 patient-years). Overall efficacy according to the treating physician was observed in 47 patients (60%) after the first cycle of rituximab. Median ESSDAI decreased from 11 (2-31) to 7.5 (0-26) (p<0.0001). Median dosage of corticosteroid decreased from 17.6 mg/day (3-60) to 10.8 mg/day (p=0.1). Forty-one patients were retreated with rituximab. Four infusion reactions and one delayed serum sickness-like disease resulted in rituximab discontinuation. Three serious infections (1.3/100 patient-years) and two cancer-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In common practice, the use of rituximab in pSS is mostly restricted to patients with systemic involvement. This prospective study shows good efficacy and tolerance of rituximab in patients with pSS and systemic involvement.

Safety and efficacy of rituximab in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from 136 patients from the French AutoImmunity and Rituximab registry.

OBJECTIVE: A number of open-label studies have suggested the potential benefit of rituximab (RTX) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, in 2 recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of RTX, the primary end points were not met. We undertook this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RTX in off-trial patients with SLE seen in regular clinical practice. METHODS: We analyzed prospective data from the French AutoImmunity and Rituximab (AIR) registry, which includes data on patients with autoimmune disorders treated with RTX. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six patients received treatment for SLE. The mean +/- SD score on the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus: National Assessment (SELENA) version of the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) was 11.3 +/- 8.9 at baseline. Severe infections were noted in 12 patients (9%), corresponding to a rate of 6.6/100 patient-years. Most severe infections occurred within the first 3 months after the last RTX infusion. Five patients died, due to severe infection (n = 3) or refractory autoimmune disease (n = 2). Overall response was observed in 80 of 113 patients (71%) by the SELENA-SLEDAI assessment. Efficacy did not differ significantly between patients receiving RTX monotherapy and those receiving concomitant immunosuppressive agents (who had higher baseline disease activity). Articular, cutaneous, renal, and hematologic improvements were noted in 72%, 70%, 74%, and 88% of patients, respectively. Among responders, 41% experienced a relapse of disease, with a response in 91% after retreatment with RTX. CONCLUSION: Data from the AIR registry show a satisfactory tolerance profile and clinical efficacy of RTX in patients with SLE. The contrasting results with those from recent RCTs leave open the question of the therapeutic use of RTX in SLE. Additional controlled studies with new designs are needed to define the place of RTX in the therapeutic arsenal for SLE.

Incidence and risk factors of Legionella pneumophila pneumonia during anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: a prospective French study.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe the incidence and risk factors of legionellosis associated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonist use. METHODS: From February 1, 2004, to January 31, 2007, we prospectively collected all cases of legionellosis among French patients receiving TNF-α antagonists in the Research Axed on Tolerance of Biotherapies (RATIO) national registry. We conducted an incidence study with the French population as a reference and a case-control analysis with four control subjects receiving TNF-α antagonists per case of legionellosis. RESULTS: Twenty-seven cases of legionellosis were reported. The overall annual incidence rate of legionellosis for patients receiving TNF-α antagonists, adjusted for age and sex, was 46.7 (95% CI, 0.0-125.7) per 100,000 patient-years. The overall standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was 13.1 (95% CI, 9.0-19.1; P < .0001) and was higher for patients receiving infliximab (SIR, 15.3 [95% CI, 8.5-27.6; P < .0001]) or adalimumab (SIR, 37.7 [95% CI, 21.9-64.9; P < .0001]) than etanercept (SIR, 3.0 [95% CI, 1.00-9.2; P = .06]). In the case-control analysis, exposure to adalimumab (OR, 8.7 [95% CI, 2.1-35.1]) or infliximab (OR, 9.2 [95% CI, 1.9-45.4]) vs etanercept was an independent risk factor for legionellosis. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rate of legionellosis for patients receiving TNF-α antagonists is high, and the risk is higher for patients receiving anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibodies than soluble TNF-receptor therapy. In case of pneumonia occurring during TNF-α antagonist therapy, specific urine antigen detection should be performed and antibiotic therapy should cover legionellosis. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00224562; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Osteoarticular complications of erysipelas.

BACKGROUND: Rare osteoarticular complications occurring after erysipelas have been reported. We describe 9 patients in whom various osteoarticular complications developed during erysipelas. OBJECTIVE: We sought to analyze osteoarticular complications during erysipelas, paying special attention to clinical, bacteriologic, and radiologic data. METHODS: Data were retrospectively recorded from the files of patients seen in 3 dermatologic centers between 1998 and 2000. They included laboratory tests, bacteriologic cultures, radiologic investigations, and treatment modalities and outcome of both erysipelas and osteoarticular complications. RESULTS: We observed 9 patients (7 men and 2 women; mean age 49.6 years) who first presented with typical erysipelas of the lower limb and then osteoarticular complications developed during the course of their disease, always localized to a joint contiguous to the erysipelas plaque. These complications included: relatively benign complications, ie, bursitis (n = 5) or algodystrophy (n = 1), occurring after erysipelas with favorable course; and more severe complications, ie, osteitis (n = 1), arthritis (n = 1), and septic tendinitis (n = 1), occurring after erysipelas characterized by local cutaneous complications (abscess, necrosis). CONCLUSIONS: Osteoarticular complications of erysipelas can be divided into the 2 groups of nonseptic complications (mainly bursitis), which are characterized by a favorable outcome, and septic complications (osteitis, arthritis, tendinitis), which require specific, often prolonged treatment and, sometimes, operation. Their diagnosis is on the basis of clinical and radiologic findings rather than joint aspirations, which are usually not possible through infected skin tissue.

Treatment of severe immune thrombocytopenia associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: 59 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the response to treatment in a large cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) associated with autoimmune thrombocytopenia. METHODS: Response to treatment was assessed retrospectively in 59 patients with SLE, either definite (n = 44) or incomplete (n = 15), associated with frank autoimmune thrombocytopenia (defined as platelet count < 50 x 10(9)/l). Response to treatment was classified as complete (CR: platelet count > 150 x 10(9)/l), partial (PR: platelet count > 50 x 10/l), or failure (FR) in the other cases. RESULTS: Oral prednisone alone was used in 50 of the 59 patients (mean initial dose 1 mg/kg body weight/day). A response was obtained in 80% of cases (CR in 28. PR in 12) but only 11 (22%) had a sustained response (CR, n = 7; PR, n = 4). In contrast, combined treatment with prednisone and either danazol (n = 18) or hydroxychloroquine (n = 11) resulted in 50% (7 CR, 2 PR) and 64% (4 CR, 3 PR) longterm responses, respectively, allowing prednisone to be withdrawn or the dose tapered below 0.2 mg/kg body weight/day. High dose methylprednisolone pulses (n = 10) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (n = 31) resulted in positive responses in 60% (4 CR, 2 PR) and 65% (12 CR, 8 PR) of cases, respectively, but the response was transient in each case. Splenectomy (n = 17) resulted in 65% longterm responses (10 CR, 1 PR). Only 2 longterm partial responses were obtained with the 22 immunosuppressant-containing regimens administered to 14 patients. At the end of the study. a response was observed in 52 (88%) patients [CR: 36 (61%), PR: 16 (27%)], mainly as a result of splenectomy or combined treatment with prednisone and either danazol or hydroxychloroquine. CONCLUSION: Longterm remission was obtained in the majority of patients. The major treatments inducing remission were splenectomy and prednisone combined with danazol or hydroxychloroquine.