Haploinsufficiency of the NF1 gene is associated with protection against diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The hereditary predisposition to diabetes is only partially explained by genes identified so far. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a rare monogenic dominant syndrome caused by aberrations of the NF1 gene. Here, we used a cohort of 1410 patients with NF1 to study the association of the NF1 gene with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A total of 1410 patients were confirmed to fulfil the National Institutes of Health diagnostic criteria for NF1 by individually reviewing their medical records. The patients with NF1 were compared with 14 017 controls matched for age, sex and area of residence as well as 1881 non-NF1 siblings of the patients with NF1. Register-based information on purchases of antidiabetic medication and hospital encounters related to diabetes were retrieved. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the relative risk for diabetes in NF1. RESULTS: Patients with NF1 showed a lower rate of T2D when compared with a 10-fold control cohort (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.43) or with their siblings without NF1 (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.47). The estimates remained practically unchanged after adjusting the analyses for history of obesity and dyslipidaemias. The rate of T1D in NF1 was decreased although statistically non-significantly (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.25). CONCLUSION: Haploinsufficiency of the NF1 gene may protect against T2D and probably T1D. Since NF1 negatively regulates the Ras signalling pathway, the results suggest that the Ras pathway may be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 of the child increases birth weight.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is associated with reduced adult height, but there are no cohort studies on birth size. This retrospective study includes a cohort of 1,410 persons with NF1 and a matched comparison cohort from the general population. Figures for birth size were retrieved from the administrative registers of Finland, and the data were converted to standard deviation scores (SDS), defined as standard deviation difference to the reference population. The birth weight among infants with NF1 was higher than among infants without the disorder (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval]: 0.53 SDS [0.19-0.87]), as was the head circumference at birth (0.58 SDS [0.26-0.90]). The birth length of the NF1 infants did not differ significantly from the comparison cohort. The birth weight in the group consisting of NF1 and non-NF1 infants of NF1 mothers was lower than among infants of mothers in the comparison cohort (-0.28 SDS [-0.51 to -0.06]), as was the birth length (-0.22 SDS [-0.45 to 0.00]). In conclusion, the birth weight and head circumference of persons with NF1 are significantly higher than those of persons without the disorder. NF1 of the mother reduces birth weight and birth length of the infant.

Prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 in the Finnish population.

PURPOSE: The incidence of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is ~1/2,000 live births, but the current estimates of prevalence vary greatly. This retrospective total-population study was aimed at determining the prevalence of NF1 in Finland. METHODS: All secondary and tertiary referral centers of Finland were searched for NF1 patients. Patient records were manually reviewed and patients fulfilling the National Institutes of Health diagnostic criteria for NF1 were included. Prevalence on 31 December 2005 was determined. Data on incidence and survival were combined to refine the prevalence estimation. RESULTS: A total of 1,279 patients with NF1 were alive on 31 December 2005, yielding a prevalence of 1/4,088 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1/4,320-1/3,869). The survival of patients with NF1 was inferior compared with the general population (hazard ratio 3.10, 95% CI 2.73-3.53, P < 0.001). When the survival rates of NF1 patients and the Finnish population were combined with an estimate of NF1 incidence, a prevalence of 1/2,052 (95% CI 1/2,176-1/1,941) was estimated for NF1 in a population aged 0-74 years. CONCLUSION: NF1 is a much more common disorder than previously thought. A large proportion of NF1 patients may not be correctly identified by health-care systems or they do not seek secondary health care for their NF1.

The pregnancy in neurofibromatosis 1: A retrospective register-based total population study.

The objective of this retrospective total population study was to form a view of the pregnancies of the patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). A cohort of 1,410 Finnish patients with NF1 was acquired by searching NF1-related inpatient and outpatient hospital visits and confirming the diagnoses by reviewing the medical records. Ten matched control persons per patient with NF1 were collected from Population Register Centre. Study persons were linked to data from Medical Birth Register and Care Register for Health Care through the personal identity code. Cesarean deliveries, hypertension/preeclampsia, and placental abruptions were more common among mothers with NF1 with adjusted odds ratios of 2.24 (95%CI 1.63-3.07), 1.96 (95%CI 1.18-3.24), and 13.40 (95%CI 4.26-42.13), respectively. The adjusted mean pregnancy duration was 0.65 (95%CI 0.42-0.88) weeks shorter among the mothers with NF1 than in the control group consisting of non-NF1 mothers giving birth to a non-NF1 child. The pregnancies of non-NF1 mothers giving birth to a NF1 child were 0.43 (95%CI 0.24-0.62) weeks shorter than in the control group. In summary, NF1 of the mother was associated with a shortened pregnancy and increased pregnancy complications. Also, the NF1 of the fetus slightly shortened pregnancy. Since mothers with NF1 are at increased risk for pregnancy complications, careful evaluation of their pregnancies is warranted.

Congenital anomalies in neurofibromatosis 1: a retrospective register-based total population study.

BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a dominantly inherited Rasopathy caused by mutations in the NF1 gene on chromosome 17. NF1 has been connected to congenital anomalies, e.g., in the skeletal and cardiovascular systems, but the overall incidence of anomalies is unknown. In this retrospective register-based total population study conducted in Finland, the congenital anomalies in NF1 were evaluated. METHODS: One thousand four hundred ten patients with NF1 were identified by searching the medical records related to inpatient and outpatient hospital visits of patients with an associated diagnosis for NF1 in 1987-2011. Each diagnosis was confirmed by a thorough review of the medical records. Ten non-NF1 control persons per NF1 patient were collected from the Population Register Centre. NF1 patients and controls were linked to the Medical Birth Register and the Register of Congenital Malformations. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for major congenital anomalies (MCA) were calculated. RESULTS: The OR for at least one MCA among NF1 children was almost threefold (adjusted OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.71-4.54) compared to controls matched for age, sex and municipality. NF1 children had a significantly increased risk of congenital anomalies in the circulatory (adjusted OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.64-6.83), urinary (adjusted OR 4.26, 95% CI 1.36-13.35) and musculoskeletal (adjusted OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.09-7.02) systems. Also, anomalies of the eye, ear, head and neck were more common among NF1 children than controls (adjusted OR 4.66, 95% CI 1.42-15.31). Non-NF1 children of mothers with NF1 did not have more anomalies than controls (adjusted OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.13-2.21). CONCLUSIONS: Children with NF1 have more MCAs than controls and close follow-up during pregnancy and the neonatal period is required if the mother or father has NF1. Non-NF1 children of mothers with NF1 do not have an increased risk for anomalies.

Distinctive Cancer Associations in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

PURPOSE: The current study was designed to determine the risk of cancer in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) by cancer type, age, and sex with unprecedented accuracy to be achieved by combining two total population-based registers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A population-based series of patients with NF1 (N = 1,404; 19,076 person-years) was linked to incident cancers recorded in the Finnish Cancer Registry and deaths recorded in the national Population Register Centre between 1987 and 2012. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated for selected cancer types. Survival of the patients with cancer with and without NF1 was compared. RESULTS: In malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and CNS tumors, the cancers traditionally associated with NF1, we observed SIRs of 2,056 (95% CI, 1,561 to 2,658), and 37.5 (95% CI, 30.2 to 46.0), respectively, and SMRs of 2,301 (95% CI, 1,652 to 3,122) and 30.2 (95% CI, 19.1 to 45.2), respectively. We found an unequivocally increased risk for breast cancer. In particular, SIR was 11.1 (95% CI, 5.56 to 19.5) for breast cancer in women with NF1 age < 40 years; the overall SMR for breast cancer was 5.20 (95% CI, 2.38 to 9.88). Particularly high overall SIRs were observed in patients with NF1 age < 15 years: women, 87.6 (95% CI, 58.6 to 125); men, 45.6 (95% CI, 28.4 to 68.5). An estimated lifetime cancer risk for patients with NF1 was 59.6%. The 5-year survival of patients with cancer and NF1, excluding nervous tissue cancers, was worse than that of comparable patients with cancers without NF1 (54.0% v 67.5%; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Our results emphasize the general cancer proclivity of patients with NF1. These findings should translate to clinical practices to determine clinical interventions and focused follow-up of patients with NF1.