Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Ultrasound Med ; 41(12): 2933-2938, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35293635

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Measuring the posterior horn of the lateral ventricle in the fetus during ultrasound scans may be challenging. We aimed to examine this measurement feasibility, in relation to gestational age. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted, including nonanomalous fetuses, in which both lateral ventricles measured less than 10 mm during anomaly scans. The measurements were performed according to the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology guidelines. Success rate of measuring both ventricles was assessed at different gestational ages. Association between lateral ventricle width with contralateral ventricle width, gender, gestational age, and fetal head position were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 156 cases were recruited. The lateral ventricle distal to the probe was measured in all cases. In 10 cases proximal lateral ventricle could not be adequately measured (failed proximal ventricle measurement group). In 146 scans both ventricle measurements were available. All 10 cases of failed proximal ventricle measurement were in third trimester (30-38 weeks). Success rate of measurement of both ventricles was 100%, 96.2%, 71.4%, and 37.5% for gestational week 14-29, 30-32, 33-35, and 36-38, respectively (P <.001). Proximal lateral ventricle width was strongly associated with the distal ventricle width (B = 0.422, 95% confidence interval 0.29, 0.555, P <.001), but not with head position, fetal gender, or gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of the proximal lateral ventricle is feasible in most cases, even during late third trimester scans. Efforts should be made to visualize both ventricles in every evaluation of the fetal brain.


Assuntos
Feto , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Transversais , Estudos de Viabilidade , Apresentação no Trabalho de Parto , Ventrículos Cerebrais/diagnóstico por imagem , Idade Gestacional
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 32(19): 3255-3265, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29621904

RESUMO

Background: Assessment of pelvic configuration is an important factor in the prediction of a successful vaginal birth. However, manual evaluation of the pelvis is practically a vanishing art, and imaging techniques are not available as a real-time bed-side tool. Unlike the obstetrical conjugate diameter (OC) and inter spinous diameter (ISD), the pubic arch angle (PAA) can be easily measured by transperineal ultrasound. Objectives: Three-dimensional computed tomography bone reconstructions were used to measure the three main birth canal diameters, evaluate the correlation between them, and establish the normal reference range for the inlet, mid-, and pelvic outlet. Study design: Measurements of the PAA, obstetric conjugate (OC), and ISD were performed offline using three-dimensional post processing reconstruction in bone algorithm application of the pelvis on examinations performed for suspected renal colic in nonpregnant reproductive age woman. The mean of two measurements was used for statistical analysis which included reproducibility of measurements, regression curve estimation between PAA, OC, and ISD, and calculation of the respective reference range centiles for each PAA degree. Results: Two hundred ninety-eight women comprised the study group. The mean ± SD of the PAA, ISD, and OC were 104.9° (±7.4), 103.8 mm (±7.3), and 129.9 mm (±8.3), respectively. The intra- and interobserver agreement defined by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was excellent for all parameters (range 0.905-0.993). A significant positive correlation was found between PAA and ISD and between PAA and OCD (Pearson's correlation = 0.373 (p < .001), and 0.163 (p = .022), respectively). The best regression formula was found with quadratic regression for inter spinous diameter (ISD): 34.122778 + (0.962182*PAA - 0.002830*PAA2), and linear regression for obstetric conjugate (OC): 110.638397 + 0.183156*PAA. Modeled mean, SD, and reference centiles of the ISD and OCD were calculated using the above regression models as function of the PAA. Conclusions: We report significant correlation between the three pelvic landmarks with greatest impact on the prediction of a successful vaginal delivery: the PAA which is easily measured sonographically and the ISD and OC which are not measurable by ultrasound. This correlation may serve as a basis for future studies to assess its utility and prognostic value for a safe vaginal delivery.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico , Pelve/anatomia & histologia , Osso Púbico/anatomia & histologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Vagina/anatomia & histologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Biometria , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Distocia/diagnóstico , Distocia/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Ísquio/anatomia & histologia , Ísquio/diagnóstico por imagem , Parto/fisiologia , Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez , Prognóstico , Osso Púbico/diagnóstico por imagem , Sínfise Pubiana/anatomia & histologia , Sínfise Pubiana/diagnóstico por imagem , Sacro/anatomia & histologia , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagem , Vagina/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa