Liposomal Bupivacaine May Benefit Select Reduction Mammaplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain control can be challenging in reduction mammaplasty patients. This study compares perioperative liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel; Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, Calif) with standard local anesthetics to determine if liposomal bupivacaine decreases opioid and antiemetic use, impacting length of stay and complication rates, thus improving patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of 170 reduction mammaplasty patients was performed. Patients were divided into groups based on local anesthetic used (bupivacaine only and liposomal bupivacaine) and into subgroups based on obesity classification. Length of hospital stay; pain scores immediately postoperatively, at discharge, and at follow-up; and postoperative analgesics and antiemetics were compared. Further analysis was performed after weight stratification within pre- and postmenopausal categories. RESULTS: Liposomal bupivacaine resulted in less pain than bupivacaine immediately postoperatively and at discharge in obesity class I (P = 0.021 and P = 0.018). In obesity class II, antiemetic use was lower in the liposomal bupivacaine group (P = 0.012). Length of stay was persistently lower with liposomal bupivacaine for premenopausal women, and this difference was significant in obesity class I (P = 0.038). In premenopausal women, discharge pain scores were lower in the overweight liposomal bupivacaine group (P = 0.034) and analgesic use was lower in obesity class III (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal bupivacaine decreases postoperative pain, opioid, and antiemetic use in select patients. Liposomal bupivacaine might not be equally efficacious in pain reduction in obese or postmenopausal women given the theoretical increased absorption by adipose tissue. In addition, liposomal bupivacaine may have a dose-dependent effect, and weight-based dosing should be investigated.

Redefining the Role of Resection Weight Prediction in Reduction Mammaplasty and Breaking the "One-Scale-Fits-All" Paradigm.

BACKGROUND: Reduction mammaplasty is a highly effective procedure for treatment of symptomatic macromastia. Prediction of resection weight is important for the surgeon and the patient, but none of the current prediction models is widely accepted. Insurance carriers are arbitrarily using resection weight to determine medical necessity, despite published literature supporting that resection weight does not correlate with symptomatic relief. What is the most accurate method of predicting resection weight and what is its role in breast reduction surgery? METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty at a single institution from 2012 to 2017. A senior biostatistician performed multiple regression analysis to identify predictors of resection weight, and linear regression models were created to compare each of the established prediction scales to actual resected weight. Patient outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Three-hundred fourteen patients were included. A new prediction model was created. The Galveston scale performed the best (R = 0.73; p < 0.001), whereas the Schnur scale performed the worst (R = 0.43; p < 0.001). The Appel and Descamps scales had variable performance in different subcategories of body mass index and menopausal status (p < 0.01). Internal validation confirmed the Galveston scale's best predictive value; 38.6 percent and 28.9 percent of actual breast resection weights were below Schnur prediction and 500-g minimum, respectively, yet 97 percent of patients reported symptomatic improvement or relief. CONCLUSIONS: The authors recommend a patient-specific and surgeon-specific approach for prediction of resection weight in breast reduction. The Galveston scale fits the best for older patients with higher body mass indices and breasts requiring large resections. Medical necessity decisions should be based on patient symptoms, physical examination, and the physician's clinical judgment. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, IV.

Post-transplant native pneumonectomy for interstitial fibrosis and small cell lung cancer.

Lung transplantation is a definitive treatment for select patients with end-stage pulmonary disease. Following transplantation, the reported rate of lung cancer is between 1-9% and is associated with a variety of risk factors, including smoking history and chronic immunosuppression. The majority of post-transplant lung cancer reported in the literature is histologically classified as non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). We report a unique case of early stage small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) identified in the native lung following single lung transplantation.

Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in the Acute Care Setting: New Innovations and Technologies.

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PUs) challenge many in the healthcare field requiring costly and complex care. PUs result from prolonged ischemia and subsequent soft-tissue injury caused by unrelieved pressure over a bony prominence. Proper risk assessment and implementation of prevention strategies for PUs are crucial to providing comprehensive care while reducing healthcare costs. The emphasis has led to the expansion of research in PU prevention technologies in the recent years. The aim of this review is to present an evidence-based summary of some of the new innovations in PU prevention. METHODS: A literature search was performed. Articles were included if the article discussed the cost, prevalence, assessment, diagnosis, and/or prevention of PUs. The literature search was limited to 2013 to 2016. RESULTS: A total of 1393 potential studies were identified using the search criteria. Three hundred fifty-three articles were reviewed and when possible, preference for inclusion was given to those studies with a higher level of evidence or those discussing novel ideas/innovations. CONCLUSION: The summary of topics explored includes the following: the use of risk assessment scales as an adjunct in risk identification, the benefit of alternative support surfaces to aid in prevention as compared with standard hospital mattresses, effective repositioning strategies, silicone prophylactic dressing for shear reduction, microclimate control, nutritional considerations, use of electrical stimulation for spinal cord injury patients, and the importance of patient participation.