Perioperative Hypercoagulability in Free Flap Reconstructions Performed for Intracranial Tumors.

OBJECTIVE(S): Patients with intracranial tumors have a higher risk of thromboembolic events. This risk increases at the time of surgical intervention. We have noted an anecdotal increase in perioperative flap thrombosis in patients undergoing free tissue transfer for intracranial tumor resection. This study aims to formally evaluate this risk. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent free tissue transfer for scalp/cranial reconstruction. Perioperative thrombosis and free flap outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The 209 patients who underwent 246 free tissue transfers were included in the study. The 28 free flap scalp reconstructions were associated with intracranial tumors, 19 were performed following composite cranial resections with associated dural resection/reconstruction, and 199 were performed in the absence of intracranial tumors (control group). There was a significantly higher incidence of perioperative flap thrombosis in the intracranial tumor group (11/28, 39%) when compared to controls (38/199, 19%) (p = 0.0287). This was not seen when scalp tumors extended to the dura alone (4/19, 21%, p = 0.83). Therapeutic anticoagulation used for perioperative thrombosis (defined as intraoperative or in the immediate postoperative phase up to 5 days) was associated with a lower risk of flap failure, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.148). Flap survival rates were equivalent between flaps performed for intracranial pathology (93.3%) and controls (95%). CONCLUSION: There is an increase in perioperative flap thrombosis in patients with intracranial tumors undergoing free tissue scalp reconstruction. Anticoagulation appears to mitigate this risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This recommendation is based on level 3 evidence (retrospective case-control studies, systematic review of retrospective studies, and case reports) Laryngoscope, 133:1103-1109, 2023.

Outcomes of Cranioplasty Reconstructions: Review of Cranioplasty Implants and Free Flap Coverage Variables that Affect Implant Exposure.

BACKGROUND: Complex scalp wounds with cranial/dural involvement are challenging to reconstruct. Successful reconstruction can be achieved with cranial implants/hardware and free flap coverage. Wounds can breakdown and require revision procedures. We addressed reconstructive outcomes of different implants requiring free flaps. OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors associated with implant exposure. DESIGN: Multi-institutional retrospective review of 82 patients, 2000-2020, repaired with cranial implants and free flap coverage. RESULTS: Implant exposure occurred in 13/82 (16%) reconstructions. Flap atrophy or thinning leading to implant exposure occurred in 11/82 (13%) reconstructions, including partial flap atrophy OR 0.05 (95% CI 0.0-0.35) and total flap atrophy OR 0.34 (95% CI 0.02-19.66). Revision surgeries that occurred subsequent to flap reconstruction were also associated with implant exposure (OR 0.02 (95% CI 0.0-0.19)). Implant exposure was not associated with radiation therapy, patient health history, implant type, flap type, or postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Implant exposure is associated with free flap atrophy, leading to inadequate implant coverage and the need for revision surgeries. Completing reconstruction with adequate soft tissue bulk and coverage and avoiding revision surgery may decrease the risk for implant exposure over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:2954-2958, 2023.

When is pre-operative imaging required for craniofacial dermoid cysts/sinuses? A review.

OBJECTIVES: Dermoid cysts/sinuses (DCS) are congenital masses occurring along lines of embryonic fusion. Midline DCS carry a risk of intracranial extension. Pre-operative computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the primary imaging modalities used and based on the results, the need to involve a neurosurgical team in the resection is determined. Although less so, non-midline locations are also at risk for intracranial communication. This study aims to quantify our institutional experience with both midline and lateral DCS for intracranial extension and discuss potential need for preoperative imaging in all DCS cases. METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Pediatric patients ages 0-18 years with DCS presenting to the pediatric otolaryngology, plastic surgery, and neurosurgery clinics from 2005 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, imaging modality, location, size, complications, and presence/absence of intracranial extension. DCS location included nasoethmoidal (NE), periorbital, frontotemporal (FT), and scalp. Lesions were further classified as midline and non-midline. RESULTS: 205 patients with surgically removed DCS were included for analysis. Mean age at surgery was 3 years. MRI was the most common imaging modality used (60.5%), followed by US (18%), CT (18%) and plain films (1%). Locations were: NE (69, 34%), periorbital (67, 33%), FT (28, 14%), and scalp (41, 20%). 105 DCS were midline: NE (69), periorbital (7), and scalp (29). Of these, 29 (28%) had intracranial extension: NE (8), scalp (21). 100 DCS were non-midline: periorbital (60), FT (28) and scalp (12). Of these, 7 (7%) had intracranial extension: periorbital (3), FT (3) and scalp (1). CONCLUSION: The risk of intracranial extension of midline craniofacial DCS is well established. We have shown that there is a percentage of lateral DCS which carry a risk for intracranial extension, and for which the involvement of a neurosurgical team may be required. Given the potential benefit, pre-operative imaging of all lateral head and neck DCS may be prudent to screen for intracranial extension.

Mandibular rehabilitation: From the Andy Gump deformity to jaw-in-a-day.

The mandible is a critical structure of the lower facial skeleton which plays an important role in several vital functions. Segmental resection of the mandible is at times required in patients with advanced oral cavity malignancies, primary mandibular tumors, and radiation or medication induced osteonecrosis. Mandibulectomy can significantly decrease quality of life, and thus mandibular reconstruction is an important aspect of the operative plan. Mandibular reconstruction is challenging due to the complex three-dimensional anatomy of the mandible, and the precision required to restore dental occlusion in dentate patients. Significant advances have been made over the past decade in the ability to reconstruct and rehabilitate patients after a segmental mandibulectomy. This review will highlight these advances and discuss the timing of dental implantation.