Endoscopic Intragastric Injection of Botulinum Toxin A in Obese Patients Accelerates Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery: Follow-Up of a Randomised Controlled Trial (IntraTox Study).

Background: Intragastric injection of botulinum toxin A (BT-A) has been shown to be effective for weight loss up to six months after administration, according to previous studies. Our objective was to determine, in patients on bariatric surgery waiting lists, the effect of BT-A on weight loss in the pre- and postoperative period and to analyse if there are different responses based on Body Mass Index (BMI). Methods: We performed a follow-up analysis of the IntraTox study, which included 46 patients on bariatric surgery waiting lists in a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The treatment group received intragastric BT-A, whereas the control group received physiological saline solution. The one-time procedure was performed at the time of diagnostic endoscopy 7−8 months before surgery. Weight loss was evaluated at admission and after 4 and 12 weeks from the bariatric surgery. Our analysis was stratified by BMI at randomisation. Results: weight loss percentage on the day of surgery, with respect to the initial visit, was −4.5 ± 3.9% for the control group vs. −7.6 ± 4.2%, for the treatment group (p = 0.013). Weight loss percentage tended to remain greater in the treatment group one month after the intervention (−12.7 ± 4.7% vs. −15.2 ± 4.6%, p = 0.07) and become similar three months after (−21.6 ± 4.7% vs. −21.6 ± 4.6%). After stratifying by BMI, only patients with BMI over 50 kg/m2 allocated to the treatment group obtained a greater weight loss at the end of the trial, the day of surgery, and one month after, compared with the placebo group (−4.9 ± 4.9%, −10.8 ± 5.3% and −17.1 ± 3.8% vs. −0.1 ± 2.6%, −4.3 ± 3.2% and −12.8 ± 4.1%, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusions: intragastric injection of BT-A is effective to achieve significant weight loss, especially in extreme obesity. Its use before bariatric surgery enhances perioperative weight loss.

Endoscopic intragastric injection of botulinum toxin A in obese patients on bariatric surgery waiting lists: A randomised double-blind study (IntraTox study).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Several studies have evaluated the effect of intragastric injection of botulinum toxin A to treat obesity, achieving mixed results. Our objective is to determine the effect of intragastric botulinum toxin A on weight loss, satiety, biomarkers, and quality of life of obese patients prior bariatric surgery. METHODS: Design: single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 52 obese patients on bariatric surgery waiting lists. Two-arm parallel: the treatment group was administered intragastric botulinum toxin A by endoscopy, whereas the control group was administered physiological saline solution. Weight loss was evaluated at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24, as well as changes in body composition, satiety (Visual analogue scale (VAS) and GCSI questionnaire), quality of life (GIQLI questionnaire), and biomarkers of satiety and appetite. RESULTS: Weight loss at weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 after the endoscopy, with respect to the basal visit, was 0.6 ± 2 kg, 0.4 ± 2.7 kg, 0.4 ± 3.1 kg, 0.2 ± 4.5 kg, and 0.6 ± 4.3 kg for the control group vs 1.9 ± 2.1 kg, 2 ± 2.6 kg, 2.8 ± 4.1 kg, 3.5 ± 5.3 kg, and 4.5 ± 7 kg for the treatment group, respectively, being differences between groups significant at all times (p = 0.016, 0.031, 0.014, 0.021, and 0.023, respectively). Treatment group patients obtained a significantly higher score for GIQLI questionnaire compared with baseline (104.4 ± 13.9 points vs 97.7 ± 15.6 points; p = 0.024), showing a significant improvement in the section of subjective physical capacity. No significant differences were found regarding perception of satiety, or biomarkers of satiety and appetite. CONCLUSIONS: Intragastric injection of botulinum toxin A is an effective and safe procedure to achieve a moderate weight loss and improve quality of life. Registered under clinicaltrialsregister.eu Identifier EudraCT number 2015-004391-29 https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2015-004391-29/ES.

Normative reference values for hand grip dynamometry in Spain. Association with lean mass.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to establish reference values for hand grip strength, compare the results obtained with Collin and Jamar type dynamometers and determine their association with anthropometric and lean mass measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional population-based study was undertaken in Pizarra (Málaga, Spain). The grip strength of the dominant hand was measured using Collin and Jamar dynamometers. Skinfolds (triceps, abdominal, biceps of dominant arm and subscapular) were measured, and body composition was estimated. Eight hundred seventeen adults randomly selected from the census were recruited. Dynamometry reference values are presented for the dominant hand, by gender and age groups. RESULTS: No determinations could be made with the Collin dynamometer in 69 women due to the difficulty in grasping the dynamometer. We found significant positive correlations between the measurements with Jamar and Collin dynamometers (r = 0.782; p < 0.001) and between grip strength and lean mass index (LMI), determined by both dynamometers (r = 0.538, p < 0.001 and r = 0.462, p < 0.001, respectively). Malnourished patients according to LMI had significantly lower grip strength than normally nourished patients (p < 0.001 for Jamar; p < 0.02 for Collin). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamometry reference values in the Spanish population are presented. We recommend the use of the Jamar type dynamometer versus the Collin type dynamometer. Hand grip dynamometry is associated with lean mass, which confirms its usefulness in nutritional assessment.