RESUMO
We compared the performance of three commercially available anti-double-stranded DNA antibody ELISA kits with respect to their precision, accuracy, linearity, and the detection limit. We tested six sets of patients (lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, hepatitis C, malignancies) to assess specificity, sensitivity, and diagnostic efficiency of the three assays. The diagnostic efficiency of the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test was analyzed as a reference. The sensitivity of the evaluated enzyme immunoassays ranged from 55.6 to 66.7%, the specificity from 98.4 to 100%, and the diagnostic efficiency from 90.2-92.7%. All ELISAs were superior to the immunofluorescence test, both with respect to sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic efficiency. The commercial kits tested were comparable with respect to their performance characteristics.