Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: Efficacy of Conservative and Surgical (Percutaneous, Open) Treatment-A Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial.

There is controversy regarding the best treatment for acute ruptures of the Achilles tendon. Multiple treatments present good results in the short and long term, none being superior to the other if a protocol of rehabilitation with full early weightbearing rehabilitation is followed. The objective of this study was to provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of conservative or surgical (percutaneous or open) treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture. A randomized, controlled, parallel-groups, pilot clinical trial was performed in patients aged ≥18 years who arrived at the emergency room of our center experiencing acute Achilles tendon rupture. Patients were randomized via a computer-generated list to receive 1 of 3 treatments (conservative, percutaneous surgery, or open surgery). All patients followed the same protocol of rehabilitation with early weightbearing. A responder (i.e., successful treatment) was defined as capable of standing heelrise mono- and bipodally for 3 seconds, having a pain score ≤2 (verbal numerical rating scale) after walking, and having returned to active previous life (sport) at 1-year follow-up. From 2014 to 2017, 34 consecutive patients (median age, 41 years [range 18 to 59]; 32 male [94%]) were included: 11 conservative treatment, 11 percutaneous surgery, and 12 open surgery. At 1-year follow-up, the proportion of responders was 100% (11/11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 74% to 100%), 82% (9/11, 95% CI 52% to 95%), and 83% (10/12, 95% CI 55% to 95%), respectively. There was no case of total rerupture. Similar efficacy was found for conservative, percutaneous, and open surgery treatments for acute Achilles tendon rupture at 1-year follow-up with an early weightbearing rehabilitation program.

Chronotropic incompetence in persons with down syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the chronotropic response to exercise through peak heart rate and the Chronotropic Response Index (CRI) in participants with Down syndrome (DS) and in nondisabled control participants. DESIGN: Comparative study describing the acute exercise heart rate response. SETTING: University sports medicine facility. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty participants with DS (mean age +/- standard deviation, 24.2+/-3.5y) and 20 control participants without disabilities (age, 21.2+/-2.8y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maximal treadmill exercise tests with metabolic and heart rate measurements. Maximal heart rate and the CRI were considered main outcomes. RESULTS: The peak oxygen consumption (41.7 vs 31.8mL. kg(-1).min(-1)) and peak heart rate (165+/-14.7 vs 192+/-7.7 beats/min) were significantly lower in participants with DS than in controls (P<.05). The CRI was below normal (.84+/-.25) in participants with DS and was normal (.97+/-.07) in controls. CONCLUSION: Both the CRI and the peak heart rates were indicative of chronotropic incompetence in participants with DS, but not in controls. The CRI of the participants with DS was similar to that reported for nondisabled populations who have a true chronotropic response to exercise. The CRI indicated that the low peak heart rate in our participants with DS was a true chronotropic response.