Influence of using recommended radiological criteria on MDCT-angiography diagnosis of single isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the rate of false-positive diagnoses of MDCT-pulmonary angiography (MDCT-A) in patients with single isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SISSPE). METHODS: All patients who underwent MDCT-A between 2006 and 2017 for ruling out acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and received an initial diagnosis of SISSPE were included. The MDCT-A of these patients were reviewed retrospectively by four experienced thoracic radiologists, who applied radiological criteria recommended by the American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Guidelines (ACCP 2016) for the diagnosis of SISSPE. Data extracted from medical records were history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), alternative diagnoses, other diagnostic studies for VTE, anticoagulation, bleeding complications, and VTE over the following 3 months. RESULTS: Of 3839 patients undergoing MDCT-A, PE was found in 1021 (26.6%) and SISSPE in 59 (1.5% overall and 5.8% of all patients with PE). An alternative diagnosis to PE was made on the basis of CT in 33 (55.9%) patients. Forty-one (69.5%) patients received anticoagulants, and major life-threatening bleeding complications occurred in 2, with one death. Recurrent PE was not documented in any patient with SISSPE. In the retrospective assessment of the 59 cases of SISSPE, 21 were negative for PE, with a false-positive rate of 35.6% (21/59); so the percentage of SISSPE cases after the revision was 3.7% of all patients with PE; 11 of these 21 patients received anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists should be aware of the high rate of false-positives when making the diagnosis of SISSPE on MDCT-A without using strict diagnostic criteria. Misdiagnosis exposes patients to unnecessary anticoagulation. KEY POINTS: • Radiologist should be aware of the high rate of false-positive diagnoses of single isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SISSPE) in MDCT-pulmonary angiography (MDCT-A) performed for ruling out pulmonary embolism. • Misdiagnosis of SISSPE in MDCT-A can be reduced by using strict diagnostic radiological criteria recommended by the American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Guidelines. • Unnecessary anticoagulation therapy with potential severe bleeding complications may result from misdiagnosis of SISSPE.

Computer-assisted diagnosis for an early identification of lung cancer in chest X rays.

Computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) algorithms have shown its usefulness for the identification of pulmonary nodules in chest x-rays, but its capability to diagnose lung cancer (LC) is unknown. A CAD algorithm for the identification of pulmonary nodules was created and used on a retrospective cohort of patients with x-rays performed in 2008 and not examined by a radiologist when obtained. X-rays were sorted according to the probability of pulmonary nodule, read by a radiologist and the evolution for the following three years was assessed. The CAD algorithm sorted 20,303 x-rays and defined four subgroups with 250 images each (percentiles ≥ 98, 66, 33 and 0). Fifty-eight pulmonary nodules were identified in the ≥ 98 percentile (23,2%), while only 64 were found in lower percentiles (8,5%) (p < 0.001). A pulmonary nodule was confirmed by the radiologist in 39 out of 173 patients in the high-probability group who had follow-up information (22.5%), and in 5 of them a LC was diagnosed with a delay of 11 months (12.8%). In one quarter of the chest x-rays considered as high-probability for pulmonary nodule by a CAD algorithm, the finding is confirmed and corresponds to an undiagnosed LC in one tenth of the cases.