Self-Expandable Metal Stent (SEMS) Versus Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) for Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background and aim Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is the gold standard approach for the treatment of encapsulated pancreatic collections (EPCs) including pseudocyst and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON), and is associated with an equivalent clinical efficacy to surgical drainage with fewer complications and less morbidity. Drainage may be achieved via several types of stents including a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) and lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). However, to date there have been no randomized trials to compare these devices. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the SEMS versus LAMS for EUS-guided drainage of EPCs. Methods A phase IIB randomized trial was designed to compare the SEMS versus LAMS for the treatment of EPCs. Technical success, clinical success, adverse events (AEs), and procedure time were evaluated. A sample size of 42 patients was determined. Results There was no difference between the two groups in technical (LAMS 80.95% vs 100% SEMS, p=0.107), clinical (LAMS 85.71% vs 95.24% SEMS, p=0.606) or radiological success (LAMS 92.86% vs 83.33% SEMS, p=0.613). There was no difference in AEs including stent migration rate and mortality. The procedure time was longer in the LAMS group (mean time 43.81 min versus 24.43 min, p=0.001). There was also a difference in the number of intra-procedure complications (5 LAMS vs 0 SEMS, p=0.048). Conclusion SEMS and LAMS have similar technical, clinical, and radiological success as well as AEs. However, SEMS has a shorter procedure time and fewer intra-procedure complications compared to non-electrocautery-enhanced LAMS in this phase IIB randomized controlled trial (RCT). The choice of the type of stent used for EUS drainage of EPCs should consider device availability, costs, and personal and local experience.

Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A narrative review.

Acute post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is a feared and potentially fatal complication that can be as high as up to 30% in high-risk patients. Pre-examination measures, during the examination and after the examination are the key to technical and clinical success with a decrease in adverse events. Several studies have debated on the subject, however, numerous topics remain controversial, such as the effectiveness of prophylactic medications and the amylase dosage time. This review was designed to provide an update on the current scientific evidence regarding PEP available in the literature.

Adverse Events and Complications with Intragastric Balloons: a Narrative Review (with Video).

Intragastric balloon (IGB) is a minimally invasive and reversible therapy for weight loss with a good efficacy and safety profile. Introduced in the 1980s, IGBs have significantly evolved in the last couple of decades. They mechanically act by decreasing the volume of the stomach and its reservoir capacity, delaying gastric emptying, and increasing satiety leading to a subsequent weight loss. Despite the low rates of complications and mortality associated with IGBs, adverse events and complications still occur and can range from mild to fatal. This review aims to provide an update on the current scientific evidence in regard to complications and adverse effects of the use of the IGB and its treatment. This is the first comprehensive narrative review in the literature dedicated to this subject.

Rare and Fatal Gastrointestinal Mucormycosis (Zygomycosis) in a COVID-19 Patient: A Case Report.

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) quickly spread to all continents. However, data regarding all the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 are insufficient. Patients with COVID-19 might present higher susceptibility to fungal coinfections. Mucormycosis is a rare and often life-threatening fungal disease characterized by vascular invasion by hyphae, resulting in thrombosis and necrosis. This is the first case report of mucormycosis in a COVID-19 patient. An 86-year-old male patient was admitted to the emergency room with acute diarrhea, cough, dyspnea, and fever from 5 days prior. Blood tests revealed a hemoglobin level of 14.3 mg/dL. Five days following the admission, the patient presented with melena and a hemoglobin level of 5.6 mg/dL. A transfusion of three units of red blood cells was required. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed two giant gastric ulcers with necrotic debris and a deep hemorrhagic base without active bleeding. Furthermore, biopsies confirmed mucormycosis. Despite intensive care, the patient died 36 hours after the esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

[Endoscopic treatment of squamous cell esophageal cancer]. / Tratamento endoscópico do câncer epidermóide do esôfago.

OBJECTIVE: In this article, it was evaluated the role of endoscopic procedures for the management of squamous cell esophageal cancer. DATA SOURCE: Relevant publications cited at PubMed database in the last 10 years were analyzed and compared with the experience developed at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division of the Department of Gastroenterology of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine. Mucosectomy and advanced tumor tunnelization were the most important developments in that area. DATA SYNTHESIS: Endoscopic mucosal resection of early epidermoid cancer of the esophagus is indicated when the lesion is confined to the epithelium (m1) or to the lamina propria (m2). The described 5-year survival rate after endoscopic mucosal resection of intramucosal epidermoid tumor of the esophagus approaches 95%. Based on the available evidence, it seems reasonable to indicate endoscopic mucosal resection as a first-choice treatment for patients with intramucosal epidermoid esophageal carcinoma. There are a variety of endoscopic palliative methods for dysphagia relief in advanced esophageal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The choice will vary according to the anatomical features and location of the tumor, patient preferences, local and expertise availability. The technical success rate for placement of metal stents across the malignant stenosis is close to 100%. The rate of long-term palliation of dysphagia approaches 80% which makes expandable metal stents the treatment of choice for palliation of obstructive symptoms caused by advanced squamous cell cancer of the esophagus.

Deep sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl regimens.

AIM: To compare deep sedation with propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl regimens during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: After obtaining approval of the research ethics committee and informed consent, 200 patients were evaluated and referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients were randomized to receive propofol-fentanyl or midazolam-fentanyl (n = 100/group). We assessed the level of sedation using the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S) score and bispectral index (BIS). We evaluated patient and physician satisfaction, as well as the recovery time and complication rates. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software and included the Mann-Whitney test, χ² test, measurement of analysis of variance, and the κ statistic. RESULTS: The times to induction of sedation, recovery, and discharge were shorter in the propofol-fentanyl group than the midazolam-fentanyl group. According to the OAA/S score, deep sedation events occurred in 25% of the propofol-fentanyl group and 11% of the midazolam-fentanyl group (P = 0.014). Additionally, deep sedation events occurred in 19% of the propofol-fentanyl group and 7% of the midazolam-fentanyl group according to the BIS scale (P = 0.039). There was good concordance between the OAA/S score and BIS for both groups (κ = 0.71 and κ = 0.63, respectively). Oxygen supplementation was required in 42% of the propofol-fentanyl group and 26% of the midazolam-fentanyl group (P = 0.025). The mean time to recovery was 28.82 and 44.13 min in the propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl groups, respectively (P < 0.001). There were no severe complications in either group. Although patients were equally satisfied with both drug combinations, physicians were more satisfied with the propofol-fentanyl combination. CONCLUSION: Deep sedation occurred with propofol-fentanyl and midazolam-fentanyl, but was more frequent in the former. Recovery was faster in the propofol-fentanyl group.

Tratamento endoscópico do câncer epidermóide do esôfago / Endoscopic treatment of squamous cell esophageal cancer

OBJETIVOS: Procurou-se avaliar o papel atual dos procedimentos terapêuticos endoscópicos no manejo do pacientes com carcinoma epidermóide do esôfago. LEVANTAMENTO DE DADOS: Utilizando o banco de dados do PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine), analisaram-se as publicações sobre o tema nos últimos 10 anos, cotejando-as com a experiência desenvolvida no Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Departamento de Gastroenterologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. SíNTESE DOS DADOS: Neste campo, destacam-se a ressecção endoscópica do câncer esofágico precoce e a tunelização do tumor avançado daquele órgão. A ressecção endoscópica da mucosa do câncer epidermóide precoce do esôfago é indicada quando a lesão é confinada ao epitélio (m1) ou à lamina própria (m2). A taxa de sobrevida conhecida de 5 anos após a ressecção endoscópica da mucosa do tumor epidermóide intramucoso do esôfago aproxima-se de 95 por cento. CONCLUSÕES: Baseado nas evidências disponíveis, parece razoável indicar a ressecção endoscópica da mucosa como tratamento de primeira escolha para pacientes com carcinoma esofágico epidermóide intramucoso. Existem vários métodos endoscópicos paliativos para o alívio da disfagia em câncer esofágico avançado. A escolha variará de acordo com as características anatômicas e a localização do tumor, as preferências do paciente, a disponibilidade e a capacitação do centro assistencial. A taxa de sucesso técnico da colocação de próteses metálicas auto-expansíveis em estenose maligna praticamente atinge 100 por cento. A taxa de efeito paliativo em longo prazo da disfagia aproxima-se de 80 por cento, o que faz com que esta opção seja, até o momento, o tratamento paliativo de escolha para os sintomas de obstrução causados pelo câncer esofágico de células escamosas.

OBJECTIVE: In this article, it was evaluated the role of endoscopic procedures for the management of squamous cell esophageal cancer. DATA SOURCE: Relevant publications cited at PubMed database in the last 10 years were analyzed and compared with the experience developed at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division of the Department of Gastroenterology of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine. Mucosectomy and advanced tumor tunnelization were the most important developments in that area. DATA SYNTHESIS: Endoscopic mucosal resection of early epidermoid cancer of the esophagus is indicated when the lesion is confined to the epithelium (m1) or to the lamina propria (m2). The described 5-year survival rate after endoscopic mucosal resection of intramucosal epidermoid tumor of the esophagus approaches 95 percent. Based on the available evidence, it seems reasonable to indicate endoscopic mucosal resection as a first-choice treatment for patients with intramucosal epidermoid esophageal carcinoma. There are a variety of endoscopic palliative methods for dysphagia relief in advanced esophageal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The choice will vary according to the anatomical features and location of the tumor, patient preferences, local and expertise availability. The technical success rate for placement of metal stents across the malignant stenosis is close to 100 percent. The rate of long-term palliation of dysphagia approaches 80 percent which makes expandable metal stents the treatment of choice for palliation of obstructive symptoms caused by advanced squamous cell cancer of the esophagus