Comparison of predictive value of risk scores for gastrointestinal bleeding in antiplatelet therapy.

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is the most common serious bleeding complication of antiplatelet therapy. The bleeding risk score (BRS) of GIB may help to determine the risk of bleeding, and provides a reference for the formulation of antiplatelet therapy regimen in clinical practice, but we found that no specific risk scores are available in East Asian patients. This study analyzed patients who were administered antiplatelet therapy from May 2015 to December 2018 in two medical centers. Patient's baseline data were obtained. We assessed four BRSs (New Score, RIETE Score, Cuschieri Score, de Groot Score) and compared them using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The 4,052 patients enrolled in this study had an average age of 69.6 ± 10.8 years, and 65.9% of them were male. Among the 4,052 patients included, 171 patients experienced GIB within 6 months of follow-up. In the study population, the AUCs for the New, RIETE, Cuschieri, and de Groot scores were 0.673 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.616-0.729, P < .001), 0.742 (95% CI 0.690-0.794, P < .001), 0.598 (95% CI 0.537-0.659, P = .002), and 0.875 (95% CI 0.839-0.912, P < .001), respectively. After validation, the de Groot Score has better performance. Among the four scores, the de Groot Score might be more suitable for helping Chinese clinicians to predict the risk of GIB in patients taking antiplatelet drugs, and reduce GIB events.

Comparison of clinical performance of four gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores in Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulants.

Gastrointestinal bleeding is the most common bleeding complication during anticoagulant therapy. A reliable bleeding risk score can help the clinician assess risk of bleeding in individual patients and select the anticoagulant regimen. This study retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with atrial fibrillation who received anticoagulant therapy from July 2015 to December 2018 at two centers-the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital and Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University. Demographic data, clinical findings, and laboratory results were collected from the hospital records. Patients were followed up for 6 months. The performance of four bleeding risk scores (New Score, RIETE Score, Cuschieri et al. Score, de Groot et al. Score) for prediction of gastrointestinal bleeding was assessed using the area under the curve. A total of 3462 patients (mean age, 66.3 ± 11.5 years; 59.6% males; 1055 direct oral anticoagulants users and 2407 warfarin users) were followed up for 6 months. While 99/3462 (2.9%) patients had gastrointestinal bleeding. The area under the curves for the New, RIETE, Cuschieri et al., de Groot et al. scores were 0.652 (95% CI 0.576-0.728), 0.862 (95% CI 0.809-0.914), 0.606 (95% CI 0.527-0.685), and 0.873 (95% CI 0.816-0.929), respectively. Among the four BRSs evaluated, the RIETE score and the de Groot et al. score appear to have the good predictive value, while the NEW score and the Cuschieri et al. score did not sufficiently predict gastrointestinal bleeding risk within the study Chinese population.