Retirement age does not modify the association of prior working conditions with self-rated health and mortality in retirees: results from a prospective study of retired French workers.

OBJECTIVE: It is unclear whether retirement age can modify the association of working conditions with health and mortality in retirees who are no longer exposed to these conditions. METHODS: The present study investigated this issue in a cohort of 13,378 French workers in whom self-rated health and mortality were measured over 15 years after statutory retirement. The analyses were also performed in homogenous clusters of workers differentiated on the basis of working conditions, social position, birth and retirement years. RESULTS: Bad working conditions before retirement, which were assessed using a global score combining 25 different occupational exposures, were associated with higher rates of suboptimum self-rated health and mortality in retirees after adjusting for retirement age, social position, demographics and health status before retirement. These rates were also substantially higher in the cluster of workers characterized by bad working conditions in comparison to other clusters. In contrast, retirement age was not associated with self-rated health or mortality after adjusting for working conditions, social position, demographics and health status before retirement. Likewise, no association of retirement age with self-rated health or mortality was found in any cluster of workers and no interactions were observed with any of these clusters. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that bad working conditions before retirement have long-term detrimental effects on health and mortality in retirees and that retirement age does not modulate these effects. Improving work environment rather than modifying retirement age should be prioritized to promote health and reduce mortality not only in workers but also in retirees.

Pharmacological Characterization of Aprocitentan, a Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist, Alone and in Combination with Blockers of the Renin Angiotensin System, in Two Models of Experimental Hypertension.

The endothelin (ET) system has emerged as a novel target for hypertension treatment where a medical need persists despite availability of several pharmacological classes, including renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers. ET receptor antagonism has demonstrated efficacy in preclinical models of hypertension, especially under low-renin conditions and in hypertensive patients. We investigated the pharmacology of aprocitentan (N-[5-(4-bromophenyl)-6-[2-[(5-bromo-2-pyrimidinyl)oxy]ethoxy]-4-pyrimidinyl]-sulfamide), a potent dual ETA/ETB receptor antagonist, on blood pressure (BP) in two models of experimental hypertension: deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt rats (low-renin model) and spontaneously hypertensive rats [(SHR), normal renin model]. We also compared the effect of its combination with RAS blockers (valsartan and enalapril) with that of the combination of the mineraloreceptor antagonist spironolactone with the same RAS blockers on BP and renal function in hypertensive rats. Aprocitentan was more potent and efficacious in lowering BP in conscious DOCA-salt rats than in SHRs. In DOCA-salt rats, single oral doses of aprocitentan induced a dose-dependent and long-lasting BP decrease and 4-week administration of aprocitentan dose dependently decreased BP (statistically significant) and renal vascular resistance, and reduced left ventricle hypertrophy (nonsignificant). Aprocitentan was synergistic with valsartan and enalapril in decreasing BP in DOCA-salt rats and SHRs while spironolactone demonstrated additive effects with these RAS blockers. In hypertensive rats under sodium restriction and enalapril, addition of aprocitentan further decreased BP without causing renal impairment, in contrast to spironolactone. In conclusion, ETA/ETB receptor antagonism represents a promising therapeutic approach to hypertension, especially with low-renin characteristics, and could be used in combination with RAS blockers, without increasing the risk of renal impairment.

Primary Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Predicted by Poor Working Conditions in the GAZEL Cohort.

The mechanisms by which work environment might influence cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are still a matter of debate. In particular, the involvement of the main behavioral and clinical risk factors and their relationships with working conditions are not always clear, despite an abundant body of literature. Most studies have investigated the impact of a limited number of characteristics of the work environment on the occurrence of 1 or a few risk factors. In contrast, in this study we used a global approach in which 30 objective and subjective indicators of working conditions were tested as predictors of 9 modifiable CVD risk factors in a well-characterized cohort of 20,625 middle-aged French workers who were followed from the 1990s until they retired or until December 31, 2013. The incidence of 3 CVD risk factors (obesity, sleep complaints, and depression) was predicted by a large number of indicators of working conditions in both age- and sex-adjusted and multivariate-adjusted Cox regression models, whatever the significance threshold retained. These results suggest the existence of close relationships between a poor work environment and a higher risk of developing obesity, sleep complaints, or depression. These risk factors may contribute to increased CVD risk not only when workers are exposed to poor working conditions but also after retirement, as predictors of the appearance of other risk factors.

Unemployment is associated with high cardiovascular event rate and increased all-cause mortality in middle-aged socially privileged individuals.

PURPOSE: To assess prospectively the association between employment status and cardiovascular health outcomes in socially privileged individuals. METHODS: The incidence of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality rate were monitored during 12 years in a national sample of 5,852 French volunteers, aged 45-64 years, who were free of cardiovascular disease or other overt disease at baseline. The association between health outcomes and employment status was tested using Cox proportional modelling with adjustment for confounding factors. RESULTS: Compared to randomly selected individuals, these volunteers were characterized by higher education level and socio-economic status and lower cardiovascular risk and mortality rate. A total of 242 cardiovascular events (3.5 events per 1,000 person-years) and 152 deaths from all causes (2.2 deaths per 1,000 person-years) occurred during follow-up. After adjustment for age and gender, both cardiovascular event risk [HR (95% CI) 1.84 (1.15-2.83), p = 0.01] and all-cause mortality [2.79 (1.66-4.47), p = 0.0002] were increased in unemployed individuals compared to workers. These poor health outcomes were observed to the same extent after further adjustment for clinical, behavioural and socio-demographic characteristics of individuals at baseline [HR (95% CI) 1.74 (1.07-2.72), p = 0.03 and 2.89 (1.70-4.69), p = 0.0002, respectively]. In contrast, neither cardiovascular event risk nor all-cause mortality was significantly increased in retired individuals compared to workers after adjustment for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the existence of a link between unemployment and poor cardiovascular health and suggest that this link is not mediated by conventional risk factors in middle-aged socially privileged individuals.

Aldosterone synthase inhibition: cardiorenal protection in animal disease models and translation of hormonal effects to human subjects.

BACKGROUND: Aldosterone synthase inhibition provides the potential to attenuate both the mineralocorticoid receptor-dependent and independent actions of aldosterone. In vitro studies with recombinant human enzymes showed LCI699 to be a potent, reversible, competitive inhibitor of aldosterone synthase (K i = 1.4 ± 0.2 nmol/L in humans) with relative selectivity over 11ß-hydroxylase. METHODS: Hormonal effects of orally administered LCI699 were examined in rat and monkey in vivo models of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and angiotensin-II-stimulated aldosterone release, and were compared with the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist eplerenone in a randomized, placebo-controlled study conducted in 99 healthy human subjects. The effects of LCI699 and eplerenone on cardiac and renal sequelae of aldosterone excess were investigated in a double-transgenic rat (dTG rat) model overexpressing human renin and angiotensinogen. RESULTS: Rat and monkey in vivo models of stimulated aldosterone release predicted human dose- and exposure-response relationships, but overestimated the selectivity of LCI699 in humans. In the dTG rat model, LCI699 dose-dependently blocked increases in aldosterone, prevented development of cardiac and renal functional abnormalities independent of blood pressure changes, and prolonged survival. Eplerenone prolonged survival to a similar extent, but was less effective in preventing cardiac and renal damage. In healthy human subjects, LCI699 0.5 mg selectively reduced plasma and 24 h urinary aldosterone by 49 ± 3% and 39 ± 6% respectively (Day 1, mean ± SEM; P < 0.001 vs placebo), which was associated with natriuresis and an increase in plasma renin activity. Doses of LCI699 greater than 1 mg inhibited basal and ACTH-stimulated cortisol. Eplerenone 100 mg increased plasma and 24 h urinary aldosterone while stimulating natriuresis and increasing renin activity. In contrast to eplerenone, LCI699 increased the aldosterone precursor 11-deoxycorticosterone and urinary potassium excretion. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide new insights into the cardiac and renal effects of inhibiting aldosterone synthase in experimental models and translation of the hormonal effects to humans. Selective inhibition of aldosterone synthase appears to be a promising approach to treat diseases associated with aldosterone excess.

Aldosterone synthase inhibition in humans.

Aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) inhibition has emerged as a new option for the treatment of hypertension, heart failure and renal disorders, in addition to mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) blockade. The aim is to decrease aldosterone concentrations in both plasma and tissues, thereby decreasing MR-dependent and MR-independent effects in the cardiac, vascular and renal target organs. LCI699 was the first orally active aldosterone-synthase inhibitor to be developed for human use. Its structure is similar to that of FAD286, the dextroenantiomer of the aromatase inhibitor, fadrozole. It dose-dependently decreases plasma and urine aldosterone concentrations by up to 70 or 80% and increases plasma renin activity in healthy male subjects on a low-sodium diet. LCI699 does not decrease basal plasma cortisol concentrations at doses of 0.5-3 mg q.d., but it blocks the cortisol response to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) at doses ≥ 3 mg q.d. In a proof-of-concept study in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), LCI699 (0.5-1 mg b.i.d.) induced a dose-dependent and reversible 70-80% decrease in plasma and urinary aldosterone concentration accompanied by a massive dose-dependent accumulation of deoxycorticosterone (>+700%), the aldosterone precursor, in the plasma, thereby confirming the inhibition of the CYP11B2 gene product. This effect was associated with a rapid correction of hypokalaemia, a modest decrease in blood pressure (BP) and a mild increase in plasma renin concentration in patients with PA. LCI699 administration induced biological signs of partial inhibition of the glucocorticoid axis, such as dose-dependent increases in both plasma ACTH and 11-deoxycortisol (the precursor of cortisol) concentrations, consistent with the inhibition of the CYP11B1 gene product. An 8-week placebo-controlled dose-response study on patients with Stage 1 and 2 essential hypertension reported an optimal decrease in BP with a dose of 1 mg LCI699 q.d., which had an antihypertensive effect similar to that of 50 mg b.i.d. eplerenone. A blunted cortisol response to ACTH was observed in 20% of patients, but the clinical and biological safety and tolerability of LCI699 were similar to those of placebo and eplerenone. The discovery of this first orally active aldosterone synthase inhibitor, LCI699, has provided new opportunities to assess the feasibility and the haemodynamic, biological and safety consequences as well as the limitations of this new approach to block the aldosterone pathway in hypertensive patients. However, as the effects of LCI699 on the glucocorticoid axis limit the use of higher doses range because of the loss of selectivity for CYP11B2, this aldosterone synthase inhibitor cannot replace the MR blockade in patients with hypertension, other cardiovascular or renal disorders. The development of second-generation aldosterone synthase inhibitors with a higher selectivity index for CYP11B2 than LCI699 should make it possible to test this approach at much higher doses in these patients, after the necessary toxicology and Phase I studies.

Renin inhibitors and cardiovascular and renal protection: an endless quest?

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has become a major therapeutic approach in medicine since the end of the 1970's. Although these molecules were the first RAS blockers to be developed, it would have been physiologically and pharmacologically more pertinent to selectively inhibit renin itself. Indeed, the reaction between renin and its unique substrate, angiotensinogen, is the highly regulated and rate-limiting step of the RAS. The development of direct renin inhibitors (DRI) has been a slow and complex process and the synthesis of the first orally active DRI, aliskiren, was only achieved in the 2000's. Its pharmacological profile in patients with hypertension, diabetic nephropathy or heart failure, in addition to experimental evidence, suggests that aliskiren may be of value for the management of cardiovascular and renal diseases. However, the long-term, randomized, placebo-controlled, morbidity/mortality trial, ALTITUDE, which included 8,600 patients with type 2 diabetes, proteinuria and a high cardiovascular risk already treated with ACE inhibitors or ARBs was terminated in December 2011 because of futility and an increased incidence of serious adverse events in the aliskiren 300 mg arm. Other long-term studies are still ongoing to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of aliskiren to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure and in elderly individuals (≥65 years) with systolic blood pressure of 130 to 159 mmHg, no overt cardiovascular disease, and a high cardiovascular risk profile. In the meantime, according to the European Medicines Agency recommendations, aliskiren should not be prescribed to diabetic patients in combination with ACE inhibitors or ARBs.

20-Year prevalence projections for dementia and impact of preventive policy about risk factors.

Incidence of dementia increases sharply with age and, because of the increase in life expectancy, the number of dementia cases is expected to rise dramatically over time. Some studies suggest that controlling some modifiable risk factors for dementia like diabetes or hypertension could lower its incidence. However, as treating these vascular factors would also reduce mortality risk, the actual impact of such public-health intervention on dementia prevalence is not known. Accounting for the impact of dementia and risk factors on mortality, the aim of this work was (1) to compute projections of age- and-sex specific prevalence of dementia in France from 2010 to 2030, (2) to evaluate how public-health interventions targeting risk factors for dementia could change these projections. Age-and-sex specific incidence of dementia and mortality of demented subjects were estimated from the Paquid population-based cohort using a semi-parametric illness-death model. Future global mortality rates and population sizes were obtained from national demographic projections. Under the assumption that life expectancy will increase by 3.5 years for men and 2.8 years for women by 2030, the number of subjects with dementia was estimated to increase by about 75% from 2010 to 2030 with a 200% increase after 90 years of age. Therapeutic intervention on the whole population reducing high blood pressure prevalence would lead to a decrease in both dementia incidence rates and mortality and would have a modest impact on the number of dementia cases. On the other hand, a preventive dementia treatment targeting ApoE4 carriers would probably not improve survival and hence would decrease dementia prevalence by 15-25%.

Clinical outcomes by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score and blood pressure level in high risk individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Clinical practice guidelines for patients with diabetes recommend using blood pressure (BP) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk to guide antihypertensive treatment. While this approach directs treatment to patients who should receive a large ASCVD risk reduction, its effect on other outcomes is uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the contributions of systolic blood pressure level (SBP) and predicted 10-year ASCVD risk using Pooled Cohort risk equations to the prediction of major macrovascular disease, death and major microvascular disease in patients with diabetes. Data came from 7426 individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) without macrovascular disease at baseline in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. The risk for major macrovascular events and death increased progressively across ASCVD risk categories. Compared to participants with 10-year predicted ASCVD risk <20% and SBP <130 mmHg, the hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals (CIs)) associated with SBP ≥150 mmHg and 10-year predicted ASCVD risk <20%, 20-34% and ≥35% were 1.01 (0.58, 1.77), 1.90 (1.28, 2.84) and 2.82 (1.98, 4.01) for major macrovascular disease, respectively, and 0.83 (0.42, 1.62), 1.79 (1.13, 2.82) and 3.29 (2.22, 4.88) for death, respectively. The risk for major microvascular disease increased with BP regardless of ASCVD risk; HRs for SBP ≥150 mmHg and 10-year predicted ASCVD risk <20%, 20-34% and ≥35% vs. ASCVD risk <20% and SBP <130 mmHg were 1.52 (1.08,2.13), 1.47 (1.10, 1.96) and 1.23 (0.94, 1.60), respectively. ASCVD risk in addition to SBP improved the estimation of major macrovascular events and death but not major microvascular events among individuals with T2D.

Effects of a novel aldosterone synthase inhibitor for treatment of primary hypertension: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: LCI699, a novel inhibitor of aldosterone synthase, reduces serum aldosterone, and may have benefit in the treatment of hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed the first double-blind, randomized trial with LCI699 in patients with primary hypertension. We randomized 524 patients to LCI699 0.25 mg once daily (n=92), 0.5 mg once daily (n=88), 1.0 mg once daily (n=86), and 0.5 mg twice daily (n=97); eplerenone 50 mg twice daily (n=84); or placebo (n=77) for 8 weeks. Adrenocorticotropic hormone (250 µg IV) stimulation testing was performed in a subset of patients to quantify the selectivity of LCI699 for aldosterone synthase compared with 11-ß-hydroxylase. Reductions in clinic diastolic blood pressure were significant for LCI699 1.0 mg (-7.1 mm Hg; P=0.0012) and eplerenone 50 mg twice daily (-7.9 mm Hg; P<0.0001) compared with placebo (-2.6 mm Hg) but not other doses of LCI699. Significant reductions in clinic systolic blood pressure were observed with all doses of LCI699 (P<0.005 or better) and eplerenone (P<0.0001). All doses of LCI699 significantly reduced 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure compared with placebo (P<0.01). Adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation of cortisol was suppressed in ≈20% of subjects receiving LCI699 at a total daily dose of 1.0 mg. Safety and tolerability were similar among LCI699, placebo, and eplerenone. CONCLUSIONS: Aldosterone synthase inhibition with LCI699 significantly lowered clinic and ambulatory blood pressure. A minority of subjects developed blunted adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated release of cortisol. These results support additional research to evaluate use of aldosterone synthase inhibition in primary hypertension and/or patients characterized by aldosterone excess. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00758524.

Respective Mediating Effects of Social Position and Work Environment on the Incidence of Common Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

Background Social position and work environment are highly interrelated and their respective contribution to cardiovascular risk is still debated. Methods and Results In a cohort of 20 625 French workers followed for 25 years, discrete-time survival analysis with reciprocal mediating effects, adjusted for sex, age, and parental history of early coronary heart disease, was performed using Bayesian structural equation modeling to simultaneously investigate the extent to which social position mediates the effect of work environment and, inversely, the extent to which work environment mediates the effect of social position on the incidence of common cardiovascular risk factors. Depending on the factor, social position mediates 2% to 53% of the effect of work environment and work environment mediates 9% to 87% of the effect of social position. The mediation by work environment is larger than that by social position for the incidence of obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, sleep complaints, and depression (mediation ratios 1.32-41.5, 6.67 when modeling the 6 factors together). In contrast, the mediation by social position is larger than that by work environment for the incidence of nonmoderate alcohol consumption, smoking, and leisure-time physical inactivity (mediation ratios 0.16-0.69, 0.26 when modeling the 3 factors together). Conclusions The incidence of behavioral risk factors seems strongly dependent on social position whereas that of clinical risk factors seems closely related to work environment, suggesting that preventive strategies should be based on education and general practice for the former and on work organization and occupational medicine for the latter.

Trends in Worldwide Research in Hypertension Over the Period 1999-2018: A Bibliometric Study.

Bibliometric analysis, a powerful tool for assessing trends in research output, was employed to analyze the evolution of hypertension research over a 20-year period. The analysis was based on 90 308 original articles and a citation analysis. The use of bibliometric as a potential tool for shaping research policy at the institution or country level was also explored. The number of published hypertension articles increased by 43.5% over the 20-year period. By contrast, the increase in the number of articles in all medical disciplines was 96%, and in the cardiovascular field was 64%. Of the 6 countries producing the largest number of articles, the United States was consistently the major contributor. There was a slight decrease from Japan, a slight increase from the United Kingdom, and relatively stable output from Germany and Italy over the study period. Output from China showed the strongest growth. The trends in Specialization Index and Category Normalized Citation Impact varied by country. In Russia, Poland, and Brazil, increases in output were greater for hypertension research than for medical research in general. The United Kingdom and Denmark had greater hypertension research output than the other countries. VOSviewer analysis showed an intensification of collaborations between countries and a shift, over 10 years, from 3 clusters towards 2 clusters. Such analysis may help to shape research policy at the country level and can be similarly performed for institutions. Historical changes in hypertension research can be monitored over decades if the same channels continue to be used for communication of scientific results.

Randomized Dose-Response Study of the New Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist Aprocitentan in Hypertension.

This study examined the dose-response characteristics of aprocitentan, a dual endothelin A/endothelin B receptor antagonist, in patients with essential hypertension. In a randomized, double-blind, parallel study design, eligible patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 90-109 mm Hg received aprocitentan 5, 10, 25, or 50 mg, placebo, or lisinopril 20 mg as a positive control once daily for 8 weeks. Multiple automated office BP readings were obtained with patients resting unattended (unattended automated office BP) at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 8. Ambulatory BP was monitored for 24 hours at baseline and week 8. After a single-blind placebo run-in period, 490 eligible patients were randomized to the double-blind phase, with 409 patients completing 8 weeks of therapy per protocol. Aprocitentan 10, 25, and 50 mg decreased sitting systolic/diastolic unattended automated office BP from baseline to week 8 (placebo-corrected decreases: 7.05/4.93, 9.90/6.99, and 7.58/4.95 mm Hg, respectively, P≤0.014 versus placebo), compared with an unattended automated office BP reduction of 4.84/3.81 mm Hg with lisinopril 20 mg. For patients with valid ambulatory BP, aprocitentan 10, 25, and 50 mg significantly decreased placebo-corrected 24-hour BP by 3.99/4.04, 4.83/5.89, and 3.67/4.45 mm Hg, respectively. Incidence of adverse events was similar in the aprocitentan groups (22.0%-40.2%) and the placebo group (36.6%). Aprocitentan produced dose-dependent decreases in hemoglobin, hematocrit, albumin, and uric acid, an increase in estimated plasma volume, but no change in weight versus placebo. These findings support further investigation of aprocitentan at doses of 10 to 25 mg in hypertension. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02603809.

Activity assays and immunoassays for plasma Renin and prorenin: information provided and precautions necessary for accurate measurement.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of plasma renin is important for the clinical assessment of hypertensive patients. The most common methods for measuring plasma renin are the plasma renin activity (PRA) assay and the renin immunoassay. The clinical application of renin inhibitor therapy has thrown into focus the differences in information provided by activity assays and immunoassays for renin and prorenin measurement and has drawn attention to the need for precautions to ensure their accurate measurement. CONTENT: Renin activity assays and immunoassays provide related but different information. Whereas activity assays measure only active renin, immunoassays measure both active and inhibited renin. Particular care must be taken in the collection and processing of blood samples and in the performance of these assays to avoid errors in renin measurement. Both activity assays and immunoassays are susceptible to renin overestimation due to prorenin activation. In addition, activity assays performed with peptidase inhibitors may overestimate the degree of inhibition of PRA by renin inhibitor therapy. Moreover, immunoassays may overestimate the reactive increase in plasma renin concentration in response to renin inhibitor therapy, owing to the inhibitor promoting conversion of prorenin to an open conformation that is recognized by renin immunoassays. CONCLUSIONS: The successful application of renin assays to patient care requires that the clinician and the clinical chemist understand the information provided by these assays and of the precautions necessary to ensure their accuracy.