Overburden of rare ALMS1 deleterious variants in Chinese early-onset type 2 diabetes with severe insulin resistance.

AIMS: Alström syndrome (AS) is a rare recessive disorder characterised by diabetes, obesity, insulin resistance (IR), and visual and hearing impairments. Mutations in the ALMS1 gene have been identified as the causative agents of AS. This study aimed to explore the relationship between rare ALMS1 variants and clinical features in Chinese patients with early-onset type 2 diabetes (age at diagnosis ≤40 years; EOD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: ALMS1 gene sequencing was performed in 611 Chinese individuals with EOD, 36 with postprandial hyperinsulinemia, and 47 with pre-diabetes and fasting IR. In-silico prediction algorithm and the American College of Medical Genetics Guidelines (ACMG) were used to evaluate the deleteriousness and pathogenicity of the variants. RESULTS: Sixty-two rare ALMS1 variants (frequency <0.005) were identified in 82 patients with EOD. Nineteen variants were predicted to be deleterious (pD). Patients with EOD carrying pD variants had higher fasting C-peptide, postprandial C-peptide, and HOMA2-IR levels than those without variants. The frequency of ALMS1 pD variants in the subgroup with more insulin-resistant EOD was higher than that in other EOD subgroups. Two patients with EOD, obesity, and IR who carried one heterozygous pathogenic/likely pathogenic rare variant of ALMS1 according to ACMG were identified. Moreover, rare heterozygous pD variants of ALMS1 were found in participants from cohorts of postprandial hyperinsulinemia as well as in pre-diabetes with fasting IR. CONCLUSIONS: ALMS1 rare pD variants are enriched in the populations with significant IR, which is a major hallmark of diabetes pathogenesis. Accordingly, our exploratory study provides insights and hypotheses for further studies of gene function.

Hypoglycemic Response to Dorzagliatin in a Patient With GCK-MODY.

OBJECTIVE: Metformin, insulin, and insulin secretagogues do not alter HbA1c levels in glucokinase maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY). However, the efficacy of the new hypoglycemic drugs on GCK-MODY remains unclear. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We describe a case of GCK-MODY with unchanged blood glucose under different therapies during an 8 years' follow-up. His HbA1c and biochemical indices under different hypoglycemic treatments were recorded. RESULTS: Oral glucose-lowering drugs, including thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, α-glucosidase inhibitor, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor that had not been evaluated previously, did not improve the HbA1c level in this patient. However, the glucokinase activator dorzagliatin effectively and safely lowered his HbA1c level. CONCLUSIONS: Dorzagliatin was effective and safe in this patient with GCK-MODY, providing potential application prospects for precise treatment of GCK-MODY with dorzagliatin.

A randomized clinical trial for meal bolus decision using learning-based control in adults with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: We proposed an artificial-pancreas-like algorithm (AP-A) which could automatically determine the pre-prandial insulin dose based on intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) data trajectories in multiple dose injection (MDI) therapy. We aim to determine whether pre-prandial insulin dose adjustments guided by the AP-A is as effective and safe as physician decisions. METHODS: We performed a randomized, single-blind, clinical trial at a tertiary, referral hospital in Beijing, China. Type 2 diabetes participants were eligible if they were aged  18 years, with a glycated hemoglobin of 8.0% or higher. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the AP-A arm supervised by physician and the conventional physician treatment arm. The primary objective was to compare percentage time spent with sensor glucose level in 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (TIR) between the two study arms. Safety was assessed by the percentage time spent with sensor glucose level below 3.0 mmol/L (TBR). RESULTS: 140 participants were screened, of whom 119 were randomly assigned to AP-A arm (n = 59) or physician arm (n = 60). The TIR achieved by the AP-A arm was statistically non-inferior compared with the control arm (72.4% (63.3-82.1) vs. 71.2% (54.9-81.4)), with a median difference of 1.33% (95% CI, -6.00 to 10.94, non-inferiority margin -7.5%). TBR was also statistically non-inferior between the AP-A and control arms (0.0% (0.0-0.0) vs. 0.0% (0.0-0.0), respectively; median difference (95% CI, 0.00% (0.00 to 0.00), non-inferiority margin 2.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The AP-A supported physician titration of pre-prandial insulin dosage offers non-inferior glycemic control compared with optimal physician care in type 2 diabetes.