RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are myriad strategies to reduce opioid consumption after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recent studies have suggested that preoperative counseling may reduce opioid use after a variety of orthopedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether preoperative video-based patient education regarding opioid use and abuse reduces opioid consumption after TKA. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients were randomized before TKA to either receive preoperative video-based counseling or not. Counseling involved a pretaped 5-minute video that educated patients on statistics regarding the "opioid epidemic" and discussed safe use and alternatives to opioids after TKA. There were no significant differences in baseline patient demographics between groups. All patients received a similar multimodal perioperative pain management protocol and completed a daily diary for 2 weeks postoperatively. Diary records measured pain levels using a visual analog score, opioid consumption, side effects experienced, and patient opinion and satisfaction regarding their pain control. RESULTS: Patients in the counseling group consumed significantly less morphine milligram equivalents on postoperative days 0 to 3 (78.8 versus 106.1, P = .020) and in week one postoperatively (129.9 versus 180.7, P = .028), with a trend of less consumption over 2 weeks postoperatively (186.9 versus 239.1, P = .194). There were no significant differences in the number of patients requiring refills, side effects, or daily pain levels between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study found significantly decreased opioid consumption within the first week after TKA in patients who received preoperative video counseling.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Artroplastia do Joelho , Aconselhamento , Dor Pós-Operatória , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Medição da Dor , Gravação em Vídeo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Racial disparities have been documented in care of many respiratory diseases but little is known about the impact of race on the treatment of interstitial lung diseases. The purpose of this study was to determine how race and ethnicity influence treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. METHODS: Adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (>18 years) were identified using TriNetX database and paired-wised comparisons were performed for antifibrotic treatment among White, Black, Hispanic and Asian patients. Mortality of treated and untreated IPF patients was compared after propensity score matching for age, sex, nicotine dependence, oxygen dependence and predicted FVC. Additional comparisons were performed in subgroups of IPF patients older than 65 years of age and with lower lung function. RESULTS: Of 47,184 IPF patients identified, the majority were White (35,082), followed by Hispanic (6079), Black (5245) and Asian (1221). When subgroups were submitted to matched cohort pair-wise comparisons, anti-fibrotic usage was lower among Black patients compared to White (6.2% vs. 11.4%, p-value <0.0001), Hispanic (10.8% vs. 20.2%, p-value <0.0001) and Asian patients (9.6% vs. 14.7%, p-value = 0.0006). Similar treatment differences were noted in Black individuals older than 65 years and those with lower lung function. Mortality among White patients, but not Hispanic, Black, or Asian patients, was lower in patients on antifibrotic therapy versus not on therapy. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that Black IPF patients had lower antifibrotic use compared to White, Hispanic and Asian patients. Our findings suggest that urgent action is needed to understand the reason why racial disparities exist in the treatment of IPF.
Assuntos
Antifibróticos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática , Adulto , Humanos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/epidemiologia , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/etnologia , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/mortalidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Antifibróticos/uso terapêutico , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify individuals at risk of asthma by assessing the prevalence of asthma in an urban, athletic adolescent population using preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) data. STUDY DESIGN: Using the Athlete Health Organization (AHO) PPE data from 2016 to 2019, asthma prevalence was collected by reported diagnosis in the history or physical. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were performed to characterize the relationship between asthma and social factors such as race, ethnicity, and income. Control variables such as age, body mass index, blood pressure, sex, and family history were also collected. RESULTS: Over 2016-2019, 1,400 athletes ranging from 9 to 19 years of age had completed PPEs (Table 1). A large percentage of student-athletes were found to have asthma (23.4%), of whom a majority 86.3% resided in low-income zip-codes. Additionally, 65.5% of athletes with asthma identified as Black, with race being associated with asthma prevalence (p < 0.05). Demographic factors like income, age, and gender were not significantly associated with asthma prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: Self-identified Black individuals reported higher prevalence of asthma when compared to the general population. Identifying factors like race and income that place adolescent athletes at risk of asthma is a key step to understanding the complex relationship between asthma and social determinants of health. This work advances the conversation for establishing best practices for serving vulnerable populations, as seen in this urban population of children with asthma.
Assuntos
Asma , Esportes , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Prevalência , População Urbana , Asma/epidemiologia , AtletasRESUMO
The past decade has seen a shift in health care delivery models to be more value-based: patient-centered, accessible, and cost-effective. One of the primary modes of addressing these needs has been through the implementation of telemedicine-digital health care technology that streamlines and enhances traditional health care delivery. In the orthopaedic setting, there are various methods of telemedicine utilization, each uniquely optimized for different clinical scenarios. There are certain financial and technological limitations when utilizing telemedicine for orthopaedic care that pose notable barriers to uniform utilization across the specialty. Nonetheless, these challenges are currently being tested as orthopaedic surgeons continuously become more innovative and creative as to how they deliver care. As we enter our "new normal" in the post-COVID-19 era, the availability and use of telemedicine will equip orthopaedic surgeons to deliver high-quality, affordable, and accessible care in an ever-changing health care landscape.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Ortopedia , Telemedicina , Tecnologia Biomédica , Humanos , Assistência ao PacienteRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Unnecessary emergency department (ED) transfers represent a notable source of excess costs and misutilization of healthcare resources, particularly with management of acute pediatric musculoskeletal injuries. This study used institutional data to create a model investigating the expected costs of a formal peer-to-peer telemedicine intervention designed to triage pediatric orthopaedic transfers, which we hypothesized would decrease healthcare costs by minimizing unwarranted ED-to-ED transfers. METHODS: In this retrospective modeling analysis, 350 pediatric orthopaedic trauma patients transferred to two in-network referral hospitals from outside facilities were identified and stratified into three groups representing how patients theoretically optimally could have been treated. Group 1 patients required ambulance transfer, group 2 patients required ED-level care but no ambulance transfer, and group 3 patients did not require ED-level care. Base case estimates for the proportions of patients in each group, probability of ambulance transport, and direct costs of care for each patient were derived from the database. A decision tree was developed to evaluate the expected costs of two triaging strategies: (1) transfer everyone or (2) triage first using e-consultation. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to determine how the results of the decision analysis varied across ranges of cost and probability estimates. RESULTS: In the base case analysis, the telemedicine triage strategy was cheaper than the transfer-all strategy ($4,858 versus $6,610). In a 2-way sensitivity analysis comparing cost of a telemedicine visit and proportion of telemedicine triaged patients requiring ambulance transport, the telemedicine triage strategy remained cheaper than the transfer-all strategy across almost all possibilities for both variables. Additional potential benefits of triage before transfer, such as decreased length of time to completion of ED visit, cost to the family, and patient comfort and satisfaction, were not incorporated into this analysis. The potential for misdiagnosis related to telehealth and its potential costs were not included. DISCUSSION: We revealed substantial cost savings for the healthcare system from implementing a telehealth platform for peer-to-peer consultation when considering patient transfer for musculoskeletal trauma. Initial peer-to-peer e-consultations cost less than reflexive ambulance transfer in most situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level II.
RESUMO
In the current study we evaluated an afterschool nutrition education programme, called Vetri Cooking Lab (VCL), for promoting healthy and diverse eating habits among at-risk children in the Greater Philadelphia area. To understand potential programme impacts, we conducted a longitudinal analysis of survey data collected before and after participation in VCL. Main study included cooking confidence, cooking knowledge, changes in dietary consumption behaviours, and changes in vegetable preferences. Participants included students in grades 3-11 enrolled in VCL during the 2018-19 school year at VCL sites (n = 60) throughout Philadelphia, PA, and Camden, NJ. Eligible participants completed surveys both before and after participating in the programme. We found that students' confidence and knowledge increased (P < 0.001) after the cooking intervention. Knowledge and confidence were positively associated (r = 0.55; P < 0.001). Confidence was correlated with consumption behaviour changes (r = 0.18; P = 0.022). Confidence was positively associated with consumption changes in both our adjusted (OR = 1.81; P < 0.001) and unadjusted models (aOR = 1.88; P = 0.013). Compared to Black students, White students were more likely to report consumption changes (aOR = 5.83; P = 0.013). Hispanic/Latino participants and participants who spoke Spanish had nearly three times higher odds of consumption behaviour changes (Hispanic/Latino OR = 2.55; P = 0.007; Spanish OR = 3.04; P = 0.005). Student age and gender were not associated with behaviour changes. Our research demonstrates that programmes integrating practical cooking skills education along with nutrition, food, and cooking education can improve confidence and knowledge about healthy food choices amongst children driving an overall improvement in children's eating habits.
Assuntos
Culinária , Dieta Saudável , Comportamento Alimentar , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Philadelphia , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Preferências Alimentares , Estudantes , Adolescente , Estudos Longitudinais , Instituições Acadêmicas , Verduras , Inquéritos e Questionários , Educação em Saúde , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , DietaRESUMO
As medicine shifts to a value-based focus, health care providers in inpatient settings are actively seeking approaches to providing high-quality patient care without exacerbating prevailing cost burden. Complementary and integrative medicine may offer one potential solution for this challenge. Although the benefits of utilizing integrative practices in the inpatient setting have not been explored extensively thus far, early evidence demonstrates great promise of using integrative modalities to improve symptom burden in the inpatient setting while increasing patient pain satisfaction and reducing overall costs of care. Currently, social, educational, and financial barriers exist, limiting the widespread incorporation of complementary and integrative medicine into the inpatient setting. Nonetheless, a more robust body of literature demonstrating the effectiveness of complementary and integrative medicine in reducing costs of care and improving patient outcomes may help address these limitations and lead to the acceptance of integrative practices as the standard of high-value inpatient care.
Assuntos
Medicina Integrativa , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Hospitalização , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade da Assistência à SaúdeRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preoperative clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification is associated with differences in patient-reported outcomes and spinopelvic parameters after posterior decompression and fusion for L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). SUMMARY: The CARDS classification for lumbar DS, an alternative to the Meyerding system, considers additional radiographic findings such as disc space collapse and segmental kyphosis and stratifies DS into 4 radiographically distinct classes. Although CARDS has been shown to be a reliable and reproducible method for classifying DS, very few studies have assessed whether the CARDS types represent distinct clinical entities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients with L4-L5 DS who underwent posterior lumbar decompression and fusion. Changes in spinopelvic alignment and patient-reported outcomes measures, including recovery ratios and percentage of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference, were compared among patients in each CARDS classification 1-year postoperatively using analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis H with Dunn post hoc analysis. Multiple linear regression determined whether CARDS groups significantly predicted patient-reported outcomes measures, lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) while controlling for demographic and surgical characteristics. RESULTS: Preoperative type B spondylolisthesis predicted decreased improvement in "physical component and mental component score of the short form-12" compared with type A spondylolisthesis (ß-coefficient = -5.96, P = 0.031) at 1 year. Significant differences were found between CARDS groups with regards to ΔLL (A: -1.63 degrees vs B: -1.17 degrees vs C: 2.88 degrees vs D: 3.19 degrees, P = 0.010) and ΔPI-LL (A: 1.02 degrees vs B: 2.09 degrees vs C: -2.59 degrees vs D: -3.70 degrees, P = 0.012). Preoperative type C spondylolisthesis was found to predict increased LL (ß-coefficient = 4.46, P = 0.0054) and decreased PI-LL (ß-coefficient = -3.49, P = 0.025) at 1 year compared with type A spondylolisthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and radiographic outcomes differed significantly by preoperative CARDS classification type for patients undergoing posterior decompression and fusion for L4-L5 DS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Assuntos
Lordose , Fusão Vertebral , Espondilolistese , Animais , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espondilolistese/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodosRESUMO
Background Telehealth platforms may save resources for patients and providers, but the precise impact of their incorporation during the postoperative period is not well understood. The goal of this study is to determine whether telehealth incorporation in the postoperative period leads to an overall increase in healthcare utilization after upper extremity surgery. Methodology Patients seen for a postoperative telehealth visit after upper extremity surgery were randomly selected and retrospectively enrolled. Complications and the total number of postoperative visits before clinical discharge were recorded and compared to controls matched by surgery type and surgeon. Results A total of 56 patients were seen for 60 telehealth visits. The most common surgical procedures were distal radius open-reduction internal fixation (n = 8), open carpal tunnel release (n = 8), and endoscopic carpal tunnel release (n = 6). One telehealth visit (1.7%) required conversion to in-person evaluation due to suspected superficial infection necessitating in-person physical examination. The average number of postoperative visits prior to clinical discharge was 2.6 in the telehealth group compared to 2.7 in matched controls (p = 0.886). Complication rates were similar between groups. Conclusions The rate of necessary in-person evaluation after postoperative telehealth visits was less than 2%. The incorporation of telehealth visits did not appear to increase healthcare utilization after upper extremity surgery. Accordingly, the postoperative period is likely an ideal application for safe and effective telehealth implementation.
RESUMO
Context: Studies on adult spinal deformity have shown spinopelvic malalignment results in worse outcomes. However, it is unclear if this relationship exists in patients with single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) receiving short-segment fusions. Aims: To determine if spinopelvic alignment affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion (PLDF) with or without a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with L4-5 DS. Settings and Design: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients who underwent PLDF for L4-5 DS at a single tertiary referral academic medical center. Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into groups based on preoperative cutoff values of 20° for pelvic tilt (PT) and 11° for pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) with subsequent reclassification based on correction to <20° PT or 11° PI-LL. Radiographic outcomes and PROMs were compared between the groups. Statistical Analysis Used: Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine whether radiographic cutoff values served as the independent predictors of change in PROMs. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: A total of 188 patients with completed PROMs were included for the analysis. Preoperative PT >20° was associated with significantly greater reduction in PI-LL (-2.41° vs. 1.21°, P = 0.004) and increase in sacral slope (SS) (1.06° vs. -1.86°, P = 0.005) compared to patients with preoperative PT <20°. On univariate analysis, no significant differences were observed between any groups with regard to PROMs. Preoperative sagittal alignment measures and postoperative correction were not found to be independent predictors of improvement in clinical outcomes. Conclusion: A preoperative PT >20° is associated with improved PI-LL reduction and an increase in SS. However, no differences in clinical outcomes were found 1 year postoperatively for patients with preoperative PT >20° and PI-LL ≥11° compared to patients below this threshold.