Postoperative Cognitive Decline in Patients Undergoing Major Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: A Pilot Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative cognitive decline (POCD) is characterised by deficits in attention, memory, executive function, and information processing that persist beyond the early postoperative period. Its incidence ranges from 10%-25% after noncardiac surgery. Limited literature exists on POCD after gynecologic oncology surgery. Our primary objective was to identify the incidence of POCD among patients 55 years or older undergoing major gynecologic oncology surgery. METHODS: This mixed-methods, prospective, observational cohort study followed patients 55 years or older who underwent surgery for gynecologic malignancies between February and July 2022. Semi-structured interviews and the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) were administered before surgery as well as 1 and 3 months after. Assessments were delivered virtually and in-person in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. POCD was defined as ≥2-point decline from baseline MMSE score. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients participated; 19 completed the 1-month follow-up, and 15 completed the 3-month follow-up. The average age was 64 (range: 56-90). The mean preoperative MMSE score was 16.6 out of 17 (virtual) and 12.9 out of 13 (in-person). Two patients had a 1-point decline in their 1-month MMSE score; both recovered by 3 months. One patient had a 1-point decline in their 3-month MMSE score. Semi-structured interviews revealed common themes of "brain fog" at the 1-month follow-up and mild, persistent attention and word-finding deficits at 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This study's qualitative component captured subtle subjective findings suggestive of potential POCD. Larger studies are required, and a more extensive neuropsychological test battery may be required to elicit subtle findings not clearly reflected by MMSE scores.

Gender imbalance in gynecologic oncology authorship and impact of COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Despite increased participation of women in academic medicine in recent decades, gender disparities persist. The gender gap in authorship and editorial boards in gynecologic oncology, and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, have not been recently evaluated. We examined gender representation and the impact of COVID-19 on authorship and editorial boards of two major peer-reviewed gynecologic oncology journals. METHODS: We conducted a bibliometric analysis of original articles published in Gynecologic Oncology and the International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, comparing the most contemporary 5-year period (2016-2020) to single years in the two prior decades (1996, 2006). To assess the early impact of COVID-19, we compared publications from May 2020-April 2021 to 2019. Editorial boards were analyzed for gender composition. First names, pronouns, and institutional photographs were used to determine gender. RESULTS: There were 3022 original articles published between 2016 and 2020, 763 in 2006, and 203 in 1996. Gender was identified for 91.3% of first authors (3641 articles) and 95.6% of senior authors (3813 articles). Men comprised the majority of the editorial boards in 2021 at 57% and 61% for Gynecologic Oncology and the International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, respectively. Men were overrepresented as senior authors across all study periods: 93% in 1996, 77% in 2006, and 58% in 2016-2020. Over time, representation of women as first and senior authors increased (7% in 1996, 42% in 2016-2020, p<0.00001). There was no immediate impact of the early pandemic on gender distribution of authorship. CONCLUSIONS: Despite greater representation of women over time as authors in gynecologic oncology journals, there remains gender disparity in senior authorship and editorial board representation. This presents an opportunity for the academic publishing community to advocate for deliberate strategies to achieve gender parity. Although no impact of the early COVID-19 pandemic was found, this requires ongoing surveillance.

Identification and Characteristics of the Three Subgroups of Pain in Chinese Children and Adolescents with Cancer.

PURPOSE: Pain is a distressing symptom for children and adolescents with cancer and is experienced by individuals differently. This study sought to determine subgroups according to their pain experiences, and how demographic, clinical, and quality of life (QOL)-related characteristics might differ across subgroups. DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 187 pediatric patients with cancer aged 8 to 17 years old and asked them to complete measures of pain intensity, pain duration, pain interference and pain control using the Chinese translation of the validated questionnaire from the Pain Squad app, as well as 7 PROMIS measures assessing QOL-related outcomes. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify latent subgroups. RESULTS: Three subgroups of children were identified: low-pain/low-duration (69.5%), moderate-pain/high-duration (19.8%), and high-pain/moderate-duration (10.7%). Hospitalized children were more likely to be in the moderate-pain/high-duration subgroup. Children in the high-pain/moderate-duration subgroup were more likely to be cared for by unemployed caregivers. Scores on depressive symptoms (p = 0.002), anger (p < 0.001), anxiety (p = 0.045), fatigue (p = 0.044), and mobility (p = 0.008) questionnaire were significantly worse in the high-pain/moderate-duration subgroup than the other two subgroup. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This study provides a scientific foundation for further studies exploring predictive factors related to pain experiences. More targeted treatment strategies targeting the specific characteristics of each subgroup will help improve patients' QOL and use of medical resources. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 identified pain subgroups demonstrate the heterogeneity in pain experiences among pediatric patients with cancer. Knowledge of these subgroups can assist clinicians in better identifying and targeting pain treatment for children with cancer.

Clinical empathy as perceived by patients with chronic illness in Canada: a qualitative focus group study.

BACKGROUND: Although clinical empathy - the ability of a physician to understand a patient's illness experience, communicate this understanding and act collaboratively to create a treatment plan - provides substantial benefits to both physicians and patients, medical students typically experience a decline in empathy during training. The primary objective of this study was to generate a model of clinical empathy grounded in the perspectives of people with chronic illness living in Canada, to promote empathy-focused curricular development in Canadian medical education. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative focus group study using a constructivist grounded theory approach. We recruited adults (age ≥ 18 yr) with chronic illness who had recently seen a physician in Canada from virtual support groups. Six semistructured virtual focus groups with 3-5 participants each were scheduled between June and September 2021. We coded the transcripts using the constant comparative method, allowing for the construction of an overarching theory. RESULTS: Twenty patients (17 women and 3 men) participated in the focus groups; 1 group had 2 participants because 1 participant failed to appear. The majority of participants (14 [70%]) had at least a college degree. The mean rating for overall satisfaction with the Canadian health care system was 5.4/10.0 (median 5.0). The emergent theory showed that the perceived presence of physician empathy engendered positive internal processing by patients, leading to increased health care efficacy and enhanced mental health outcomes. Negative patient processing in response to the perceived absence of empathy led to reduced quality of health care delivery (e.g., ineffective referrals and more appointments), increased use of health care resources, disruptions in patients' personal lives, and negative physical and mental health outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Clinical empathy can have life-altering impacts on patients, and its absence may increase resource use. As empathy involves understanding patients' lived experiences, any valid intervention to improve clinical empathy must be informed by patient perspectives.

Rapid mobilization of a virtual pediatric chronic pain clinic in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Studies have been conducted describing the potential for using virtual care software during disasters and public health emergencies. However, limited data exist on ways in which the Canadian health care system utilizes virtual care during disasters or public health emergencies. AIMS: Due to the need for social distancing and reduction of nonessential ambulatory services during the COVID-19 pandemic, the SickKids Chronic Pain Clinic sought to transition care delivery from in person to virtual. The virtual clinic aimed to reduce risks associated with physical contact and environmental exposure without reducing access to care itself. METHODS: Harnessing of various digital tools including Ontario Telemedicine Network Guestlink, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams. The Chronic Pain Clinic Team worked together to communicate with patients and families, schedule virtual visits, establish remote access to clinical data collection tools, digitize the after-visit summary, and add resources on pain self-management to the clinic's website. RESULTS: The Chronic Pain Clinic successfully transitioned all clinic appointments (multidisciplinary and individual; 77 appointments) over a 2-week period to virtual care. Virtual clinics did not surpass the usual time taken pre-COVID-19, suggesting that the clinic workflow was readily adaptable to virtual care. CONCLUSIONS: Access to quality virtual care is essential to prevent chronic pain from taking a toll on the lives of patients and families. Rapid establishment of a virtual clinic without gaps in service delivery to patients is possible given institutional support and a team culture centered around collaboration and flexibility.

Contexte: Des études ont été menées pour décrire le potentiel d'utilisation des logiciels de soins virtuels lors de catastrophes et d'urgences de santé publique. Toutefois, il existe peu de données sur les moyens par lesquels le systéme de soins de santé canadien utilise les soins virtuels lors de catastrophes ou d'urgences de santé publique.But: En raison de la nécessité d'une distanciation sociale et de la réduction des services ambulatoires non essentiels pendant la pandémie de COVID-19, la clinique de douleur chronique de SickKids a cherché à assurer une transition de la prestation des soins en personne vers des soins virtuels. La clinique virtuelle visait à réduire les risques liés au contact physique et à l'exposition environnementale sans réduire l'accès aux soins en tant que tels.Méthodes: Exploitation de divers outils numériques, dont le Réseau de télémédecine de l'Ontario Guestlink, Zoom et Microsoft Teams. L'équipe de la Clinique de la douleur chronique a travaillé ensemble pour communiquer avec les patients et les familles, programmer des visites virtuelles, établir un accès à distance aux outils de collecte de données cliniques, numériser le résumé après la visite et ajouter des ressources sur l'auto-prise en charge de la douleur sur le site web de la clinique.Résultats: La Clinique de la douleur chronique a réussi à faire passer tous les rendez-vous de la clinique (multidisciplinaires et individuels; 77 rendez-vous) sur une période de deux semaines à des soins virtuels. Les cliniques virtuelles n'ont pas dépassé le temps habituel avant la COVID-19, ce qui indique que le flux de travail de la clinique était facilement adaptable aux soins virtuels.Conclusions: L'accès à des soins virtuels de qualité est essentiel pour éviter que la douleur chronique ne fasse des ravages dans la vie des patients et des familles. L'établissement rapide déune clinique virtuelle sans interruption dans la prestation des services aux patients est possible grâce à un soutien institutionnel et à une culture d'èquipe centrèe sur la collaboration et la souplesse.