Neutrophilic Bronchial Inflammation Correlates with Clinical and Functional Findings in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.

Background. Neutrophilic bronchial inflammation is a main feature of bronchiectasis, but not much is known about its relationship with other disease features. Aim. To compare airway inflammatory markers with clinical and functional findings in subjects with stable noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB). Methods. 152 NFCB patients (62.6 years; females: 57.2%) underwent clinical and functional cross-sectional evaluation, including microbiologic and inflammatory cell profile in sputum, and exhaled breath condensate malondialdehyde (EBC-MDA). NFCB severity was assessed using BSI and FACED criteria. Results. Sputum neutrophil percentages inversely correlated with FEV1 (P < 0.0001; rho = -0.428), weakly with Leicester Cough Questionnaire score (P = 0.068; rho = -0.58), and directly with duration of the disease (P = 0.004; rho = 0.3) and BSI severity score (P = 0.005; rho = 0.37), but not with FACED. Sputum neutrophilia was higher in colonized subjects, P. aeruginosa colonized subjects showing greater sputum neutrophilia and lower FEV1. Patients with ≥3 exacerbations in the last year showed a significantly greater EBC-MDA than the remaining patients. Conclusions. Sputum neutrophilic inflammation and biomarkers of oxidative stress in EBC can be considered good biomarkers of disease severity in NCFB patients, as confirmed by pulmonary function, disease duration, bacterial colonization, BSI score, and exacerbation rate.

Baseline airway inflammation may be a determinant of the response to ozone exposure in asthmatic patients.

CONTEXT: It is well known that ozone exposure decreases lung function and increases airway neutrophilia, but large variability has been observed among asthmatic patients. OBJECTIVE: To find possible predictors of functional and inflammatory airway response to ozone in asthmatic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 120 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, randomly exposed to either air or ozone (0.3 ppm for 2 h) in a challenge chamber. Symptoms and pulmonary function test (PFT) were measured before and immediately after exposure. Six hours after exposure, induced sputum was collected. Patients were evaluated according to their functional (FEV1 responders) or neutrophilic (neutrophil responders) response to ozone. We considered, as possible predictors of response: age, baseline FEV1, previous treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), baseline sputum neutrophils, baseline sputum eosinophils, methacholine responsiveness, atopy and smoking habit. RESULTS: FEV1 responders had lower baseline FEV1, and a lower percentage of these had received ICS treatment. Neutrophil responders were younger, with lower baseline sputum inflammation and greater methacholine responsiveness. These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic analysis. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Patients not previously treated with ICS and patients with lower FEV1 are more prone to functional response to ozone. Lower baseline airway inflammation and greater bronchial hyperresponsiveness may predict neutrophilic airway response to ozone in asthmatic patients. Thus, determinants of functional and inflammatory responses to ozone are different.

Asthma control test (ACT): comparison with clinical, functional, and biological markers of asthma control.

BACKGROUND: Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a simple tool for assessing the level of asthma control in clinical practice, and it has been validated in comparison with a general clinical assessment of asthma control, including forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between ACT score and clinical and functional findings of asthma control and biomarkers of airway inflammation. METHODS: A total of 68 asthmatic patients observed in our asthma clinic (33 regularly treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and 35 ICS-naïve) filled ACT questionnaire and underwent the following measurements: (a) FEV(1) before and after salbutamol; (b) exhaled nitric oxide; (c) bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine; (d) sputum eosinophil count; and (e) daytime and nighttime symptoms, rescue salbutamol, and twice-daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) recording on a 4-week diary card. RESULTS: ACT score significantly correlated with symptom score, rescue medication use, and PEF variability, but not with FEV(1), FEV(1) reversibility, and markers of airway inflammation, which could not distinguish controlled from uncontrolled patients according to ACT, regardless of ICS treatment. CONCLUSION: ACT score is a valid tool to simply assess the current level of asthma control in terms of symptoms, rescue medication use, and PEF variability. Pulmonary function and biomarkers of airway inflammation are not related to the clinical asthma control as assessed by ACT and may represent additional measurements potentially useful in asthma management.

Transient sputum eosinophilia may occur over time in non-eosinophilic asthma and this is not prevented by salmeterol.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Symptomatic, steroid-naïve asthmatic patients may have low sputum eosinophil numbers. The aim of the study was to determine whether low sputum eosinophil numbers persisted over time, during treatment with salmeterol monotherapy. METHODS: Forty steroid-naïve, symptomatic asthmatic patients, with sputum eosinophils <3%, were randomized to receive open-label salmeterol (50 µg twice a day, n = 30) or fluticasone (125 µg twice a day, n = 10) and were then assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months. All patients underwent spirometry, a methacholine challenge test and sputum induction at each visit. Symptom scores and peak expiratory flow were recorded throughout the study. Patients were permitted to withdraw from the study at any time, if they experienced exacerbations or deterioration of symptoms. RESULTS: The average sputum eosinophil percentage remained normal (≤1.9%) in both groups over the study period. The eosinophil percentages were ≤1.9% in 65 of the 80 samples obtained from salmeterol-treated patients throughout the study period. Eight patients had an asthma exacerbation or deterioration, during which one developed sputum eosinophilia. Twelve patients, 11 of whom were randomized to salmeterol and one to fluticasone, developed transient sputum eosinophilia at least once during the study. This was not associated with asthma exacerbation (except for one patient). Sputum neutrophil percentage did not change in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Low sputum eosinophil numbers persisted over 6 months in a majority of patients with non-eosinophilic asthma who received salmeterol monotherapy. However, transient sputum eosinophilia occurred in 40% indicating that non-eosinophilic asthma may not be a stable phenotype.

Acute administration of bronchodilators on exercise tolerance in treated COPD patients.

Exercise intolerance is a major feature in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Bronchodilators increase endurance time (ET) and reduce dynamic hyperinflation (DH). We evaluated whether a single-dose of salbutamol/ipratropium + flunisolide (BD+ICS), added on top of the regular treatment, may improve ET in COPD patients. In a single-blind randomized crossover pilot trial, nebulised BD+ICS or placebo (PL) was administered 30 min before a constant load cardiopulmonary test, in 22 moderate-to-severe COPD patients (FEV1: 53.9% pred). ET was the primary outcome measured. BD+ICS did not improve ET or VO2 peak with respect to PL. BD+ICS increased pre-test FEV1 and pre-test Inspiratory Capacity but did not modify DH. In a retrospective analysis, patients were divided in Improvers (N=11) and Non-Improvers (N=11) according to the difference in ET between BD+ICS and PL (> 25 s). Improvers had a worst BODE index, a higher static hyperinflation and poorer Vd/Vt ratio at peak of exercise with respect to Non-Improvers. Improvers only had a significant increase from BD+ICS on pre-test FEV1 and IC. In conclusion, although a single-dose BD+ICS did not improve ET in COPD patients under regular treatment, a subgroup of more severe patients may have some benefit from that.

Increase in markers of airway inflammation after ozone exposure can be observed also in stable treated asthmatics with minimal functional response to ozone.

BACKGROUND: The discrepancy between functional and inflammatory airway response to ozone has been reported in normal subjects, but few data are available for stable asthmatics regularly treated with inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: Twenty-three well controlled, regularly treated, mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients underwent two sequential randomised exposures to either filtered air or ozone (0.3 ppm for 2 hours) in a challenge chamber. Pulmonary function (PF) was monitored, and patients with FEV1 decrease greater than 10% from pre-challenge value were considered as responders. Immediately after each exposure, exhaled breath condensate (EBC) was collected to measure malondialdehyde (MDA). Six hours after each exposure, PF and EBC collection were repeated, and sputum was induced to measure inflammatory cell counts and soluble mediators (IL-8 and neutrophil elastase). The response to ozone was also evaluated according to the presence of polymorphism in oxidative stress related NQO1 and GSTM1 genes. RESULTS: After ozone exposure, sputum neutrophils significantly increased in responders (n = 8), but not in nonresponders (n = 15). Other markers of neutrophil activation in sputum supernatant and MDA in EBC significantly increased in all patients, but only in nonresponders the increase was significant. In nonresponders, sputum eosinophils also significantly increased after ozone. There was a positive correlation between ozone-induced FEV1 fall and increase in sputum neutrophils. No difference in functional or inflammatory response to ozone was observed between subjects with or without the combination of NQO1wt- GSTM1null genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Markers of neutrophilic inflammation and oxidative stress increase also in asthmatic subjects not responding to ozone. A greater functional response to ozone is associated with greater neutrophil airway recruitment in asthmatic subjects.

Sputum eosinophilia is a determinant of FEV1 decline in occupational asthma: results of an observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential determinants of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) decline in workers with occupational asthma (OA) still exposed to the causative agent. We hypothesised that sputum eosinophilia might be a predictor of poor asthma outcome after diagnosis. SETTING, DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: In a specialistic clinical centre of the University Hospital of Pisa, we studied 39 participants (28 M, 11 F) diagnosed as having OA, routinely followed up between 1990 and 2009. They were a subgroup of 94 participants diagnosed as affected by OA in that period: 9 had been removed from work at the diagnosis, 21 were excluded for having ceased occupational exposure after few months from diagnosis, and 25 were lost at the follow-up or had no acceptable sputum measurements at the diagnosis. Estimates of the decline in FEV1 were obtained by means of simple regression analysis during the period of occupational exposure after diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to analyse the effects of factors (baseline FEV1 and sputum inflammatory cells, duration and type of exposure) that may potentially influence FEV1 decline. RESULTS: At follow-up (5.7+3.7 years), most participants were still symptomatic despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) treatment and had their occupational exposure reduced. Participants with higher sputum eosinophils (>3%) at baseline had a significantly greater decline of FEV1 (-52.5 vs -18.6 mL/year, p=0.012). Logistic regression showed that persistent exposure and sputum eosinophilia were significantly associated with a greater decline in FEV1 (OR 11.5, 95% CI 1.8 to 71.4, p=0.009 and OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 41.7, p= 0.042, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Sputum eosinophilia at diagnosis, together with the persistence of occupational exposure during follow-up, may contribute to a greater decline in FEV1 in patients with OA still at work. Further long-term studies are required as to whether intensive ICS treatment may be beneficial for patients with OA and increase ad eosinophilic inflammation.

Efficacy of anticholinergic drugs in asthma.

Although bronchial hyperresponsiveness to cholinergic agents is a main feature of asthma, the role of anticholinergic drugs in chronic asthma management has been largely underestimated. Several single-dose studies comparing acute bronchodilation induced by ipratropium bromide with salbutamol have shown that salbutamol was more effective than ipratropium in asthma treatment. Recently, tiotropium has been studied in asthma, when added to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids in unselected moderate asthmatics or in patients with uncontrolled asthma, or patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and history of asthma. Later, studies on patients with Arg/Arg ß(2)-receptor polymorphism demonstrated a similar efficacy of tiotropium in comparison with salmeterol when both were added to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Further long-term studies are currently in progress, for the evaluation of the efficacy of tiotropium on clinical asthma control, and on the rate and severity of asthma exacerbations, as well as the potential modification of inflammatory mechanisms and varying efficacy in specific asthma phenotypes (such as smoking asthmatics).

Effects of oral prednisone on sputum eosinophils and cytokines in patients with severe refractory asthma.

BACKGROUND: Severe asthma occurs in a heterogeneous group of patients in whom symptoms and airway inflammation persist despite maximal antiasthma treatment. OBJECTIVE: To verify whether a short-term course of oral steroids would modify sputum inflammatory cytokine and sputum eosinophil concentrations and whether this effect is related to the presence of sputum eosinophilia. METHODS: In 59 patients with severe refractory asthma, we measured pulmonary function and inflammatory markers in hypertonic saline-induced sputum before and after 2 weeks of treatment with 0.5 mg/kg of oral prednisone (n = 39) or placebo (n = 20) daily. Selected sputum portions were assayed for total and differential cell counts and supernatant interleukin (IL) 5 and IL-8 concentrations. RESULTS: At baseline, no statistical differences were found among placebo- and prednisone-treated patients in terms of sputum inflammatory cell percentages and IL-5 and IL-8 concentrations. After treatment, forced expiratory volume in 1 second significantly increased and sputum eosinophil percentages and IL-5 and IL-8 concentrations significantly decreased in the prednisone group, whereas no changes were observed in the placebo group. The positive effect of prednisone treatment was observed only in patients with baseline sputum eosinophilia, whereas in noneosinophilic patients with severe asthma prednisone induced only a significant decrease of sputum IL-8. CONCLUSIONS: Additional high-dose oral corticosteroids improve pulmonary function and reduce not only sputum eosinophil but also sputum proinflammatory cytokine concentrations in patients with severe refractory asthma.