Effects of clopidogrel and aspirin in combination versus aspirin alone on platelet activation and major receptor expression in diabetic patients: the PLavix Use for Treatment Of Diabetes (PLUTO-Diabetes) trial.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel is widely used in diabetic patients after vascular events; however, the ability of this thienopyridine to yield additional antiplatelet protection on top of aspirin has never been explored in a controlled study with comprehensive assessment of platelet activity. The objective of this study was to compare the antiplatelet profiles of clopidogrel + aspirin in combination (C + ASA) versus aspirin alone (ASA) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Seventy patients with documented diabetes already treated with antecedent aspirin were randomly assigned to receive C + ASA or ASA in the PLUTO-Diabetes trial. Platelet studies included adenosine diphosphate-, collagen-, and arachidonic acid-induced aggregometry; PFA-100 (Dade-Behring, Miami, FL) and Ultegra (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA) analyzers; and expression of 6 major receptors by flow cytometry at baseline and at day 30 after randomization. RESULTS: There were no differences in the baseline clinical and platelet characteristics between the C + ASA and ASA groups, or subsequent significant changes in platelet biomarkers in the ASA group, except for diminished collagen-induced aggregation (P = .02). In contrast, when compared with the ASA group, therapy with C + ASA resulted in significant inhibition of platelet activity assessed by adenosine diphosphate aggregation (P = .0001); closure time prolongation (P = .0003) and reduction of platelet activation units with Ultegra (P = .0001); and expression of platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (P = .002), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antigen (P = .0002), and activity (P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with C + ASA for 1 month provides significantly greater inhibition of platelet activity than ASA alone in diabetic patients in this small randomized trial. However, despite dual antiplatelet regimen, diabetic patients exhibit high residual activity of some platelet biomarkers, including unaffected protease-activated receptor 1 receptor expression.

Magnitude and time course of platelet inhibition with extended release dipyridamole with or without aspirin in healthy Japanese volunteers. The AGgrenox versus Aspirin Therapy Evaluation (AGATE-Japan).

Randomized trials showed greater stroke prevention with extended release dipyridamole in combination with low dose aspirin than with either aspirin or dipyridamole alone. However, most studies with this formulation (Aggrenox) were carried out in Europe and North America. Considering potential inter-racial differences in drug response, we conducted a small randomized study in healthy Japanese volunteers to compare antiplatelet regimens with regard to the changes in the platelet biomarkers. Thirty healthy volunteers (18-40 years old, 15 male and 15 female) of Japanese descent were randomized to Aggrenox (n = 17) or aspirin 81 mg (n = 13 volunteers) for 30 days. Platelet function was assessed at baseline, and on days 15, and 30 by conventional aggregometry, whole blood flow cytometry, and cartridge-based analyzer. Both Aggrenox and aspirin provided sustained platelet inhibition at Day 15 and Day 30. Therapy with Aggrenox, however, was associated with more prominent and significant inhibition of collagen-induced aggregation (p = 0.08, Day 15), as well as prolongation of the closure time (p = 0.001, Day 30); diminished expression of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) (p = 0.02, Day 30), glycoprotein IIb (GPIIb) antigen (p = 0.001 and 0.024 for Day 15 and Day 30), and GPIIb/IIIa activity by PAC-1 antibody (p = 0.014 and 0.03), CD62 (P-selectin) (p = 0.03 for Day 15 and Day 30), as well as inhibition of protease activated receptors (PAR-1) associated with intact WEDE-15 (p = 0.002 and 0.003) and SPAN-12 (p = 0.002 and 0.04) thrombin receptors when compared with aspirin. The magnitude and durability of platelet response after Aggrenox in healthy Japanese is similar to those effects observed in Caucasians and African-Americans. A larger study to assess drug efficacy and safety in the Japanese post-stroke patients is warranted.

Consistent platelet inhibition during long-term maintenance-dose clopidogrel therapy among 359 compliant outpatients with documented vascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Numerous reports have dichotomized responses after clopidogrel therapy using varying definitions and platelet tests in patients immediately after acute vascular events; however, no large study has assessed platelet characteristics in outpatients receiving long-term treatment for more than 30 days with the maintenance dose (75 mg/d) of clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to describe the responses of ex vivo measures of platelet aggregation and activation to long-term clopidogrel therapy in a large population of outpatients after coronary stenting or ischemic stroke. METHODS: We conducted a secondary post hoc analysis of a data set represented by presumably compliant patients after coronary stenting (n = 237) or a documented ischemic stroke (n = 122) treated with clopidogrel-and-aspirin combination antiplatelet therapy. RESULTS: The mean duration of treatment was 5.8 months (range 1-21 months). Every patient exhibited a significant inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation (mean 52.9%, range 36%-70%) as compared with the preclopidogrel measures. Inhibition of aggregation strongly correlated with a diminished expression of PECAM-1 (platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1, r = 0.75), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (r = 0.62), and PAR-1 (protease-activated receptor 1, r = 0.71). None of the patients developed hyporesponsiveness (reduction from the baseline <15%) or profound inhibition (residual platelet activity <10%). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the wide variability of responses that exists in the acute setting, long-term therapy with clopidogrel leads to consistent and much less variable platelet inhibition. Lack of nonresponse and profound inhibition with clopidogrel allow for the maintenance of a delicate balance between proven efficacy and acceptable bleeding risks for long-term secondary prevention in outpatients after acute vascular events.

Combination antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel: the role of antecedent and concomitant doses of aspirin. An analysis of 711 patients.

BACKGROUND: Numerous randomized studies have shown that the combination of clopidogrel with aspirin yields better clinical outcomes than monotherapy in patients with acute vascular events. However, the impact of the aspirin dose on the antiplatelet potency of clopidogrel is unclear. We sought to compare the antiplatelet profile of aspirin 81 mg (n = 252) versus aspirin 325 mg (n = 459) before and during conventional clopidogrel loading (300 mg), and/or clopidogrel maintenance (75 mg/daily) therapy. METHODS: Secondary post hoc analysis of an existing dataset consisting of 711 patients after coronary stenting (n = 601) and ischemic stroke (n = 110) treated previously with aspirin for at least 1 month, and then with aspirin + clopidogrel for at least 7 days was performed. Platelet assessments include conventional and whole blood aggregometry, rapid cartridge-based analyzers, and expression of platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, P-selectin, and GPIIb/IIIa activity by flow cytometry measured before and after addition of clopidogrel. RESULTS: There was a small but consistent yet non-significant trend towards more potent platelet inhibition with aspirin 325 mg compared to aspirin 81 mg for every platelet activation parameter before addition of clopidogrel. However, after loading and/or 1 week of chronic treatment with clopidogrel + aspirin, measured platelet parameters became very similar between the groups, and identical for collagen-induced aggregation and PFA-100 analyzer readings. CONCLUSIONS: Before addition of clopidogrel, aspirin 325 mg has a tendency to provide stronger platelet inhibition than aspirin 81 mg. However, when clopidogrel and aspirin are used in combination, the higher aspirin dose does not translate into superior antiplatelet action. Given that the existing body of evidence supports the comparable efficacy and, particularly, superior safety of lower versus higher doses of aspirin, aspirin 81 mg should be the dose used in combination with clopidogrel.

Does heart failure etiology, New York Heart Association class, or ejection fraction affect the ability of clopidogrel to inhibit heightened platelet activity?

The ability of clopidogrel to inhibit platelet function in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) was proved by the PLUTO-CHF trial. We retrospectively analyzed platelet characteristics with respect to CHF etiology, class, and ejection fraction in patients enrolled in the PLUTO-CHF study. Twenty-five patients were divided by CHF etiology, severity, and ejection fraction. All patients received aspirin 325 mg for at least 1 month prior to screening. Platelet function studies were performed at baseline and after 30 days of therapy. There were no differences in platelet parameters dependent on clinical characteristics of CHF, except for a significant (P = 0.023) decrease in platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1) expression in the New York Heart Association class III-IV due to the higher baseline values. Therapy with clopidogrel resulted in a significant inhibition of platelet activity assessed by ADP-induced and epinephrine-induced aggregation, closure time, expression of PECAM-1, glycoprotein Ib, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antigen, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa activity with PAC-1, CD151, and reduced formation of platelet-leukocyte conjugates when compared with baseline. Clopidogrel provides antiplatelet protection in the broad spectrum of patients with CHF independently of its etiology, severity, or myocardial contractility. This uniform platelet inhibition with clopidogrel may be an important consideration in designing future large-scale clinical trials.

Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe the responses of patients to clopidogrel using ex vivo measures of platelet aggregation and activation in a large, heterogeneous population. BACKGROUND: Recently, a number of reports, using various definitions, have dichotomized patients who are treated with clopidogrel into a minority of "non-responders" and a majority of "responders." Such classifications imply that treatment leads to an all-or-none response, with potentially important clinical implications. METHODS: We conducted secondary post-hoc analyses of a dataset consisting of volunteers (n = 94) and patients after coronary stenting (n = 405), with heart failure (n = 25), and after stroke (n = 20). RESULTS: The response of subjects to clopidogrel followed a normal, bell-shaped distribution, with a mean and standard deviation of 41.9 +/- 20.8% when aggregation was induced by 5 mumol/l of adenosine diphosphate. When hyporesponsiveness and hyper-responsiveness to clopidogrel were considered to be two standard deviations less than and greater than the mean, respectively, the prevalence of hyporesponsiveness and hyper-responsiveness in these patients was 4.2% and 4.8%, respectively. Pretreatment platelet activity and clinical characteristics were not associated with responsiveness to clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals receiving clopidogrel exhibit a wide variability in response that follows a normal distribution. The clinical implications of this variability are unknown but potentially are important. Clinical trials are needed to define whether hyporesponders to clopidogrel are at increased risk for thrombotic events and whether hyper-responders are at increased risk for bleeding. If so, the individualization of antiplatelet therapy, including clopidogrel dosing, may be possible in the future but will require the ability to easily and reproducibly measure responsiveness by a method that has been proven to be predictive of clinical events.

Valsartan inhibits platelet activity at different doses in mild to moderate hypertensives: Valsartan Inhibits Platelets (VIP) trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous in vitro studies have suggested that valsartan produces significant inhibition of human platelets, probably targeting angiotensin I platelet receptors. To test whether valsartan inhibits platelet activity in mild to moderate hypertensives we conducted the randomized Valsartan Inhibits Platelets (VIP) trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-five patients with mild to moderate hypertension were randomized to valsartan 80 (n = 25), valsartan 160 (n = 29), or valsartan 320 mg/d (n = 21) for 9 weeks. Platelet function was assessed at baseline, week 5, and week 9 by aggregometry, flow cytometry, and cartridge-based analyzer. Independently of dose and duration, valsartan provided early sustained significant inhibition of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation, decreased shear-induced activation measured with PFA-100 analyzer, and diminished expression of GP IIb/IIIa activity measured by PAC-1 antibody, GPIb (CD42b), vitronectin receptor (CD51/61), P-selectin (CD62p), lysosome-associated membrane protein (CD107a), and CD40-ligand (CD154). The antiplatelet properties of valsartan were more profound in patients with diabetes (n = 28) when compared with the nondiabetic group (n = 47). In subgroup analyses of patients with diabetes there appeared to be stronger inhibition of the platelet receptors, a significant decrease of adenosine diphosphate- and collagen-induced platelet aggregation, and more profound inhibition of GP IIb/IIIa activity. CONCLUSIONS: In the randomized VIP trial, valsartan produced sustained inhibition of platelet aggregation and major platelet receptors. The antiplatelet properties of valsartan were not dose or time dependent. In subgroup analyses patients with diabetes with mild to moderate hypertension tended to have greater platelet inhibition, a finding which, if confirmed in future studies suggests possible additional advantages for using valsartan in this high-risk population.

Effect of statins on platelet PAR-1 thrombin receptor in patients with the metabolic syndrome (from the PAR-1 inhibition by statins [PARIS] study).

We investigated whether, in primary prevention patients with metabolic syndrome, statins affect the platelet protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) thrombin receptor by performing serial measurements of its activity and the antigen expression level by flow cytometry before and during treatment. Recent data from randomized trials of statins are compatible with the possibility of clinically relevant pleiotropic effects. The use of statins is associated with a reduced thrombosis burden and diminished platelet activity, as shown in animal models and in vitro studies. Seventy patients with the metabolic syndrome who were not taking antiplatelet agents were assigned consecutively at starting doses at the discretion of the responsible clinician to 1 of 6 statins (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin) or to a no-statin group for 6 weeks. Platelet expression of intact (SPAN12 antibody) and cleaved (WEDE15) PAR-1 thrombin receptors were assessed by flow cytometry at baseline and at weeks 4 and 6 of treatment. At baseline, no difference was found in receptor expression. However, after 4 weeks of treatment, all statins had significantly inhibited (46% to 55%) the activated epitope of PAR-1 expression. After 6 weeks, inhibition remained, despite a slight rebound (22% to 37%). Also, a delayed pattern of inhibition of the intact PAR-1 receptor epitope was found. In conclusion, all statins inhibited the activity and antigen level of the platelet PAR-1 thrombin receptor, which has a major role in regulating platelet activity and thrombin formation. These observational data offer a plausible mechanism for the recently demonstrated pleiotropic effects of statins that may contribute to early clinical benefit.

Platelet/endothelial biomarkers in depressed patients treated with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline after acute coronary events: the Sertraline AntiDepressant Heart Attack Randomized Trial (SADHART) Platelet Substudy.

BACKGROUND: Depression after acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) has been identified as an independent risk factor for subsequent cardiac death. Enhanced platelet activation has been hypothesized to represent 1 of the mechanisms underlying this association. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are known to inhibit platelet activity. Whether treatment of depressed post-ACS patients with SSRIs alters platelet function was not known. Accordingly, we serially assessed the release of established platelet/endothelial biomarkers in patients treated with sertraline vs placebo in the Sertraline AntiDepressant Heart Attack Randomized Trial (SADHART). METHODS AND RESULTS: Plasma samples (baseline, week 6, and week 16) were collected from patients randomized to sertraline (n=28) or placebo (n=36). Anticoagulants, aspirin, and ADP-receptor inhibitors were permitted in this study. Platelet factor 4, beta-thromboglobulin (betaTG), platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, P-selectin, thromboxane B2, 6-ketoprostaglandin F1a, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and E-selectin were measured by ELISA. Treatment with sertraline was associated with substantially less release of platelet/endothelial biomarkers than was treatment with placebo. These differences attained statistical significance for betaTG (P=0.03) at weeks 6 and 16 and for P-selectin (P=0.04) at week 16. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant advantage for sertraline vs placebo for diminishing E-selectin and betaTG concentrations across the entire treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with sertraline in depressed post-ACS patients is associated with reductions in platelet/endothelial activation despite coadministration of widespread antiplatelet regimens including aspirin and clopidogrel. The antiplatelet and endothelium-protective properties of SSRIs might represent an attractive additional advantage in patients with depression and comorbid coronary artery and/or cerebrovascular disease.

Effects of clopidogrel and aspirin in combination versus aspirin alone on platelet activation and major receptor expression in patients after recent ischemic stroke: for the Plavix Use for Treatment of Stroke (PLUTO-Stroke) trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clopidogrel is widely used in patients after recent ischemic stroke; however, its ability to yield additional antiplatelet protection on top of aspirin has never been explored in a controlled study. To determine whether clopidogrel with aspirin (C+ASA) will produce more potent platelet inhibition than aspirin alone (ASA) in patients after ischemic stroke, we conducted the Plavix Use for Treatment of Stroke trial. METHODS: Seventy patients after ischemic stroke were randomly assigned to C+ASA or ASA groups. Platelet studies included aggregometry; cartridge-based analyzers; expression of PECAM-1, P-selectin, GP IIb/IIIa (antigen and activity), vitronectin receptor, and formation of platelet-leukocyte microparticles by flow cytometry. Platelet tests were performed at baseline and after 30 days after randomization. RESULTS: There were no deaths, hospitalizations, or serious adverse events. There were no differences in the baseline platelet characteristics between C+ASA and ASA groups, or significant changes in platelet parameters in the ASA group, except diminished collagen-induced aggregation (P=0.001). In contrast, therapy with C+ASA resulted in a significant inhibition of platelet activity assessed by ADP- (P=0.00001) and collagen-induced (P=0.02) aggregation; closure time prolongation (P=0.03), and reduction of platelet activation units with Ultegra (P=0.00001); expression of PECAM-1 (P=0.01), and GP IIb/IIIa activity with PAC-1 (P=0.02) when compared with ASA group. Therapy with C+ASA also resulted in the reduced formation of platelet-leukocyte microparticles (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with C+ASA for 1 month provides significantly greater inhibition of platelet activity than ASA alone in patients after recent ischemic stroke in the frame of the small randomized trial.

Relationship between release of platelet/endothelial biomarkers and plasma levels of sertraline and N-desmethylsertraline in acute coronary syndrome patients receiving SSRI treatment for depression.

OBJECTIVE: In a platelet/endothelial biomarker substudy of the Sertraline AntiDepressant Heart Attack Randomized Trial (SADHART), the authors sought to determine whether plasma levels of sertraline and its primary metabolite N-desmethylsertraline affect the release of platelet/endothelial biomarkers. METHOD: Fifty-five acute coronary syndrome patients with depression were randomly assigned to receive sertraline (N=23) or placebo (N=32). Twenty-six serial plasma samples collected at week 6 (N=12) and week 16 (N=14) were analyzed. Platelet factor 4 (PF4), beta-thromboglobulin (beta-TG), platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1), P-selectin, thromboxane B(2) (TxB(2)), prostacyclin (6-keto-PGF1alpha), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and E-selectin were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Concentrations of sertraline and N-desmethylsertraline were determined by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection in autologous samples. RESULTS: Strong, mostly time-dependent negative correlations were found for the plasma levels of sertraline and N-desmethylsertraline with PF4 (week 6: r=-0.69 and -0.33, respectively; week 16: r=-0.63 for both), beta-TG (week 6: r=-0.43 and -0.29; week 16: r=-0.66 and -0.57), PECAM-1 (week 6: r=-0.82 and -0.49; week 16: r=-0.60 for both), P-selectin (week 6: r=-0.82 and -0.49; week 16: r=-0.73 and -0.43), and TxB(2) (week 6: r=-0.66 and -0.59; and week 16: r=-0.64 and -0.41). Regression analysis revealed some borderline correlations for endothelial markers such as 6-keto- PGF1alpha and E-selectin and a positive correlation for VCAM-1. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first documented evidence that plasma release of platelet/endothelial biomarkers is directly related to the levels of sertraline and N-desmethylsertraline in acute coronary syndrome patients receiving SSRI treatment for depression. The clinical significance of these findings should be assessed in the setting of a randomized clinical trial.

Analysis of risk of bleeding complications after different doses of aspirin in 192,036 patients enrolled in 31 randomized controlled trials.

We sought to compare the risk of hemorrhage due to the low (<100 mg), moderate (100 to 200 mg), and high (>200 mg) doses of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) in 192,036 patients enrolled in 31 clinical trials. Despite substantial differences in the reporting patterns of bleeding complications, low-dose ASA was associated with the lowest risk, and moderate doses caused a relatively high hemorrhagic event rate, especially with regard to minor, gastrointestinal, and total bleeding, and stroke. These findings should be considered when using combination antiplatelets, anticoagulant therapy, or both, with ASA, especially with the daily dose of >100 mg.

Absence of interaction between atorvastatin or other statins and clopidogrel: results from the interaction study.

BACKGROUND: Some, but not all, post hoc analyses have suggested that the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel are inhibited by atorvastatin. We sought to address this issue prospectively by performing serial measurements of 19 platelet characteristics using conventional aggregometry, rapid analyzers, and flow cytometry. METHODS: The Interaction of Atorvastatin and Clopidogrel Study (Interaction Study) was designed for patients undergoing coronary stenting. All patients (n = 75) received 325 mg of aspirin daily for at least 1 week and 300 mg of clopidogrel immediately prior to stent implantation. They had been taking atorvastatin (n = 25), any other statin (n = 25), or no statin (n = 25) for at least 30 days prior to stenting. The main outcome measure was comparison of platelet biomarkers 4 and 24 hours after clopidogrel administration between study groups. RESULTS: At baseline, patients from both statin groups exhibited diminished platelet aggregation and reduced platelet expression of G-protein-coupled protease-activated thrombin receptor (PAR)-1. There were no significant differences in measured platelet characteristics among the study groups 4 and 24 hours after clopidogrel intake, with the exception of a lower collagen-induced aggregation at 24 hours and a constantly diminished expression of PAR-1 in patients treated with any statin. CONCLUSIONS: Statins in general, and atorvastatin in particular, do not affect the ability of clopidogrel to inhibit platelet function in patients undergoing coronary stenting. These prospective data also suggest that statins may inhibit platelets directly via yet unknown mechanism(s) possibly related to the regulation of the PAR-1 thrombin receptors.

Platelet activation in patients with congestive heart failure: do we have enough evidence to consider clopidogrel?

Our understanding of the pathogenesis of congestive heart failure (CHF) has improved remarkably in recent years. However, despite better knowledge and novel pharmaceutical strategies, this disease is still one of the most brutal killers in the Western world. The pathophysiology of CHF is complex, and much of our comprehension revolves strictly around the neurohormonal and mechanical mechanisms involved. It has been suggested that CHF is associated with altered hemostasis, but whether a prothrombotic state contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of the disease is still not well known. The purpose of this review article is to discuss our current knowledge of platelet activation in patients with CHF and the potential role of antiplatelet agents in preventing these hemostatic abnormalities. Clopidogrel is an established medication that reduces the incidence of stroke, myocardial ischemia, or vascular death. It is currently the drug of choice in the prophylaxis of subacute stent thrombosis and postischemic stroke treatment. Promising results of the most resent trials (Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events [CAPRIE] and Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events [CURE]) may expand future indications of this ADP receptor antagonist for prevention of thrombotic complications in the CHF population. Currently conducted clinical trials (Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart Failure [WATCH] and Plavix Use for Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure [PLUTO-CHF] should clarify the role of clopidogrel in these patients.

Effects of roxifiban on platelet aggregation and major receptor expression in patients with coronary artery disease for the Roxifiban Oral Compound Kinetics Evaluation Trial-I (ROCKET-I Platelet Substudy).

BACKGROUND: It has been expected that therapy with oral glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockers including roxifiban will reduce mortality and vascular complications in a long-term. However, platelet-related properties of roxifiban in the clinical setting are not well known. We measured platelet characteristics during chronic treatment in patients with coronary artery disease enrolled in the Roxifiban Oral Compound Kinetics Evaluation Trial (ROCKET-I). METHODS: ROCKET-I was designed as a randomized, double blind, multicenter, dose-ranging study of roxifiban, administered either as monotherapy or concomitantly with aspirin, compared with aspirin alone. Thirty-one patients were assigned for 24 weeks of therapy with aspirin (n = 7), roxifiban (n = 9), or roxifiban plus aspirin (n = 15). Platelets were assessed 5 times in each patient at baseline, and at weeks 2, 4, 12, 18, and 24 thereafter with aggregometry and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Baseline platelet characteristics were similar in all 3 groups. There was a consistent significant decrease of adenosine diphosphate- (P =.0001) and collagen-induced (P =.002) platelet aggregation in the patients treated with roxifiban when compared with patients treated with aspirin alone. Flow cytometry revealed paradoxical late activation of GP IIb/IIIa expression (P =.007) when roxifiban was used without aspirin, which was significant compared with the aspirin and aspirin-roxifiban groups. There were no differences among groups in GP Ib expression, although its rise was more profound in the patients treated with roxifiban. There were substantial differences in the P-selectin expression. Although aspirin time dependently decreased the percent of P-selectin positive platelets (P =.02), treatment with roxifiban resulted in the phasic changes with the early inhibition (P =.01) and then 2-fold activation (P =.0001) starting at week 12 of the therapy. There was an early transient activation of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 expression (P =.008) at week 2, followed by the later inhibition of this receptor (P =.003) in patients treated with roxifiban. CONCLUSION: Despite achieving sustained inhibition of platelet aggregation, therapy with roxifiban has been associated with over expression or phasic changes of major platelet receptors. These data may explain clinical concerns about the use of oral GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors linking higher mortality rates and incidence of thrombotic episodes with paradoxical switching to alternative passways of platelet activation.

Effect of tenecteplase versus alteplase on platelets during the first 3 hours of treatment for acute myocardial infarction: the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Agent (ASSENT-2) platelet substudy.

BACKGROUND: Platelets play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of acute myocardial infarction, as well as in the occurrence of coronary artery reocclusion and bleeding events. Therefore, the success of fibrinolytic therapy may be dependent on its direct effects on platelets. METHODS AND RESULTS: We sought to determine how tenecteplase (TNK) and alteplase (tPA) affect platelets in vitro in human volunteers and ex vivo by use of patient data from the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Agent (ASSENT-2) trial. For the in vitro studies, whole blood from 9 healthy volunteers was incubated with 30 mg TNK and 60 mg tPA. Platelet function was measured by conventional aggregometry, bedside point-of-care devices, and sensitive flow cytometry techniques. For the ex vivo study, 41 patients were selected from the ASSENT-2 trial: 21 had received TNK and 20 had received tPA. Each patient underwent 7 serial blood draws every 30 minutes for 3 hours. Levels of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), P-selectin, beta-thromboglobulin, platelet factor 4, thromboxane, and prostacyclin were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Significant inhibition of conventional and whole blood aggregation and reduced platelet function by point-of-care analyzers were observed for both agents, but mostly in the TNK-treated samples. After incubation with TNK, flow cytometry revealed decreased expression of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa, PECAM-1, vitronectin receptor, CD151, and formation of the platelet-monocyte aggregates. Serial samples from patients in the ASSENT-2 trial showed a significant decrease of soluble platelet-endothelial biomarkers in the TNK group. There was a trend toward decreased platelet function characteristics with tPA; however, these differences were much smaller than those observed with TNK. CONCLUSIONS: Both tPA and TNK were shown to affect platelet function in human volunteers and in patients with AMI early after thrombolysis. The antiplatelet properties of TNK were shown to be more profound than those of tPA. These findings are relevant to ongoing investigations of combination therapy with fibrinolytic and antiplatelet agents in patients with AMI.

Effects of clopidogrel and aspirin combination versus aspirin alone on platelet aggregation and major receptor expression in patients with heart failure: the Plavix Use for Treatment Of Congestive Heart Failure (PLUTO-CHF) trial.

BACKGROUND: Persistent platelet activation may contribute to thrombotic events in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Chronic use of mild platelet inhibitors could therefore represent an independent avenue to improve morbidity, mortality, and quality of life in this expanding population. Although clopidogrel is widely used in patients with acute coronary syndromes and ischemic stroke, the ability of this novel ADP-receptor antagonist to inhibit platelet function in patients with CHF is unknown. We assessed antiplatelet properties of clopidogrel with aspirin (C+A) versus aspirin alone (A) in patients with CHF with heightened platelet activity. METHODS: Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, or CHF symptoms in the setting of preserved systolic function and New York Heart Association class II-IV were screened. Patients were considered to have platelet activation when 4 of the following 5 parameters were met: ADP-induced platelet aggregation >60%; collagen-induced aggregation >70%; whole blood aggregation >18 ohms; expression of GP IIb/IIIa >220 log MFI; and P-selectin cell positivity >8%. All patients were treated with 325 mg of acetylsalycilic acid (ASA) for at least 1 month. Patients receiving an antithrombotic agent other than ASA were excluded. Patients meeting clinical and laboratory criteria were randomly assigned to C+A (n=25), A (n=25) groups, or represent screen failures (n=38). Platelet studies (conventional and whole blood aggregometry, shear-induced activation, expression of 10 major receptors and formation of platelet-leukocyte microparticles) were performed at baseline and after 30 days of therapy. RESULTS: There were no deaths, hospitalizations, or serious adverse events. There were no changes in platelet parameters in the A group. In contrast, therapy with C+A resulted in a significant inhibition of platelet activity assessed by ADP-induced (P =.00001), and epinephrine-induced (P =.0016) aggregation, closure time (P =.04), expression of PECAM-1 (P =.009), GP Ib (P =.006), GP IIb/IIIa antigen (P =.0001), GP IIb/IIIa activity with PAC-1 (P =.0021), and CD151 (P =.0026) when compared with the A group. Therapy with C+A also resulted in the reduced formation of platelet-leukocyte microparticles (P =.021). Collagen-induced aggregation in plasma and in whole blood, expression of vitronectin receptor, P-selectin, CD63, CD107a, and CD107b did not differ among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with C+A for 1 month provides significantly greater inhibition of platelet activity than ASA alone in patients with CHF. Patients with CHF with heightened platelet activity represent a potential target population in which addition of clopidogrel may decrease mortality rates by reducing the incidence of thrombotic vascular events.

Effect of a single dose aspirin on platelets in humans with multiple risk factors for coronary artery disease.

We sought to assess how one tablet of non-enteric coated aspirin (325 mg) affects human platelets in subjects with risk factors for coronary artery disease. Data from 63 individuals with multiple cardiac risk factors were analyzed. Platelets were assessed twice at baseline (pre-aspirin), and after 3-4 h (post-aspirin). We employed 5 microM epinephrine-induced conventional aggregometry, closure time with epinephrine/collagen cartridge by PFA-100(R) (Dade-Behring), and aspirin response units (ARU) stimulated by propyl gallat with Ultegra (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA, USA) for measuring platelet function. In addition, the expression of platelet receptors was determined by using the following monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD31, CD41, CD42b, CD51/CD61, CD62p, CD63, CD107a, and CD151. Platelet-leukocyte formation was detected utilizing dual antibodies for a pan-platelet marker CD151, and CD14, a monocyte/macrophage marker. PAC-1 was used to measure fibrinogen-platelet binding. One pill of aspirin significantly decreased platelet-rich plasma (PRP) aggregation (74.18+/-16.75% vs. 24.92+/-8.64%; p<0.0001) and resulted in reduction of the aspirin response units (ARU) (662.24+/-65.65 vs. 451.05+/-69.31; p<0.0001). There was also prolongation of the closure time (194.4+/-25.3 vs. 258.63+/-55.61 s; p<0.0001). High correlation (r(2)=0.73-0.86) between platelet analyzer readings and aggregation was observed. One tablet of aspirin moderately inhibited expression of most surface platelet receptors measured, and such inhibition reached significance (p<0.05) for PAC-1, CD31, CD41, CD42, CD62p, and CD151. We conclude that a single dose of aspirin affects major platelet receptors, presumably directly or indirectly through the inhibition of prostanoids via platelet cyclooxygenase-1 blockade. The Ultegra Analyzer with a novel cartridge seems to be reliable in reflecting aspirins' effects on platelets and could be used in the future in clinical practice for monitoring aspirin therapy.

Magnitude and time course of platelet inhibition with Aggrenox and Aspirin in patients after ischemic stroke: the AGgrenox versus Aspirin Therapy Evaluation (AGATE) trial.

The European Stroke Prevention Study showed greater stroke prevention for Aggrenox than either for aspirin or dipyridamole alone. To test whether Aggrenox has superior antiplatelet properties to aspirin alone we conducted the AGgrenox versus Aspirin Therapy Evaluation (AGATE) trial. Forty patients with prior ischemic stroke not taking aspirin for at least 30 days were randomized to Aggrenox (2 pills/daily) or aspirin (81 mg plus matching placebo/daily) for 30 days. Platelet function was assessed at baseline, 24 h, and days 3, 7, 15, and 30 by aggregometry, flow cytometry and cartridge-based analyzers. Both Aggrenox and aspirin provided fast and sustained platelet inhibition. Aggrenox(R), however, especially after 15 days, showed significant prolongation of the closure time (P=0.04), diminished expression of platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) (P=0.01), glycoprotein IIb (GPIIb) antigen (P=0.02), and GPIIb/IIIa activity (P=0.01) by PAC-1 C antibody, CD63 (P=0.03), as well as inhibition of Protease Activated Receptors (PAR-1) associated with intact (SPAN12, P=0.01) and cleaved (WEDE15, P=0.01) thrombin receptors as compared with aspirin. Surprisingly, GPIb expression increased, especially after aspirin. In the randomized trial of small sample size, aspirin and Aggrenox produced fast and sustained platelet inhibition. In 25 of 90 direct comparisons, Aggrenox was superior to aspirin, whereas in 4 of 90, aspirin was superior to Aggrenox. In 61 of 90 direct comparisons, aspirin and Aggrenox were equivalent. Aggrenox was associated with a profound reduction of PAR-1 receptors, an observation that may be related to the greater clinical benefit of Aggrenox compared with Aspirin in preventing recurrent stroke.

Lack of uniform platelet activation in patients after ischemic stroke and choice of antiplatelet therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Platelets play an important role in the natural history of ischemic stroke, and are known to be activated in the acute phase. Although aspirin reduces risks of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death, the extent of platelet action and the effect of aspirin on platelet function in patients recovering from stroke remain unclear. METHODS: We studied 120 individuals divided into three equal groups: aspirin-free patients after ischemic stroke, post-stroke patients receiving aspirin (81-650 mg/daily), and aspirin-free subjects with multiple risk factors for vascular disease. Conventional platelet aggregation induced by 5 microM ADP and 5 microM epinephrine, cartridge-based analyzers (Ultegra, and PFA-100) readings, and expression of CD31, CD41a, CD42b, GPIIb/IIIa activity, CD51/CD61, CD62p, CD63, CD107a, CD154, CD165, formation of platelet-monocyte aggregates, intact (SPAN12), and cleaved (WEDE15) PAR-1 thrombin receptors by flow cytometry were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no differences between aspirin-free post-stroke patients and aspirin-free controls. Although aggregation was slightly higher, 12 out of the 14 receptor analyses, were surprisingly lower in the post-stroke cohort. Aspirin-treated patients exhibited highly significant inhibition of epinephrine-induced aggregation (p=0.0001), prolongation of the closure time (p=0.03), and reduction of the aspirin reactive units (p=0.02) measured by the Ultegra device. In addition, surface platelet expression of thrombospondin (p=0.001), GPIIb/IIIa activity (p=0.04), P-selectin (p=0.03), CD40-ligand (p=0.04), CD165 (p=0.02), the formation of the platelet-monocyte aggregates (p=0.01), and intact epitope of PAR-1 thrombin receptor (p=0.03) were significantly lower in the aspirin-treated group. CONCLUSIONS: Platelets are not activated in aspirin-free patients after ischemic stroke. Platelet function is significantly inhibited in those treated with aspirin when compared with healthy subjects with risk factors for vascular disease. Bleeding complications and hemorrhagic transformations after aggressive antiplatelet regimens could be related to the decreased or normal baseline platelet characteristics in such patients. Further analysis of platelet heterogeneity and its clinical significance remains to be determined in randomized trials.