A systematic review on the efficacy of adjunctive surgical strategies during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia without intraoperative evidence of neurovascular conflict.

Aim of the present study was to conduct a comprehensive review of surgical strategies that can be offered to patients with trigeminal neuralgia undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery and without intraoperative evidence of neurovascular conflict, with a high pre-operative suspicion of conflict lacking intraoperative confirmation, or individuals experiencing recurrence after previous treatment. This systematic review followed established guidelines (PRISMA) to identify and critically appraise relevant studies. The review question was formulated according to the PICO (P: patients; I: intervention; C: comparison; O: outcomes) framework as follows. For patients with trigeminal neuralgia (P) undergoing MVD surgery (I) without demonstrable preoperative neurovascular conflict, high suspicion of conflict but no intraoperative confirmation or recurrence after previous treatment (C), do additional surgical techniques (nerve combing, neurapraxia, arachnoid lysis) (O) improve pain relief outcomes (O)? The search of the literature yielded a total of 221 results. Duplicate records were then removed (n = [76]). A total of 143 papers was screened, and 117 records were excluded via title and abstract screening; 26 studies were found to be relevant to our research question and were assessed for eligibility. Upon full-text review, 17 articles were included in the review, describing the following techniques; (1) internal neurolysis (n = 6) (2) arachnoid lysis/adhesiolysis (n = 2) (3) neurapraxia (n = 3) (4) partial rhizotomy of the sensory root (n = 4) (5) pontine descending tractotomy (n = 2). The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions) assessment tool. While the described techniques hold promise, further research is warranted to establish standardized protocols, refine surgical approaches, and comprehensively evaluate long-term outcomes.

Predicting Role of GFAP and UCH-L1 biomarkers in Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a preliminary study to evaluate in the short-term their correlation with severity of bleeding and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (sSAH) is a severe brain vascular accident. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) can be theoretically assayed to predict a patient's progression, picturing different aspects of clinical failure after sSAH. The study aims to: a) explore the correlation between sSAH blood volume and biomarkers variation; b) evaluate if these can be predictive of the neurogenic response after sSAH and be prognostic of patient outcome; c) establish eventual threshold levels of biomarkers to define patients' clinical outcome. METHODS: Blood volumetry at CT scan upon admission, GFAP and UCH-L1 were collected at 24 h, at 72 h, and after 7 days from hemorrhage. Trends and cut-off serum sampling were determined. Clinical outcome was assessed with mRS scale at 14 days. RESULTS: A strong correlation between GFAP and UCH-L1 and blood diffusion volume in all explored serum intervals related to unfavorable outcome. GFAP and UCH-L1 were very early predictors of unfavorable outcomes at 24 h from sSAH (p = 0.002 and 0.011 respectively). Threshold levels of UCH-L1 apparently revealed a very early, early and late predictor of unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: GFAP and UCH-L1 represent a potential tool for prompt monitoring and customization of therapies in neurosurgical patients.

Outcome Comparison of Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia Surgical Treatments-An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews.

Medical treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is not always a feasible option due to a lack of full response or adverse effects. Open surgery or percutaneous procedures are advocated in these cases. Several articles have compared the results among different techniques. Nevertheless, the findings of these studies are heterogeneous. Umbrella reviews are studies sitting at the peak of the evidence pyramid. With this umbrella review, we provided a systematic review of the outcomes of the surgical procedures used for TN treatment. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included following the PRISMA guidelines. Ten articles were enrolled for qualitative and quantitative assessment. Level of evidence was quantified using a specific tool (AMSTAR-2). Results were heterogenous in terms of outcome and measurements. Microvascular decompression (MVD) appeared to be the most effective procedure both in the short-term (pain relief in 85-96.6% of cases) and long-term follow-up (pain relief in 64-79% of cases), although showed the highest rate of complications. The results of percutaneous techniques were similar but radiosurgery showed the highest variation in term of pain relief and a higher rate of delayed responses. The use of the AMSTAR-2 tool to quantify the evidence level scored three studies as critically low and seven studies as low-level, revealing a lack of good quality studies on this topic. Our umbrella review evidenced the need of well-designed comparative studies and the utilization of validated scales in order to provide more homogenous data for pooled-analyses and meta-analyses in the field of TN surgical treatment.