Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 32(7): 701-4, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27278391

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In 2011, we established a dedicated center for patients with chest wall deformities. Here, we evaluate the center's effect on patient volume and management. METHODS: A retrospective review of 699 patients with chest wall anomalies was performed. Patients were compared, based on the date of initial consultation, before the pectus center opened (July 2009-June 2011, Group 1) versus after (July 2011-June 2013, Group 2). Analysis was performed utilizing Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: 320 patients were in Group 1 and 379 in Group 2, an 18.4 % increase in patient volume. Excavatum patients increased from 172 (Group 1) to 189 (Group 2). Carinatum patients increased from 125 (Group 1) to 165 (Group 2). Patients undergoing operative repair of carinatum/mixed defects dropped significantly from 15 % (Group 1) to 1 % (Group 2) (p < 0.01), whereas those undergoing nonoperative bracing for carinatum/mixed defects rose significantly from 19 % (Group 1) to 63 % (Group 2) (p < 0.01). Patients traveled 3-1249 miles for a single visit. CONCLUSION: Initiating a dedicated pectus center increased patient volume and provided an effective transition to nonoperative bracing for carinatum patients. The concentrated focus of medical staff dedicated to chest wall deformities has allowed us to treat patients on a local and regional level.


Assuntos
Tórax em Funil/cirurgia , Modelos Organizacionais , Centros Cirúrgicos/organização & administração , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 29(5): 445-9, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23340830

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: No protocol exists for prophylaxis or therapeutic management of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) related deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in children. Currently, very few patients are provided prophylaxis for DVT. In this study, we analyzed our current practice of PICC placement to identify the frequency of DVT, analyze risk factors and determine current treatment patterns in order to determine the need for protocols. METHODS: The dataset was retrospectively collected from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2011. Patients with an upper extremity PICC were assessed for subsequent DVT formation. Variables included: demographics, co-morbidities, method of DVT diagnosis, treatment course, and recurrence. RESULTS: There were 1,289 PICC placements, with 24 (1.9 %) per line events of DVT in 23 patients, of which 3 had recent surgery, 2 had sepsis, 1 had a family history of clots, and 2 had a malignancy. All but one was symptomatic. Diagnosis was made in 92 % by ultrasound, the remaining with CT. No patients had prophylaxis. Of the seven patients who underwent hypercoagulable work-up, three were positive. 15 patients were treated with enoxaparin, 5 patients were treated with heparin, 2 treated with tissue plasminogen activator and 2 were observed. 84 % were treated with long-term enoxaparin for a mean of 3.3 months with 54 % proven clot resolution and 1 patient had recurrence of UE DVT. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DVT with PICC placement is small in children and prophylaxis can probably be reserved for those with previous DVT or known hypercoagulable state.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Trombose Venosa/terapia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Criança , Enoxaparina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia
3.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 29(5): 455-8, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23344151

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Perforated appendicitis is associated with abscess formation before or after appendectomy. Many abscesses are not amenable to drainage due to size or location. In this study, we compare patients who had a drain placed for an abscess to those who were treated without a drain. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from January 2000 to March 2011. Abscess before or after appendectomy was assessed. CT scans were reviewed and abscess size was estimated using the product of the greatest anteroposterior and lateral dimensions from an axial image. Patients with abscess smaller than 5 cm(2) were excluded. Patients treated with a drain were compared to those without using t test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact for categorical variables. RESULTS: Of 217 patients, those with drains had significantly more CT scans, total healthcare visits and larger abscess size. When match controlled for size, drain patients accrued more CT scans and healthcare visits. In a subset analysis of aspiration versus antibiotics only, there were more CT scans but no difference between length of stay, total healthcare visits, abscess size, recurrence, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Appendicitis-associated abscesses may be treated with antibiotics alone based on size, which improves resource utilization with fewer CT scans and healthcare visits.


Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal/etiologia , Abscesso Abdominal/cirurgia , Apendicite/complicações , Drenagem , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa