Status and Future Directions for Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease With and Without Pulmonary Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty continues to gain traction as a treatment option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. Recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines on pulmonary hypertension now give balloon pulmonary angioplasty a Class 1 recommendation for inoperable and residual chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Not surprisingly, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension centers are rapidly initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs. However, we need a comprehensive, expert consensus document outlining critical concepts, including identifying necessary personnel and expertise, criteria for patient selection, and a standardized approach to preprocedural planning and establishing criteria for evaluating procedural efficacy and safety. Given this lack of standards, the balloon pulmonary angioplasty skill set is learned through peer-to-peer contact and training. This document is a state-of-the-art, comprehensive statement from key thought leaders to address this gap in the current clinical practice of balloon pulmonary angioplasty. We summarize the current status of the procedure and provide a consensus opinion on the role of balloon pulmonary angioplasty in the overall care of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease with and without pulmonary hypertension. We also identify knowledge gaps, provide guidance for new centers interested in initiating balloon pulmonary angioplasty programs, and highlight future directions and research needs for this emerging therapy.

Effects of medical therapy and age on cardiac output changes following balloon pulmonary angioplasty: Implications for combination therapy in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) exhibit exercise intolerance due to reduced cardiac output (CO) even after successful balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA). Medical therapy is a potential option for such cases; however, it is unclear which patients necessitate it even after BPA. METHODS: This study included 286 patients with CTEPH who underwent BPA and right heart catheterization 1 year after the final BPA and classified them into no-medication and withdrawal groups. The no-medication group comprised patients without pulmonary hypertension (PH) medications before and after BPA, while the withdrawal group included patients who received PH medications before BPA and discontinued them after BPA. We assessed differences in the changes in CO after BPA from baseline (ΔCO) between the 2 groups. Additionally, we evaluated the ΔCO among different age categories within each group: younger (<60 years), middle-aged (60-70 years), and older adults (≥70 years). RESULTS: After adjusting baseline covariates, overall CO did not differ significantly. However, ΔCO was significantly positive in the no-medication group but negative in the withdrawal group (0.32 and -0.33, difference in ΔCO: -0.65, 95% confidence intervals: -0.90 to -0.40). A significantly positive effect on ΔCO was observed in younger and middle-aged individuals, with a significant interaction between age and ΔCO in no-medication groups. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing CO with BPA alone may be challenging with age in patients with CTEPH. Given that discontinuation of PH medication after BPA decreased CO more than the effect of BPA, medical therapy might be necessary even after successful BPA.

Pulmonary Hypertension With Interstitial Pneumonia: Initial Treatment Effectiveness and Severity in a Japan Registry.

Background: Recent guidelines discourage the use of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with respiratory diseases. Therefore, stratifications of the effectiveness of PAH-targeted therapies are important for this group. Objectives: The authors aimed to identify phenotypes that might benefit from initial PAH-targeted therapies in patients with PH associated with interstitial pneumonia and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. Methods: We categorized 270 patients with precapillary PH (192 interstitial pneumonia, 78 combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema) into severe and mild PH using a pulmonary vascular resistance of 5 WU. We investigated the prognostic factors and compared the prognoses of initial (within 2 months after diagnosis) and noninitial treatment groups, as well as responders (improvements in World Health Organization functional class, pulmonary vascular resistance, and 6-minute walk distance) and nonresponders. Results: Among 239 treatment-naive patients, 46.0% had severe PH, 51.8% had mild ventilatory impairment (VI), and 40.6% received initial treatment. In the severe PH with mild VI subgroup, the initial treatment group had a favorable prognosis compared with the noninitial treatment group. The response rate in this group was significantly higher than the others (48.2% vs 21.8%, ratio 2.21 [95% CI: 1.17-4.16]). In multivariate analysis, initial treatment was a better prognostic factor for severe PH but not for mild PH. Within the severe PH subgroup, responders had a favorable prognosis. Conclusions: This study demonstrated an increased number of responders to initial PAH-targeted therapy, with a favorable prognosis in severe PH cases with mild VI. A survival benefit was not observed in mild PH cases. (Multi-institutional Prospective Registry in Pulmonary Hypertension associated with Respiratory Disease; UMIN000011541).