Investigation of treatment continuity, usefulness, and nocebo effect in switching from the original etanercept to its biosimilar in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A JET observational study in Japanese clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the usefulness and onset of nocebo effects after switching from the original etanercept (ETN) to a biosimilar (BS) in routine clinical practice at rheumatology clinics in Japan (13 sites). METHODS: A total of 165 patients (87.0% women, age = 57.88 ± 15.07 years, and disease duration = 10.32 ± 7.71 years), whose low disease activity was maintained with the original ETN for ≥12 weeks, and who agreed to switch treatment to its BS, were included. The end-points were disease activity score 28 (DAS28)-C-reactive protein and DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the changes in DAS28-C-reactive protein and DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate >12 weeks before switching and >12 weeks after switching (P = 0.132 and 0.334, respectively). The treatment continuation rate during the 52 weeks after switching to BS was 97.3%. During this period, BS was discontinued in only four patients, and no nocebo effects were suspected in these four patients. CONCLUSION: Switching from ETN to BS was effective even in routine clinical practice at rheumatology clinics in Japan, and no nocebo effects were observed. Sufficient explanations to patients by rheumatologists and the additional payment for drug costs between patients at hospital visits effectively improved the continuation rate without any nocebo effect.

Iguratimod versus salazosulfapyridine in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate: Adjusted with propensity score matching.

OBJECTIVES: Methotrexate (MTX) is recommended as a first-line conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This retrospective study sought to identify an add-on csDMARD treatment strategy for RA patients with MTX-inadequate response (IR). METHODS: We collected the cases of RA patients treated with salazosulfapyridine (SASP) or iguratimod (IGU) as the additional csDMARD for MTX-IR during a 24-month follow-up. We performed propensity score matching to evaluate the retention rate, clinical efficacy, and safety profile (n = 54, each group). RESULTS: The retention rates at 24 months were 38.5% (MTX+SASP group) and 67.8% (MTX+IGU group). At 3 and 6 months, the MTX+IGU group's 28 joint-disease activity score (DAS28) was significantly decreased versus the MTX+SASP group, and at 3 months the MTX+IGU group's good-responder percentage (22.9%) was significantly higher versus the MTX+SASP group's good-responder percentage (10.7%). Conversely, compared to the MTX+SASP group, the MTX+IGU group showed a greater reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IGU is a useful add-on csDMARD for RA patients with MTX-IR; its high retention rate and good clinical response make it a useful combination therapy for controlling RA disease activity. However, the renal function should be monitored during follow-up.

Safety and efficacy of filgotinib for Japanese patients with RA and inadequate response to MTX: FINCH 1 52-week results and FINCH 4 48-week results.

OBJECTIVES: To present safety and efficacy of the JAK1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib in Japanese patients with prior inadequate response (IR) to methotrexate (MTX) from a 52-week randomised controlled parent study (PS) and long-term extension (LTE) through June 2020. METHODS: The PS (NCT02889796) randomised MTX-IR patients to filgotinib 200 (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100), adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg, or placebo; all took stable background MTX. At week (W) 24, placebo patients were rerandomised to FIL200 or FIL100. The primary endpoint was W12 American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement; safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) reporting. For the LTE (NCT03025308), eligible filgotinib patients continued FIL200/FIL100; ADA patients were rerandomised (blinded) to FIL200 or FIL100; all continued MTX. RESULTS: In all, 114/147 Japanese patients completed the PS, 115 enrolled in LTE, and 103 remained on study in June 2020. In the PS, AEs were consistent with the overall population, and W24 efficacy was maintained or improved through W52, comparable with the overall population. LTE AE incidences were similar between doses; filgotinib efficacy was consistent from baseline to W48 and similar between PS ADA and filgotinib patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among MTX-IR Japanese patients, filgotinib maintained efficacy over 1 year; LTE safety was consistent with the PS.

Long-term safety and efficacy of filgotinib treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in Japanese patients naïve to MTX treatment (FINCH 3).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of filgotinib (FIL) for Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and limited/no prior methotrexate (MTX) exposure. We present a Japanese population subanalysis of a global randomised-controlled trial at Week 52 and interim long-term extension (LTE) to Week 48 through June 2020. METHODS: Patients were randomised to FIL 200 mg plus MTX, FIL 100 mg plus MTX, FIL 200 mg, or MTX for 52 weeks. At completion, eligible patients could enrol in the LTE. Those receiving FIL continued; those receiving MTX were rerandomised (blinded) to FIL 200 or 100 mg upon discontinuation of MTX. After a 4-week washout period, MTX could be re-added. RESULTS: Adverse event rates at Week 52 and in the LTE to Week 48 were comparable across treatment groups. Week 52 American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) rates were 83% (19/23), 82% (9/11), 75% (9/12), and 76% (19/25) for FIL 200 mg plus MTX, FIL 100 mg plus MTX, FIL 200 mg, and MTX, respectively. Through LTE Week 48, ACR20 rates were maintained. CONCLUSIONS: In the 56 Japanese patients treated with FIL, efficacy was maintained through Week 52 and beyond, with no increases in the incidence of adverse events.

Integrated safety analysis of filgotinib treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in patients from Japan over a median of 1.5 years.

OBJECTIVE: Characterize safety of the Janus kinase-1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib (FIL) in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Data from three Phase 3 trials (NCT02889796, NCT02873936, and NCT02886728) and a long-term extension (NCT03025308) through September 2019 were integrated; patients received ≥1 dose of FIL 200 (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100) daily, or placebo (PBO). We calculated exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years FIL exposure (100PYE) for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse events of special interest. RESULTS: Among 3691 total patients and 6080.7 PYE, 229 Japanese patients received FIL for 311.4 PYE (median 1.5, maximum 2.5 years). During the 12-week PBO-controlled period, serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to study drug disruption were comparable between FIL and PBO. Serious infection rates were 1.9%, 0%, and 2% for FIL200, FIL100, and PBO during the PBO-controlled period; long-term FIL200 and FIL100 EAIRs were 3.8 and 2.1/100PYE. No herpes zoster (HZ) or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) occurred during the PBO-controlled period; long-term FIL200 and FIL100 EAIRs were 3.0 and 2.1/100PYE (HZ) and 0.6 and 0/100PYE (MACE). CONCLUSION: Long-term FIL treatment (median 1.5, maximum 2.5 years exposure) was well tolerated at 100- and 200-mg doses in Japanese patients with RA.

Histopathological changes of synovial tissue in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with TNF-α inhibitors or IL-6 inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the cell types that undergo apoptosis in TNF-α inhibitor (TNFI)- and IL-6 inhibitor (IL-6I)-treated synovia of RA patients, and to observe and compare histological changes in them. METHODS: Synovial tissue was collected during total knee arthroplasty from 20 RA patients who were divided into three groups based on RA treatment received: conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs, control group), TNFI, or IL-6I. Tissue samples were subjected to haematoxylin and eosin staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase fluorescein-deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labelling (TUNEL), immuno-histochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence staining for, respectively, histopathological assessment, apoptosis detection and IHC evaluation and scoring. RESULTS: TUNEL-positive cells were detected surrounding the discoid fibrosis unique to the TNFI group, while those in the IL-6I group were distributed widely, especially surrounding the blood vessels. IHC revealed that in TNFI-treated tissue, CD86- and CD80-positive cells were detected only in the lining and sublining layer, while CD163- and CD206-positive cells were detected more broadly; in the IL-6I-treated tissue, all four were detected widely but their levels were lower than in the control group. Immunofluorescence also revealed macrophages mainly were the apoptotic cells in the lining and sublining layers of TNFI group. TUNEL Expression levels of CD20- and CD3-positive cells were remarkably lower in the IL-6I group, compared with the control and TNFI groups. CONCLUSIONS: TNFIs and IL-6Is target different action sites and synovial cell types, resulting in histopathological features of synovium distinct from one another.

Efficacy and safety of abatacept in biologic-naïve patients with active rheumatoid arthritis by background methotrexate dose: post hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 4 study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of abatacept in biologic-naïve, anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by background methotrexate (MTX) dose. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 4 study (NCT01758198), patients received intravenous abatacept (∼10 mg/kg) or placebo both with MTX (≥6 mg/week). Efficacy (Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein [DAS28 (CRP)] and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI]) was assessed by baseline MTX dosage (≤8 and >8 mg/week) to week 16; safety was assessed by MTX dosage ≤8 and >8 mg/week. Change from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) and HAQ-DI was assessed using longitudinal repeated measures analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 101 and 102 patients received abatacept + MTX ≤8 and >8 mg/week, while 96 and 106 patients received placebo + MTX ≤8 and >8 mg/week, respectively. Regardless of baseline MTX dose received, mean changes from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) and HAQ-DI in abatacept groups were similar; repeated measures analysis showed similar trends in changes from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) and HAQ-DI. Abatacept safety profile was consistent with previous observations. CONCLUSIONS: Post hoc analysis demonstrated similar efficacy and safety of abatacept in biologic-naïve ACPA-positive Japanese patients with RA regardless of baseline MTX dose.

Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in combination with methotrexate in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who have an inadequate response to methotrexate: Subpopulation analyses of 24-week data of a global phase 3 study (FINCH 1).

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Janus kinase-1 inhibitor filgotinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: Data from 147 Japanese patients in FINCH 1, a 52-week global Phase 3 study, were analysed up to 24 weeks. Patients received once-daily filgotinib 200 or 100 mg, biweekly adalimumab, or placebo, all with stable background MTX. RESULTS: In the Japanese population, American College of Rheumatology 20% response rates at Week 12 (primary endpoint) were 77.5%, 65.9%, 53.6%, and 36.8% for filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, adalimumab, and placebo. Proportions of patients achieving Disease Activity Score with 28 joints <2.6 at Week 24: filgotinib 200 mg, 65.0%; filgotinib 100 mg, 51.2%; adalimumab, 42.9%; and placebo, 5.3%. Incidence rates of serious infections: filgotinib 200 mg, 2.5%; filgotinib 100 mg, 0%; adalimumab, 10.7%; and placebo, 5.3%. Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities Grade ≥3 occurred in five (12.5%) filgotinib 200 mg, three (7.3%) filgotinib 100 mg, one (3.6%) adalimumab, and no placebo patients. No deaths were reported among Japanese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Filgotinib once daily combined with MTX was effective and generally safe and well tolerated up to Week 24 in Japanese patients with RA and inadequate response to MTX.

Efficacy and safety of filgotinib alone and in combination with methotrexate in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and limited or no prior exposure to methotrexate: Subpopulation analyses of 24-week data of a global phase 3 study (FINCH 3).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of filgotinib for Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and limited or no prior methotrexate (MTX) exposure. METHODS: Data up to 24 weeks were analysed for 71 Japanese patients from a 52-week global Phase 3 study. Patients with RA and limited or no prior MTX exposure were randomised in a 2:1:1:2 ratio to filgotinib 200 mg plus MTX, filgotinib 100 mg plus MTX, filgotinib 200 mg, or MTX. Maximum MTX dose was 15 mg/week. Primary endpoint was proportion achieving 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at Week 24. RESULTS: Week 24 ACR20 rates in Japanese patients were 82.6%, 90.9%, 83.3%, and 80.0% for filgotinib 200 mg plus MTX, filgotinib 100 mg plus MTX, filgotinib 200 mg, and MTX, respectively. Greater ACR20 rates with filgotinib vs MTX occurred at Week 2. Greater proportions receiving filgotinib vs MTX achieved DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Weeks 12 and 24. Adverse event rates were comparable across treatments and between the Japanese and overall populations. CONCLUSIONS: While Week 24 ACR20 rates were similar, filgotinib provided faster responses and higher remission rates vs MTX. In Japanese patients with RA and limited or no prior MTX exposure, filgotinib was generally well tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in Japanese patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis: Subgroup analyses of a global phase 3 study (FINCH 2).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of filgotinib in Japanese RA patients who have failed or were intolerant to one or more biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) from the global FINCH 2 study (NCT02873936). METHODS: This subgroup analysis was performed using the predefined statistical analyses. The FINCH 2 study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study in adult RA patients with inadequate response to bDMARDs. The randomized patients were treated with once-daily filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg or placebo on a background of csDMARDs for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Of 449 patients enrolled in the overall population, 40 patients were enrolled from Japan. In the Japanese population, the American College of Rheumatology 20% response rates at week 12 (primary endpoint) were 83.3% and 53.3% for filgotinib, 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively, vs 30.8% for placebo. Filgotinib was well tolerated, similar to the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: Both doses of once-daily filgotinib 200 mg and filgotinib 100 mg were effective, and generally well-tolerated in Japanese patients with active refractory RA.

Choice of the most appropriate biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug for injection spacing: results from a multicentre observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine which biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) is most appropriate for spacing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have persistent stable symptoms. METHODS: In patients with sustained low disease activity (LDA) or better for ≥3 months who were treated with bDMARDs, the interval between bDMARD injections was extended 1.5 times, and treatment continuation rates at 104 weeks were calculated for each drug. Patients who discontinued therapy owing to adverse reactions and those who withdrew for reasons unrelated to the drugs were excluded. Whether patients could remain in LDA or better after injection spacing was investigated. The targeted drugs were an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor (golimumab [GOL]) and 2 non-TNF inhibitors (tocilizumab [TCZ] and abatacept [ABT]). RESULTS: The spacing evaluation included 57, 93, and 40 patients who received GOL subcutaneous injection (SC), TCZ (SC in 21 and drip intravenous injection [DIV] in 72), and ABT (SC in 12 and DIV in 22), respectively. At 104 weeks, the number of patients who discontinued therapy owing to adverse reactions did not significantly differ among the drugs. At 104 weeks, the treatment continuation rate was 0.71 for TCZ SC, 0.70 for GOL, 0.69 for TCZ DIV, 0.55 for ABT SC, and 0.50 for ABT DIV. The continuation rate for ABT was significantly lower than those for GOL and TCZ. No significant difference in continuation rates was observed between SC and DIV. CONCLUSIONS: When the injection interval was extended, GOL and TCZ were superior to ABT in terms of continuation rate.

A randomized double-blind parallel-group phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of NI-071 and infliximab reference product in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to methotrexate.

Objectives: This study aimed to demonstrate the equivalence of NI-071, an infliximab biosimilar (BS), and the infliximab reference product (RP) for treating Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to methotrexate.Methods: In this multicenter two-period phase III study, patients were treated with BS or RP for 30 weeks (Period I) in a randomized double-blind manner and then with BS for the following 24 weeks (Period II). The efficacy and safety of BS and RP were compared.Results: The disease activity score in 28-joint count based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein and the American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70-based efficacy profiles of BS were similar to those of RP during Period I (30 weeks) including evaluations at week 14, a critical time point. BS efficacy was maintained throughout the 54-week study period. BS efficacy profile matched the RP profile until week 54 after the drug switch from RP to BS at week 30. The safety profiles of BS and RP were comparable and the long-term safety of BS was confirmed.Conclusion: BS demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to RP at treatment weeks 14 and 30, and long-term safety until week 54 in Japanese RA patients.

Clinical benefit of 1-year certolizumab pegol (CZP) add-on therapy to methotrexate treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis was observed following CZP discontinuation: 2-year results of the C-OPERA study, a phase III randomised trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical impact of 1-year certolizumab pegol (CZP) therapy added to the first year of 2-year methotrexate (MTX) therapy, compared with 2-year therapy with MTX alone. METHODS: MTX-naïve patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognostic factors were eligible to enter Certolizumab-Optimal Prevention of joint damage for Early RA (C-OPERA), a multicentre, randomised, controlled study, which consisted of a 52-week double-blind (DB) period and subsequent 52-week post treatment (PT) period. Patients were randomised to optimised MTX+CZP (n=159) or optimised MTX+placebo (PBO; n=157). Following the DB period, patients entered the PT period, receiving MTX alone (CZP+MTX→MTX; n=108, PBO+MTX→MTX; n=71). Patients who flared could receive rescue treatment with open-label CZP. RESULTS: 34 CZP+MTX→MTX patients and 14 PBO+MTX→MTX patients discontinued during the PT period. From week 52 through week 104, significant inhibition of total modified total Sharp score progression was observed for CZP+MTX versus PBO+MTX (week 104: 84.2% vs 67.5% (p<0.001)). Remission rates decreased after CZP discontinuation; however, higher rates were maintained through week 104 in CZP+MTX→MTX versus PBO+MTX→MTX (41.5% vs 29.3% (p=0.026), 34.6% vs 24.2% (p=0.049) and 41.5% vs 33.1% (p=0.132) at week 104 in SDAI, Boolean and DAS28(erythrocyte sedimentation rate) remission. CZP retreated patients due to flare (n=28) showed rapid clinical improvement. The incidence of overall adverse events was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In MTX-naïve patients with early RA with poor prognostic factors, an initial 1 year of add-on CZP to 2-year optimised MTX therapy brings radiographic and clinical benefit through 2 years, even after stopping CZP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01451203.

Whole genome analysis on the genetic backgrounds associated with the secondary failure to etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Etanercept is effective for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, some of the patients eventually lose efficacy (secondary failure) despite the absence of neutralizing antibodies. We aimed to explore single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with secondary failure. METHODS: We recruited RA patients given etanercept at 50 mg/week for ≥6 months from the Matsubara Mayflower Hospital RA registry. They were assigned to responders, secondary failure patients, and non-responders according to Disease Activity Score. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed using Illumina HumanHAP300k BeadChips and the results were analyzed with Plink software. Clinical backgrounds were compared by ANOVA and contingency table analysis. The protocol was approved by IRB and written informed consent was obtained. RESULTS: Ninety, 27 and 17 patients were assigned to responders, secondary failure patients, and non-responders, respectively. No significant differences were observed regarding clinical backgrounds among the groups. GWAS revealed that six and 37 SNPs may be associated with secondary failure to etanercept with p< 10-6 and <10-5, respectively. CONCLUSION: While our preliminary results with borderline significance should be validated by studies with a greater population size, some of the SNPs detected by our GWAS may be involved in the development of secondary failure to etanercept.

The first double-blind, randomised, parallel-group certolizumab pegol study in methotrexate-naive early rheumatoid arthritis patients with poor prognostic factors, C-OPERA, shows inhibition of radiographic progression.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of combination therapy using certolizumab pegol (CZP) and methotrexate (MTX) as first-line treatment for MTX-naive, early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognostic factors, compared with MTX alone. METHODS: MTX-naive, early RA patients with ≤12 months persistent disease, high anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide, and either rheumatoid factor positive and/or presence of bone erosions were enrolled in this multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo (PBO)-controlled study. Patients were randomised 1:1 to CZP+MTX or PBO+MTX for 52 weeks. Primary endpoint was inhibition of radiographic progression (change from baseline in modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS CFB)) at week 52. Secondary endpoints were mTSS CFB at week 24, and clinical remission rates at weeks 24 and 52. RESULTS: 316 patients randomised to CZP+MTX (n=159) or PBO+MTX (n=157) had comparable baseline characteristics reflecting features of early RA (mean disease duration: 4.0 vs 4.3 months; Disease Activity Score 28-joint assessment (DAS28)) (erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)): 5.4 vs 5.5; mTSS: 5.2 vs 6.0). CZP+MTX group showed significantly greater inhibition of radiographic progression relative to PBO+MTX at week 52 (mTSS CFB=0.36 vs 1.58; p<0.001) and week 24 (mTSS CFB=0.26 vs 0.86; p=0.003). Clinical remission rates (Simple Disease Activity Index, Boolean and DAS28 (ESR)) of the CZP+MTX group were significantly higher compared with those of the PBO+MTX group, at weeks 24 and 52. Safety results in both groups were similar, with no new safety signals observed with addition of CZP to MTX. CONCLUSIONS: In MTX-naive early RA patients with poor prognostic factors, CZP+MTX significantly inhibited structural damage and reduced RA signs and symptoms, demonstrating the efficacy of CZP in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: (NCT01451203).

The usefulness of a new triple combination treatment utilizing methotrexate, salazosulfapyridine, and bucillamine in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Combination treatment with methotrexate, salazosulfapyridine and bucillamine as an alternative to treatment with TNF-inhibiting biologics in rheumatoid arthritis was investigated. METHODS: Twenty-six facilities allied with the Japan Association of Rheumatologists in Private Practice participated in this study. One hundred and twelve patients enrolled in this study, all of whom were within 3 years of diagnosis with rheumatoid arthritis for whom treatment with one DMARD or a combination of two DMARDs had failed (DAS28 > 3.2). Patients chose their own treatment. The triple DMARDs combination group was comprised of 72 patients; the TNF-inhibiting biologics treatment group was comprised of 40 patients. RESULTS: DAS28 scores for the triple DMARDs combination group and the TNF-inhibiting biologics treatment groups were 4.84 ± 0.96 and 5.23 ± 1.26, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. From the 6th month, average disease activities of both groups were reduced, and there was no difference between the two groups at 12 months (DAS28, 3.39 ± 1.43 and 3.05 ± 1.43, p = 0.39). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the degree of bone destruction between the two groups at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The triple DMARD combination therapy provided a new treatment option for those patients for whom treatment with biologics is difficult.

Biologic-free remission of established rheumatoid arthritis after discontinuation of abatacept: a prospective, multicentre, observational study in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether biologic-free remission of RA is possible with discontinuation of abatacept. METHODS: Japanese RA patients in 28-joint DAS with CRP (DAS28-CRP) remission (<2.3) after >2 years of abatacept treatment in a phase II study and its long-term extension entered this 52 week, multicentre, non-blinded, prospective, observational study. At enrolment, the patients were offered the option to continue abatacept or not. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who remained biologic-free at 52 weeks after discontinuation. Clinical, functional and structural outcomes were compared between those who continued and those who discontinued abatacept. RESULTS: Of 51 patients enrolled, 34 discontinued and 17 continued abatacept treatment. After 52 weeks, 22 of the 34 patients (64.7%) remained biologic-free. Compared with the continuation group, the discontinuation group had a similar remission rate (41.2% vs 64.7%, P = 0.144) although they had a significantly higher mean DAS28-CRP score at week 52 (2.9 vs 2.0, P = 0.012). The two groups were also similar with regard to mean HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score (0.6 for both, P = 0.920), mean change in total Sharp score (ΔTSS; 0.80 vs 0.32, P = 0.374) and proportion of patients in radiographic remission (ΔTSS ≤ 0.5) at the endpoint (64.3% vs 70.6%, P = 0.752). Those attaining DAS28-CRP < 2.3 or < 2.7 without abatacept at the endpoint had significantly lower HAQ-DI score and/or CRP at enrolment. Non-serious adverse events occurred in three patients who continued or resumed abatacept. CONCLUSION: Biologic-free remission of RA is possible in some patients after attaining clinical remission with abatacept. Lower baseline HAQ-DI or CRP may predict maintenance of remission or low disease activity after discontinuation of abatacept. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ (UMIN000004137).

Effect of nutritional counseling and long term isomaltulose based liquid formula (MHN-01) intake on metabolic syndrome.

The isomaltulose based liquid formula (MHN-01), suppresses postprandial plasma glucose and insulin levels in healthy persons and patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or type 2 diabetes. MHN-01 intake as a part of breakfast also suppresses glucose and insulin levels after lunch, suggesting second meal effect. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of nutritional counseling and long-term (24 weeks) MHN-01 ingestion on biomarkers of metabolic syndrome. Forty-one subjects with criteria of metabolic syndrome participated in this study composed with the control period (0-12 week) followed by nutritional counseling and the experimental period (12-36 week) followed by 200 kcal (837 kJ) of MHN-01 or dextrin-based standard balanced liquid formula (SBF) loading as a part of breakfast. In 16 of 41 subjects became to out of criteria for liquid formula loading study during control period (unqualified group). In the unqualified group, several biomarkers were improved. In experimental period, serum HbA1c levels significantly increased in SBF group (n = 12) but did not change in MHN-01 group (n = 10). Thus, intake of 837 kJ MHN-01 as a part of breakfast may be effective for suppression of deteriorating glucose metabolism in metabolic syndrome.

Long-term safety and efficacy of treatment with subcutaneous abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are methotrexate inadequate responders.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were MTX inadequate responders, in a long-term extension (LTE) to a double-dummy, double-blind study (NCT01001832). METHODS: Patients, who had previously received SC or intravenous (IV) abatacept with MTX (6-8 mg/week) for 24 weeks, received SC abatacept (125 mg/week) with MTX for an additional 52 weeks. Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy were assessed. RESULTS: The LTE included 112 patients. SC abatacept was generally well tolerated in the LTE, with no new safety signals. American College of Rheumatology 20, 50, and 70 response rates, disease activity score 28 (C-reactive protein) remission rates (< 2.6), and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index response rates (≥ 0.3 improvement from baseline) achieved at the end of the double-blind period were maintained over the LTE and were comparable in patients who received SC or IV abatacept in the double-blind period. Seropositivity for immunogenicity occurred in 4 (3.6%) patients. Self-injection of SC abatacept was well controlled and not associated with additional safety events. CONCLUSIONS: SC abatacept had acceptable safety and was well tolerated and effective over the LTE (76 weeks in total), with low rates of immunogenicity in Japanese patients.

Adalimumab, a human anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, outcome study for the prevention of joint damage in Japanese patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: the HOPEFUL 1 study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab+methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received MTX or biologics. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study evaluated adalimumab 40 mg every other week+MTX 6-8 mg every week versus MTX 6-8 mg every week alone for 26 weeks in patients with RA (≤2-year duration). The primary endpoint was inhibition of radiographic progression (change (Δ) from baseline in modified total Sharp score (mTSS)) at week 26. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients received adalimumab+MTX (mean dose, 6.2±0.8 mg/week) and 163 patients received MTX alone (mean dose, 6.6±0.6 mg/week, p<0.001). The mean RA duration was 0.3 years and 315 (94.3%) had high disease activity (DAS28>5.1). Adalimumab+MTX significantly inhibited radiographic progression at week 26 versus MTX alone (ΔmTSS, 1.5±6.1 vs 2.4±3.2, respectively; p<0.001). Significantly more patients in the adalimumab+MTX group (62.0%) did not show radiographic progression (ΔmTSS≤0.5) versus the MTX alone group (35.4%; p<0.001). Patients treated with adalimumab+MTX were significantly more likely to achieve American College of Rheumatology responses and achieve clinical remission, using various definitions, at 26 weeks versus MTX alone. Combination therapy was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab in combination with low-dose MTX was well tolerated and efficacious in suppressing radiographic progression and improving clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with early RA and high disease activity.