Splicing stories and poly(A) tales: an update on RNA processing and transport.

The basic steps in RNA processing, transport and translation have been conserved throughout eukaryotic evolution, as have many of the components involved. Nevertheless, the recognition processes which underlie RNA metabolism also display non-conserved features, whose appearance may have been made necessary by the increasing number and variety of processing substrates in higher eukaryotes and the complex requirements for differential regulation of RNA metabolism. Although many components of the mRNA processing machinery have been identified, our understanding of how a precursor is defined and accurately processed is still rudimentary. There are numerous indications that gene expression, from transcription all the way through to translation, is an integrated process. The challenge is to understand RNA processing and transport within this integrated whole.

Ran-GTP coordinates regulation of microtubule nucleation and dynamics during mitotic-spindle assembly.

It was recently reported that GTP-bound Ran induces microtubule and pseudo-spindle assembly in mitotic egg extracts in the absence of chromosomes and centrosomes, and that chromosomes induce the assembly of spindle microtubules in these extracts through generation of Ran-GTP. Here we examine the effects of Ran-GTP on microtubule nucleation and dynamics and show that Ran-GTP has independent effects on both the nucleation activity of centrosomes and the stability of centrosomal microtubules. We also show that inhibition of Ran-GTP production, even in the presence of duplicated centrosomes and kinetochores, prevents assembly of a bipolar spindle in M-phase extracts.

Distinct AAA-ATPase p97 complexes function in discrete steps of nuclear assembly.

Although nuclear envelope (NE) assembly is known to require the GTPase Ran, the membrane fusion machinery involved is uncharacterized. NE assembly involves formation of a reticular network on chromatin, fusion of this network into a closed NE and subsequent expansion. Here we show that p97, an AAA-ATPase previously implicated in fusion of Golgi and transitional endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes together with the adaptor p47, has two discrete functions in NE assembly. Formation of a closed NE requires the p97-Ufd1-Npl4 complex, not previously implicated in membrane fusion. Subsequent NE growth involves a p97-p47 complex. This study provides the first insights into the molecular mechanisms and specificity of fusion events involved in NE formation.

Nucleocytoplasmic transport: Ran, beta and beyond.

Proteins, RNAs and even large macromolecular complexes are transported into and out of nuclei with remarkable rapidity and specificity. Nucleocytoplasmic transport must therefore be efficient and selective. Characterization of the roles of the importin beta family of transport receptors and of the Ran GTPase has showed how these characteristics can be achieved, but there are many examples of nucleocytoplasmic transport that do not fit this model. Here, we discuss current understanding of various transport mechanisms and evaluate cases in which the molecules and mechanisms underlying nucleocytoplasmic transport are used to carry out important cellular functions in the absence of a nucleus.

Intracellular distribution of the U1A protein depends on active transport and nuclear binding to U1 snRNA.

Nuclear transport of the U1 snRNP-specific protein U1A has been examined. U1A moves to the nucleus by an active process which is independent of interaction with U1 snRNA. Nuclear localization requires an unusually large sequence element situated between amino acids 94 and 204 of the protein. U1A transport is not unidirectional. The protein shuttles between nucleus and cytoplasm. At equilibrium, the concentration of the protein in the nucleus and cytoplasm is not, however, determined solely by transport rates, but can be perturbed by introducing RNA sequences that can specifically bind U1A in either the nuclear or cytoplasmic compartment. Thus, U1A represents a novel class of protein which shuttles between cytoplasm and nucleus and whose intracellular distribution can be altered by the number of free binding sites for the protein present in the cytoplasm or the nucleus.

An ATP-dependent, Ran-independent mechanism for nuclear import of the U1A and U2B" spliceosome proteins.

Nuclear import of the two uracil-rich small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U snRNP) components U1A and U2B" is mediated by unusually long and complex nuclear localization signals (NLSs). Here we investigate nuclear import of U1A and U2B" in vitro and demonstrate that it occurs by an active, saturable process. Several lines of evidence suggest that import of the two proteins occurs by an import mechanism different to those characterized previously. No cross competition is seen with a variety of previously studied NLSs. In contrast to import mediated by members of the importin-beta family of nucleocytoplasmic transport receptors, U1A/U2B" import is not inhibited by either nonhydrolyzable guanosine triphosphate (GTP) analogues or by a mutant of the GTPase Ran that is incapable of GTP hydrolysis. Adenosine triphosphate is capable of supporting U1A and U2B" import, whereas neither nonhydrolyzable adenosine triphosphate analogues nor GTP can do so. U1A and U2B" import in vitro does not require the addition of soluble cytosolic proteins, but a factor or factors required for U1A and U2B" import remains tightly associated with the nuclear fraction of conventionally permeabilized cells. This activity can be solubilized in the presence of elevated MgCl(2). These data suggest that U1A and U2B" import into the nucleus occurs by a hitherto uncharacterized mechanism.

A cap binding protein that may mediate nuclear export of RNA polymerase II-transcribed RNAs.

It has previously been shown that efficient export of U1 snRNA or of microinjected, in vitro synthesized, RNA transcripts from the nucleus of Xenopus oocytes is facilitated by their monomethyl guanosine cap structures. Nuclear exit of these transcripts could be competitively inhibited by microinjection of an excess of a cap analog, the dinucleotide m7GpppG (Hamm, J., and I. W. Mattaj. 1990. Cell. 63:109-118). We have now analyzed the ability of several other related cap analogs to inhibit the export of U1 snRNA from the nucleus. The results define the recognition specificity of a factor(s) involved in RNA transport, and indicate that the cap binding activity (CBA) involved in RNA export is different from cap binding proteins (CBPs) involved in the initiation of translation. A CBP, whose specificity for different analogs correlates with the ability of the analogs to inhibit U1 snRNA export, is identified in nuclear extracts prepared from HeLa cells. We propose that this protein may have a role in the export of capped RNAs from the nucleus.

Nuclear export of different classes of RNA is mediated by specific factors.

Various classes of RNA are exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, including transcripts of RNA polymerase I (large ribosomal RNAs), II (U-rich small nuclear RNAs [U snRNAs], mRNAs), and III (tRNAs, 5S RNA). Here, evidence is presented that some steps in the export of various classes of nuclear RNA are mediated by specific rather than common factors. Using microinjection into Xenopus oocytes, it is shown that a tRNA, a U snRNA, and an mRNA competitively inhibit their own export at concentrations at which they have no effect on the export of heterologous RNAs. While the export of both U snRNAs and mRNAs is enhanced by their 7-methyl guanosine cap structures, factors recognizing this structure are found to be limiting in concentration only in the case of U snRNAs. In addition to the specific factors, evidence for steps in the export process that may be common to at least some classes of RNA are provided by experiments in which synthetic homopolymeric RNAs are used as inhibitors.

Nuclear exclusion of transcription factor IIIA and the 42s particle transfer RNA-binding protein in Xenopus oocytes: a possible mechanism for gene control?

The intracellular location of 7S and 42S RNP particles in Xenopus oocytes has been determined by immunohistochemistry. Using antibodies directed against the 48-mol-wt protein component of the 42S particle and against transcription factor IIIA, the protein moiety of the 7S particle, we show that these ribonucleoprotein particles are detectable only in the oocyte cytoplasm, being excluded from the nucleus. The mechanism of this nuclear exclusion, and its possible significance in the regulation of 5S RNA gene expression, are discussed.

A role for the M9 transport signal of hnRNP A1 in mRNA nuclear export.

Among the nuclear proteins associated with mRNAs before their export to the cytoplasm are the abundant heterogeneous nuclear (hn) RNPs. Several of these contain the M9 signal that, in the case of hnRNP A1, has been shown to be sufficient to signal both nuclear export and nuclear import in cultured somatic cells. Kinetic competition experiments are used here to demonstrate that M9-directed nuclear import in Xenopus oocytes is a saturable process. Saturating levels of M9 have, however, no effect on the import of either U snRNPs or proteins carrying a classical basic NLS. Previous work demonstrated the existence of nuclear export factors specific for particular classes of RNA. Injection of hnRNP A1 but not of a mutant protein lacking the M9 domain inhibited export of mRNA but not of other classes of RNA. This suggests that hnRNP A1 or other proteins containing an M9 domain play a role in mRNA export from the nucleus. However, the requirement for M9 function in mRNA export is not identical to that in hnRNP A1 protein transport.

A nuclear cap-binding complex binds Balbiani ring pre-mRNA cotranscriptionally and accompanies the ribonucleoprotein particle during nuclear export.

In vertebrates, a nuclear cap-binding complex (CBC) formed by two cap- binding proteins, CBP20 and CBP80, is involved in several steps of RNA metabolism, including pre-mRNA splicing and nuclear export of some RNA polymerase II-transcribed U snRNAs. The CBC is highly conserved, and antibodies against human CBP20 cross-react with the CBP20 counterpart in the dipteran Chironomus tentans. Using immunoelectron microscopy, the in situ association of CBP20 with a specific pre-mRNP particle, the Balbiani ring particle, has been analyzed at different stages of pre-mRNA synthesis, maturation, and nucleo-cytoplasmic transport. We demonstrate that CBP20 binds to the nascent pre-mRNA shortly after transcription initiation, stays in the RNP particles after splicing has been completed, and remains attached to the 5' domain during translocation of the RNP through the nuclear pore complex (NPC). The rapid association of CBP20 with nascent RNA transcripts in situ is consistent with the role of CBC in splicing, and the retention of CBC on the RNP during translocation through the NPC supports its proposed involvement in RNA export.

RAN/TC4 mutants identify a common requirement for snRNP and protein import into the nucleus.

Kinetic competition experiments have demonstrated that at least some factors required for the nuclear import of proteins and U snRNPs are distinct. Both import processes require energy, and in the case of protein import, the energy requirement is known to be at least partly met by GTP hydrolysis by the Ran GTPase. We have compared the effects of nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues and two mutant Ran proteins on the nuclear import of proteins and U snRNPs in vitro. The mutant Ran proteins have different defects; Q69L (glutamine 69 changed to leucine) is defective in GTP hydrolysis while T24N (threonine 24 changed to asparagine) is defective in binding GTP. Both protein and snRNP import are sensitive either to the presence of the two mutant Ran proteins, which act as dominant negative inhibitors of nuclear import, or to incubation with nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues. This demonstrates that there is a requirement for a GTPase activity for the import of U snRNPs, as well as proteins, into the nucleus. The dominant negative effects of the two mutant Ran proteins indicate that the pathways of protein and snRNP import share at lease one common component.

Diversity in the signals required for nuclear accumulation of U snRNPs and variety in the pathways of nuclear transport.

The requirements for nuclear targeting of a number of U snRNAs have been studied by analyzing the behavior of in vitro-generated transcripts after microinjection into the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes. Like the previously studied U1 snRNA, U2 snRNA is excluded from the nucleus when it does not have the 2,2,7mGpppN cap structure typical of the RNA polymerase II (pol II)-transcribed U snRNAs. Surprisingly, two other pol II-transcribed U snRNAs, U4 and U5, have a much less stringent requirement for the trimethyl cap structure. The gamma-monomethyl triphosphate cap structure of the RNA polymerase III-transcribed U6 snRNA, on the other hand, is shown not to play a role in nuclear targeting. Wheat germ agglutinin, which is known to prevent the import of many proteins into the nucleus, inhibits nuclear uptake of U6, but not of U1 or U5 snRNAs. Conversely, a 2,2,7mGpppG dinucleotide analogue of the trimethyl cap structure inhibits transport of the pol II U snRNAs, but does not detectably affect the transport of either U6 snRNA or a karyophilic protein. From these results it can be deduced that U6 enters the nucleus by a pathway similar or identical to that used by karyophilic proteins. The composite nuclear localization signals of the trimethyl cap-containing U snRNPs, however, do not function in the same way as previously defined nuclear targeting signals.

Nucleocytoplasmic transport.

Active transport of proteins and RNAs between the nucleus and cytoplasm is a major process in eukaryotic cells. Recently, factors that recognize transport substrates and mediate nuclear import or export have been characterized, revealing interactions that target substrates to the nuclear pore complexes, through which translocation occurs. Translocation requires energy, and for the import process this energy is at least partly consumed by the action of the small guanosine triphosphatase Ran. In the first half of the review, some of the well-established general background information on nucleocytoplasmic transport is discussed. The second half describes recent information on the mechanistic details of nuclear import and export as well as major unresolved issues such as how directionality is conferred on either import or export. The whole review is slanted toward discussion of metazoan cells.

Identification of hSRP1 alpha as a functional receptor for nuclear localization sequences.

Import of proteins into the nucleus is a two-step process, involving nuclear localization sequence (NLS)-dependent docking of the substrate at the nuclear envelope followed by translocation through the nuclear pore. A recombinant human protein, hSRP1 alpha, bound in vitro specifically and directly to substrates containing either a simple or bipartite NLS motif. hSRP1 alpha promoted docking of import substrates to the nuclear envelope and together with recombinant human Ran reconstituted complete nuclear protein import. Thus, hSRP1 alpha has the properties of a cytosolic receptor for both simple and bipartite NLS motifs.

Ribonucleoprotein assembly: clues from spinal muscular atrophy.

Mutation or deletion of one of the two genes encoding a protein known as SMN has recently been shown to cause spinal muscular atrophy. The SMN protein has been found to be part of a multi-component complex that appears to function in the assembly of cellular ribonucleoprotein particles.

Meiosis: MeiRNA hits the spot.

The protein Mei2 performs at least two functions required in fission yeast for the switch from mitotic to meiotic cell cycles. One of these functions also requires meiRNA. It appears that meiRNA targets Mei2 to the nucleus, where it can promote the first meiotic division.

Receptor-mediated substrate translocation through the nuclear pore complex without nucleotide triphosphate hydrolysis.

BACKGROUND: The transport of macromolecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm is an energy-dependent process. Substrates are translocated across the nuclear envelope through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). Translocation requires nucleocytoplasmic transport receptors of the importin beta family, which interact both with the NPC and, either directly or via an adaptor, with the transport substrate. Although certain receptors have recently been shown to cross the NPC in an energy-independent manner, translocation of substrate-receptor complexes through the NPC has generally been regarded as an energy-requiring step. RESULTS: We describe an in vitro system that is based on permeabilised cells and supports nuclear export mediated by leucine-rich nuclear export signals. In this system, export is dependent on exogenous CRM1/Exportin1 - a nuclear export receptor - the GTPase Ran and nucleotide triphosphates (NTPs), and is further stimulated by Ran-binding protein 1 (RanBP1) and nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2). Unexpectedly, non-hydrolysable NTP analogues completely satisfy the NTP requirements for a single-round of CRM1-mediated translocation of protein substrates across the NPC. Similarly, single transportin-mediated nuclear protein import events are shown not to require hydrolysable NTPs and to occur in the absence of the Ran GTPase. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that, contrary to expectation and prior conclusions, the translocation of substrate-receptor complexes across the NPC in either direction occurs in the absence of NTP hydrolysis and is thus energy independent. The energy needed to drive substrate transport against a concentration gradient is supplied at the step of receptor recycling in the cytoplasm.

Identification of a nuclear export receptor for tRNA.

BACKGROUND: Transport of macromolecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells is mediated by nuclear import and export receptors. The receptors identified to date are members of a family of Ran GTPase-binding proteins whose founding member is importin-beta. Interaction between these receptors and their cargo is regulated by the GTP-bound form of Ran. Export complexes form and import complexes disassemble on binding of RanGTP to the receptor. Yeast Los 1 p is a member of the importin-beta family with a poorly defined role in tRNA production. RESULTS: A human member of the importin-beta family that is distantly related to Los 1 p (21% identity) has been characterized. The protein shuttled between the nucleus and cytoplasm and interacts with tRNA in a RanGTP-dependent manner. Injection of the protein into the nuclei of Xenopus oocytes resulted in a specific stimulation of the export of tRNA from the nucleus and in relief of the competitive inhibition of tRNA export caused by the introduction of saturating amounts of nuclear tRNA. CONCLUSIONS: The human protein has the functional properties expected of a transport receptor that mediates export of tRNA from the nucleus. We therefore name the protein Exportin(tRNA).

Anti-(U1) small nuclear RNA antibodies in anti-small nuclear ribonucleoprotein sera from patients with connective tissue diseases.

Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) particles are a class of RNA-containing particles in the nucleus of eukaryotic cells. Sera from patients with connective tissue diseases often contain antibodies against the proteins present in these snRNPs. Antibodies against the RNA components of snRNPs, the U snRNAs, are thought to be rare. We tested 118 anti-snRNP sera for the presence of anti-snRNA antibodies and found them in 45 sera (38%). In all sera the antibodies (IgG and F(ab)2 fragments thereof) were exclusively directed against U1 snRNA. The anti-(U1) RNA antibodies were always accompanied by anti-(U1)RNP antibodies but were not found in sera which contain antibodies of the Sm serotype directed against all nucleoplasmic U snRNP particles. Like anti-RNP antibodies, anti-U1 RNA activity is confined to sera from patients with SLE or SLE overlap syndromes and is rarely found in patients with other connective tissue diseases. By analyzing binding to subfragments of U1 snRNA made in vitro, it was demonstrated that anti-(U1)RNA antibodies recognize epitopes distributed throughout the U1 RNA molecule. In most sera, however, either the second or the fourth hairpin loop is the main target of the antibody. The possible mechanisms that could lead to the production of this new type of autoantibody are discussed.