Measures of harm reduction service provision for people who inject drugs.

Coverage is an important dimension in measuring the effectiveness of needle and syringe programmes in providing sterile injecting equipment for people who inject drugs. The World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) currently recommend methods for measuring coverage at the population level, that is, across an estimated population of people who inject drugs within a given geographical area. However, population-level measures of coverage rely on highly uncertain population estimates and cannot capture the different levels of syringe acquisition and injecting episodes among individual users. Consequently, such measures only broadly evaluate the extent of programme service delivery, rather than describe how people who inject drugs as individuals and sub-groups interact with needle and syringe programmes. In response to these limitations, several researchers have proposed measuring coverage at the individual level, by the percentage of injecting episodes in relation to the number of sterile needles and syringes acquired. These measures evaluate coverage according to each individual's needs. Such measures provide enhanced information for planning and monitoring of harm reduction programmes and have now been used in multiple international research studies. We advise that WHO, UNODC and UNAIDS add individual-level coverage measurement methods to their international monitoring guidelines for harm reduction programmes. By doing this, more responsive and effective programmes can be created to better reduce injecting risk behaviours and blood-borne virus transmission among people who inject drugs.

La couverture est une dimension importante lorsque l'on veut mesurer l'efficacité des programmes de distribution d'aiguilles et de seringues à fournir du matériel d'injection stérile aux consommateurs de drogues par injection. L'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS), l'Office des Nations Unies contre la drogue et le crime (ONUDC) et le Programme commun des Nations Unies sur le VIH/sida (ONUSIDA) recommandent actuellement des méthodes pour mesurer la couverture au niveau de la population, c'est-à-dire sur une population estimée de consommateurs de drogues par injection dans une zone géographique donnée. Or, les mesures de la couverture au niveau de la population se fondent sur des estimations très incertaines de la population et ne permettent pas de refléter les différents degrés d'acquisition de seringues et d'épisodes d'injection chez les usagers. Par conséquent, ces mesures n'évaluent que globalement la portée des programmes au lieu de décrire la manière dont les consommateurs de drogues par injection interagissent, individuellement et en sous-groupes, avec les programmes de distribution d'aiguilles et de seringues. En réponse à ces limitations, plusieurs chercheurs ont proposé de mesurer la couverture au niveau individuel, en calculant le pourcentage d'épisodes d'injection par rapport au nombre d'aiguilles et de seringues stériles acquises. Ces mesures permettent d'évaluer la couverture en fonction des besoins de chaque personne. Ce type de mesures offre des informations plus fiables pour la planification et le suivi des programmes de réduction des risques et il est aujourd'hui utilisé dans plusieurs études de recherche internationales. Nous suggérons à l'OMS, à l'ONUDC et à l'ONUSIDA d'ajouter des méthodes de mesure de la couverture au niveau individuel à leurs directives internationales pour le suivi des programmes de réduction des risques. Cela permettra de mettre au point des programmes plus adaptés et efficaces afin de mieux réduire les comportements à risque liés aux injections ainsi que la transmission de virus par le sang chez les consommateurs de drogues par injection.

La cobertura es un factor importante para medir la eficacia de los programas de agujas y jeringas en el suministro de equipo de inyección estéril para las personas que se inyectan drogas. La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), la Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito (ONUDD) y el Programa Conjunto de las Naciones Unidas sobre el VIH/SIDA (ONUSIDA) recomiendan actualmente métodos para medir la cobertura a nivel poblacional, es decir, a través de una población estimada de consumidores de drogas inyectables dentro de una zona geográfica determinada. Sin embargo, las medidas de cobertura a nivel poblacional se basan en estimaciones poblacionales altamente inciertas y no pueden captar los diferentes niveles de adquisición de jeringas y episodios de inyección entre los usuarios individuales. En consecuencia, esas medidas solo miden en términos generales el alcance de la prestación de servicios de los programas, en lugar de describir la forma en que las personas que se inyectan drogas como individuos y subgrupos interactúan con los programas de suministro de agujas y jeringas. En respuesta a estas limitaciones, varios investigadores han propuesto medir la cobertura a nivel individual, por el porcentaje de episodios de inyección en relación con el número de agujas y jeringas estériles adquiridas. Estas medidas miden la cobertura de acuerdo a las necesidades de cada individuo. Estas medidas proporcionan una mejor información para la planificación y el seguimiento de los programas de reducción de daños y se han utilizado actualmente en múltiples estudios de investigación internacionales. Aconsejamos que la OMS, la ONUDD y el ONUSIDA incorporen métodos de medición de la cobertura a nivel individual a sus directrices internacionales de vigilancia de los programas de reducción de daños. De este modo, se pueden crear programas más receptivos y eficaces para reducir mejor los comportamientos de riesgo en el uso de drogas inyectables y la transmisión de virus transmitidos por la sangre entre las personas que se inyectan drogas.

Syringe Stockpiling by Persons Who Inject Drugs: An Evaluation of Current Measures for Needle and Syringe Program Coverage.

Needle and syringe program (NSP) coverage is commonly used to assess NSP effectiveness. However, existing measures don't capture whether persons who inject drugs (PWIDs) stockpile syringes, an important and novel aspect of NSP coverage. In this study, we determine the extent of stockpiling in a sample of Australian PWIDs and assess whether including stockpiling enhances NSP coverage measures. As part of the Illicit Drug Reporting System study, PWIDs reported syringes procured and given away, total injections in the last month, and syringes currently stockpiled in 2014. We calculated NSP coverage with and without stockpiling to determine proportional change in adequate NSP coverage. We conducted receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine whether inclusion of stockpiled syringes in the measure improved sensitivity in discriminating cases and noncases of risky behaviors. Three-quarters of the sample reported syringe stockpiling, and stockpiling was positively associated with nonindigenous background, stable accommodation, no prison history, longer injecting careers, and more frequent injecting. Compared with previous measures, our measure was significantly better at discriminating cases of risky behaviors. Our results could inform NSP policy to loosen restricted-exchange practice, allowing PWIDs greater flexibility in syringe procurement practices, promoting greater NSP coverage, and reducing PWIDs' engagement in risky behaviors.

How does the use of multiple needles/syringes per injecting episode impact on the measurement of individual level needle and syringe program coverage?

BACKGROUND: Recent work by McCormack et al. (2016) showed that the inclusion of syringe stockpiling improves the measurement of individual-level syringe coverage. We explored whether including the use of a new parameter, multiple sterile syringes per injecting episode, further improves coverage measures. METHODS: Data comes from 838 people who inject drugs, interviewed as part of the 2015 Illicit Drug Reporting System. Along with syringe coverage questions, the survey recorded the number of sterile syringes used on average per injecting episode. We constructed three measures of coverage: one adapted from Bluthenthal et al. (2007), the McCormack et al. measure, and a new coverage measure that included use of multiple syringes. Predictors of multiple syringe use and insufficient coverage (<100% of injecting episodes using a sterile syringe) using the new measure, were tested in logistic regression and the ability of the measures to discriminate key risk behaviours was compared using ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: 134 (16%) participants reported needing multiple syringes per injecting episode. Women showed significantly increased odds of multiple syringe use, as did those reporting injection related injuries/diseases and injecting of opioid substitution drugs or pharmaceutical opioids. Levels of insufficient coverage across the three measures were substantial (20%-28%). ROC curve analysis suggested that our new measure was no better at discriminating injecting risk behaviours than the existing measures. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, there appears to be little need for adding a multiple syringe use parameter to existing coverage formulae. Hence, we recommend that multiple syringe use is not included in the measurement of individual-level syringe coverage.