Barriers and Facilitators of Pain Self-Management Among Patients with Cancer: An Integrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Defining the main barriers and facilitators of cancer pain self-management are essential to improve patients' overall quality of life. AIM: The main purpose of this review was to identify the main barriers and facilitators for cancer pain self-management. METHOD: An integrative review guided by the five-stages framework that was identified by Souza et al. (2010) was used: (1) preparing the guiding question; (2) searching or sampling the literature; (3) data collection; (4) critical analysis of the studies; and (5) discussion of results. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the electronic databases of PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Psych INFO. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified. The main facilitators that foster the process of cancer pain self-management were supportive ambiances including family caregivers as well as health care providers, active participation of patients with cancer in health care including self-discovery and self-awareness, acquiring pain knowledge, and using a pain diary. The main barriers include concerns regarding the use of pain medications, knowledge deficit, negative beliefs and attitudes, unsupportive ambiance, and psychological distress. Some patients' characteristics could be related to these barriers such as age, sex, race, marital status, educational level, level of pain, and presence of comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer pain experience multiple barriers and facilitators when attempting to take on an active role in managing their pain.

Philosophical Assumptions Used in Research on Barriers for Effective Cancer Pain Management: A Scoping Review.

Cancer pain is one of the most common symptoms in cancer patients and often has a negative impact on patients' functional status and quality of life. Despite the available guidelines for effective pain management, factors such as barriers to cancer pain management still exist. The lens or philosophical assumptions used to guide cancer pain management research is a crucial but often overlooked component of high-quality research. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to classify and map the available evidence and identify the knowledge gap regarding using a philosophical assumption to address the barriers of pain management among patients with cancer. Absence of clear philosophical assumptions in the qualitative research and generally a theoretical quantitative research may contribute to the slow progress in identifying and addressing barriers to cancer pain management. Therefore, the hermeneutic circle was suggested to address the main barriers of cancer pain management, focusing on the dialectic approach between the participants including researchers, cancer patients, and their family caregivers, health care providers, and policymakers. Understanding and possible solutions of the problem could be obtained through fusion of the horizons; in which the participants past and present horizons emerge. Then the collaborative efforts between the participants may yield effective strategies to overcome cancer pain barriers to improve the quality of cancer pain management.

Development of the Adverse Analgesic Drug Event Measure.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how people respond to an analgesic adverse drug event despite the significant incidence of deaths and hospitalizations associated with analgesic adverse drug events. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this two-phase instrument development study was to test the validity and reliability of the Analgesic Adverse Drug Event Measure (AADEM). METHODS: Content validity was established during Phase I. Six experts rated the 58-item measure developed from a pilot survey of adults who had experienced an analgesic adverse drug event. Experts' ratings supported a 17-item AADEM with a scale content validity index of .86. Phase II consisted of online administration of the AADEM to a national Qualtrics panel who reported an adverse drug event from a self-administered analgesic. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted using principal axis factoring and oblique rotation including Direct Oblimin and Promax rotations with Kaiser normalization. RESULTS: Four factors emerged from the analysis: sought care, consulted provider, discontinued or continued analgesic, and attributed adverse drug event with a total explained variance of 55.4%. Scale content validity index for the 13-item AADEM was .88. Internal consistency for the four subscales was acceptable, but low for the full 13-item AADEM. DISCUSSION: Results establish preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of the 13-item AADEM to measure response to an analgesic adverse drug event. Next steps involve confirmatory factor analysis in a different sample to examine the underlying construct of the AADEM. The AADEM might help identify people at risk for serious analgesic adverse drug events.

African American Young Adults' Pain and Pain Reduction Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Effective acute pain management strategies are important for young adults in order to reduce risk for transition to chronic pain. AIM: To describe pain and pain self-management strategies used by African American young adults. DESIGN & SETTING: A national online cross-sectional survey design was used. PARTICIPANT/SUBJECTS: Ninety-four African Americans Qualtrics panelists ages 18-25 who reported previous experience with acute pain responded. Methods: Respondents completed the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form to describe their pain intensity, pain interference with function, pain self-management, and percent of relief obtained from their self-management. RESULTS: African American young adults reported pain primarily in the back (n = 22, 23.4%) and head (n = 19, 20.2%), with moderate pain intensity M = 4.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.79) and pain interference with function M = 4.6 (SD = 2.36). African American young adults described their worst pain in the last 24 hours as M = 5.7 (SD = 2.01), least pain as M = 3.4 (SD = 2.41), and average pain as M = 5.1 (SD = 2.09). They reported 61.3% pain relief from self-treatment. A total of 45 (47.9%) reported no pain self-management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: African American young adults report moderate levels of pain intensity and pain interference with function. A significant number report no pain self-management strategies. Focused pain assessment and education about efficacious pain self-management strategies, both pharmacological and complementary, could assist young African Americans to reduce their pain and risk of chronic pain in the future.

The Electronic Pain Management Life History Calendar: Development and Usability.

BACKGROUND: Changes over time to self-managed chronic pain treatments are not a routine part of pain management discussions and might provide insight into adjustments that improve pain outcomes. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to develop and test an electronic pain management life history calendar (ePMLHC) for use with older adults with chronic pain. DESIGN: An instrument development design was used to develop and test the ePMLHC. METHODS: Twenty-four community-dwelling older adults with osteoarthritis pain completed the ePMLHC describing their pain treatment regimens and treatment response history. Accuracy of the ePMLHC data was examined through post-ePMLHC audiorecorded interviews, with the older adults describing their pain treatment history. Feedback on use of the ePMLHC was also measured. An iterative process was used to refine and retest the ePMLHC. The final ePMLHC version was examined with the remaining 12 older adults. RESULTS: Significant differences between data reported via the ePMLHC and interviews did not support feasibility of independently reported data via the ePMLHC. Older adults reported that completing the ePMLHC helped them more fully self-reflect on their pain self-management. CONCLUSIONS: The ePMLHC has the potential to enhance communication about past pain management treatments and promote more personalized pain treatment regimens, but further development is required.

Older Adults' Response to Analgesic Adverse Drug Reactions: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Older adults who take analgesics for chronic pain are at increased risk for adverse drug events (ADEs). Aims/Design: The purpose of this descriptive pilot survey was to examine how older adults self-identify analgesic ADEs, and actions they take in response to analgesic ADEs. Setting/Participants/Methods: Twenty-two community dwelling older adults with chronic pain who reported an analgesic ADE associated with their chronic pain management were interviewed and asked to describe their analgesic related ADE. Written responses were content analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen opioids were reported by 15, 11 NSAIDs were reported by 8, and acetaminophen was reported by 2 older adults as associated with an ADE. Gastrointestinal ADEs were most common with upset stomach (31.8%) most frequent. Neurological ADEs were also common but more varied with dizziness (27.3%) and headache (13.6%) reported most frequently. A total of 54.5% responded to their ADE by contacting their physician. Three (13.6%) went to the emergency department. A total of 36.4% stopped taking their ADE associated analgesic, 22.7% started taking a different analgesic, and 22.7% started prophylaxis. Three (13.6%) continued their ADE related analgesic. A total of 54.5% reported their symptoms subsided, but 13.6% reported their symptoms remained. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of older adults with chronic pain self-manage their analgesic related ADE without contacting their primary care provider. Analgesic related ADE prevention and management should be discussed during primary care visits to reduce ADEs and enhance pain management outcomes for older adults with chronic pain.

The Pain Management Life History Calendar: A Pilot Study.

Pain management trajectory data that includes previous pain treatments, timing, changes, and outcomes provide crucial data for patients with chronic pain and their practitioners to use when discussing ways to optimize pain management regimens. The aim of this study was to test the use of the life history calendar method to identify pain treatments, treatment regimens, timing, and outcomes of the pain management trajectory of individuals with chronic pain, and to examine feasibility. A pilot, descriptive, methodological design was used. Settings included community-based sites such as congregate housing. Nineteen community-dwelling older adults with osteoarthritis (OA) pain of at least 1 year's duration participated. Participants were interviewed and asked to chronicle from the beginning of the OA pain to the present all of their pain treatments and treatment effects (pain outcomes and adverse events). Raters independently content analyzed the transcribed interviews to identify pain treatments, treatment groupings (regimens), and treatment effects on pain. Feasibility of patients reporting their pain management trajectories was content analyzed by identifying participant difficulty identifying pain treatments, treatment effects, treatment sequence; and difficulty discriminating between treatments, and between OA pain and other pain sources. Individual pain management trajectories were constructed that depicted chronological order of pain treatment regimens and treatment effects. Participants identified pain treatments, discriminate between treatments and between OA and other conditions, and identified treatment effects. Treatment sequence was identified, but more precise timing was generally not reported. Pain management trajectories could provide a helpful way for practitioners to discuss safe, efficacious pain management options with patients.

Older black adult osteoarthritis pain communication.

A quantitative descriptive secondary data analysis design was used to describe older black adult communication of osteoarthritis pain and the communication strategies used to convey the pain information. Pain content from 74 older black adults with persistent osteoarthritis pain was analyzed using criteria from the American Pain Society arthritis pain management guidelines that included type of pain (nociceptive/neuropathic), quality of pain, source, location, intensity, duration/time course, pain affect, effect on personal lifestyle, functional status, current pain treatments, use of recommended glucosamine sulfate, effectiveness of prescribed treatments, prescription analgesic side effects, weight management to ideal body weight, exercise regimen or physical therapy and/or occupational therapy, and indications for surgery. Communication strategies were analyzed with criteria derived from Communication Accommodation Theory that included being clear, using medical syntax, using ethnic specific syntax, being explicit, and staying on topic when discussing pain. The majority of communicated pain content included pain location, intensity, and timing. Regarding communication strategies, most of the older black adults used specific descriptions of pain and remained on topic. Fewer used explicit descriptions of pain that produced a vivid mental image, and few used medical terminology. Use of medical syntax and more explicit descriptions might improve communication about pain between health care practitioners and patients. Practitioners might assist older black adults with persistent osteoarthritis pain to communicate important clinical pain information by helping them to use relevant medical terminology and more explicit pain descriptions when discussing pain management.

Older adults' pain communication during ambulatory medical visits: an exploration of communication accommodation theory.

The purpose of this descriptive secondary analysis was to explore the use of Communication Accommodation Theory as a framework to examine pain communication strategies used by older adults and their primary care practitioners during medical ambulatory care visits. Ambulatory medical visits for 22 older adults with moderate or greater osteoarthritis pain were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and coded by two independent raters for six a priori communication strategies derived from the attuning strategies of Communication Accommodation Theory: (1) patient selecting the pain topic; (2) patient taking a turn; (3) patient maintaining focus on the pain topic; (4) practitioner using an open-ended question without social desirability to start the pain discussion; (5) practitioner encouraging the patient to take a turn by asking open-ended questions; and (6) practitioner interruptions. The majority of practitioners did not start the pain discussion with an open-ended question, but did not interrupt the older adults as they discussed their pain. Five (22.7%) of the older adults did not discuss their osteoarthritis pain during the ambulatory medical visit. The majority of patients took their turn during the pain discussion, but did not maintain focus while describing important osteoarthritis pain information to their practitioner. Practitioners might assist older adults to communicate more information about their pain by initiating the pain discussion with an open-ended pain question. Older adults might provide more pain information to their practitioner by staying on the pain topic until they have completed all of the pain information they wish to discuss with the practitioner.

Trialing to pain control: a grounded theory.

The aim of this study was to examine the basic social psychological process of managing inadequately relieved pain in adults. Transcribed data from 23 ambulatory medical visits of adults with pain and interviews with four practitioners and four patients with pain were analyzed using constant comparative analysis. The basic problem was perception of running out of treatment options. Trialing was the process used to resolve the problem and consisted of four phases: finding the right practitioner, initiating the trial, adjusting treatments, and continuing to monitor with the patient taking control over the pain. Failure to achieve control over pain occurred when providers were unclear or failed to listen or when patients disagreed about treatment. Improving patient-provider communication may enhance trialing.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Analgesic Adverse Drug Event Measure.

Background and Purpose: The Analgesic Adverse Drug Event Measure (AADEM) measures how people respond when they experience analgesic adverse drug events (ADEs). The purpose of this study was to confirm the underlying constructs of the AADEM: attributed ADE, consulted provider, sought care, and continued/discontinued analgesic. Methods: A cross-sectional instrumentation design was used. Three hundred and thirty-two adults who self-reported an analgesic ADE responded to the online AADEM. Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted. Results: Model fit was adequate across all indexes. Internal consistency for the full AADEM was low, while subscale internal consistency was generally acceptable probably due to three significant negative correlations and two positive correlations between the latent factors. Conclusions: The results supported the construct validity of the AADEM. Advanced practice nurses and other primary care providers can use the AADEM to investigate analgesic ADEs. Greater insight into how people respond to an analgesic ADE via the use of the AADEM may help prevent future analgesic ADEs.

Effect of a virtual pain coach on pain management discussions: a pilot study.

There is a need to enhance patient and practitioner pain communications. A pain communication plus virtual pain coach intervention was tested in the primary care setting for the effect on communication of osteoarthritis pain information by older adults aged ≥60 years, on practitioners' pain management changes, and on older adults' reduced pain and depressive symptoms 1 month later. A randomized controlled pilot study design was used. Twenty-three older adults with osteoarthritis pain were randomly assigned to the pain communication plus virtual pain coach group or the pain communication-only group. Pain communication consisted of a video of important osteoarthritis pain information. The coach consisted of practicing out loud with a virtual pain coach via laptop computer. Pain and depressive symptoms were measured with, respectively, the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form and the Beck Depression Inventory II before intervention and 1 month later. Immediately after the intervention, older adults had their primary care visits, which were audiotaped, transcribed, and content analyzed for older adults' communicated pain information and practitioners' pain management changes. Older adults in the pain communication plus virtual pain coach group described significantly more pain source information and were prescribed significantly more osteoarthritis pain treatments than older adults in the pain communication-only group. A nonsignificant trend in pain intensity and depressive symptoms reduction resulted for older adults in the pain communication plus virtual pain coach group 1 month later. The virtual pain coach presents a possible strategy for increasing pain management discussions between practitioners and older adults with persistent pain.

The effect of a Spanish virtual pain coach for older adults: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To pilot test the effects of a virtual pain coach on ambulatory Spanish-speaking older adults with pain from osteoarthritis. METHODS: A randomized, controlled design was used. Eighteen Spanish-speaking older adults were randomly assigned to the virtual pain coach and pain communication education group, or to the pain communication education-only group. All participants viewed the pain communication videotape. Participants in the virtual pain coach group practiced talking about their osteoarthritis pain with the virtual pain coach. Immediately after the respective intervention, participants had their ambulatory medical visit. Pain intensity and pain interference with activities were measured with the Brief Pain Inventory, and depressive symptoms were measured with the Beck Depression Inventory II at baseline and 1 month later. RESULTS: No significant group difference emerged for pain intensity, pain interference with activities, or depressive symptoms 1 month later. More older adults in the virtual pain coach group reported a change from nonuse to use of opioids at 1 month, 50% vs 0% of the education only group, Fisher's exact test, P = 0.023. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data indicate that the Spanish virtual pain coach might assist Spanish-speaking older adults to talk with their practitioner about their osteoarthritis pain and obtain opioid treatment changes, but that pain and depressive symptoms continue unchanged 1 month later. Additional refinement and testing is required for the Spanish-speaking virtual pain coach to determine acceptability and outcomes for assisting Spanish-speaking older adults to communicate about their pain with their primary care practitioner.

Predictors of older adults' chronic pain in the context of opioid adverse drug events.

BACKGROUND: Factors predictive of chronic pain in older adults could help focus prevention and treatment efforts for those most at risk of chronic pain. PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to describe demographic and pain self-management factors predictive of chronic pain in the context of opioid adverse drug events (ADEs) reported for a cohort of older adults within the same year. METHOD: The design was a post hoc analysis of 9,095 cases aged 65 years and older from the 2019 National Health Interview Survey that reported chronic pain and 380 cases aged 65 years and older with opioid adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) during the second quarter of 2019. Logistic regression predicted chronic pain. RESULTS: Less than a baccalaureate education increased the odds of chronic pain by 28.0% while lower income minimally increased the odds. Male gender increased the odds of chronic pain by 12.0%. Increased age minimally increased the odds for chronic pain. Use of opioids, other pain treatments, complementary treatments, and antidepressants were all associated with increased odds of chronic pain. FAERS opioid ADEs ranged from pruritus to death, with death identified in 16 (4.2%) cases. Misuse, abuse, or dependence was documented in 1.8% of cases. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Less-educated older adults may be particularly at risk of chronic pain and should be routinely assessed and prescribed safe and efficacious pain self-management as needed. Some men may need additional support to use pain treatments.

Hispanic older adults' osteoarthritis pain communication.

Better understanding of how Hispanic older adults describe their chronic pain might suggest ways to support Hispanic older adults to talk about important pain information with their practitioner. The study aim was to describe how Hispanic older adults communicate pain information, including the amount of pain information and communication processes employed. A secondary analysis with a descriptive design was used. The data were from a larger primary study that tested the effect of practitioner pain question phrasing on the amount of pain information described by older adults with osteoarthritis pain. The sample for this secondary analysis was composed of the 24 Hispanic older adults with chronic osteoarthritis pain. In the primary study older adults watched and orally responded to a videotape of a practitioner asking about their pain. Pain content from the patient responses was content analyzed by two independent raters. Communication processes were also content analyzed by two independent raters using a priori criteria from communication accommodation theory (clarity, syntax, complexity, explicitness, and staying on topic). Participants described a mean of 5.5 (SD 3.39) items of pain information. The majority stayed on topic, and one-half spoke clearly and explicitly. Hispanic older adults with osteoarthritis pain concisely describe clinically important pain information when given the opportunity to do so.

Effect of a virtual pain coach on older adults' pain communication: a pilot study.

A randomized posttest-only double blind design was used to pilot test the effect of a virtual practitioner pain communication coach on older adults' communication of their osteoarthritis pain. Baseline pain intensity and pain interference with activities were measured using the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form. Thirty older adults watched a video of a practitioner describing important osteoarthritis pain information followed by either a virtual practitioner coach, a video practitioner coach, or no coach. Participants were next asked, via a videotaped health care practitioner, to orally describe their pain as if speaking to their own practitioner. The amount of important distinctive pain information described by the older adults was audiotaped, transcribed, content analyzed, and summed using a priori criteria from the American Pain Society osteoarthritis pain management guidelines. Older adults described M=6.3 (SD=3.17), M=3.0 (SD=2.08), and M=5.2 (SD=2.40) items of important pain information as a result of the virtual coach, video coach, and no coach conditions, respectively; F(2,25)=3.17, p=.06, η²=.01. Older adults who practiced talking with the virtual coach described more than one additional item of important pain information. The clinically significant group difference supports the need to test the intervention in a randomized clinical trial. The virtual coaching and education intervention might enable older adults to communicate their pain management information more effectively to their practitioners.

Predictors of serious adverse drug events from opioids: Results from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System.

BACKGROUND: Opioids pose significant increased risk for serious adverse drug events (ADEs). PURPOSE: The purpose was to identify significant predictors and their associated magnitude of risk for serious life-threatening opioid ADEs. METHODS: A post hoc design was used to examine predictors of opioid analgesics ADEs with Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) data. The sample consisted of all eligible cases from the second quarter of the 2019 FAERS where an opioid analgesic was identified as the primary suspect for an ADE. Logistic regression was used to predict serious life-threatening ADEs. Final predictors included age, gender, misuse/substance use disorder, number of concurrent opioids; use of benzodiazepines, other sedatives, and antidepressants; and use of morphine, fentanyl, and oxycodone. RESULTS: Life-threatening ADEs, excluding suicide and suicide attempts, comprised 19.9% of the cases. Protective factors that reduced risk included female gender, use of antidepressants, and use of morphine. Harmful factors that increased risk of a serious ADE included misuse/substance use disorder, use of benzodiazepines, and use of other sedatives. Persons taking an opioid with both a benzodiazepine and another sedative increased risk of a serious ADE by 18.78 times. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Results provide risk data helpful to share with people who use prescribed opioids for self-management of pain. Combination of opioids and clinically indicated antidepressants that do not both promote serotonin uptake inhibition may reduce risk for serious opioid ADEs. Practitioners should continue to avoid prescribing benzodiazepines and other sedatives when opioids are used.

Motivating people to learn cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of automated external defibrillators.

The purpose of this study was to test the effect of a motivational message on the intention of laypersons to learn cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use. A pretest-posttest, double-blind, randomized design was used with 220 community-dwelling adults. Participants were randomly assigned to the treatment group reading the CPR and AED pamphlet emphasizing learning CPR and AED use to save someone they love and the 3-minute window for response time; or to the comparison group reading the identical pamphlet without the 2 motivational statements. Intention to learn CPR and AED use and to look for AEDs in public areas was measured before and after reading the respective pamphlet. No significant difference emerged between the groups for the number of participants planning to learn CPR and AED use. A significant number of participants in both groups increased intention to learn CPR and AED use. Significantly more treatment participants than comparison participants planned to routinely look for AEDs in public areas after reading the pamphlet, however. Teaching critical facts such as the low survival rate for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest might encourage laypersons to learn CPR and AED use. Routinely teaching family members of people at risk for a cardiac arrest about the short window of time in which CPR and AED use must begin and encouraging them to learn about CPR and AEDs to save someone they love may encourage family members to identify the location of AEDs in public places.

Predictors of hemorrhagic stroke in older persons taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Results from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic strokes have not declined in the United States despite a decline worldwide. PURPOSE: To identify hemorrhagic stroke risk associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), other medications associated with increased risk for hemorrhagic stroke, and diabetes, cardiovascular disease, gender, and age. METHODS: A post hoc design was used to examine predictors of hemorrhagic stroke for adults of age 65 years and older from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System database. The initial sample consisted of all cases reported during the third quarter of 2016 and the second quarter of 2018 with an NSAID as the primary suspect for the adverse drug event (ADE). An additional 397 cases with warfarin as the primary suspect were included in the final sample (N = 3,784) to test for bias from including only NSAID as the primary ADE suspect cases. Extracted data included the primary ADE (hemorrhagic stroke or other ADE), age, gender, primary suspect drug (NSAID or warfarin), and presence of a second NSAID, rivaroxaban, warfarin, clopidogrel, antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants), inhaled corticosteroids, diabetes, or cardiovascular medications. Logistic regression was used to predict hemorrhagic stroke. RESULTS: Aspirin and warfarin increased the risk for hemorrhagic stroke by 3.458 and 3.059, respectively. Presence of an additional NSAIDs reduced the risk by 48%. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Hemorrhagic stroke risk specific to older adults may provide helpful estimates for practitioners as they weigh the risk benefit of prescribing aspirin as an antiplatelet therapy for older adults.

Older adults' pain descriptions.

The purpose of this study was to describe the types of pain information described by older adults with chronic osteoarthritis pain. Pain descriptions were obtained from older adults' who participated in a post-test-only double-blind study testing how the phrasing of health care practitioners' pain questions affected the amount of communicated pain information. The 207 community-dwelling older adults were randomized to respond to either the open-ended or the closed-ended pain question. They viewed and orally responded to a computer-displayed videotape of a practitioner asking them the respective pain question. All of them then viewed and responded to the general follow-up questions, "What else can you tell me?" and lastly, "What else can you tell me about your pain, aches, soreness or discomfort?" Audiotaped responses were transcribed and their content analyzed by trained independent raters using 16 a priori criteria from the American Pain Society's Guidelines for the Management of Pain in Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Juvenile Chronic Arthritis. Older adults described important but limited types of information primarily about pain location, timing, and intensity. Pain treatment information was elicited after repeated questioning. Therefore, practitioners need to follow up older adults' initial pain descriptions with pain questions that promote a more complete pain management discussion. Routine use of a multidimensional pain assessment instrument that measures information such as functional interference, current pain treatments, treatment effects, and side effects would be one way of ensuring a more complete pain management discussion with older adults.