Assessment of the reliability of virtual preanesthetic airway evaluation compared to traditional in-person airway evaluation: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Airway evaluation is a fundamental component of the preanesthetic examination. Virtual care has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to assess the reliability of a virtual preanesthetic airway evaluation compared with a traditional in-person airway evaluation. METHODS: This prospective observational study compared the inter-rater agreement of an in-person airway evaluation performed by a consultant anesthesiologist with a virtual airway evaluation (VAE) performed by consultant anesthesiologists and medical students. The airway evaluation was completed using a comprehensive airway evaluation and scoring tool. The primary outcome was the inter-rater agreement of total scores between in-person anesthesiologist airway evaluations and the VAEs of both the anesthesiologists and medical students, assessed using Cohen's Kappa (CK). Secondary outcomes included the inter-rater agreement for each airway evaluation component between the in-person anesthesiologists and both the anesthesiologist and medical student VAEs, assessed using prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted Kappa. RESULTS: One hundred out of 111 participants completed all three evaluations. The in-person anesthesiologist airway evaluations had fair and good levels of agreement of total scores with the VAEs of the anesthesiologists (CK, 0.21; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.07 to 0.34) and the medical students (CK, 0.74; 97.5% CI, 0.62 to 0.86), respectively. One participant was reported to have a difficult intubation. CONCLUSION: Virtual airway evaluations performed by anesthesiologists and medical students had fair and good inter-rater agreement, respectively, with in-person anesthesiologist airway evaluations. Further study with a focus on patients with difficult airways is required to define the predictive value of VAEs regarding difficult intubations.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'évaluation des voies aériennes constitue un élément fondamental de l'examen préanesthésique. Les soins prodigués virtuellement ont augmenté pendant la pandémie de COVID-19. Nous avons tenté d'évaluer la fiabilité d'une évaluation préanesthésique virtuelle des voies aériennes par rapport à une évaluation traditionnelle en personne. MéTHODE: Cette étude observationnelle prospective a comparé la concordance inter-observateurs d'une évaluation des voies aériennes en personne effectuée par un anesthésiologiste avec une évaluation virtuelle des voies aériennes (EVVA) réalisée par des anesthésiologistes et des étudiants en médecine. L'évaluation des voies aériennes a été réalisée à l'aide d'un outil d'évaluation et de notation des voies aériennes. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la concordance inter-observateurs des scores totaux entre les évaluations des voies aériennes réalisées par des anesthésiologistes en personne et les EVVA effectuées par des anesthésiologistes et des étudiants en médecine, évaluée à l'aide du coefficient Kappa de Cohen (CK). Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient la concordance inter-observateurs pour chaque composante de l'évaluation des voies aériennes entre les anesthésiologistes en personne et les anesthésiologistes et étudiants en médecine ayant réalisé les EVVA, évaluée à l'aide d'un coefficient de Kappa ajusté pour la prévalence et les biais. RéSULTATS: Cent des 111 participants ont complété les trois évaluations. Les évaluations des voies aériennes par des anesthésiologistes en personne présentaient des niveaux de concordance des scores totaux fidèles et bons par rapport aux EVVA réalisées par les anesthésiologistes (CK, 0,21; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 97,5 %, 0,07 à 0,34) et les étudiants en médecine (CK, 0,74; IC 97,5 %, 0,62 à 0,86), respectivement. Une intubation difficile a été rapportée pour un participant. CONCLUSION: Les évaluations virtuelles des voies aériennes réalisées par des anesthésiologistes et des étudiants en médecine avaient une concordance inter-observateurs fidèle et bonne avec les évaluations des voies aériennes réalisées en personne par des anesthésiologistes. Des recherches plus approfondies axées sur les patients présentant une prise en charge difficile des voies aériennes sont nécessaires pour définir la valeur prédictive des EVVA dans un contexte d'intubations difficiles.

Identifying behaviors that characterize emergence delirium: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic criteria for emergence agitation are sensitive but not specific; they misclassify patients who are angry or upset as having emergence delirium. AIMS: The aim of this three-phase study was to determine expert agreement on the behaviors that differentiate children with emergence delirium from those without. METHODS: In the first phase of this observational study, pediatric dental patients were video recorded while awakening from anesthesia. In the second phase, salient 10 s segments of the recordings showing patient activity were shown to an expert audience of pediatric dentists, anesthesiologists and Post Anesthetic Care nurses, who scored the recordings as showing or not showing "true emergence delirium." In phase 3, the video segments were assessed by three research assistants using a behavior checklist for features that discriminate between those scored "true emergence delirium" and those scored "NOT true emergence delirium" by the experts. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-four pediatric dental patients were included. Subsequently, an expert audience consisting of 10 anesthesiologists, 12 anesthesiology residents, 3 pediatric dentists, and 4 experienced Post Anesthesia Care Unit nurses rated each 10-second video segment. This resulted in three groups of patients: a group for whom all experts agreed was "True emergence delirium" (n = 33; CI 21 to 45), a group for whom all agreed was "Not True emergence delirium" (n = 120; CI 107 to 133), and a group where experts disagreed (n = 11; CI 4 to 18). Three research assistants then completed a behavior checklist for each of the 33 "True emergence delirium" video segments and matched "Not True" controls. Twenty-four behaviors were identified as significantly different between videos scored True emergence delirium and those scored Not True emergence delirium. Research assistants reached almost perfect agreement (0.81-1.00) on one behavior, and substantial agreement (0.61-0.80) on seven behaviors that characterized "True emergence delirium." CONCLUSIONS: Eight behaviors that differentiate pediatric dental patients with emergence delirium from those without were found. These discriminators may be used to develop a scale that will lead to better diagnosis and treatment of emergence delirium.

Spinal cord tethering after selective dorsal rhizotomy below the conus medullaris.

BACKGROUND: Two techniques for selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) involve stimulating and sectioning nerve rootlets either below the conus medullaris or above the entrances to their respective dural root sleeves. In general, both techniques lead to sustained improvements in lower extremity spasticity with low complication rates. To our knowledge, spinal cord tethering has not been previously reported as a complication of SDR using either technique. METHODS: We review the presentation, treatment, and outcome of two patients who developed symptomatic spinal cord tethering after SDR below the conus. RESULTS: A 4-year-old male and a 6-year-old female each with a history of spastic diparetic cerebral palsy underwent L1-L2 osteoplastic laminectomy and SDR below the conus. Both surgeries went well with no known complications. Both patients initially did well, with marked improvement in their tone and gait. There were no significant immediate postoperative bowel or bladder problems. The male patient presented 10 months after surgery with new-onset urinary incontinence. A urological evaluation was performed but no imaging was performed. He re-presented 8 months later with worsened urinary incontinence, new fecal incontinence, and worsened gait. An MRI showed signs of tethering, including a holocord syrinx. He underwent two untethering surgeries as well syrinx fenestration, and although his gait improved, it remained worse than it had been several months after surgery. The incontinence did not improve. The second patient also developed urinary incontinence a year after SDR. Due to our experience with the first patient, we obtained an MRI immediately and found evidence of tethering. She underwent untethering and her incontinence improved. CONCLUSION: We report two cases of spinal cord tethering after SDR below the conus, a previously unreported complication. It is important to realize that this complication can occur after SDR.

A comparison of methods used to secure pediatric endotracheal tubes using a live human dermal model.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation is a common lifesaving procedure. An in situ endotracheal tube (ETT) must be secured in position to avoid displacement and potentially life-threatening complications. Adhesive tapes form the most common intraoperative ETT stabilization methods. Limited published data are available to guide the clinical decision regarding ETT taping method. We performed an interventional study aiming to establish which of many commonly employed ETT tape/supplementary adhesive methods provides the most resistance to ETT distraction. METHODS: An experiment was undertaken to measure the force required to distract an ETT secured to a live dermal model with 24 different ETT securing methods comprising six types of tape alone and in combination with one of three supplementary adhesives. The primary measurement was the peak force (Newtons) required to distract a secured ETT 3 cm. RESULTS: A total of 1,164 measurements were made. The mean force required to distract the ETT ranged from 7.8 to 21.8 Newtons. The combination of Cloth Adhesive™ + Mastisol® had the greatest observed mean distraction force, as well as the greatest estimated lower and upper confidence limits. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in force required to distract an ETT based on taping methods.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: L'intubation endotrachéale est une intervention critique courante. Le tube endotrachéal (TET) in situ doit être fixé en position adéquate pour éviter qu'il ne se déplace et provoque des complications potentiellement fatales. Les bandes adhésives sont la méthode de stabilisation peropératoire de TET la plus fréquemment utilisée. Il n'existe que peu de données publiées pour guider la décision clinique quant à la méthode de fixation du TET. Nous avons réalisé une étude interventionnelle visant à établir laquelle des nombreuses méthodes couramment employées de bandes adhésives ou de méthodes adhésives supplémentaires du TET procurait la meilleure protection contre un déplacement du TET. MéTHODE: Une expérience a été menée pour mesurer la force nécessaire à déplacer/déloger un TET fixée à un modèle de derme vivant avec 24 méthodes différentes de sécurisation du TET, comprenant six types de ruban adhésif seuls et en combinaison avec l'un de trois adhésifs supplémentaires. La mesure principale était la force maximale (en newton) nécessaire pour déplacer un TET sécurisée de 3 cm. RéSULTATS: Au total, 1164 mesures ont été effectuées. La force moyenne requise pour déplacer le TET allait de 7,8 à 21,8 newtons. La combinaison du ruban Cloth Adhesive™ + Mastisol® a entraîné la plus grande force de déplacement moyenne observée, ainsi que les plus grandes limites inférieure et supérieure estimées des intervalles de confiance. CONCLUSION: Il existe des différences significatives dans la force nécessaire pour déplacer un TET en fonction des méthodes de fixation utilisées.

A performance comparison of the most commonly used minimally invasive monitors of cardiac output.

BACKGROUND: Shock is common in critically ill and injured patients. Survival during shock is highly dependent on rapid restoration of tissue oxygenation with therapeutic goals based on cardiac output (CO) optimization. Despite the clinical availability of numerous minimally invasive monitors of CO, limited supporting performance data are available. METHODS: Following approval of the University of Saskatchewan Animal Research Ethics Board, we assessed the performance and trending ability of PiCCOplus™, FloTrac™, and CardioQ-ODM™ across a range of CO states in pigs. In addition, we assessed the ability of invasive mean arterial blood pressure (iMAP) to follow changes in CO using a periaortic transit-time flow probe as the reference method. Statistical analysis was performed with function-fail, bias and precision, percent error, and linear regression at all flow, low-flow (> 1 standard deviation [SD] below the mean), and high-flow (> 1 SD above the mean) CO conditions. RESULTS: We made a total of 116,957 paired CO measurements. The non-invasive CO monitors often failed to provide a CO value (CardioQ-ODM: 40.6% failed measurements; 99% confidence interval [CI], 38.5 to 42.6; FloTrac: 9.6% failed measurements; 99% CI, 8.7 to 10.5; PiCCOplus: 4.7% failed measurements; 99% CI, 4.5 to 4.9; all comparisons, P < 0.001). The invasive mean arterial pressure provided zero failures, failing less often than any of the tested CO monitors (all comparisons, P < 0.001). The PiCCOplus was most interchangeable with the flow probe at all flow states: PiCCOplus (20% error; 99% CI, 19 to 22), CardioQ-ODM (25% error; 99% CI, 23 to 27), FloTrac (34% error; 99% CI, 32 to 38) (all comparisons, P < 0.001). At low-flow states, CardioQ-ODM (43% error; 99% CI, 32 to 63) and Flotrac (45% error; 99% CI, 33 to 70) had similar interchangeability (P = 0.07), both superior to PiCCOplus (48% error; 99% CI, 42 to 60) (P < 0.001). Regarding CO trending, the CardioQ-ODM (correlation coefficient, 0.82; 99% CI, 0.81 to 0.83) was statistically superior to other monitors including iMAP, but at low flows iMAP (correlation coefficient, 0.58; 99% CI, 0.58 to 0.60) was superior to all minimally invasive CO monitors (all comparisons P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: None of the minimally invasive monitors of CO performed well at all tested flows. Invasive mean arterial blood pressure most closely tracked CO change at critical flow states.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: L'état de choc est fréquent chez les patients blessés et en urgence absolue. La survie pendant le choc dépend fortement de la restauration rapide de l'oxygénation tissulaire avec des objectifs thérapeutiques basés sur l'optimisation du débit cardiaque (DC). Malgré la disponibilité clinique de nombreux moniteurs minimalement invasifs du DC, il n'existe que des données limitées sur leur performance pour appuyer leur utilisation. MéTHODE: À la suite de l'approbation du comité d'éthique de la recherche animale de l'Université de la Saskatchewan, nous avons évalué la performance et la capacité de suivi des tendances des appareils PiCCOplus™, FloTrac™ et CardioQ-ODM™ sur une vaste gamme d'état de DC chez des cochons. Nous avons également évalué la capacité de la tension artérielle moyenne invasive (iMAP) à suivre les changements de DC en utilisant une sonde périaortique de débit basée sur le temps de transit comme méthode de référence. L'analyse statistique a été réalisée avec fonction-échec, biais et précision, pourcentage d'erreur et régression linéaire à des conditions de DC de tous les débits, de faible débit (> 1 écart-type [ET] au-dessous de la moyenne) et de débit élevé (> 1 ET au-dessus de la moyenne). RéSULTATS: Nous avons effectué un total de 116 957 mesures de DC appariées. Les moniteurs non invasifs de la DC n'ont souvent pas réussi à fournir une valeur de DC (CardioQ-ODM : 40,6% de mesures échouées; intervalle de confiance [IC] de 99 %, 38,5 à 42,6; FloTrac : 9,6 % de mesures échouées; IC 99 %, 8,7 à 10,5; PiCCOplus : 4,7 % de mesures échouées; IC 99 %, 4,5 à 4,9; toutes les comparaisons, P < 0,001). La tension artérielle moyenne invasive n'a fourni aucun échec plus souvent que n'importe lequel des moniteurs de DC testés (toutes les comparaisons, P < 0,001). Le PiCCOplus était le plus interchangeable avec la sonde de débit à tous les états de débit : PiCCOplus (erreur de 20 %; IC 99 %, 19 à 22), CardioQ-ODM (erreur de 25 %; IC 99 %, 23 à 27), FloTrac (erreur de 34 %; IC 99 %, 32 à 38) (toutes les comparaisons, P < 0,001). Aux états de débit faible, les moniteurs CardioQ-ODM (erreur de 43 %; IC 99 %, 32 à 63) et FloTrac (erreur de 45 %; IC 99 %, 33 à 70) présentaient une interchangeabilité similaire (P = 0,07), tous deux supérieurs au PiCCOplus (erreur de 48 %; IC 99 %, 42 à 60) (P < 0,001). En ce qui concerne le suivi des tendances de DC, le CardioQ-ODM (coefficient de corrélation, 0,82; IC 99 %, 0,81 à 0,83) était statistiquement supérieur aux autres moniteurs, y compris au iMAP, mais à faibles débits, l'iMAP (coefficient de corrélation, 0,58; IC 99 %, 0,58 à 0,60) était supérieure à tous les moniteurs de DC minimalement invasifs (toutes les comparaisons, P < 0,001). CONCLUSION: Aucun des moniteurs de DC minimalement invasif n'a donné de bons résultats à tous les débits testés. La tension artérielle moyenne invasive était le moniteur qui a suivi de plus près les changements de DC dans des états critiques de débit.

Subcutaneous ketamine for postoperative pain relief in Rwanda: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Postoperative pain control is often inadequate in low-income countries such as Rwanda, prompting the search for an inexpensive improvement. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to study the use of subcutaneous ketamine for the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing major surgery in Kigali, Rwanda. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients undergoing major abdominal, head and neck, plastic, or gynecological surgeries were studied. In addition to standard care, patients received five subcutaneous injections of ketamine 1 mg·kg-1 (ketamine group, n = 30) or normal saline (placebo group, n = 29) during the postoperative period. The first injection was administered in the postanesthesia care unit and then every 12 hr thereafter starting at 20:00 on the day of surgery. Pain was assessed three times per day using an 11-point verbal response scale. Patients were also assessed for side effects, including nausea and vomiting, hallucinations, nightmares, sedation, hypertension, and seizures. RESULTS: The mean (SD) overall postoperative pain scale score was higher in the control group than in the ketamine group [4.8 (1.7) vs 3.7 (1.5), respectively; difference of means, 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3 to 1.9; P = 0.009]. Brief hallucinations (ketamine group, 11 patients; placebo group, 0 patients; risk difference, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.54; P < 0.001) were associated with ketamine administration. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study in Kigali, Rwanda showed that subcutaneous administration of ketamine 1 mg·kg-1 twice daily, in addition to standard postoperative care, produced a small improvement in postoperative pain but resulted in more minor side effects TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02514122). Registered 31 July 2015.

The experience of spasticity after spinal cord injury: perceived characteristics and impact on daily life.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. OBJECTIVES: Determine the impact of motor control characteristics attributed to spasticity, such as spasms, stiffness, and clonus on the daily life of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Nationwide, United States. METHODS: Internet-administered questionnaire, the Patient Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM) and items describing characteristics of spasticity including stiffness, spasms, clonus, and pain. RESULTS: Of the 145 respondents, 113 (78%) reported a PRISM score of at least 5/164, indicating spasticity had some impact on their daily lives. Stiffness impact was highly correlated (ρ = 0.84; p < 0.01) with the PRISM negative impact on Daily Activities subscale and moderately correlated with the other PRISM subscales (ρ = 0.55-0.63; p < 0.01). Spasm presence had a negligible or low correlation with PRISM negative impact subscales (ρ = 0.29-0.47; p < 0.01). Trunk muscle stiffness and spasms had a low correlation with PRISM Need for Assistance and Daily activities (ρ = 0.42 and ρ = 0.41, p < 0.01, respectively). Anti-spasticity medications were ineffective for 58% of respondents. Pain in the legs was reported by 57% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of spasticity is highly individualized, and is often distributed differently across arms, trunk, and legs. Despite the fact that traditional definitions of spasticity focus on reflex responsiveness, the stiffness associated with spasticity appears to be more problematic than spasms or clonus. The self-described characteristics of spasticity and its physiological presentation are complex and related to pain. This varied presentation lends support to the concept that management of spasticity may be best achieved by multimodality strategies.

Author Correction: The experience of spasticity after spinal cord injury: perceived characteristics and impact on daily life.

There is an author correction associated with this article.

Low-dose subcutaneous ketamine for postoperative pain management in Rwanda: a dose-finding study.

PURPOSE: Good pain control is not a normal part of surgical care in sub-Saharan Africa due to lack of resources. The primary objective of this study was to determine an efficacious dose of subcutaneous ketamine for postoperative pain for use in a future randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Following research ethics board and local hospital approval for this research, we obtained informed consent from 31 patients undergoing major surgery for a random walk dose-finding study. In addition to standard postoperative care, participants received five doses of subcutaneous ketamine at scheduled intervals from arrival in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) to postoperative day 2. Participants received 50 mg of ketamine (minimum 0.6 to maximum 1.1 mg·kg-1, based on different body weights) for the first and second dose, with subsequent doses adjusted by 10 mg according to pain and side effects. Pain scores were recorded at rest and with movement. RESULTS: The following mean (standard deviation [SD]) pain scores at rest and with movement were recorded on arrival in the PACU and on the afternoon of postoperative days 1 and 2: [at rest: 8.2 (1.5), 3.2 (1.8), and 0.7 (1.0), respectively; with movement: 9.4 (0.8), 5.1 (1.7), and 2.4 (1.1), respectively]. This rate of improvement suggests possible pain relief through use of ketamine. The mean (SD) ketamine dose that appeared efficacious in pain reduction was 0.90 (0.23) mg·kg-1. There were no serious side effects. CONCLUSION: Adding subcutaneous ketamine to standard analgesic measures resulted in decreases in postoperative pain scores without serious side effects. These data can be used to inform a randomized controlled trial to compare subcutaneous ketamine plus standard care with placebo plus standard care for reducing postoperative pain.

Dexmedetomidine during total knee arthroplasty performed under spinal anesthesia decreases opioid use: a randomized-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether the opioid-sparing effects of dexmedetomidine seen in patients undergoing general anesthesia are reproducible in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. We hypothesized that the administration of intravenous dexmedetomidine for sedation during total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia would decrease postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 hr following surgery. METHODS: We conducted this prospective double-blind randomized-controlled trial in 40 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III) undergoing total knee arthroplasty with a standardized spinal anesthetic. Patients were randomized to receive either a dexmedetomidine loading dose of 0.5 µg·kg(-1) over ten minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.5 µg·kg·hr(-1) for the duration of the surgery, or a normal saline loading dose and an infusion of an equivalent volume. The primary outcome was the consumption of morphine delivered via patient-controlled analgesia in the first 24 hr following surgery. RESULTS: The mean (SD) cumulative morphine at 24 hr in the dexmedetomidine group was 29.2 (11.2) mg compared with 61.2 (17.2) mg in the placebo group (mean difference, 32.0 mg; 95% confidence interval, 22.7 to 41.2; P < 0.001). In the dexmedetomidine group, there was a delay in the time to first analgesic request (P = 0.003) and a reduction in the mean morphine use at six and 12 hr following surgery (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine was associated with a significant decrease in morphine use in the first 24 hr following total knee arthroplasty. Our study shows that an intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine for sedation in patients receiving spinal anesthesia can produce postoperative analgesic effects. This offers another potential adjunct in the multimodal pain management of these patients. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT02026141).

Augmentation of Voluntary Locomotor Activity by Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Motor-Incomplete Spinal Cord-Injured Individuals.

The level of sustainable excitability within lumbar spinal cord circuitries is one of the factors determining the functional outcome of locomotor therapy after motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. Here, we present initial data using noninvasive transcutaneous lumbar spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) to modulate this central state of excitability during voluntary treadmill stepping in three motor-incomplete spinal cord-injured individuals. Stimulation was applied at 30 Hz with an intensity that generated tingling sensations in the lower limb dermatomes, yet without producing muscle reflex activity. This stimulation changed muscle activation, gait kinematics, and the amount of manual assistance required from the therapists to maintain stepping with some interindividual differences. The effect on motor outputs during treadmill-stepping was essentially augmentative and step-phase dependent despite the invariant tonic stimulation. The most consistent modification was found in the gait kinematics, with the hip flexion during swing increased by 11.3° ± 5.6° across all subjects. This preliminary work suggests that tSCS provides for a background increase in activation of the lumbar spinal locomotor circuitry that has partially lost its descending drive. Voluntary inputs and step-related feedback build upon the stimulation-induced increased state of excitability in the generation of locomotor activity. Thus, tSCS essentially works as an electrical neuroprosthesis augmenting remaining motor control.

Tracheal palpation to assess endotracheal tube depth: an exploratory study.

PURPOSE: Correct placement of the endotracheal tube (ETT) occurs when the distal tip is in mid-trachea. This study compares two techniques used to place the ETT at the correct depth during intubation: tracheal palpation vs placement at a fixed depth at the patient's teeth. METHODS: With approval of the Research Ethics Board, we recruited American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II patients scheduled for elective surgery with tracheal intubation. Clinicians performing the tracheal intubations were asked to "advance the tube slowly once the tip is through the cords". An investigator palpated the patient's trachea with three fingers spread over the trachea from the larynx to the sternal notch. When the ETT tip was felt in the sternal notch, the ETT was immobilized and its position was determined by fibreoptic bronchoscopy. The position of the ETT tip was compared with our hospital standard, which is a depth at the incisors or gums of 23 cm for men and 21 cm for women. The primary outcome was the incidence of correct placement. Correct placement of the ETT was defined as a tip > 2.5 cm from the carina and > 3.5 cm below the vocal cords. RESULTS: Movement of the ETT tip was readily palpable in 77 of 92 patients studied, and bronchoscopy was performed in 85 patients. Placement by tracheal palpation resulted in more correct placements (71 [77%]; 95% confidence interval [CI] 74 to 81) than hospital standard depth at the incisors or gums (57 [61%]; 95% CI 58 to 66) (P = 0.037). The mean (SD) placement of the ETT tip in palpable subjects was 4.1 (1.7) cm above the carina, 1.9 cm (1.5-2.3 cm) below the ideal mid-tracheal position. CONCLUSION: Tracheal palpation requires no special equipment, takes only a few seconds to perform, and may improve ETT placement at the correct depth. Further studies are warranted.

Three-finger tracheal palpation to guide endotracheal tube depth in children.

BACKGROUND: Accurate endotracheal tube (ETT) depth is critical, especially in children. The current tools used to guide appropriate ETT depth have significant limitations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of tracheal palpation in the neck to guide appropriate ETT placement in children. METHODS: A prospective observational study with a convenience sample of 50 children was conducted. During intubation, an investigator palpated the trachea with three fingertips side-by-side extending upward from the suprasternal notch. The anesthesiologist advanced the ETT slowly until palpated at the sternal notch. The investigator stated ETT palpation certainty as 'strongly felt', 'weakly felt', or 'not felt.' Final ETT position was determined by bronchoscopy and categorized as 'ETT too shallow' (tip in proximal » of trachea), 'ETT too deep' (tip in distal » of trachea), or 'ETT placement satisfactory' (between those extremes). RESULTS: Thirty boys and 20 girls undergoing dental surgery with nasal intubation were recruited (median age 4.4 years; range 2.0-10.8). The ETT (all ≥4 mm ID) was palpable at the sternal notch in all patients: 46 of 50 strongly palpable and 4 of 50 weakly palpable. The experimental methods led to satisfactory ETT placement in 49 of 50 patients, too deep in 1 of 50 patients. Compared with the Pediatrics Advanced Life Support (PALS) predictive formula, satisfactory placement would have been 41 of 50 patients (P < 0.008). Number needed to treat is 6.3 for improvement over the PALS method. CONCLUSIONS: The use of tracheal palpation to guide ETT placement has excellent clinical performance and better guides appropriate ETT depth than the PALS formula in our study population.

Modification of spasticity by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) on lower-limb spasticity. DESIGN: Interventional pilot study to produce preliminary data. SETTING: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria. PARTICIPANTS: Three subjects with chronic motor-incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) who could walk ≥10 m. INTERVENTIONS: Two interconnected stimulating skin electrodes (Ø 5 cm) were placed paraspinally at the T11/T12 vertebral levels, and two rectangular electrodes (8 × 13 cm) on the abdomen for the reference. Biphasic 2 ms-width pulses were delivered at 50 Hz for 30 minutes at intensities producing paraesthesias but no motor responses in the lower limbs. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Wartenberg pendulum test and neurological recordings of surface-electromyography (EMG) were used to assess effects on exaggerated reflex excitability. Non-functional co-activation during volitional movement was evaluated. The timed 10-m walk test provided measures of clinical function. RESULTS: The index of spasticity derived from the pendulum test changed from 0.8 ± 0.4 pre- to 0.9 ± 0.3 post-stimulation, with an improvement in the subject with the lowest pre-stimulation index. Exaggerated reflex responsiveness was decreased after tSCS across all subjects, with the most profound effect on passive lower-limb movement (pre- to post-tSCS EMG ratio: 0.2 ± 0.1), as was non-functional co-activation during voluntary movement. Gait speed values increased in two subjects by 39%. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that tSCS, similar to epidurally delivered stimulation, may be used for spasticity control, without negatively impacting residual motor control in incomplete SCI. Further study in a larger population is warranted.