Five-year outcomes of revisional bariatric surgery: gastric band to sleeve gastrectomy or to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Revisional bariatric surgery after an index adjustable gastric band (AGB) may be indicated to remedy weight relapse or band-related complications. We examined outcomes five years following revision from AGB to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (AGB-LSG) or to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (AGB-RYGB). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review to identify patients (men and women, age 18-80) who underwent one revisional bariatric procedure with AGB as the index procedure at two medical centers in our healthcare system between January 2012 and February 2017. We only included patients with a pre-revision BMI > 30 kg/m2 for whom 5-year follow-up data were available. We compared 5-year weight loss and remission of comorbidities in patients undergoing AGB-LSG and AGB-RYGB conversion. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients met inclusion criteria (65 AGB-LSG, 49 AGB-RYGB). At 5-year post-revision, percent total weight loss (3.4% vs 19.9%; p < 0.001), percent excess weight loss (7.0% vs 50.8%; p < 0.001) and decrease in BMI (1.5 vs 8.8; p < 0.001) was greater in AGB-RYGB vs. AGB-LSG. No significant difference in remission or development of new comorbidities was observed. CONCLUSION: Conversion of AGB to RYGB is associated with superior intermediate-term weight loss compared to conversion of AGB to LSG. Future multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to further describe the intermediate-term outcomes of revisional bariatric surgery.

Outcomes over 20 years performing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-surgeon experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a single surgeon's 20-year experience with robotic radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Patients who had undergone robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy by a single surgeon were identified via an IRB approved prospectively maintained prostate cancer database. Patients were divided into 5-year cohorts (cohort A 2001-2005; cohort B 2006-2010; cohort C 2011-2015; cohort D 2016-2021) for analysis. Oncologic and quality of life outcomes were recorded at the time of follow-up visits. Continence was defined as 0-1 pad with occasional dribbling. Potency was defined as intercourse or an erection sufficient for intercourse within the last 4 weeks. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred fifty-two patients met criteria for inclusion. Clavien ≥ 3 complication rates decreased from 5.9% to 3.2%, p = 0.021. There was considerable Gleason grade group (GG) and stage migration to more advanced disease between cohort A (6.4% GG4 or GG5, 16.2% pT3 or pT4, 1.2% N1) and cohort D (17% GG4 or GG5, 45.5% pT3 or pT4, 14.4% N1; p < 0.001). Consistent with this, an increasing proportion of patients required salvage treatments over time (14.6% of cohort A vs 22.5% of cohort D, p < 0.001). 1-year continence rates improved from 74.8% to greater than 92.4%, p < 0.001. While baseline potency and use of intraoperative nerve spare decreased, for patients potent at baseline, there were no significant differences for potency at one year (p = 0.065). CONCLUSIONS: In this 20-year review of our experience with robotic prostatectomy, complication rates and continence outcomes improved over time, and there was a migration to more advanced disease at the time of surgery.

A randomized controlled trial of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on opioid and anti-emetic use, length of stay and safety after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). METHODS: Patients who underwent LSG between March 2018 and January 2019 at our accredited, high-volume bariatric surgery center were randomized to either standard of care (SOC) or ERAS. ERAS included a pre- and post-surgical medication regimen designed to reduce postoperative nausea, vomiting and pain. Outcomes included post-operative symptom scores, opioid use, anti-emetic use, time to achieve readiness for discharge (RFD) and inpatient and 30-day adverse events, readmissions and emergency department visits. RESULTS: The final analysis included 130 patients, (SOC 65; ERAS 65). Groups did not differ on demographics or comorbidities. Relative to SOC, fewer ERAS patients utilized opioids in the hospital ward (72.3% vs. 95.4%; p < .001), peak pain scores were significantly lower, and median time to achieve RFD was shorter (28.0 h vs. 44.4 h; p = 0.001). More ERAS patients were discharged on post-operative day 1 (38.5% vs. 15.4%; p < .05). The overall use of rescue anti-emetic medications was not different between groups. Rates of postoperative 30-day events, readmissions, and emergency department visits did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Relative to SOC, ERAS was associated with earlier discharge, lower pain scores, less frequent use of opioids and use in lower amounts after LSG with no differences in 30 day safety outcomes.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Is Associated With Reduced Hospital Length of Stay after Urgent or Emergency Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery at an Urban, Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis With Propensity Score Matching.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) was associated with reduced length of stay (LOS) after urgent or emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of an institutional database for urgent or emergency isolated CABG before versus after ERAS. Propensity matching identified comparable subpopulations pre- versus post-ERAS. Interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate LOS. SETTING: At a tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,012 patients undergoing urgent or emergent CABG-346 from 2016 to 2017 (pre-ERAS), and 666 from 2018 to 2020 (post-ERAS). Emergent CABG was performed within 24 hours, and urgent CABG was performed during the same hospitalization to reduce clinical risk. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Propensity-matched post-ERAS (n = 565) versus pre-ERAS patients (n = 330) demonstrated reduced LOS (9 [8-13] v (10 [8-14] days p = 0.015), increased likelihood of extubation within 6 hours (46.0% v 35.8%, p = 0.003), shorter ventilation time (6.3 [5.1-10.2] v (7.2 [5.4-12.2] hours, p = 0.003), reduced morphine milligram equivalent use on postoperative days 1 and 2 (69.6 ± 62.2 v 99.0 ± 61.6, p < 0.001), and increased intraoperative ketamine use (58.8% v 35.2%, p < 0.001). There were no differences regarding reintubation, intensive care unit readmission, or 30-day morbidity. Adjusted segmental regression (n = 1,012) for LOS demonstrated reduced mean LOS of approximately 2 days after ERAS (ß2 coefficient -1.943 [-3.766 to -0.121], p = 0.037), with stable trends for mean LOS and no change in slope throughout the pre-ERAS and post-ERAS time periods. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced recovery after surgery was associated with reduced LOS after urgent or emergency CABG without adverse effects on prolonged ventilation, reintubation, intensive care unit readmission, or 30-day outcomes.

Utility of a Novel Scale to Assess Readiness for Discharge After Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The safe release of a patient from hospital care after bariatric surgery depends upon the achievement of satisfactory health status. Here, we describe a new objective scale (the Readiness for Discharge, RFD Scale) to measure the patient's suitability for hospital discharge after bariatric surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational analysis of data collected in a randomized clinical trial of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy from 3/15/2018 to 1/12/2019. Nursing staff assessed 122 patients every 4-8 h after surgery using a checklist to document 5 components: ambulation, vital signs, pain, nausea, and oral intake of clear fluid. Satisfaction of each component was scored as "1" (satisfactory) or "0" (not satisfactory). Scores were summed and analyzed for patterns. RFD = 5 marked the patient as ready for discharge. RESULTS: Sufficient intake of clear liquid was the last RFD component satisfied in 87% of patients. Two overall response patterns emerged: "Steady Progressors" (n = 51) whose RFD score rose steadily from 0 to 5 without reversion to a lower score; and "Oscillators" (n = 71) who had at least one temporary decrease in RFD score on the way to attaining 5, or showed a simultaneous oscillation of components without change in RFD. CONCLUSIONS: The RFD checklist allows objective scoring of medical readiness for discharge after LSG and has the potential to improve clinical communication.

Outcomes of MRI fusion-guided versus systematic standard prostate biopsies.

INTRODUCTION: The current utility of MRI-fusion targeted biopsy as either an adjunct to or replacement for systematic template biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer is disputed. The purpose of this study is to assess the current effectiveness of MRI-targeted versus systematic template prostate biopsies at two institutions and to consider possible underlying factors that could impact variability between detection rates in our patient population compared to others. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review from our prospectively maintained prostate cancer databases was conducted. Patients with prostate MRI lesions (PI-RADSv2) receiving concurrent systematic 12-core and MRI-fusion targeted biopsies were reviewed. Clinically significant cancer was considered to be Grade Group ≥ 2. RESULTS: A total of 457 patients were included in the analysis; 255 patients received their biopsy at Institution A and 202 at Institution B. Overall cancer detection rate was 68%; the clinically significant cancer detection rate was 34%. Both MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies identified unique cases of clinically significant prostate cancer that the other modality missed. Out of 157 cases of clinically significant prostate cancer, MRI-targeted biopsy identified 29/157 cases (18%) missed by systematic biopsy, while systematic biopsy identified 37/157 cases (24%) missed by MRI-targeted biopsy (p = .39). Individual biopsy performance was similar when stratified by active surveillance or prior biopsy status, PI-RADSv2 score, and institution. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-fusion targeted and systematic biopsy each identified unique cases of clinically significant prostate cancer. Both biopsy modalities should be utilized in order to provide the greatest sensitivity for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Is Associated With Improved Outcomes and Reduced Racial and Ethnic Disparities After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis With Propensity-Score Matching.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol implementation was associated with improved outcomes and decreased racial and ethnic outcome disparities after isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of an institutional CABG database with propensity-score matching. SETTING: At a single tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand seven hundred thirty-five patients undergoing isolated CABG: 656 patients from 2016 to 2017 (pre-ERAS) and 1,079 patients from 2018 to 2020 (post-ERAS). Each patient cohort was divided into a White subgroup and a racial and ethnic minorities (Minorities) subgroup. INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Propensity-matched post-ERAS patients (n = 584) compared to pre-ERAS patients (n = 584) demonstrated reductions in total length of stay (LOS) (median [interquartile range]): (7 [5-10] v 8 [6-11.5] days, p = .006), postoperative LOS (5 [4-7] v 5 [4-7] days, p = .001), total ventilation time (6.1 [4.8-9.5] v 6.6 [5.2-10.9] hours, p = .004), postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (mean ± standard deviation: 68.6 ± 57.5 v 100.0 ± 59.4, p < .001), and increased likelihood of early extubation (48.8% v 42.3%, p = .026); the Minorities subgroup demonstrated reductions in likelihood of intensive care unit (ICU) readmission (1.3% v 8.1%, p = .012) and postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (73.6 ± 64.0 v 107.8 ± 71.9, p < .001). Logistic regression models demonstrated that disparities in ICU readmission and postoperative LOS between White and Minorities patients were eliminated post-ERAS. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS for isolated CABG surgery was associated with reduced total and postoperative LOS, reduced total ventilation time, and increased early extubation for all patients, as well as reduced ICU readmission for the Minorities subgroup. ERAS implementation was associated with reduced disparities between White and racial and ethnic minority patients for ICU readmission and postoperative LOS.

Identification of a five gene signature to predict time to biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Identification of novel biomarkers associated with high-risk prostate cancer or biochemical recurrence can drive improvement in detection, prognosis, and treatment. However, studies can be limited by small sample sizes and sparse clinical follow-up data. We utilized a large sample of prostate specimens to identify a predictive model of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy and we validated this model in two external data sets. METHODS: We analyzed prostate specimens from patients undergoing radical prostatectomy at Hartford Hospital between 2008 and 2011. RNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prostates was hybridized to a custom Affymetrix microarray. Regularized (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [Lasso]) Cox regression was performed with cross-validation to identify a model that incorporated gene expression and clinical factors to predict biochemical recurrence, defined as postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 0.2 ng/ml or receipt of triggered salvage treatment. Model performance was assessed using time-dependent receiver operating curve (ROC) curves and survival plots. RESULTS: A total of 606 prostate specimens with gene expression and both pre- and postoperative PSA data were available for analysis. We identified a model that included Gleason grade and stage as well as five genes (CNRIP1, endoplasmic reticulum protein 44 [ERP44], metaxin-2 [MTX2], Ras homolog family member U [RHOU], and OXR1). Using the Lasso method, we determined that the five gene model independently predicted biochemical recurrence better than a model that included Gleason grade and tumor stage alone. The time-dependent ROCAUC for the five gene signature including Gleason grade and tumor stage was 0.868 compared to an AUC of 0.767 when Gleason grade and tumor stage were included alone. Low and high-risk groups displayed significant differences in their recurrence-free survival curves. The predictive model was subsequently validated on two independent data sets identified through the Gene Expression Omnibus. The model included genes (RHOU, MTX2, and ERP44) that have previously been implicated in prostate cancer biology. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of a small number of genes is associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence independent of classical pathological hallmarks.

Use of EPIC 26 to identify men likely to benefit from surgical interventions for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To examine outcomes of surgical procedures for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (post-RP UI) and to identify patients who may benefit from a surgical intervention to treat post-RP UI. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) from July 2004 through July 2016 at our institution. Cases underwent surgical interventions for UI following RP. Controls had RP during the study period but did not have an intervention for UI following RP. We used the UI scale of the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) 26 to: (1) quantify post-RP UI before and after UI intervention overall and for specific surgical procedures; (2) evaluate the significance of improvement in post-RP UI before and after UI intervention and (3) identify controls with levels of post-RP UI that were comparable to the cases. RESULTS: Two thousand nine hundred and sixty-eight RPs were performed; 48 patients underwent further surgical intervention (39 slings, 9 artificial urinary sphincter, AUS). For 20 cases with complete EPIC UI data (15 slings, 5 AUS), the median (IQR) pre-UI intervention score was 27.00 (IQR 22.75-42.75). Improvement was significant overall (p < 0.001) and for slings (p = 0.001). 71/2085 controls had post-prostatectomy UI scores ≤ 27.0, suggesting that they may have benefited from a post-RP surgical intervention for UI. CONCLUSION: Data support the effectiveness of surgery to treat post-RP UI. A sizeable population of unidentified men may benefit from a surgical intervention to treat urinary incontinence after RP.

Does post prostatectomy decipher score predict biochemical recurrence and impact care?

PURPOSE: To examine the ability of the Decipher test to predict early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and to impact clinical decisions in advance of metastasis and death. METHODS: We identified Decipher tests ordered after radical prostatectomy for adverse pathology in men treated for prostate cancer between 1/1/14 and 8/31/18. Biochemical recurrence was defined as prostate-specific antigen > 0.02 ng/mL. Decipher score is reported as lower risk (< 0.6) and higher risk ≥ 0.60). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine the relationship between Decipher score and time to biochemical recurrence (months). Cox regression was used to analyze the relationship between Decipher score and time to biochemical recurrence while controlling for a number of clinical characteristics. Secondary analyses focused on a subset of men with prostate-specific antigen > 0.02 and < 0.20 ng/mL to determine if high-risk Decipher scores were associated with receipt of salvage treatment. RESULTS: A total of 203 cases were analyzed: 37.9% and 62.1% had lower and higher risk Decipher scores respectively, and 56.2% had a biochemical recurrence. Median (inter-quartile range) follow-up was 20 (13.5, 25.3) months. Decipher score was significantly associated with time to biochemical recurrence (p = 0.027) while in the secondary analyses, high-risk Decipher scores (≥ 0.60) were associated with salvage treatment (p = 0.018). Stage category and Decipher score were significant predictors of time from elevated PSA to salvage treatment in the secondary analyses. CONCLUSION: While it might not contribute statistically, Decipher score can be clinically useful in helping patients reach treatment decisions.

Use of the Urethral Sling to Treat Symptoms of Climacturia in Men After Radical Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Climacturia affects up to 45% of men after radical prostatectomy (RP). Although urethral slings decrease the severity and frequency of stress incontinence after RP, their efficacy as a treatment for climacturia after RP has not been well studied. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported changes in climacturia symptoms after implantation of a urethral sling as a treatment for stress incontinence after RP. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review identified males aged 18-80 years who received urethral slings for stress incontinence after RP at our institution from 2012 to 2017. These patients were mailed an 11-item questionnaire asking them about climacturia symptoms before and after implantation of a urethral sling. Written informed consent was obtained from patients participating in the mailed questionnaire. OUTCOMES: Respondents were asked to report on climacturia frequency and severity, bother, partner bother, and incontinence before and after implantation of urethral slings. RESULTS: A total of 42 questionnaires were mailed; 17 were available for analysis. The median age (and interquartile range, IQR) of the sample at RP was 64 (59.5, 68.0). Almost all (94.1%) of the men were sexually active at the time of the study and 64.7% reported experiencing urinary leakage during sexual arousal. Most (58.8%) underwent the urethral sling procedure to treat general incontinence; 35.3% underwent the procedure to treat both general incontinence and incontinence during sexual activity and 1 (5.9%) underwent it for other reasons. A median of 28.1 months elapsed between RP and sling procedure (IQR: 18.36, 53.88; minimum: 8.00; maximum: 108.36). Statistically significant shifts toward improvement from presling to postsling were noted for frequency of leakage during sexual arousal or orgasm (P = .041) and for the degree to which leakage of urine during sexual arousal or orgasm was a "bother" (P = .027). While almost all (94%) of the men were incontinent before sling, this percentage dropped to 53% after sling (P = .031). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Urethral slings should be discussed as a treatment strategy for climacturia during clinical consultations with patients. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths include consistent surgical technique. Limitations include retrospective design, lack of a nonsling comparison group, subjective nature of outcome measures, possible response bias, and variability in time interval between RP and sling procedure. CONCLUSION: Use of urethral slings after RP is associated with improvements in climacturia symptoms, bother, and incontinence. Nolan J, Kershen R, Staff I, et al. Use of the Urethral Sling to Treat Symptoms of Climacturia in Men After Radical Prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2020;17:1203-1206.

Prostate cancer genomics: comparing results from three molecular assays.

INTRODUCTION: OncotypeDx, Prolaris, and Decipher have each been validated to predict outcomes and guide treatment for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, but they have yet to be compared to one another. Here we assess the correspondence between the results of each. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review to identify patients who underwent at least two of the three genomic tests at Hartford Hospital between 2014 and 2017. We used test-specific definitions of a favorable prediction for each to compare the percent agreement between each pair. Results were also compared to treatment recommendations based on current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. We compared pair-wise agreement using Cohen's kappa (K). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients received at least two different genomic tests. For 12 patients who received both the Decipher and Prolaris, % agreement and K were 66.7 and 0.31 (p = .276), respectively. For 8 patients who received both Prolaris and Oncotype DX, % agreement and K were 75 and 0.39 (p = .168), respectively. Two patients received both Decipher and Oncotype DX, yielding 50% agreement and an incalculable K. For Prolaris versus NCCN, % agreement and K were 75 and .21, respectively (p = .117; n = 20). For Decipher versus NCCN, % agreement and K were 60 and .15, respectively (p = .268; n = 15). For Oncotype DX versus NCCN (n = 10), agreement was 50%, K was incalculable. CONCLUSIONS: Notable differences exist in prognostic outcomes obtained from OncotypeDx, Prolaris, and Decipher.

Return to work after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retro-pubic prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the return-to-work interval (RTWI) after radical retro-pubic prostatectomy (RRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in men being treated for early-stage prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We mailed a 28-item questionnaire to a random sample of 2,696 patients who either had RRP from 1995 to 2004 or RALP from 2004 to 2011. RESULTS: We received analyzable questionnaires from 315 patients; 178 had RALP and 137 had RPP. The median RTWI was shorter in the RALP group than in the RRP group (3 versus 4 weeks, p = .016). The percent of subjects who had not returned to work 4 weeks after surgery was 23.6% for RALP and 38.2% for RRP (p = .010). In multivariate regression analysis, surgical approach was a significant predictor of RTWI independent of other social/clinical variables that were associated with either surgical approach or RTWI (p = .014). CONCLUSION: Our data support a shortening of RTWI by RALP.

A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Hyperbaric Oxygenation Therapy in the Preservation of Erectile Function after Radical Prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygenation therapy to preserve erectile function as part of penile rehabilitation after robot assisted bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study from January 2009 to April 2013. Men 40 to 65 years old who underwent robot assisted bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy were randomized 1:1 to the control or the treatment group. Participants were exposed to air as the control or to 100% oxygen as the treatment in hyperbaric conditions. The primary outcome was erectile function at 18 months as measured by IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function). Secondary outcomes were 12-month urinary symptoms, and 18-month sexual, urinary, bowel and hormonal related symptoms as measured by EPIC-26 (Expanded Prostate Index Composite-26). Adverse events and long-term cancer outcomes were monitored. Primary and secondary outcomes in the 2 groups were compared by the independent group t-test, the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the chi-square test of proportion. RESULTS: A total of 109 potent men were randomized to hyperbaric oxygenation therapy or the control group. A total of 43 men in the air group and 40 in the hyperbaric oxygenation therapy group completed the 18-month followup. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups on any outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed no difference in erectile recovery in men treated with hyperbaric oxygenation therapy vs placebo. Larger studies involving more diverse comorbidities and different hyperbaric oxygenation therapy regimens are needed to better evaluate the usefulness of hyperbaric oxygenation therapy for penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?

PURPOSE: We compared pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients at favorable intermediate risk who fulfilled current NCCN® (National Comprehensive Cancer Network®) Guidelines® for active surveillance criteria to outcomes in patients who met more traditional criteria for active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried our institutional review board approved prostate cancer database for patients who met NCCN criteria for very low risk (T1c, Grade Group 1, 3 or fewer of 12 cores, 50% or less core volume and prostate specific antigen density less than 0.15 ng/ml), low risk (T1-T2a, Grade Group 1 and prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml) or favorable intermediate risk (major pattern grade 3 and less than 50% positive biopsy cores) and who had 1 intermediate risk factor, including T2b/c, Grade Group 2 or prostate specific antigen 10 to 20 ng/ml. Men at intermediate risk who did not meet favorable criteria were labeled as being at unfavorable intermediate risk. Patients at favorable intermediate risk were compared to those at very low and low risk, and those at unfavorable intermediate risk to identify differences in rates of adverse pathological findings at radical prostatectomy, including Gleason score Grade Group 3-5, nonorgan confined disease or nodal involvement. Time to biochemical recurrence was compared among the groups using Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 3,686 patients underwent radical prostatectomy between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015. Of these men 1,454, 250 and 1,362 fulfilled the criteria for low, favorable intermediate and unfavorable intermediate risk, respectively. The rate of adverse pathological findings in favorable intermediate risk cases was significantly higher than in low risk cases and significantly lower than in unfavorable intermediate risk cases (27.4% vs 14.8% and 48.5%, respectively, each p <0.001). Time to biochemical recurrence differed significantly among the risk groups (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to men at low risk those at favorable intermediate risk represent a distinct group. Care should be taken when selecting these patients for active surveillance and monitoring them once they are in an active surveillance program.

Multimodal approach utilising a weight management programme prior to bariatric surgery in patients with BMI ≥50 kg/m2: A propensity score matching retrospective cohort study.

We evaluated preoperative weight loss and days from initial consult to surgery in patients with BMI ≥50 kg/m2 who were and were not enrolled in medical weight management (MWM) prior to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. We retrospectively identified patients with BMI ≥50 kg/m2 who had primary sleeve gastrectomy between 2014 and 2019 at two bariatric surgery centres in our healthcare system. Patients presenting after 2017 that received preoperative MWM (n = 28) were compared to a historical cohort of non-MWM patients (n = 118) presenting prior to programme initiation in 2017 on preoperative percent total body weight loss (%TBWL) and days from initial consult to surgery. A total of 151 patients (MWM, 33; non-MWM, 118) met inclusion criteria. BMI was significantly greater in MWM versus non-MWM (p = .018). After propensity score matching, median BMI at initial consult in non-MWM versus MWM no longer differed (p = .922) neither were differences observed on the basis of weight, age, sex, race or ethnicity. After PSM, MWM had significantly lower BMI at surgery (p = .018), lost significantly more weight from consult to surgery (p < .001) and achieved significantly greater median %TBWL from consult to surgery (p < .001). We noted no difference between groups on 6-month weight loss (p = .533). Days from initial consult to surgery did not differ between groups (p < .863). A preoperative MWM programme integrated into multimodal treatment for obesity in patients with a BMI ≥50 kg/m2 resulted in clinically significant weight loss without prolonging time to surgery.

The Effect of a Peritoneal Iliac Flap on Lymphocele Formation After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Results From the PLUS Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a peritoneal flap on the formation of lymphoceles after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection. METHODS: We conducted a single surgeon, assessor blinded prospective randomized controlled trial (the Prospective Lymphocele Ultrasound Study) in men undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection. At the conclusion of the node dissection, patients were block randomized 1:1 to either standard of care (no bladder peritoneal flap) or to the creation of a bladder peritoneal flap. Lymphocele formation was assessed by pelvic ultrasound postoperatively. The primary outcome was lymphocele formation. Rates of lymphocele formation and complications were analyzed using chi-square. Other outcomes, including length of stay, number of lymph nodes removed, lymphocele volume, and quality of life measures, were analyzed by t-tests or Wilcoxon Ranked Sum Tests, as appropriate. An a priori power calculation was performed using O'Brien-Fleming alpha sharing for the interim analyses. Two preplanned interim analyses were performed when 45 and 90 patients per group had follow-up ultrasounds. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in lymphocele formation was seen on the second interim analysis for 183 patients (4.3% vs. 15.6%, p = .011) stopping enrollment; this remained significant in the final analysis of 216 patients (3.6% vs 14.2%, p = .006). No other significant differences were observed. CONCLUSION: This prospective randomized trial supports the implementation of this simple modification for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection.

What is the most effective way to ensure that patients successfully undergo germline testing for prostate cancer?

INTRODUCTION: We sought to identify the most effective way to refer patients with prostate cancer to germline testing. METHODS: After IRB approval, we queried the electronic medical records (EMR) to identify patients (ages 18-89) with prostate cancer who were referred for or offered germline testing for prostate cancer from May 1, 2019 to February 24, 2021 through either telephone referral, EMR referral or in-office testing. The 3 cohorts were compared on receipt of testing and time to testing. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression evaluated the influence of referral cohort and reason for testing on receipt of testing and time to testing, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients met study inclusion criteria; 47 were referred for germline testing via telephone, 70 were referred through the EMR and 67 were offered testing in the office. No significant demographic or clinical differences were observed. Telephone referral yielded the lowest response (17%; P < 0.001) with the longest time interval between referral and testing (103 days; P < 0.001); in-office testing yielded the highest response (66%). More patients were referred because of both family history and high risk characteristics in the EMR and in-office testing cohorts (21.4% and 25.4% respectively). Referral method was significantly (P < 0.001) associated with receipt of test, while reason for testing was not. Referral method was also independently related to time to testing (P < 0.001) while reason for referral was not. CONCLUSIONS: Urologists should offer germline testing in the office for the most effective and expedient results.

Prostate Cancer Detection and Complications of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rates of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and complications associated with transperineal (TP) and transrectal (TR) biopsy approaches to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion targeted biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified men who underwent TP or TR MRI-targeted biopsy with concurrent systematic random biopsy from August 2020 to August 2021. Primary outcomes were detection rates of csPCa and 30-day complication rates between the 2 MRI-biopsy groups. Data were additionally stratified by prior biopsy status. RESULTS: A total of 361 patients were included in the analysis. No demographic differences were observed. No significant differences were observed between TP and TR approaches on any of the outcomes of interest. TR MRI-targeted biopsies identified csPCa in 47.2% of patients, and TP MRI-targeted biopsies identified csPCa in 48.6% of patients (P = .78). No significant differences were observed in csPCa detection between the 2 approaches for patients on active surveillance (P = .59), patients with prior negative biopsy (P = .34), and patients who were biopsy naïve (P = .19). Complication rates did not vary by approach (P = .45). CONCLUSION: Neither the identification of csPCa by MRI-targeted biopsy nor rates of complications differed significantly based on a TR or TP approach. No differences were seen between MRI-targeted approaches based on prior biopsy or active surveillance status.

Incidence of Hiatal Hernia Repair During Primary Bariatric Surgery Conversion: an Analysis of the 2020 MBSAQIP Database.

The rate of hiatal hernia (HH) repair during conversion bariatric surgery is largely unknown. We sought to determine this rate in 12,788 patients undergoing conversion surgery using the 2020 participant use file of the MBSAQIP database. Concurrent HH repair was performed in 24.1% of conversion cases; most commonly during SG to RYGB (33.1%), followed by AGB to SG conversion (20.2%). The remaining conversion pathways had a repair rate around 13%. Only 12.1% of HH repairs were performed using a mesh. GERD was the primary indication for conversion in 65% of the SG to RYGB cases. A much higher proportion of patients with concomitant HH repair reported GERD as the main reason for conversion than those without a HH repair (44.5% vs. 23.7%; p<0.001).