RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical and health systems outcomes of rapid molecular testing versus throat culture recovery for the management of group A Streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis in a pediatric emergency department (PED). METHODS: We conducted a single-center randomized trial of children (3-17 years) presenting to a PED with suspected GAS pharyngitis. A single dual-headed throat swab was collected, and participants were randomized to 1 of 2 parallel treatment groups with 1:1 allocation: point-of-care (POC) nucleic acid amplification testing or standard throat culture. The primary outcomes were time to throat pain +/- fever resolution. Secondary outcomes included absenteeism, length of stay, return visits to care, and antibiotic prescriptions and utilization. RESULTS: A total of 227 children were randomly assigned to culture (n = 115) or POC (n = 112) testing. Antibiotics were initiated earlier in the POC group by approximately 1 day (95% confidence interval, -0.40 to -1.58). No associated difference in time to throat pain or fever resolution was observed between groups. There was a decrease in the proportion of prescribed antibiotics in the POC group (0.35) compared with the culture group (0.79; P < 0.001). Otherwise, no significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing a POC nucleic acid amplification testing program for GAS in a PED facilitates earlier treatment and fewer antibiotic prescriptions. Although this did not translate to improved clinical and health systems outcomes in our study, it may serve as an important tool amid evolving pediatric febrile illnesses and growing antimicrobial resistance patterns.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Faringite , Testes Imediatos , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Streptococcus pyogenes , Humanos , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Faringite/microbiologia , Faringite/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Masculino , Feminino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Recent clinical practice guidelines recommend that decisions regarding lumbar puncture (LP) for febrile infants older than 28 days should no longer be based on urinalysis results, but rather independently determined by inflammatory markers and sometimes guided by shared decision-making (SDM). This study sought to assess management decisions for febrile infants aged 29 to 60 days with an abnormal urinalysis. METHODS: A scenario-based survey was sent to emergency department physicians at all 15 Canadian tertiary pediatric centers. Participants were asked questions regarding management decisions when presented with a well-appearing febrile infant in the second month of life with either an abnormal or normal urinalysis. RESULTS: Response rate was 50.2% (n = 116/231). Overall, few respondents would perform an LP based on either an abnormal or normal urinalysis alone (10.3% and 6.0%, respectively). However, regression analysis demonstrated that decisions regarding LP were influenced by urinalysis results (P < 0.001), with respondents more likely to defer to inflammatory marker results for infants with a normal urinalysis result (57.8%) compared with those with an abnormal urinalysis (28.4%). Hospitalization (62.1%) and empiric antibiotic treatment by intravenous route (87.9%) were both frequent for low-risk infants with an abnormal urinalysis. Nearly half of respondents reported rarely (<25% of encounters) engaging families in SDM regarding LP decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge translation initiatives reflecting current evidence should target use of inflammatory markers rather than urinalysis results to guide decisions regarding LP. Efforts emphasizing outpatient management with oral antibiotics and SDM for low-risk infants with an abnormal urinalysis could also further align management with current evidence and guidelines.
RESUMO
Objectives: This study was aimed to determine the sample size required to conduct an efficacy randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate superiority of intranasal (IN) lidocaine to placebo as an analgesic option for children presenting to the paediatric emergency department (PED) with migraine or posttraumatic headache with migraine features and to evaluate study protocol feasibility. Study Design: This study is a double-blind RCT of children aged 7 to 16 years at a single-centre PED. Thirty-two participants were randomized to receive either IN 2% lidocaine or 0.9% sodium chloride. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of subjects with a Verbal Numeric Rating Scale pain score of <4 at 30 and 60 minutes post-IN therapy. Primary outcome data were analyzed using a test of differences between proportions. Secondary objectives included assessing the feasibility of our study protocol by evaluating recruitment rates, adverse drug events, and PED length of stay (LOS). Results: Six of 17 participants in the lidocaine group and 2 of 15 in the placebo group were treated successfully. Using these proportions with 95% confidence intervals and 80% power, the sample size required to find a significant difference between proportions would be 67 participants per arm. Our enrolment rate was 55% and there were no serious adverse drug events. The median PED LOS was similar between groups. Conclusion: We determined the sample size required to conduct a definitive RCT to evaluate the superiority of IN lidocaine to placebo and found the study protocol is feasible but identified important considerations in PED migraine trial design.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) severity score among children with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infections and HUS by stratifying them according to their risk of adverse events. The score has not been previously evaluated in a North American acute care setting. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed medical records of children <18 years old infected with STEC and treated in 1 of 38 participating emergency departments in North America between 2011 and 2015. The HUS severity score (hemoglobin [g/dL] plus 2-times serum creatinine [mg/dL]) was calculated using first available laboratory results. Children with scores >13 were designated as high-risk. We assessed score performance to predict severe adverse events (ie, dialysis, neurologic complication, respiratory failure, and death) using discrimination and net benefit (ie, threshold probability), with subgroup analyses by age and day-of-illness. RESULTS: A total of 167 children had HUS, of whom 92.8% (155/167) had relevant data to calculate the score; 60.6% (94/155) experienced a severe adverse event. Discrimination was acceptable overall (area under the curve 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79) and better among children <5 years old (area under the curve 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.87). For children <5 years, greatest net benefit was achieved for a threshold probability >26%. CONCLUSIONS: The HUS severity score was able to discriminate between high- and low-risk children <5 years old with STEC-associated HUS at a statistically acceptable level; however, it did not appear to provide clinical benefit at a meaningful risk threshold.
Assuntos
Regras de Decisão Clínica , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Infecções por Escherichia coli/diagnóstico , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica/diagnóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Escherichia coli Shiga Toxigênica , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecções por Escherichia coli/complicações , Infecções por Escherichia coli/mortalidade , Feminino , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica/complicações , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica/mortalidade , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , América do Norte , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (P-OHCA) are infrequent, have low survival rates, and often have poor neurologic outcomes. Recent evidence indicates that high-performance emergency medical service (EMS) care can improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) guideline performance in the out of hospital setting and introduce an easy-to-use tool that scores guideline compliance and patient safety. METHODS: We observed EMS teams responding to standardized pediatric resuscitation simulations. Teams were dispatched to a mock assisted living home for a choking 6-year-old with a complex medical history. The child manikin was presented as unconscious and apneic, with bradycardic pulse. Teams were expected to monitor vitals; initiate airway management and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); and establish vascular access and administer epinephrine based on PALS guidelines. We developed a tool to score the quality of care for critical tasks and had a clinical expert evaluate technical performance using blinded video review. RESULTS: We observed 34 EMS teams providing care in P-OHCA simulations. Teams were proficient at assessing vitals, using correct-sized equipment, intubation, and confirmation of tube placement. Teams were delayed in initiating positive pressure ventilation (PPV) and chest compressions. Many teams (53%) deviated from guidelines in chest compressions with 17 (50%) performing continuous compressions before establishing an advanced airway and one (3%) not performing compressions. Similarly, 20 (59%) teams deviated from medication guidelines with 12 (35%) failing to administer epinephrine, six (18%) underdosing, and two (6%) overdosing by more than 20%. CONCLUSION: EMS teams were successful in selecting the appropriate equipment but delayed initiating ventilations in a child with severe bradycardia. We also noted frequent use of continuous chest CC rather than the AHA recommended 15:2 ratio. We developed a scoring tool with time-based criteria that can be used to assess guideline compliance, individual performance, and/or educational effectiveness.
Assuntos
Suporte Vital Cardíaco Avançado/normas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Pediatria , Adulto , Auxiliares de Emergência , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Treinamento com Simulação de Alta Fidelidade , Humanos , Masculino , Manequins , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Tempo para o TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infections are leading causes of pediatric acute renal failure. Identifying hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) risk factors is needed to guide care. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, historical cohort study to identify features associated with development of HUS (primary outcome) and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) (secondary outcome) in STEC-infected children without HUS at initial presentation. Children aged <18 years who submitted STEC-positive specimens between January 2011 and December 2015 at a participating study institution were eligible. RESULTS: Of 927 STEC-infected children, 41 (4.4%) had HUS at presentation; of the remaining 886, 126 (14.2%) developed HUS. Predictors (all shown as odds ratio [OR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]) of HUS included younger age (0.77 [.69-.85] per year), leukocyte count ≥13.0 × 103/µL (2.54 [1.42-4.54]), higher hematocrit (1.83 [1.21-2.77] per 5% increase) and serum creatinine (10.82 [1.49-78.69] per 1 mg/dL increase), platelet count <250 × 103/µL (1.92 [1.02-3.60]), lower serum sodium (1.12 [1.02-1.23 per 1 mmol/L decrease), and intravenous fluid administration initiated ≥4 days following diarrhea onset (2.50 [1.14-5.46]). A longer interval from diarrhea onset to index visit was associated with reduced HUS risk (OR, 0.70 [95% CI, .54-.90]). RRT predictors (all shown as OR [95% CI]) included female sex (2.27 [1.14-4.50]), younger age (0.83 [.74-.92] per year), lower serum sodium (1.15 [1.04-1.27] per mmol/L decrease), higher leukocyte count ≥13.0 × 103/µL (2.35 [1.17-4.72]) and creatinine (7.75 [1.20-50.16] per 1 mg/dL increase) concentrations, and initial intravenous fluid administration ≥4 days following diarrhea onset (2.71 [1.18-6.21]). CONCLUSIONS: The complex nature of STEC infection renders predicting its course a challenge. Risk factors we identified highlight the importance of avoiding dehydration and performing close clinical and laboratory monitoring.
Assuntos
Infecções por Escherichia coli , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica , Escherichia coli Shiga Toxigênica , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Feminino , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica/epidemiologia , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urêmica/terapia , Humanos , Terapia de Substituição RenalRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association between the degree of headache relief obtained in the pediatric emergency department (PED) with abortive treatment and unscheduled return visits to the PED for a recurrent or persistent headache within 72 hours. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study with 369 patients, all younger than 18 years, who presented to the PED with a primary complaint of either a headache or migraine. Patient and visit details were collected from the medical chart, along with presenting and discharge pain score. Percent pain reduction at discharge was determined through the following calculation: (Presenting Pain Score - Discharge Pain Score)/Presenting Pain Score. Associations were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: No significant association was found between the percent pain reduction and return to the PED (P = 0.49). Mean presenting pain score at the index visit was statistically higher for those who ended up returning to the PED versus those who did not (8.1 vs 7.4; P = 0.02). A trend toward increase in return visits was seen among patients who had a headache duration greater than 3 days (odds ratio, 1.99) and patients who experienced less than 50% pain reduction in the PED (odds ratio, 1.77). CONCLUSIONS: Complete resolution in the PED may not be necessary, given the lack of association between the degree of pain relief and revisit rates. Perhaps, the goal should be to achieve at least 50% pain reduction before discharge.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Cefaleia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Manejo da Dor/normas , Criança , Cefaleia/terapia , Humanos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/terapia , Alta do Paciente , Readmissão do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the frequency of opioid prescribing for pediatric headache in both ambulatory and emergency department (ED) settings, including prescribing rates by provider type. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of Washington State Medicaid beneficiaries, aged 7-17 years, with an ambulatory care or ED visit for headache between January 1, 2012, and September 30, 2015. The primary outcome was any opioid prescribed within 1 day of the visit. RESULTS: A total of 51 720 visits were included, 83% outpatient and 17% ED. There was a predominance of female (63.2%) and adolescent (59.4%) patients, and 30.5% of encounters involved a pediatrician. An opioid was prescribed in 3.9% of ED and 1.0% of ambulatory care visits (P < .001). Pediatricians were less likely to prescribe opioids in both ED (-2.70 percentage point; 95% CI, -3.53 to -1.88) and ambulatory settings (-0.31 percentage point; 95% CI, -0.54 to -0.08; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescribing rates for pediatric headache were low, but significant variation was observed by setting and provider specialty. We identified opioid prescribing by nonpediatricians as a potential target for quality improvement efforts.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Cefaleia/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , WashingtonRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emergency department overcrowding has been associated with increased odds of hospital admission and mortality after discharge from the emergency department in predominantly adult cohorts. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between crowding and the odds of several adverse outcomes among children seen at a pediatric emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving all children visiting 8 Canadian pediatric emergency departments across 4 provinces between 2010 and 2014. We analyzed the association between mean departmental length of stay for each index visit and hospital admission within 7 days or death within 14 days of emergency department discharge, as well as hospital admission at index visit and return visits within 7 days, using mixed-effects logistic regression modelling. RESULTS: A total of 1 931 465 index visits occurred across study sites over the 5-year period, with little variation in index visit hospital admission or median length of stay. Hospital admission within 7 days of discharge and 14-day mortality were low across provinces (0.8%-1.5% and < 10 per 100 000 visits, respectively), and their association with mean departmental length of stay varied by triage categories and across sites but was not significant. There were increased odds of hospital admission at the index visit with increasing departmental crowding among visits triaged to Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) score 1-2 (odds ratios [ORs] ranged from 1.01 to 1.08) and return visits among patients with a CTAS score of 4-5 discharged at the index visit at some sites (ORs ranged from 1.00 to 1.06). INTERPRETATION: Emergency department crowding was not significantly associated with hospital admission within 7 days of the emergency department visit or mortality in children. However, it was associated with increased hospital admission at the index visit for the sickest children, and with return visits to the emergency department for those less sick.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Canadá , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Mortalidade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medicina de Emergência Pediátrica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Steadily increasing emergency department (ED) utilization has prompted efforts to increase resource allocation to meet demand. Little is known about the distribution and characteristics of patient arrivals by time of day. This study describes the variability and patterns of ED resource utilization related to patient, acuity, clinical, and disposition characteristics over a 24-hour period. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study of all visits to a tertiary children's hospital over a 1-year period. We use descriptive statistics to present ED visit details stratified by shift of arrival, and multivariable regression to explore the association between shift of presentation and hospital admission at index and 7-day return ED visits. RESULTS: Of 46,942 visits during the study period, 12% arrived overnight, 42% during the day, and 45% during the evening with variability in pattern of shift arrival by day of week. Overnight arrivals had a higher acuity (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale [CTAS]) and different presenting complaints (more viral infection, less minor trauma) than day and evening arrivals, but similar ED length of stay. Shift of arrival was not associated with admission to hospital, but age, gender, socioeconomic status (SES), and day of week were. DISCUSSION: ED utilization patterns vary by shift of arrival. Though overnight arrivals represent a smaller proportion of total daily arrivals, their acuity is higher, and the spectrum of disease differs from day or evening arrivals. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding variations and patterns of ED utilization by shift of arrival and day of week may be helpful in tailoring resource allocation to more accurately and specifically meet demands.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We recently introduced a clinical practice pathway for the management of asthma that uses the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) to guide emergency department (ED) treatment and disposition. The pathway recommends discharge for patients who achieve improvement to PRAM <4 at 1 hour after the last bronchodilator. We evaluated practice variation and patient outcomes associated with PRAM-directed disposition recommendations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children aged 2 to 17 years treated for moderate asthma (PRAM score 4-7) using our asthma clinical pathway. We measured 1) the proportion of children discharged per pathway criteria who returned to our ED within 24 hours and 2) the proportion of children observed beyond the pathway discharge criteria who deteriorated (PRAM ≥4). RESULTS: We analyzed 385 patient records from September 2013 to February 2015. Among 145 (37.7%) patients discharged per pathway criteria, 4 (4/145; 2.8%) returned within 24 hours. The remaining 240 (62.2%) were observed beyond the pathway discharge criteria; 76/240 (31.7%) had a subsequent deterioration (PRAM score ≥ 4) and 25/240 (10.4%) were hospitalized. Of those who deteriorated, 46/76 (60.5%) worsened within the first additional hour of observation. CONCLUSION: We observed significant deviation from our PRAM-directed pathway discharge criteria and that a significant proportion of observed patients experienced clinical deterioration beyond the first hour of observation. We recommend observing children with moderate asthma for 2 or 3 hours from last bronchodilator therapy if PRAM < 4 is maintained, to capture the majority (97.7% or 99.7%) of patients who require further intervention and hospitalization.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We explored practice-related factors associated with preventable unscheduled return visits to an emergency department (RTED). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, using standardized review of health records. We included all visits with at least one RTED within 7 days of the index visit. Cases were reviewed by investigators and clinicians to identify: 1) the proportion of unscheduled RTED, 2) the proportion deemed clinically unnecessary and 3) the contribution of clinical practice pattern and system factors. RESULTS: There were 2809 (7.3%) index visits associated with at least one RTED. Of these, 1983 (70.6%) were unscheduled, 784 (39.5%) were considered clinically unnecessary and 739 out of 784 medically unnecessary RTEDs (94.3%) were attributed to a mismatch between parental expectations and natural progression of disease that did not require Emergency Department (ED) reassessment or interventions. Eighty per cent of reviewed written discharge instructions lacked any anticipatory guidance around symptom range and duration and 21.2% contained instructions to return to the ED for signs and symptoms which do not require ED care. An administrative or system challenge was noted as the reason for the unnecessary and unscheduled RTED in 17.5%. In 3.4% of cases, nonemergency consultants were responsible for the disposition decision and discharge process. CONCLUSIONS: Unscheduled unnecessary return visits to our ED contribute to a significant proportion of our annual volume. Providing discharge instructions that help families distinguish expected range and duration of symptoms from signs requiring ED care was identified as a potential strategy to impact the frequency of unscheduled RTED.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify and characterize patient safety events during high-risk neonatal transports in the prehospital setting. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all "lights and sirens" ambulance transports of neonates ≤30 days old over a four-year period in a metropolitan area. Each case was independently reviewed for potential patient safety events that may have occurred in clinical assessment and decision making, resuscitation, airway management, fluid or medication administration, procedures performed, and/or equipment used. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients ≤30 days old were transported by ambulance using lights and sirens during the four-year study period. Overall, safety events occurred in 19 patients and severe safety events (potentially causing permanent injury or harm, including death) occurred in ten. The incidence of safety events related to medication administrations was 90% (70% severe), resuscitation 64.7% (47.1% severe), procedures 64.7% (35.3% severe), fluid administration 50% (25% severe), clinical assessment and decision making 50% (30.8% severe), airway management 47.6% (28.6% severe), equipment use 25.5% (10.0% severe), and systems processes 19.2% (7.7% severe). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk neonatal calls are infrequent and prone to a high incidence of serious patient safety events.
Assuntos
Ambulâncias/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Ressuscitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Ambulâncias/normas , Emergências/epidemiologia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Oregon , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Studies of adult hospital patients have identified medical errors as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Little is known about the frequency and nature of pediatric patient safety events in the out-of-hospital setting. We sought to quantify pediatric patient safety events in EMS and identify patient, call, and care characteristics associated with potentially severe events. METHODS: As part of the Children's Safety Initiative -EMS, expert panels independently reviewed charts of pediatric critical ambulance transports in a metropolitan area over a three-year period. Regression models were used to identify factors associated with increased risk of potentially severe safety events. Patient safety events were categorized as: Unintended injury; Near miss; Suboptimal action; Error; or Management complication ("UNSEMs") and their severity and potential preventability were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 265 of 378 (70.1%) unique charts contained at least one UNSEM, including 146 (32.8%) errors and 199 (44.7%) suboptimal actions. Sixty-one UNSEMs were categorized as potentially severe (23.3% of UNSEMs) and nearly half (45.3%) were rated entirely preventable. Two factors were associated with heightened risk for a severe UNSEM: (1) age 29 days to 11 months (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.25-8.68); (2) cases requiring resuscitation (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.16-8.28). Severe UNSEMs were disproportionately higher among cardiopulmonary arrests (8.5% of cases, 34.4% of severe UNSEMs). CONCLUSIONS: During high-risk out-of-hospital care of pediatric patients, safety events are common, potentially severe, and largely preventable. Infants and those requiring resuscitation are important areas of focus to reduce out-of-hospital pediatric patient safety events.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Erros Médicos , Segurança do Paciente , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the types of patient safety events that take place during pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. METHODS: Retrospective medical record review from a single large urban EMS system of EMS-treated pediatric (<18years of age) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) occurring between 2008 and 2011. A chart review tool was developed for this project and each chart was reviewed by a multidisciplinary review panel. Safety events were identified in the following clinical domains: resuscitation; assessment, impression/diagnosis, and clinical decision making; airway/breathing; fluids and medications; procedures; equipment; environment; and system. RESULTS: From a total of 497 critical transports during the study period, we identified 35 OHCA cases (7%). A total of 87% of OHCA cases had a safety event identified. Epinephrine overdoses were identified in 31% of the OHCA cases, most of which were 10-fold overdoses. Other medication errors included failure to administer epinephrine when indicated and administration of atropine when not indicated. In 20% of OHCA cases, 3 or more intubation attempts took place or intubation attempts were ultimately not successful. Lack of end-tidal C02 use for tube confirmation was also common. The most common arrest algorithm errors were placing an advanced airway too early (before administration of epinephrine) and giving a medication not included in the algorithm, primarily atropine, both occurring in almost 1/3 of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Safety events were common during pediatric OHCA resuscitation especially in the domains of medications, airway/breathing, and arrest algorithms.
Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Segurança do Paciente , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Migraine headaches are a common reason for pediatric emergency department (ED) visits. Small studies suggest the potential efficacy of sub-anesthetic doses of propofol for migraine with a favorable side effect profile and potentially decreased length of stay (LOS). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of low-dose propofol (LDP) to standard therapy (ST) in pediatric migraine treatment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, pragmatic randomized controlled trial from April 2014 through June 2016 in the ED at two pediatric hospitals. Patients aged 7-19 years were eligible if they were diagnosed with migraine by the emergency physician and had a presenting visual analog pain score (VAS) of 6-10. Primary outcome was the percent of pain reduction. Secondary outcomes were ED LOS, 24-h rebound headache, return visits to the ED, and adverse reactions. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were enrolled, but 8 were excluded, leaving 66 patients in the final analysis (36 ST, 30 LDP). Pain reduction was 59% for ST and 51% for LDP (p = 0.34) with 72.2% vs. 73.3% achieving a VAS ≤ 4 with initial therapy (p = 0.92). There was a nonsignificant trend toward shorter median LOS from drug administration to final disposition favoring propofol (79 min vs. 111 min; p = 0.09). Rebound headache was significantly more common in the ST vs. LDP group (66.7% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LDP did not achieve better pain reduction than ST, however, LDP was associated with significantly fewer rebound headaches and a nonsignificant trend toward shorter median LOS from drug administration to disposition.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Manejo da Dor/normas , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Intravenosos/farmacologia , Anestésicos Intravenosos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Pediatria/métodos , Propofol/farmacologia , Propofol/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Migraine headaches are common in the pediatric emergency department. The mainstay of abortive treatment consists of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories and dopamine antagonists. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 3 commonly used dopamine antagonists to abort pediatric migraine. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who presented to the pediatric emergency department at a tertiary care pediatric hospital between January 2010 and December 2013. Patients were treated for a migraine headache with a combination of ketorolac and one of the following dopamine antagonists: prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, or promethazine. The primary outcome was treatment failure and receiving non-evidence-based treatment defined by the need for opioids. Secondary outcomes included pain score reduction and return visit within 48 hours. RESULTS: There were 57 patients during this period with 67 visits that met inclusion criteria: 27 (40.3%) visits in which patients were treated with prochlorperazine, 23 (34.3%) visits in which patients were treated with metoclopramide, and 17 (25.4%) visits in which patients were treated with promethazine. Across visits, the mean age was 14.5 years, and 63% were women. Opioids were given for treatment failure in 8.7% of visits in which patients received prochlorperazine, 25% in which patients received metoclopramide, and 42.8% in which patients received promethazine. Patients treated with promethazine had significantly higher odds of needing opioids and experiencing less than 50% reduction in pain score compared with prochlorperazine after adjusting for patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests variable efficacy among 3 commonly used dopamine antagonists for pediatric migraine headache. Promethazine seems least effective and results in higher use of opioids compared with other available dopamine antagonists.
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Metoclopramida/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Proclorperazina/uso terapêutico , Prometazina/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Quimioterapia Combinada , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Cetorolaco/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In 2013, the TRAPPED-1 survey reported inconsistent availability of pain and distress management strategies across all 15 Canadian paediatric emergency department (PEDs). The objective of the TRAPPED-2 study was to utilize a procedural pain quality improvement collaborative (QIC) and evaluate the number of newly introduced pain and distress-reducing strategies in Canadian PEDs over a 2-year period. METHODS: A QIC was created to increase implementation of new strategies, through collaborative information sharing among PEDs. In 2015, 11 of the 15 Canadian PEDs participated in the TRAPPED QIC. At the end of the year, the TRAPPED-2 survey was electronically sent to a representative member at each of the 15 PEDs. The successful introduction of the chosen strategies by the QIC was assessed as well as the addition of new strategies per site. The number of new strategies introduced in the participating and nonparticipating QIC sites were described. RESULTS: All 15 PEDs (100%) completed the TRAPPED-2 survey. Overall, 10/11 of QIC-participating sites implemented the strategy they had initially identified. All 15 Canadian PEDs implemented some new strategies during the study period; participants in the QIC reported a mean of 5.2 (1-11) new strategies compared to 2.5 (1-4) in the nonactively participating sites. CONCLUSION: While all PEDs introduced new strategies during the study, QIC-participating sites successfully introduced the majority of their previously identified new strategies in a short time period. Sharing deadlines and information between centres may have contributed to this success.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Paramedics and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) triage pediatric disaster victims infrequently. The objective of this study was to measure the effect of a multiple-patient, multiple-simulation curriculum on accuracy of pediatric disaster triage (PDT). METHODS: Paramedics, paramedic students, and EMTs from three sites were enrolled. Triage accuracy was measured three times (Time 0, Time 1 [two weeks later], and Time 2 [6 months later]) during a disaster simulation, in which high and low fidelity manikins and actors portrayed 10 victims. Accuracy was determined by participant triage decision concordance with predetermined expected triage level (RED [Immediate], YELLOW [Delayed], GREEN [Ambulatory], BLACK [Deceased]) for each victim. Between Time 0 and Time 1, participants completed an interactive online module, and after each simulation there was an individual debriefing. Associations between participant level of training, years of experience, and enrollment site were determined, as were instances of the most dangerous mistriage, when RED and YELLOW victims were triaged BLACK. RESULTS: The study enrolled 331 participants, and the analysis included 261 (78.9%) participants who completed the study, 123 from the Connecticut site, 83 from Rhode Island, and 55 from Massachusetts. Triage accuracy improved significantly from Time 0 to Time 1, after the educational interventions (first simulation with debriefing, and an interactive online module), with a median 10% overall improvement (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed between Time 0 and Time 1, paramedics and paramedic students improved more than EMTs (p = 0.002). Analysis of triage accuracy showed greatest improvement in overall accuracy for YELLOW triage patients (Time 0 50% accurate, Time1 100%), followed by RED patients (Time 0 80%, Time 1 100%). There was no significant difference in accuracy between Time 1 and Time 2 (p = 0.073). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the multiple-victim, multiple-simulation curriculum yields a durable 10% improvement in simulated triage accuracy. Future iterations of the curriculum can target greater improvements in EMT triage accuracy.
Assuntos
Medicina de Desastres/normas , Avaliação Educacional/normas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Auxiliares de Emergência/educação , Auxiliares de Emergência/normas , Triagem/normas , Criança , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Técnica Delphi , Medicina de Desastres/educação , Humanos , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Simulação de Paciente , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Return visits to the emergency department (RTED) contribute to overcrowding and may be a quality of care indicator. Previous studies focused on factors predicting returns to and from the same center. Little is known about RTEDs across a range of community and specialty hospitals within a large geographic area. OBJECTIVE: We sought to measure the frequency of pediatric RTEDs and describe their directional pattern across centers in a large catchment area. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cross-sectional study of pediatric emergency visits in the Vancouver lower mainland within 1 year. Visits were linked across study sites, including one pediatric quaternary care referral center and 17 sites ranging from large regional centers to smaller community emergency departments (EDs). Returns were defined as subsequent visits to any site with a compatible diagnosis within 7 days of an index visit. RESULTS: Among a total of 139,278 index ED visits by children, 12,133 (8.7% [95% confidence interval 8.6-8.9%]) were associated with 14,645 return visits to an ED. Three quarters of all index visits occurred at a general ED center, of which 8.9% had at least one RTED and 22% of these returns occurred at the pediatric ED (PED). Among PED index visits, 8.2% had at least one RTED and 13.6% of these returned to a general center. Overall, 38.9% of all RTEDs occurred at the PED. Multivariate regression did not identify any statistically significant association between ED crowding measures and likelihood of RTEDs. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to single-center studies, this study linking hospitals within a large geographic area identified a higher proportion of RTEDs with a disproportionate burden on the PED.