Long-term evaluation of soft-tissue changes after miniscrew-assisted and conventional rapid palatal expansion using voxel-based superimposition of cone-beam computed tomography scans.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the soft-tissue changes in the long-term after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) and conventional rapid palatal expansion (RPE) appliances compared with a matched control group using voxel-based superimposition of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. METHODS: A total of 180 CBCTs for 60 patients at 3-time points were evaluated: pretreatment (T1), postexpansion (T2), and posttreatment (T3) for 3 groups: (1) MARPE, (2) RPE, and (3) controls (time-period T1 to T3: MARPE, 2 years 8 months; RPE, 2 years 9 months; control, 2 years 7 months). The voxel-based superimposition technique was used to superimpose the CBCT scans, after which the soft-tissue surfaces were extracted from the superimposed T1-CBCT, T2-CBCT, and T3-CBCT scans. Nine landmarks were identified on the CBCT scans: nasion, A-point, pogonion, right and left alar base, right and left zygoma, and right and left gonion. The coordinates of the 9 parameters were obtained in the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis for the CBCT scans and subjected to statistical analyses. The changes in the soft-tissue surfaces were also evaluated by color-coded maps for short-term (T2) and long-term (T3) changes. The mean changes from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3 were tested against no change within the groups by paired t test, and the mean changes among the 3 groups were compared with analysis of variance F test with Tukey's Honest significant difference used for adjusting P values for multiple testing. RESULTS: In the short term, both MARPE and RPE led to a significant downward movement of pogonion, left gonion, and lateral movement of the right and left alar base compared with controls at T2 (P <0.05). In addition, MARPE led to a significant downward movement of right gonion than controls at T2 (P <0.05). Moreover, RPE led to a significant downward and forward movement of A-point and downward movement of the right and left alar base than controls at T2 (P <0.05). However, in the long-term, there were no significant differences in the soft-tissue changes among the MARPE, RPE, and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: MARPE and RPE do not lead to significant soft-tissue changes in the long term when compared with controls.

Dynamic changes in transcriptome during orthodontic tooth movement.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine global changes in gene expression with next generation sequencing (NGS) in order to assess the biological effects of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) on alveolar bone in a rat model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five Wistar rats (age 14 weeks) were used in the study. The OTM was performed using closed coil Nickel-Titanium spring to apply a mesial force on maxillary first molars of 8-10 g. Three hours, 1, 3, 7 and 14 days after the placement of the appliance, rats were killed at each time point respectively. The alveolar bone, around left maxillary first molar, were excised on compression side. The samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent RNA extraction. Total RNA samples were prepared for mRNA sequencing using the Illumina kit. RNA-Seq reads were aligned to the rat genomes using the STAR Aligner and bioinformatic analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 18 192 genes were determined. Day 1 has the highest number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) observed with more upregulated than downregulated genes. A total of 2719 DEGs were identified to use as input for the algorithm. Six distinct clusters of temporal patterns were observed representing proteins that were differentially regulated indicating different expression kinetics. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed distinct clustering by time points and days 3, 7 and 14 share similar gene expression pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct gene expression pattern was observed at different time points studied. Hypoxia, inflammation and bone remodelling pathways are major mechanisms behind OTM.

Estimating the 3-D location of impacted maxillary canines: A CBCT-based analysis of severity of impaction.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to quantify the 3-D location of impacted canines by measuring their linear and angular deviations in relation to adjacent structures and further evaluate impaction severity. METHODS: CBCT images of 314 impacted canines were analysed in the sagittal, coronal and axial planes. Linear and angular measurements were recorded. Canine inclination was identified in coronal and sagittal planes. An evaluation system was constructed for analysis. Upright canine was considered as the appropriate position for fully erupted maxillary canine. Outcomes were compared between right and left sides and by gender. For categorical variables, chi-square tests were used while Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables. Regression models were used to measure severity. RESULTS: Impactions were greater in females (119/207; 57.5%). No significant differences between unilateral (100/207; 49.3%) and bilateral (107/207; 51.7%) (P > 0.05). Out of 314 impactions, 105 (33.4%) were mild, 118 (37.58%) moderate and 91 (28.98%) severe. Severe impactions were primarily buccal (44/ 91; 48.3%), in the occlusal ½ of the adjacent incisor root (38/ 91, 41.7%), mesial to the distal border of central incisor (47/91, 51.6%), with sagittal angle value + >45 ̊ (46/ 91, 50.5%) and mesial tip + >30 ̊ (86/ 91, 94.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Severely impacted canines had their crowns buccal, closer to occlusal plane and mesial to the distal border of the central incisor with greater than 45-degree buccal inclination and greater than 30-degree mesial tip. The sagittal angle can have a significant impact on the severity of impaction. A new classification system was proposed to quantify severity.

Short-term and long-term effects of miniscrew-assisted and conventional rapid palatal expansion on the cranial and circummaxillary sutures.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to analyze the short-term and long-term effects of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) and conventional rapid palatal expansion (RPE) appliances on cranial and circummaxillary sutures as compared with a matched control group. METHODS: One hundred and eighty cone-beam computed tomography scans for 60 subjects were evaluated for the 3 groups: (1) MARPE (n = 20; aged 13.7 ± 1.74 years), (2) RPE (n = 21; age 13.9 ± 1.14 years), and (3) control (n = 19; age 13.3 ± 1.49 years) at pretreatment (T1), postexpansion (T2), and posttreatment (T3) (T1 to T3: MARPE, 2 years 8 months; RPE, 2 years 9 months; control, 2 years 7 months). Frontonasal suture, frontomaxillary suture, zygomaticomaxillary suture, zygomaticofrontal suture, intermaxillary suture, pterygomaxillary suture, nasomaxillary suture, and zygomaticotemporal suture were measured on the right and left sides for all 3 time labels. In addition, midpalatal suture was measured at the incisor, canine, and molar levels. RESULTS: Within-group analysis showed that MARPE and RPE led to a significant increase in the widths of frontonasal, frontomaxillary, intermaxillary, nasomaxillary, and midpalatal suture at incisor, canine, and molar levels at T2 compared with T1. Between-group analysis showed that MARPE and RPE significantly increased the width of the intermaxillary and midpalatal suture at the incisor, canine, and molar compared with controls at T2. In the long term, between-group comparisons showed no significant difference among the 3 groups except that MARPE led to a significant increase in the width of midpalatal suture at incisor, canine, and molar levels compared with RPE and controls at T3. CONCLUSIONS: MARPE led to a significant increase in the width of the midpalatal suture at incisor, canine, and molar levels compared with RPE and controls in the long term. There was no difference in the width of other cranial and circummaxillary sutures among the 3 groups in the long term.

Assessment of clear aligner accuracy of 2 clear aligners systems.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared treatment efficacy for specific tooth movements between 2 clear aligner systems (Clarity [3M Oral Care Solutions, St Paul, Minn] and Invisalign [Align Technology, San Jose, Calif]). METHODS: The study sample included 47 patients (7 males, 40 females; mean age, 36.57 ± 15.97 years) treated with Invisalign and 37 (4 males, 33 females; mean age, 34.30 ± 16.35 years) treated with Clarity aligners who completed their first set of aligners and had an initial refinement scan. Initial and predicted models were obtained from the initial simulated treatment plan. The first model of the refinement scan was labeled as achieved. SlicerCMF software (version 3.1; http://www.slicer.org) was used to superimpose the achieved and predicted digital models over the initial ones with regional superimposition on the relatively stable first molars. Nine hundred forty teeth in the Invisalign system were measured for horizontal, vertical, and angular movements and transverse width and compared with similar measurements of 740 teeth for the Clarity aligners. The deviation from the predicted was calculated and compared between both systems. RESULTS: The deviation achieved from the predicted was significant between the groups for the mandibular interpremolar and intercanine widths (P <0.05). Clarity aligners significantly undercorrected rotations compared with Invisalign for the mandibular first premolars, mandibular canines, maxillary canines, and maxillary central incisors. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the achieved vs predicted movements in the horizontal and vertical planes (P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of clear aligner therapy systems (Clarity and Invisalign) in treating mild and moderate malocclusions was comparable. Deviation of the achieved movements from the predicted was greatest for rotational and vertical movements.

How does alendronate affect orthodontic tooth movement in osteogenesis imperfecta: an in vivo study on a mice model.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of alendronate on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and bone modelling/remodelling in an osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) mice model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten-week-old male and female OI mice (Col1a2oim, n = 32) were divided into four groups: 1. Alendronate male (AM, n = 8), 2. Alendronate female (AF, n = 8), 3. saline male (SM, n = 8), and 4. saline female (SF, n = 8). The mice in all four groups received either Alendronate (0.05 mg/kg) or vehicle (saline 0.05 mg/kg) subcutaneously for 2 weeks prior to the placement of orthodontic spring. A nickel-titanium spring applying 3-5 cN of force was used to perform the OTM for 1 week. After 7 days of OTM, the OI mice were euthanized with CO2 inhalation and microfocus computed tomography and histological analyses were performed. RESULTS: AM and AF mice showed a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the rate of OTM compared with SM and SF mice, respectively. In addition, AM and AF mice showed a significant increase (P < 0.05) in the bone volume fraction (BVF) and tissue density (TD) compared with SM and SF mice. Histological analysis of haematoxylin-eosin staining revealed a hyalinization zone in AM and AF mice compared with SM and SF mice. Furthermore, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining indicated decreased number of osteoclasts in AM and AF mice compared with SM and SF mice. Picrosirius red staining showed, Alendronate treatment led to thick uniform and smooth morphology of collagen fibres as compared with saline group. Similarly, second harmony generation images also revealed thicker collagen fibres at the periodontal ligament (PDL)-cementum entheses and PDL-alveolar bone entheses in AM and AF mice compared with SM and SF mice. CONCLUSIONS: Alendronate led to a decrease in the rate of OTM, increase in BVF and TD, decrease in the number of osteoclasts, and smooth and thick collagen fibres compared with saline in both male and female OI mice.

Comparable Skeletal and Dental Movements Achieved Using Conventional and Surgery-First Techniques in Class III Patients.

PURPOSE: The surgery-first (SF) approach to orthognathic surgery has been proposed as a more efficient method to correct the dentofacial deformity. This study aimed to evaluate if the magnitude of skeletal and dental changes achieved in Class III patients treated with either conventional orthognathic surgery (COS) or SF techniques differ. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of Class III orthognathic surgery patients between January 2006 and May 2020 with available pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms was conducted at an academic institution. The primary predictor variable was surgery technique: COS or SF. Assessed outcome variables included cephalometric skeletal parameters: SNA, SNB, ANB, Wits Appraisal, Sn-GoGn, and FMA; and dental parameters: U1-SN, U1-NA (°), U1-NA (mm), L1-NB (°), L1-NB (mm), and overjet. Within-group posttreatment parameters were analyzed with paired t tests. Pretreatment, posttreatment, and between-group parameter changes were analyzed by 2-sided 2-sample independent t tests. Potential covariates, including gender, surgical procedure, previous conventional treatment, extractions (excluding 3rd molars), crowding, and midline discrepancy, were analyzed using Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Thirty-nine subjects were included in this study: 1) 21 COS (age: 20.9 ± 8.7 years) and 2) 18 SF (age: 19.6 ± 5.0 years). Cohorts were comparable (P > .05) for all analyzed covariates. COS showed statistically significant increases in L1-GoGn (3.31 ± 6.23°; P = .024), overjet (4.26 ± 3.99 mm; P < .001), ANB (3.5 ± 2.79°; P < .001), SNA (3.5 ± 1.85°; P < .001), and Wits Appraisal (3.78 ± 4.97 mm; P = .002). SF showed statistically significant increases in L1-GoGn (4.19 ± 4.85°; P = .002), L1-NB (3.08 ± 4.13°; P = .006), L1-NB (0.79 ± 1.35 mm; P = .023), overjet (5.82 ± 2.96 mm; P < .001), ANB (5.51 ± 3°; P < .001), SNA (4.13 ± 2.38°; P < .001), and Wits Appraisal (5.92 ± 3.42 mm; P < .001) and statistically significant decreases in U1-NA (-3.69 ± 7.35°; P = .048) and SNB (-1.38 ± 2.14°; P = .014). There were no statistically significant differences in skeletal or dental parameters between groups when adjusted for pretreatment levels of that parameter. The mean treatment duration was 38 months (standard deviation = 12.7) in COS and 17.6 months (standard deviation = 5.2) in SF. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that skeletal and dental changes between groups were not statistically different, despite an average 20-month difference in treatment duration. This suggests that either technique can be used to achieve comparable degrees of skeletal and dental movement in Class III patients.

Long-term effects on alveolar bone with bone-anchored and tooth-anchored rapid palatal expansion.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of bone-anchored and tooth-anchored expansion appliances on alveolar bone in vertical and horizontal dimensions, compared with controls, using cone-beam computed tomography. METHODS: We evaluated 180 cone-beam computed tomography scans for 60 patients at 3-time points: T1 (pretreatment), T2 (postexpansion), and T3 (posttreatment), for 3 groups: bone-anchored expansion appliance (BA), tooth-anchored expansion appliance (TA), and controls (T1-T3: BA, 2 years 8 months; TA, 2 years 9 months; control: 2 years 7 months). The intermolar width, molar angulation, palatal width, vertical buccal bone height, buccal bone thickness at the alveolar crest, and root apex were measured in the 3 groups at different time points. RESULTS: In the short term, both BA and TA led to a statistically significant increase in the intermolar width and vertical buccal bone loss after expansion compared with controls. Vertical buccal bone loss was significantly greater in TA than in BA. In addition, TA led to significantly increased molar angulation (buccal tipping) compared with controls at T2. There were no significant differences in the 3 groups in the long term except vertical buccal bone loss, which was significantly greater in TA than controls. A substantial correlation was found between molar angulation and vertical buccal bone loss, and a moderate negative correlation was found between intermolar width and buccal bone thickness at the alveolar crest at T3. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the treatment outcomes between the 3 groups in the long term except vertical buccal bone loss, which was significantly increased in the TA group compared with controls.

Variability associated with mandibular ramus area thickness and depth in subjects with different growth patterns, gender, and growth status.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the ramus bone parameters (ramus thickness and ramus depth) for miniscrew placement. An additional aim was to compare and contrast the ramus bone parameters in growing and nongrowing male and female subjects with hyperdivergent, normodivergent, hypodivergent facial types. METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography scans of 690 subjects were evaluated. They were classified in terms of growth status, gender, and facial type. Ramus thickness was measured as the distance from the outer (buccal) to the inner (lingual) aspects of the mandibular ramus. Ramus depth was measured as the distance from the anterior border of the ramus to the inferior alveolar nerve canal. The measurements for ramus thickness and ramus depth were performed at 3 different levels bilaterally: (1) occlusal plane (OP), (2) 5 mm above the occlusal plane (5OP), and (3) 10 mm above the occlusal plane (10OP). RESULTS: Males showed a significantly higher ramus thickness than females (P <0.05). Ramus thickness decreased significantly (P <0.05) as we moved superior from the level of OP to 5OP and 10OP in all 3 facial types in both females (growing and nongrowing) and males (growing and nongrowing). Growing females and growing males had significantly higher ramus thickness than nongrowing females and nongrowing males, respectively. Ramus depth increased as we moved higher from the OP to 10OP. Hyperdivergent facial type showed a significantly reduced ramus depth compared with hypodivergent and normodivergent facial type in growing and nongrowing males and females at all 3 locations, namely OP, 5OP, and 10OP (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Because of adequate ramus depth and ramus thickness, 5OP was considered the optimal insertion site for the placement of miniscrews. Patients with a hyperdivergent facial type showed significantly reduced ramus depth than hypodivergent and normodivergent facial types. Ramus thickness in males was significantly higher than in females in all facial types.

Long-term effects of conventional and miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion on root resorption.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to use cone-beam computed tomography to compare immediate and long-term effects of conventional and miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) appliances on root resorption in 2 treatment groups and a control group. METHODS: One hundred eighty cone-beam computed tomography images of 60 patients at 3 time points were assessed: initial, postexpansion, and debond. The patients were divided into 3 groups: control (n = 19), rapid palatal expansion (RPE) appliance (n = 21), and MARPE (n = 20). The period of initial to debond varied for the 3 groups: 2 years, 7 months for controls; 2 years, 9 months for RPE; and 2 years, 8 months for MARPE. The length of mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatal root of the maxillary first molar (1M); the buccal root of maxillary first premolar; and second premolar were measured. The inclination of the 1M, intercuspal width (ICW), interroot width (IRW), ICW/IRW ratio, maxillary skeletal width were measured in all 3 groups at different time points. RESULTS: Immediately after expansion, RPE and MARPE groups showed a significant increase in the molar inclination, ICW, ICW/IRW ratio, and maxillary skeletal width compared with controls at postexpansion. However, the long-term comparison did not show any significant difference for root resorption and expansion parameters between the 3 groups, except the ICW/IRW ratio, which was higher in MARPE than controls at debond. A significant negative association was observed between the length of the mesiobuccal root of 1M and molar inclination (ß = -0.025; 95% confidence interval, -0.050 to 0.0008; P <0.05). The expansion of ICW and IRW did not show a significant association with root resorption. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcomes showed no difference in the amount of root resorption between the RPE, MARPE, and control groups. Molar inclination showed a significant negative association with the length of the mesiobuccal root of the 1M.

Vitamin E enriched diet increases the rate of orthodontic tooth movement.

INTRODUCTION: Vitamin E is a popular antioxidant suggested to affect bone turnover. However, the effects of a vitamin E enriched diet on the rate of tooth movement are unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate tooth movement in rats receiving a vitamin E enriched diet. In addition, we examined bone remodeling in experimental and control rats. METHODS: Thirty-two 6-week-old male rats were divided into 4 groups: (1) group 1 (n = 8): orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) for 4 days + regular diet; (2) group 2 (n = 8): OTM for 14 days + regular diet; (3) group 3 (n = 8): OTM for 4 days + vitamin E diet; and (4) group 4 (n = 8) - OTM for 14 days + vitamin E diet. Maxillary alveolar bones and femurs of rats were analyzed by microcomputed tomography and histology. RESULTS: Rats fed a vitamin E diet presented an increased OTM rate at days 4 and 14. We found an increased number of osteoclasts and decreased bone volume in the vitamin E diet group at day 14 of OTM. In addition, there was increased expression of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in the alveolar bone of the vitamin E diet group. In contrast, there was no difference in bone remodeling in femurs or alveolar bone at the control side. CONCLUSIONS: We found that an enriched vitamin E diet increases the rate of OTM in rats, suggesting that vitamin E may be useful as an avenue to accelerate OTM.

Radiographic and histological assessment of root resorption associated with conventional and mini-screw assisted rapid palatal expansion: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate root resorption after maxillary expansion with conventional rapid palatal expansion (RPE) and mini-screw assisted rapid palatal expansion appliances (MARPE) using 2D and 3D radiographic methods and histologic methods of measuring root resorption. SEARCH METHODS AND SELECTION CRITERIA: A search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Web of Science, Global Index Medicus, Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov registry, ISRCTN Registry, National Research Register, OpenGrey, and the Trip Database was performed. The studies that had analysed root resorption after RPE or MARPE were selected for the systematic review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The database research, elimination of duplicate studies, data extraction, and risk of bias were performed by the authors independently and in duplication. This systematic review included prospective studies to evaluate root resorption following RPE after tooth-borne (TB), tooth-tissue borne (TTB), bone-borne (BB), and tooth-bone borne (TBB) expansion appliances. RESULTS: A total of 13 prospective trials (six randomized clinical trials and seven non-randomized prospective clinical trials) were identified for inclusion in this systematic review. Histological studies revealed that most teeth experience root resorption on the buccal surfaces after maxillary expansion. MARPE designs with BB and TBB expansion appliances were found to lead to reduced volumetric root resorption than conventional RPE using micro-computed tomography. However, one study using cone beam computed tomography showed no difference in the root resorption with MARPE and RPE designs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Maxillary expansion with RPE can lead to root resorption of maxillary posterior teeth. Root resorption occurs more frequently on buccal surfaces on maxillary posterior teeth. Limited evidence suggests that MARPE may lead to reduced root resorption than RPE. REGISTRATION: This systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews and interventions and reported according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO database (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; registration number: PROSPERO CRD42021271181).

Comparison of external apical root resorption with clear aligners and pre-adjusted edgewise appliances in non-extraction cases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the amount of external apical root resorption (EARR) observed during the orthodontic treatment with pre-adjusted edgewise appliance (PEA) or clear aligner therapy (CAT) and with 2D or 3D radiographic methods of measuring the root resorption. SEARCH STRATEGY AND SELECTION CRITERIA: A search of PubMed MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, LILACS, Web of Science, Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov registry, and the ISRCTN Registry was performed. Studies that have evaluated the amount of root resorption in non-extraction cases using CAT or PEA were selected for the systematic review. A meta-analysis was performed for the amount of root resorption of permanent maxillary incisors using PEA or CAT treatment modalities by either 2D or cone-beam computed tomography radiographic examination. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Database research, elimination of duplicate studies, data extraction, and risk of bias were performed by authors independently and in duplication. A random-effect meta-analysis followed by subgroup comparisons were performed to evaluate EARR. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies (4 were prospective and 12 were retrospective) were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. The mean root resorption for the permanent maxillary incisors was in the range from 0.25 to 1.13 mm (overall: 0.49 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24 to 0.75 mm). The mean root resorption difference between CAT and PEA was statistically significant (P < 0.05) for 12 but not for 21, 11, or 22. LIMITATIONS: One of the drawbacks is a lack of good quality prospective studies, specifically randomized clinical trials in the literature. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Neither PEA or CAT technique leads to clinically significant root resorption (1 mm) of the maxillary incisors. The amount of EARR of maxillary incisors is not significant in comparing two treatment modalities (PEA and CAT), except for 12, where the PEA group has significantly more EARR when compared to CAT. REGISTRATION: The protocol for this systematic review was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0 and was registered at PROSPERO database (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018113051). This systematic review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.

The effect of differential force system and minimal surgical intervention on orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to quantify the orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and orthodontically induced root resorption (OIRR) with differential force system in conjunction with minimal surgical insult. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 15-week-old, 48 male Wistar rats were used in the research and were randomly divided into six groups: 1. Group 1 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 8-g force; 2. Group 2 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 25-g force; 3. Group 3 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 100-g force; 4. Group 4 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 8-g force and alveolar decortications (ADs); 5. Group 5 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 25-g force and ADs; 6. Group 6 (8 Wistar rats): OTM for 14 days with 100-g force and ADs. A nickel-titanium spring was used to protract the molar mesially using maxillary incisors as an anchorage. ADs (minimal surgical insult) were done using a hand piece and a round bur, adjacent to the left first maxillary molar on the palatal alveolar bone. After 14 days of OTM, Wistar rats were killed and microfocus computed tomography and histological analysis were performed. RESULTS: The 100-g group showed significant increase (P < 0.05) in OTM. However, with ADs, the OTM was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in 8 and 100 g. In addition, with ADs, there is significant increase (P < 0.05) in OIRR and significant decrease (P < 0.05) in bone volume fraction. Histological quantification of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase indicated a significant increase (P < 0.05) in the number of osteoclasts with ADs when compared without ADs. CONCLUSIONS: Light force in conjunction with ADs are optimal to accelerate the OTM. Additionally, ADs increases the OIRR.

Raloxifene administration enhances retention in an orthodontic relapse model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Orthodontic relapse is a physiologic process that involves remodelling of the alveolar bone and principle periodontal ligament fibres. Raloxifene is an Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved selective oestrogen receptor modulator that inhibits systemic bone loss. In our study, we examined the effects of Raloxifene on alveolar bone modelling and orthodontic relapse in a rodent model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The efficacy of raloxifene was evaluated in 15-week-old male Wistar rats, 8 in each group (Control, Raloxifene, Raloxifene + 7-day relapse, Raloxifene + 14-day relapse) for a total of 42 days. All animals had 14 days of orthodontic tooth movement with a closed nickel-titanium coil spring tied from incisors to right first molar applying 5-8 gm of force. On the day of appliance removal, impression was taken with silicon material and the distance between first molar and second molar was filled with light-cured adhesive resin cement for retention phase. Raloxifene Retention, Raloxifene Retention + 7D, Raloxifene Retention + 14D groups received 14 daily doses of raloxifene (2.0 mg/kg/day) subcutaneously after orthodontic tooth movement during retention. After 14 days of retention, the retainer was removed and right first molar was allowed to relapse for a period of 14 days. Raloxifene injection continued for the Raloxifene + 14-day relapse group during relapse phase too. Control group received saline injections during retention. Animals were euthanized by CO2 inhalation. The outcome measure included percentage of relapse, bone volume fraction, tissue density, and histology analysis using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining and determining receptor activator of nuclear factor-кB-ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin expression. RESULTS: Raloxifene Retention + 14D group had significantly less (P < 0.05) orthodontic relapse when compared with other groups. There was a significant increase (P < 0.05) in bone volume fraction and tissue density in the Raloxifene Retention + 14D group when compared with other groups. Similarly, there was significant decrease in number of osteoclasts and RANKL expression in Raloxifene Retention + 14D group when compared with Raloxifene Retention + 7D group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Raloxifene could decrease post-orthodontic treatment relapse by decreasing bone resorption and indirectly enhancing bone formation.

Biomechanics of conventional and miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion.

Posterior Crossbite is a common condition resulting because of transverse maxillary deficiency. The growth of the craniofacial complex finishes first in the transverse dimension, followed by sagittal and vertical dimensions. Conventional rapid palatal expansion (RPE) appliances are commonly used to correct transverse maxillary deficiency. Although RPE is efficient in correcting posterior crossbite, it results in dental side effects such as buccal tipping of maxillary molars, root resorption, bone dehiscence, and relapse. Mini-implant-assisted RPE has been introduced to increase the skeletal effects of expansion especially in patients with increased maturation and greater interdigitation of midpalatal suture. This article will review the biomechanics of RPE and mini-implant-assisted RPE. Additionally, the different designs of MARPE and the long-term clinical effects of expansion appliances will also be discussed in detail.

Positional, morphologic, and volumetric differences in TMJ in unilateral posterior crossbites and controls: A retrospective CBCT study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate if there are any morphologic, positional, and volumetric differences in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of patients with unilateral posterior crossbite (UPC) compared to controls. Another objective was to analyse the discrepancy in the TMJ between the crossbite versus non-crossbite side in UPC versus right and left sides in controls. Additionally, this study aimed to evaluate the differences in the bone density at the masseteric insertion site at the angle of mandible in the UPC group and control group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two CBCTs were analysed with 66 patients in UPC group and 66 patients in control group (non-crossbite). Temporomandibular joint spaces - Anterior joint space (AJS), Superior joint space (SJS), Posterior joint space (PJS), Medial joint space (MJS), Middle joint space (MiJS), and Lateral joint space (LJS) were measured. Additionally, bone density at angle of mandible and volume of mandibular condyle were evaluated. The measurements were compared between the groups as well as between the crossbite and non-crossbite sides within the UPC group and between right and left sides within the control group. Furthermore, the associations between UPC and changes in TMJ regarding joint space availability, bone density, condylar head volume, and the effects of sex and age were evaluated using regression analysis. RESULTS: It was observed that UPC group showed a greater condylar volume, than the control group. Additionally, a larger mean discrepancy was observed between the crossbite side and non-crossbite side within the UPC group concerning condylar volume than controls. Concerning age, condylar volume was observed to be larger in adults than children. Adults showed significantly greater bone density and condylar volume than adolescents. Concerning sex, it was observed that males showed a larger SJS (right), MiJS, LJS, and bone density at the mandibular angle than females. CONCLUSION: There is a difference in the TMJ parameters particularly condylar volume in patients with UPC compared to controls.