Expert opinion on the use of contraception in people with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidance on the selection of appropriate contraception for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To address this gap, an expert-led consensus program developed recommendations to support clinicians in discussing family planning and contraception with women and men with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: A multidisciplinary steering committee (SC) of 13 international clinical experts led the program, supported by an extended faculty of 32 experts representing 18 countries. A modified Delphi methodology was used for decision-making and consensus-building. The SC drafted 15 clinical questions focused on patient-centered care, selection of contraception, and timing of stopping/starting contraception and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Statements addressing each question were drafted based on evaluation of published evidence and the experts' clinical experience. Consensus was reached if ⩾75% of respondents agreed (scoring 7-9 on a 9-point scale) with each recommendation. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 24 of 25 proposed recommendations, including how and when to discuss contraception, types and safety of contraceptives, and how to evaluate the most appropriate contraceptive options for specific patient groups, including those with significant disability or being treated with DMTs. CONCLUSION: These expert recommendations provide the first practical, relevant, and comprehensive guidance for clinicians on the selection of contraception in PwMS.

Endometriosis features and dienogest tolerability in women with depression: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Primary aim of this study was to investigate endometriosis characteristics of patients with psychiatric conditions or depression. The secondary aim was to study tolerability of dienogest in this context. METHODS: This observational case-control study included endometriosis data from patients visiting our clinic from 2015-2021. We collected information from patient charts and in phone interviews based on a structured survey. Patients with surgical confirmed endometriosis were included. RESULTS: 344 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: n = 255 no psychiatric disorder, n = 119 any psychiatric disorder and n = 70 depression. Patients with depression (EM-D, p=.018; p=.035) or psychiatric condition (EM-P, p=.020; p=.048) suffered more often from dyspareunia and dyschezia. EM-P patients had more often primary dysmenorrhoea with higher pain scores (p=.045). rASRM stage or localisation of lesions did not differ. EM-D and EM-P patients discontinued dienogest treatment more often related to worsening of mood (p= .001, p=.002). CONCLUSION: EM-D or EM-P had a higher prevalence of pain symptoms. This could not be attributed to differences in rASRM stage or location of endometriosis lesions. Strong primary dysmenorrhoea might predispose to develop chronic pain-based psychological symptoms. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment are relevant. Gynaecologist should be aware of the potential impact of dienogest on mood.

Women with endometriosis and psychiatric disorders especially have more dyschezia and dyspareunia, independent from rASRM stage, depth of infiltration and localisation of endometriosis lesions. Dienogest has an impact on mood especially in already prone patients.Trial registration: trial registration number: NCT04816357. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04816357Date of registration: 22.03.2021, date of enrolment of the first subject: 25.03.2021.

Migraine start, course and features over the cycle of combined hormonal contraceptive users with menstrual migraine - temporal relation to bleeding and hormone withdrawal: a prospective diary-based study.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have described the features of menstrually-related migraines (MRM) in the natural cycle and the efficacy of prevention. MRM in combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) users has scarcely been researched. Estrogen and progestin withdrawal in CHC users are both more abrupt and from higher hormone levels compared with the natural cycle. An advantage for prevention of MRM in CHC users is that the hormone withdrawal is predictable. It is unknown, whether the attacks during the hormone-free interval are associated with the hormone withdrawal or onset of bleeding. Improved understanding of this relation might contribute to better define and shorten the time interval for prevention. METHODS: For this prospective diary-based trial we collected migraine and bleeding data from CHC users with MRM in at least two of three cycles. We analyzed frequency of migraines over the whole CHC cycle. During the hormone-free phase the relation between onset of migraine and onset of bleeding was studied. We compared pain intensity and identified prolonged-migraine attacks during hormone use and the hormone-free phase. RESULTS: During the hormone-free interval the number of migraine days and the pain score/migraine day were significantly higher in comparison with the mean during hormone use. The prevalence of migraine attacks was fourfold on hormone-free days 3-6. Migraine typically started on days 1-4. Migraine in relation to bleeding mostly occurred on days - 1 to + 4. In 78% of the cycles the first migraine day occurred during bleeding days 1 ± 2 and 48% started on days - 1 and day 1. The predictability of the first bleeding day was very high. CONCLUSION: The day of hormone-withdrawal migraine and the first bleeding day are highly predictable in CHC users. Migraine onset is mostly day - 1 and 1 of the bleeding and on days 1-4 of the hormone-free interval. Migraine attacks of CHC users in the hormone-free interval are severe and long lasting. Further trials are necessary to investigate if this knowledge can be used to optimise prevention.

Effect of desogestrel 75 µg on headache frequency and intensity in women with migraine: a prospective controlled trial.

Objective: In contrast with combined hormonal contraception, progestin-only contraception is not associated with an increase in venous thromboembolism or stroke. Women with migraine are at increased risk of ischaemic stroke. Several studies have reported a reduction in migraine frequency and intensity with desogestrel 75 µg, a progestin-only pill. At present the quality of data is limited by retrospective study designs, lack of control groups and small sample sizes. We present the first prospective nonrandomised controlled trial. Methods: A total of 150 women with migraine visiting our clinic for contraceptive counselling were screened. The intervention group comprised women who opted for contraception with desogestrel (n = 98); the control group comprised women who continued their usual contraceptive (n = 36). Participants completed daily diaries for 90 days before the intervention and 180 days after the intervention. Results: In the intervention group, we found improvements in migraine frequency (p < .001), migraine intensity (p < .001) and the number of triptans used (p < .001). These improvements were already significant after 90 days of desogestrel use (p < .001). Disability scores also decreased significantly. No improvement was seen in the nonintervention group. Conclusion: These data demonstrate for the first time in a prospective controlled setting that daily use of the progestin desogestrel is associated with a decrease in migraine frequency, migraine intensity and pain medication use in women with migraine, with and without aura, who had previously been experiencing at least three days of migraine per month. Trial registration: The study is registered in the University of Zürich database ( www.research-projects.uzh.ch/unizh.htm ).

Effectiveness of the progestin-only pill for migraine treatment in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background Migraine is highly prevalent in women (18%). Peak morbidity affects their most productive years, coinciding with peak fertility. Hormonal contraception is often tailored for migraine prevention. Estrogen-containing contraceptives may be contraindicated in women experiencing migraine with aura due to the risk of vascular events. While improvements in migraine with a progestin-only pill (POP), which inhibits ovulation are documented, the strength and quality of evidence has not been formally evaluated. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of progestin-only contraceptives for migraine treatment by systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources and selection MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Libraries were searched (1980 to September 2016) for studies on progestin-only treatments for migraine. Studies in English on >4 non-menopausal women aged 18-50 with migraine diagnosed by formal criteria were included. Data extraction and analysis Data were quality-assessed using the GRADE system. A random effects model was used for pooled analyses. Results Pooled analyses of four studies demonstrated that desogestrel 75 mcg/day, POP significantly but modestly reduced the number of migraine attacks and migraine days. Reduced intensity and duration, reduced analgesic and triptan use were observed, along with improved headache-related quality of life. GRADE analysis indicated evidence was low to very low for each outcome measure. Adverse effects resulted in treatment cessation for <10% of participants. Two studies compared desogestrel POP to a combined oral contraceptive, demonstrating similar migraine outcomes for both treatments. Conclusions The desogestrel POP shows promise in improving migraine in women. Current evidence is observational and based on small samples of women using only one oral progestin-only formulation. Further randomized trials on additional progestin-only contraceptives are required to confirm their role in migraine management.

Correction to: Hormonal contraceptives and risk of ischemic stroke in women with migraine: a consensus statement from the European Headache Federation (EHF) and the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health (ESC).

Following the publication of this article [1], the authors noticed that they incorrectly reported the Absolute risk of ischemic stroke in women aged 20 to 44 years in relation to the use of hormonal contraception and migraine status due to a miscalculation. They apologize for this misreported result.

Effect of exogenous estrogens and progestogens on the course of migraine during reproductive age: a consensus statement by the European Headache Federation (EHF) and the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health (ESCRH).

We systematically reviewed data about the effect of exogenous estrogens and progestogens on the course of migraine during reproductive age. Thereafter a consensus procedure among international experts was undertaken to develop statements to support clinical decision making, in terms of possible effects on migraine course of exogenous estrogens and progestogens and on possible treatment of headache associated with the use or with the withdrawal of hormones. Overall, quality of current evidence is low. Recommendations are provided for all the compounds with available evidence including the conventional 21/7 combined hormonal contraception, the desogestrel only oral pill, combined oral contraceptives with shortened pill-free interval, combined oral contraceptives with estradiol supplementation during the pill-free interval, extended regimen of combined hormonal contraceptive with pill or patch, combined hormonal contraceptive vaginal ring, transdermal estradiol supplementation with gel, transdermal estradiol supplementation with patch, subcutaneous estrogen implant with cyclical oral progestogen. As the quality of available data is poor, further research is needed on this topic to improve the knowledge about the use of estrogens and progestogens in women with migraine. There is a need for better management of headaches related to the use of hormones or their withdrawal.

Improvement of migraine with change from combined hormonal contraceptives to progestin-only contraception with desogestrel: How strong is the effect of taking women off combined contraceptives?

Migraine is a disabling headache disorder, which affects up to 17% of the female population. Oestrogen withdrawal during the menstrual cycle or the hormone-free interval in users of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) plays a pivotal role. Two diary-based studies demonstrated a positive impact of the progestin-only pill (POP) desogestrel 75 µg on the frequency of the migraine attacks and pain intensity. In both studies, CHC users as well as nonusers were included, which makes it difficult to distinguish between the effect of taking women off the CHC and the benefit of the POP itself. With the present study, we compared the therapeutic effect of the POP desogestrel 75 µg on migraine in current CHC users and nonusers. We found a positive influence of desogestrel on migraine not only in women who switched from CHCs to desogestrel, but also in those who had not used hormones over 6 months before starting it. Our findings need to be confirmed in prospectively conducted studies with larger sample size.

Temporal relations in hormone-withdrawal migraines and impact on prevention- a diary-based pilot study in combined hormonal contraceptive users.

BACKGROUND: Menstrually related migraine (MRM) in the hormone-free interval (HFI) of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) are according to the ICHD definition also estrogen withdrawal migraines (EWH). MRMs are less responsive to acute medication. Therefore short-term prevention, initiated 1-2 days before onset of the anticipated bleeding and continued for 6 days, is recommended. Such a long prophylactic triptan use might increase the risk for medication overuse headache in women suffering in addition from non-menstrual migraines. In CHC users onset of hormone decline is predictable. It is however unknown, whether the EWHs are rather associated with onset of hormone withdrawal or onset of bleeding. Improved understanding of this relation might contribute to better define and shorten the time interval for prevention. METHODS: For this observational diary-based pilot study we collected data from daily conducted headache diaries of CHC users with MRM in at least two of three cycles, visiting our clinic from 2009 to 2015. We analyzed frequency of migraines for each hormone free day, onset of migraine, onset of bleeding and the relation of migraine to onset of bleeding in the 7-day period following estrogen withdrawal. We identified in addition the onset of migraine attacks lasting more than 1 day (episodes). RESULTS: Forty patient charts met the inclusion criteria, what allowed us to analyze 103 cycles. The mean number of migraine days in the HFI was 2.2 ± 1.6. Migraine started typically on days 1-5 and bleeding on days 3-5. In relation to first day of bleeding, migraines started on days -1 to 4. Almost half of the migraine attacks lasted longer than 24 h, despite the use of rescue medication. CONCLUSION: MRM in CHC users starts on bleeding days -1 to 4, what differs from findings in the natural cycle. Referring to the HFI interval migraine started mostly on days 1-5. According to these data, it seems to be reasonable to initiate short-term prevention at the last day of pill use or the first day of the HFI and continue for 5 days.

Hormonal contraceptives and risk of ischemic stroke in women with migraine: a consensus statement from the European Headache Federation (EHF) and the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health (ESC).

Several data indicate that migraine, especially migraine with aura, is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke and other vascular events. Of concern is whether the risk of ischemic stroke in migraineurs is magnified by the use of hormonal contraceptives. As migraine prevalence is high in women of reproductive age, it is common to face the issue of migraine and hormonal contraceptive use in clinical practice. In this document, we systematically reviewed data about the association between migraine, ischemic stroke and hormonal contraceptive use. Thereafter a consensus procedure among international experts was done to develop statements to support clinical decision making, in terms of cardiovascular safety, for prescription of hormonal contraceptives to women with migraine. Overall, quality of current evidence regarding the risk of ischemic stroke in migraineurs associated with the use of hormonal contraceptives is low. Available data suggest that combined hormonal contraceptive may further increase the risk of ischemic stroke in those who have migraine, specifically migraine with aura. Thus, our current statements privilege safety and provide several suggestions to try to avoid possible risks. As the quality of available data is poor further research is needed on this topic to increase safe use of hormonal contraceptives in women with migraine.

Proposal to inform European institutions regarding the regulation of conscientious objection to abortion.

The aim of this paper is to define a set of proposals to inform European institutions in the regulation of Conscientious Objection to abortion. The board of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care (ESC) was informed on the elements that should in the opinion of the authors be included in a future regulation of Conscientious Objection to abortion in Europe. These elements are outlined in this paper and the debate about them could form the basis for recommendations to the international scientific community and the European institutions. As current measures governing the principle of conscientious objection result in negative consequences regarding women's access to sexual and reproductive health services, they should be changed. Healthcare services should adopt measures to guarantee that a woman's right to voluntary abortion is not limited by the practitioner's stance on the principle of conscientious objection. In the countries where conscientious objection is allowed, the regulation must clearly delineate the extent of the duties and the exemptions of professionals based on the principles of established social consensus. The recommendations included in this document specify measures on the rights of women, the rights and duties of the practitioner, the role of institutions and the role of professional associations.

European society of contraception statement on contraception in obese women.

The obesity 'epidemic' continues to increase, mostly but not only in developed countries. As overweight and obese women are at an increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) at baseline and at a much higher risk during pregnancy, it is essential to help these women to plan pregnancies carefully and to use contraceptives with a positive ratio of benefits versus risks. The Expert Group on hormonal and molecular contraception of the European Society of Contraception convened to review the existing evidence and propose recommendations to the prescribers in line with most recent studies and with the Medical Eligibility Criteria of the World Health Organisation.

Positive effects of the progestin desogestrel 75 µg on migraine frequency and use of acute medication are sustained over a treatment period of 180 days.

BACKGROUND: Premenopausal migraines frequently are associated with fluctuations of estrogen levels. Both, migraine and combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) increase the risk of vascular events. Therefore progestagen-only contraceptives (POC) are a safer alternative. A previous short-term study demonstrated a positive impact of the oral POC desogestrel on migraine frequency. To study the effect of the POC desogestrel 75 µg on migraine frequency, intensity, use of acute medication and quality of life in a clinical setting over the period of 180 days. METHODS: Patients' charts were screened for women with migraine, who had decided to use desogestrel for contraception. Charts were included, if routinely conducted headache diaries were complete for 90 days before treatment (baseline) and over a treatment period of 180 days. We also report about starters who stopped treatment early, because of adverse events. Baseline data (day 1-90 before treatment) were compared with first and second treatment period (treatment days 1-90 and days 91-180). Quality of life was evaluated using MIDAS questionnaires. RESULTS: Days with migraine (5.8 vs 3.6), with any kind of headache (9.4 vs 6.6), headache intensity (15.7 vs 10.7), days with severe headache (5.4 vs 2.4) and use of triptans (12.3 vs7.8) were significantly reduced after 180 days. MIDAS score and grade improved significantly. CONCLUSION: Contraception with desogestrel 75 µg resulted in a significantly improved quality of life and a reduction of migraine days over the observation period of 180 days. A clinically meaningful 30% reduction in pain was observed in 25/42 (60%) participants. For counselling reasons it is of importance, that the major reduction in migraine frequency occured during the initial 90 days, however further improvement occurs with longer duration of use. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

A survey on Swiss women's preferred menstrual/withdrawal bleeding pattern over different phases of reproductive life and with use of hormonal contraception.

BACKGROUND: Today, options for bleeding-free lifestyle are actively promoted by the media, the pharmaceutical industry and health specialists. With regard to contraceptive counselling it is important to find out what women really want. METHODS: In the present study we collected information on women's attitudes towards monthly bleeding and preferences, if they could have the option to modify their individual bleeding pattern. Furthermore we evaluated the preferences with use of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs). Switzerland has never been surveyed before with regard to these issues. Questionnaires were distributed in our family planning clinic and two outdoor offices to clients aged 15 to 19 years, 25 to 34 years, and 45 to 49 years. RESULTS: Of 530 questionnaires, 292 were eligible for analysis. Around 50 of the participants would appreciate having fewer menstrual period-related symptoms. Some 37% preferred experiencing a monthly bleeding; 32% opted for every 2 to 6 months; and 29%, for no bleeding at all. This heterogeneous distribution did not differ between clients with and without menstrual symptoms. With regard to CHC use, predictable bleeding was rated as very positive and breakthrough bleeding as negative. CONCLUSION: Contraceptive counsellors should be aware that women's wishes differ widely. Predictability of bleeding seems to be more important to them than postponing it.

Headache frequency and intensity in female migraineurs using desogestrel-only contraception: a retrospective pilot diary study.

BACKGROUND: Migraine seems to be substantially related to hormonal changes. However, migraine, but also the use of combined oral contraceptives (COC), is associated with an increased risk for vascular events. Therefore progestagen-only contraception is an important alternative to combined preparations. Clinical observations and one pilot study demonstrate that the use of desogestrel 75 µg may have a positive impact on migraine. AIM: The aim of this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected headache diaries was to study the effect of desogestrel 75 µg on headache frequency, intensity and use of acute medication in premenopausal women with migraine in a clinical setting. METHODS: Patients' charts were included from women who wanted to use desogestrel 75 µg as a contraceptive and had kept headache diaries over six months (three months pretreatment and three months during treatment). Out of 58 women, 38 women had completed headache diaries for this period. Incomplete diaries ( N = 12), side effects ( N = 5) and loss to follow-up ( N = 3) were the reasons for the exclusion of 20 women. The three months (total of 90 days) before and after initiation of the progestin were compared. RESULTS: Days with migraine (5.2 vs. 3.7), days with all kind of headache (8.3 vs. 6.5) and days with use of any headache medication (5.7 vs. 3.5) were significantly reduced at follow-up after three months. In addition there was a reduction in headache intensity ( P < 0.0001). The reduction in number of days with use of triptans was not significant ( P < 0.14). CONCLUSION: In the 38/58 migraineurs with complete diaries there was a statistically significant decrease in migraine days, headache intensity and medication use. Tension-type headache days decreased but were not significant. Our preliminary data are promising, but should be interpreted cautiously because they were obtained in a small population of women visiting a specialty hormone and migraine clinic. Randomised controlled trials need to be conducted to substantiate our results.

Desogestrel-only contraception may reduce headache frequency and improve quality of life in women suffering from migraine.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effects of a three-month course of progestogen-only contraception with desogestrel 75 µg on disability, headache frequency and headache intensity in migraineurs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Migraine disability headache questionnaires (MIDAS) were collected from 37 migraineurs during counselling, and at the end of three months treatment with desogestrel. Another ten women initiated but did not complete treatment. They are included in the overall evaluations of the effect of the regimen on migraine status. RESULTS: Desogestrel was associated with significant reductions in headache days and intensity (p < 0.001; p < 0.006), and a significant improvement in quality of life. Days missed at work and days missing leisure activities diminished (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). The MIDAS migraine disability score improved significantly (from 27.4 to 11.1 points) (p < 0.001). While 25 of the 37 women (68%) experienced a decrease of at least one grade, this level of benefit cannot be extrapolated to all initiators. When dropouts are considered, MIDAS grades decrease in 53% (25/47) of the cases. CONCLUSION: The majority of migraineurs experienced a clinically significant reduction in headache frequency and improvement of quality of life with use of desogestrel. Prospective randomised controlled trials are needed to substantiate our results.

Hormonal contraception in women with migraine: is progestogen-only contraception a better choice?

A significant number of women with migraine has to face the choice of reliable hormonal contraception during their fertile life. Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) may be used in the majority of women with headache and migraine. However, they carry a small, but significant vascular risk, especially in migraine with aura (MA) and, eventually in migraine without aura (MO) with additional risk factors for stroke (smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and thrombophilia, age over 35 years). Guidelines recommend progestogen-only contraception as an alternative safer option because it does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and ischemic stroke. Potentially, the maintenance of stable estrogen level by the administration of progestins in ovulation inhibiting dosages may have a positive influence of nociceptive threshold in women with migraine. Preliminary evidences based on headache diaries in migraineurs suggest that the progestin-only pill containing desogestrel 75µg has a positive effect on the course of both MA and MO in the majority of women, reducing the number of days with migraine, the number of analgesics and the intensity of associated symptoms. Further prospective trials have to be performed to confirm that progestogen-only contraception may be a better option for the management of both migraine and birth control. Differences between MA and MO should also be taken into account in further studies.

Endometriosis Features in Women With and Without Migraine.

Background: This study examines endometriosis (EM) features in women with EM and migraines (MG) (EM-MG) and women with EM alone (EM-O). The comorbidity of MG and EM is well known. However, knowledge about differences in symptoms, clinical manifestations, and severity of EM between EM-MG and EM-O is scarce. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study of premenopausal patients with biopsy-confirmed EM treated in our department from 2015 to 2021. All patients underwent surgical treatment for EM. Information about infiltration depth and localization of EM was available. We interviewed patients using a structured questionnaire that includes questions about clinical characteristics, symptoms, and treatment history. We reported categorical variables as frequencies and continuous variables as means with standard deviations. We compared subgroups (EM-MG vs. EM-O) using an independent sample t-test, the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test. The significance level was 0.05. Results: We included 344 participants: 250 with EM-O and 94 with EM-MG. EM-MG had less severe revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine scores (p = 0.023), more deliveries (p = 0.009), more and higher scores of dysmenorrhea at menarche (p = 0.044; p = 0.036), prolonged heavy menstrual bleeding (p = 0.009), more and prolonged pain during menstrual bleeding (p = 0.011, p = 0.039), and more dyschezia (p < 0.001) compared with EM-O. Conclusion: Migraineurs experienced more intense EM symptoms at lower EM stages. This discrepancy strongly indicates pain sensitizations and a lower pain threshold in patients with EM-MG. Knowledge about EM features allows early diagnosis and treatment of women with potential EM-MG, both highly disabling conditions. Clinical Trials.gov (NCT04816357).

Intention to use a combined contraceptive method and decision after counselling in Switzerland--Swiss data from the European CHOICE study.

BACKGROUND: Considering the advantages of parenteral routes of administration of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs), their low prevalence of use in Europe is surprising. The Contraceptive health research of informed choice experience (CHOICE) study involved 11 European countries. It aimed at evaluating the influence of counselling on users' choice between three modalities of CHC administration (the pill, the transdermal patch, and the vaginal ring). We report here the results for Switzerland. STUDY DESIGN: Women (N = 2629) with a need for contraception received extended counselling. Questionnaires were used to collect data about the women's preferred method before and after counselling, and the reasons for their ultimate decision. RESULTS: After counselling, 40% of the women chose a contraceptive method that was different from the one initially intended. The number of vaginal ring users (28% vs. 11% intended) and patch users (7% vs. 4% intended) increased (p < 0.0001). Of the initially undecided women, 93% chose a contraceptive method after counselling. However, although information was provided on the risks, side effects and benefits associated with the different contraceptive methods, surprisingly few women retained this knowledge. CONCLUSION: The provision of balanced information on all CHCs influenced women's decisions to a great extent. Unlike the pill, non-oral methods were significantly more often chosen.

Six years after deregulation of emergency contraception in Switzerland: has free access induced changes in the profile of clients attending an emergency pharmacy in Zürich?

OBJECTIVES: Emergency contraception (EC) has been freely accessible in Swiss pharmacies since November 2002. Today some groups are still concerned that free access might result in less use of efficient contraceptive methods, overuse and more risky sexual behaviour. METHODS: Profiles of EC users one and six years after deregulation were analysed with regard to age, contraceptive methods used, reasons for EC use, and last contact with a gynaecologist. Data were collected from a centrally located pharmacy. Written official assessment forms concerning 1500 women (750 in 2004 and 750 in 2009) were analysed. RESULTS: Free access to EC use had no impact on regular contraceptive behaviour. The percentage of pill and condom users was very high (85%). The percentage of EC-users without any contraception (17-18%) was the same over the years. In 2009, condom rupture was reported more frequently (p < 0.001). In addition significantly more women had used EC previously in their history. CONCLUSION: Free access to EC has not resulted in less use of efficient contraceptive methods. In the context of falling abortion rates our results are reassuring. This also applies to adolescents, who mainly used EC as a back-up method and seldom in the context of unprotected intercourse.