Maternal and neonatal data collection systems in low- and middle-income countries for maternal vaccines active safety surveillance systems: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Most post-licensure vaccine pharmacovigilance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are passive reporting systems. These have limited utility for maternal immunization pharmacovigilance in LMIC settings and need to be supplemented with active surveillance. Our study's main objective was to identify existing perinatal data collection systems in LMICs that collect individual information on maternal and neonatal health outcomes and could be developed to inform active safety surveillance of novel vaccines for use during pregnancy. METHODS: A scoping review was performed following the Arksey and O'Malley six-stage approach. We included studies describing electronic or mixed paper-electronic data collection systems in LMICs, including research networks, electronic medical records, and custom software platforms for health information systems. Medline PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Bibliography of Asian Studies (BAS), and CINAHL were searched through August 2019. We also searched grey literature including through Google and websites of existing relevant perinatal data collection systems, as well as contacted authors of key studies and experts in the field to validate the information and identify additional sources of relevant unpublished information. RESULTS: A total of 11,817 records were identified. The full texts of 264 records describing 96 data collection systems were assessed for eligibility. Eight perinatal data collection systems met our inclusion criteria: Global Network's Maternal Newborn Health Registry, International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and their Health; Perinatal Informatic System; Pregnancy Exposure Registry & Birth Defects Surveillance; SmartCare; Open Medical Record System; Open Smart Register Platform and District Health Information Software 2. These selected systems were qualitatively characterized according to seven different domains: governance; system design; system management; data management; data sources, outcomes and data quality. CONCLUSION: This review provides a list of active maternal and neonatal data collection systems in LMICs and their characteristics as well as their outreach, strengths, and limitations. Findings could potentially help further understand where to obtain population-based high-quality information on outcomes to inform the conduct of maternal immunization active vaccine safety surveillance activities and research in LMICs.

Stillbirth With Group B Streptococcus Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.

BACKGROUND: There are an estimated 2.6 million stillbirths each year, many of which are due to infections, especially in low- and middle-income contexts. This paper, the eighth in a series on the burden of group B streptococcal (GBS) disease, aims to estimate the percentage of stillbirths associated with GBS disease. METHODS: We conducted systematic literature reviews (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, World Health Organization Library Information System, and Scopus) and sought unpublished data from investigator groups. Studies were included if they reported original data on stillbirths (predominantly ≥28 weeks' gestation or ≥1000 g, with GBS isolated from a sterile site) as a percentage of total stillbirths. We did meta-analyses to derive pooled estimates of the percentage of GBS-associated stillbirths, regionally and worldwide for recent datasets. RESULTS: We included 14 studies from any period, 5 with recent data (after 2000). There were no data from Asia. We estimated that 1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-2%) of all stillbirths in developed countries and 4% (95% CI, 2%-6%) in Africa were associated with GBS. CONCLUSIONS: GBS is likely an important cause of stillbirth, especially in Africa. However, data are limited in terms of geographic spread, with no data from Asia, and cases worldwide are probably underestimated due to incomplete case ascertainment. More data, using standardized, systematic methods, are critical, particularly from low- and middle-income contexts where the highest burden of stillbirths occurs. These data are essential to inform interventions, such as maternal GBS vaccination.

Meeting report: CEPI consultation on accelerating access to novel vaccines against emerging infectious diseases for pregnant and lactating women, London, 12-13 February 2020.

Infectious diseases may cause serious morbidity and mortality in pregnant women, their foetuses, and infants; the risk associated with any newly emerging infectious disease (EID) is likely unknown at the time of its emergence. While the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic shows that the development of vaccines against new pathogens can be considerably accelerated, the immunization of pregnant women generally lags behind the general population. Guided by the priority pathogen list for WHO's R&D Blueprint for Action to Prevent Epidemics, this workshop sought to define the evidence needed for use of vaccines against EIDs in pregnant and lactating women, using Lassa fever as a model. Close to 60 maternal immunization (MI) and vaccine safety experts, regulators, vaccine developers, Lassa fever experts, and investigators from Lassa-affected countries examined the critical steps for vaccine development and immunization decisions for pregnant and lactating women. This paper reports on key themes and recommendations from the workshop. Current practice still assumes the exclusion of pregnant women from early vaccine trials. A shift in paradigm is needed to progress towards initial inclusion of pregnant women in Phase 2 and 3 trials. Several practical avenues were delineated. Participants agreed that vaccine platforms should be assessed early for their suitability for maternal immunization. It was noted that, in some cases, nonclinical data derived from assessing a given platform using other antigens may be adequate evidence to proceed to a first clinical evaluation and that concurrence from regulators may be sought with supporting rationale. For clinical trials, essential prerequisites such as documenting the disease burden in pregnant women, study site infrastructure, capabilities, and staff experience were noted. Early and sustained communication with the local community was considered paramount in any program for the conduct of MI trials and planned vaccine introduction.

Safety and immunogenicity of an investigational maternal trivalent group B streptococcus vaccine in healthy women and their infants: a randomised phase 1b/2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Maternal group B streptococcus (GBS) serotype-specific capsular antibody concentrations are correlated with susceptibility to neonatal GBS invasive disease. Maternal immunisation against GBS during pregnancy might protect infants across the period of susceptibility to invasive disease, but no licensed vaccine exists. This study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a CRM197-conjugated trivalent GBS vaccine in non-pregnant and pregnant women, and antibody transfer to their infants. METHODS: We did a phase 1b/2, randomised, observer-blind single-centre study of an investigational trivalent GBS vaccine in healthy non-pregnant women (cohort 1), and a dose-ranging study in healthy pregnant women (cohort 2). The study was done at the Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital in Soweto, South Africa. Participants were healthy non-pregnant or pregnant (28-35 weeks' gestation) women aged 18-40 years. In cohort 1, non-pregnant women were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive the investigational vaccine (two injections, 1 month apart, of a 20 µg dose [of each serotype] of aluminium hydroxide-adjuvanted investigational vaccine) or placebo. In cohort 2, pregnant women were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive one injection at 28-35 weeks' gestation of 0·5 µg, 2·5 µg, or 5·0 µg of the non-adjuvanted investigational vaccine (for each serotype), or placebo. All study participants and study staff not involved with vaccine preparation were masked to the randomisation group. The vaccine contained an equal dose (0·5 µg, 2·5 µg, 5·0 µg, or 20 µg) of each of three glycoconjugates (serotypes Ia, Ib and III). Reactogenicity was monitored to day 7 and unsolicited adverse events (adverse events) and infant safety were recorded throughout the study. The primary outcomes were tolerability and GBS-specific antibody response (measured as geometric mean concentrations [GMCs] in µg/mL) following the two injections for cohort 1, and selection of one vaccine dose based on analysis of serotype-specific antibody responses at delivery (+72 h) for use in subsequent studies. These outcomes were assessed in participants or infants of participants who correctly received the study vaccine with no major protocol deviations, and provided evaluable serum samples at day 1 and the scheduled timepoints throughout the study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01193920. FINDINGS: Between Oct 5, 2010, and Sept 21, 2011, we screened 75 non-pregnant and 417 pregnant healthy South African women. Of these, 60 non-pregnant women were enrolled in cohort 1 (40 randomly assigned to the GBS 20 µg group and 40 randomly assigned to the placebo group) and 320 pregnant women were enrolled in cohort 2 (80 in each of the four groups). Among the randomised groups of pregnant women, 33-40% experienced at least one local and 54-71% one systemic solicited adverse event, less than 4% of which were severe, and the rate did not differ by study group. Also, 2% of the pregnancies resulted in stillbirth and 3·5% of the liveborn babies died by 12 months age, none of these deaths were attributed to vaccination. There was one death in a GBS-vaccine recipient, which too was unrelated to vaccination. For cohort 1, serotype-specific antibody concentrations were significantly higher, as evident by no overlap of the 95% CIs of GMCs against all three serotypes in the vaccinated group than the placebo group. For cohort 2, pregnant women in all vaccine groups had significantly higher GMCs than did those in the placebo group at delivery (eg, GMCs against serotype Ia were 11 µg/mL [95% CI 7·0-18] for the GBS vaccine 0·5 µg group, 18 µg/mL [11-29] for the GBS vaccine 2·5 µg group, 22 µg/mL [13-35] for the GBS vaccine 5·0 µg group, and 0·64 µg/mL [0·42-0·98] for the placebo group) and at all measured timepoints. GMCs did not differ significantly between the vaccine doses at any of the measured timepoints (p>0·05). INTERPRETATION: The vaccine was well tolerated and induced capsular-specific antibody responses, in non-pregnant and pregnant women. Maternal vaccination led to higher GBS serotype-specific antibody concentrations in infants than did placebo, with both interventions resulting in similar safety profiles. FUNDING: Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics division, now part of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies.

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for Newborn Infection (STROBE-NI): an extension of the STROBE statement for neonatal infection research.

Neonatal infections are estimated to account for a quarter of the 2·8 million annual neonatal deaths, as well as approximately 3% of all disability-adjusted life-years. Despite this burden, few data are available on incidence, aetiology, and outcomes, particularly regarding impairment. We aimed to develop guidelines for improved scientific reporting of observational neonatal infection studies, to increase comparability and to strengthen research in this area. This checklist, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for Newborn Infection (STROBE- NI), is an extension of the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) statement. STROBE-NI was developed following systematic reviews of published literature (1996-2015), compilation of more than 130 potential reporting recommendations, and circulation of a survey to relevant professionals worldwide, eliciting responses from 147 professionals from 37 countries. An international consensus meeting of 18 participants (with expertise in infectious diseases, neonatology, microbiology, epidemiology, and statistics) identified priority recommendations for reporting, additional to the STROBE statement. Implementation of these STROBE-NI recommendations, and linked checklist, aims to improve scientific reporting of neonatal infection studies, increasing data utility and allowing meta-analyses and pathogen-specific burden estimates to inform global policy and new interventions, including maternal vaccines.

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal disease remains an important health priority despite successful implementation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) in infant immunization programs, mainly due to the emergence of diseases caused by serotypes not included in licensed PCVs. A 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-15) containing the 7 serotypes (4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F) included in licensed PCV-7 available at study initiation plus 8 additional serotypes (1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F, 19A, 22F, 33F) was developed and evaluated in healthy adults 18-45 years of age. METHODS: Sixty subjects received one dose of PCV-15 or PCV-7. Injection-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) were collected for 14-days postvaccination and serious AEs were collected for 30-days postvaccination. Safety laboratory tests (hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis) were evaluated prior to vaccination and 14-days postvaccination. Serotype-specific IgG and opsonophagocytic killing activity (OPA) responses to 15 serotypes included in PCV-15 were measured immediately prior to vaccination and 30-days postvaccination. RESULTS: AE incidences were comparable between vaccine groups although numerically higher frequencies of erythema (33.3% versus 13.3%), swelling (50.0% versus 23.3%), and myalgia (63.3% versus 36.7%) were reported among PCV-15 versus PCV-7 recipients. Majority of AEs, irrespective of vaccine received, were transient and of mild-to-moderate intensity. No clinically significant differences were observed when comparing AE duration and severity. No laboratory abnormalities, vaccine-related SAEs or discontinuations from the study due to AEs were reported. IgG concentrations for the shared serotypes substantially increased postvaccination at comparable levels between recipients of PCV-15 and PCV-7. Substantial increases in antibody (IgG and OPA) responses to 8 serotypes unique to PCV-15 were observed in PCV-15 recipients. Slight increases to 2 serotypes unique to PCV-15, serotypes 6A and 19A, were also noted in PCV-7 recipients. CONCLUSION: PCV-15 displays an acceptable safety profile and induces IgG and OPA responses to all serotypes included in the vaccine.