Supporting family dementia caregivers: testing the efficacy of dementia care management on multifaceted caregivers' burden.

OBJECTIVES: Current research suggests that dementia care management (DCM) can decrease burden and associated health impairments of caregivers. The objective of this secondary analysis is to investigate the impact of DCM on multifaceted caregivers' burden dimensions by differentiating between objective and subjective burden. METHODS: A sample of n = 317 dyads of caregivers and community-dwelling people with dementia (PwD) participated in a general practitioner-based, cluster-randomized intervention trial (Identifier:NCT01401582) with two arms and comprehensive data assessment at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Data provided by the caregiver included an inventory with 88 items in 20 different dimensions. RESULTS: Caregivers in the intervention 'DCM' group showed decreased caregiver burden, especially in caregivers' objective burden due to caring (i.e. emotional support), caregivers' subjective burden due to behavior change (i.e. cognition, aggression and resistance, depression, late symptoms) and caregivers' subjective burden due to perceived conflicts between needs and responsibilities to care (i.e. financial losses) compared to caregivers in the control 'care as usual' group, which showed significant increased caregiver burden after 12 months. CONCLUSION: Our findings support evidence for the effectiveness of DCM to lower family dementia caregivers' burden in multifaceted dimensions.

[Unmet needs of family dementia caregivers of persons with dementia : Primary medical care]. / Offene Versorgungsbedarfe pflegender Angehöriger von Menschen mit Demenz : Primärärztliche Versorgung.

BACKGROUND: Results of current research studies revealed that providing informal care for people with dementia (PwD) is associated with caregivers' burden and a variety of health impairments. In order to provide optimal support for family caregivers of PwD, general practitioners and specialists should be able to identify caregivers' unmet needs in primary care. OBJECTIVES: The present article provides an overview of unmet needs of family caregivers that are relevant for general practitioners as well as specialists in neurology, psychiatry, psychotherapy and psychosomatics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present overview is based on current reviews on unmet needs of caregivers of PwD and on results of the general practitioner-based, cluster-randomized controlled intervention trial DelpHi-MV (Life- and person-centred help in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany; Identifier: NCT01401582). RESULTS: The article provides an overview of unmet needs of family caregivers for PwD, especially in the domains of social integration, psychological and physical health, legal and financial issues, as well as available and valid measurements. DISCUSSION: The article illustrates the importance and the possibilities for general practitioners and specialists to identify caregivers' unmet needs. The question to what extent unmet needs' assessments for family caregivers of PwD could be implemented and financed in routine care is still under debate.

Drug-related problems in community-dwelling primary care patients screened positive for dementia.

BACKGROUND: Older people have a higher risk of drug-related problems (DRPs). However, little is known about the prevalence of DRPs in community-dwelling people who screened positive for dementia. Our study aimed to determine (1) the prevalence and types of DRPs and (2) the socio-demographic and clinical variables associated with DRPs in people screened positive for dementia in primary care. METHODS: The Dementia: life- and person-centered help in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (DelpHi-MV) study is a general practitioner (GP)-based cluster-randomized controlled intervention study to implement and evaluate an innovative concept of collaborative dementia care management in the primary care setting in Germany. Medication reviews of 446 study participants were conducted by pharmacists based on a comprehensive baseline assessment that included a computer-based home medication assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01401582. RESULTS: A total of 1,077 DRPs were documented. In 414 study participants (93%), at least one DRP was detected by a pharmacist. The most frequent DRPs were administration and compliance problems (60%), drug interactions (17%), and problems with inappropriate drug choice (15%). The number of DRPs was significantly associated with the total number of drugs taken and with a formal diagnosis of a mental or behavioral disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Degree of cognitive impairment (MMSE defined) and formal diagnosis of dementia were not risk factors for an increased number of DRPs. However, the total number of drug taken and the presence of a diagnosis of mental and behavioral disorders were associated with an increased total number of DRPs.

[Financing Regional Dementia Networks in Germany: Determinants of Sustainable Healthcare Networks]. / Finanzierung regionaler Demenznetzwerke: Determinanten einer nachhaltigen Finanzierung am Beispiel spezialisierter Gesundheitsnetzwerke.

OBJECTIVES: Analysis of practice-based financing concepts in German dementia networks (DN); Provision of sustainable financing structures and their determinants in DN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Qualitative expert interviews with leaders of 13 DN were conducted. A semi-structured interview guide was used to analyse four main topics: Finance-related organization, cost, sources of funding and financial sustainability. RESULTS: DN were primarily financed by membership fees, earnings of services provided, public funds and payments by municipalities or health care providers. 63% of the DN reported a financial sustainability. Funds to support the interpersonal expanding, a mix of internal and external financing sources and investments of the municipality were determinants of a sustainable financing. Overall, DN in rural areas seemed to be disadvantaged due to a lack of potential linkable service providers. CONCLUSION: DN in urban regions are more likely able to gather sustainable funding resources. A minimum funding of 50.000 €/year for human resources coordinating the DN, seems to be a threshold for a sustainable DN.

Evaluation of the Fiscal Costs and Consequences of Alzheimer's Disease in Germany: Microsimulation of Patients' and Caregivers' Pathways.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease is a severe condition, impacting individual's wellbeing and independence in daily activities. Informal care provision is common and of great value to societies but is not without negative externalities to households and the broader economy. OBJECTIVES: Estimate the lifetime incremental fiscal consequences of Alzheimer's disease in community-based individuals and their informal caregivers. SETTING: The fiscal consequences of Alzheimer's disease was modeled using the German government and social security perspective. PARTICIPANTS: Synthetic cohort containing 1,000 pairs of people with Alzheimer's disease and their informal caregivers, compared to 1,000 demographically identical pairs from the general population. DESIGN: Disease progression was modeled using published equations and a state-transition microsimulation framework. Labor participation, financial support and paid taxes were estimated according to cognitive decline and caregiving responsibilities using German labor statistics and tax rates. Healthcare costs were sourced from several German publications. Costs and life-years were discounted at 3% annually. MEASUREMENTS: Results are reported as lifetime incremental differences in total tax revenue and transfer payments between the cohort affected by Alzheimer's disease and their general population analogues. RESULTS: The Alzheimer's disease-affected pair was associated with net incremental fiscal losses of €74,288 ($85,037) to the German government and social security over the lifetime of people with Alzheimer's disease. Most costs were lost taxes on employment earnings (48.4%) due to caregivers working reduced hours. Caregivers were estimated to earn €56,967 ($65,209) less than their general population analogues. Financial support for informal and formal care accounted for 20.4%, and medical healthcare costs represented 24.0% of the incremental fiscal losses. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model results. In a cohort with early onset Alzheimer's disease, incremental fiscal losses were predicted to be €118,533 ($114,209) over the lifetime of people with Alzheimer's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Alzheimer's disease externalities profoundly impact public economics for governments and should be considered to inform policy making and healthcare planning.