The Use of Auricular Cartilage Grafts in Septorhinoplasty: A Dual-Centre Study of Donor Site Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Objectives The use of autologous grafts is a key aspect of contemporary septorhinoplasty. When septal cartilage is deficient, auricular cartilage serves as a biocompatible, readily accessible alternative. Our study aimed to assess donor site patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) where auricular cartilage has been harvested for use in septorhinoplasty, adding to the limited existing literature on this topic. Design A dual-centre, single-surgeon retrospective analysis of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty surgery with augmentation using auricular cartilage grafts was conducted. Grafts were harvested using an anterior anti-helical approach. Patients were followed up at one week, three months and 12 months post-operatively. Donor site outcomes were assessed across several physical and psychological domains by adapting the EAR-Q questionnaire, which was administered via telephone consultation. Responses were quantified using a Likert scale. Results A total of 22 patients met our inclusion criteria. Four were lost to follow-up, five were non-responders and one case was excluded due to documentation of body dysmorphic disorder. A significant proportion of patients reported no reduction in quality of life (QOL) or confidence attributed to donor site cosmesis. High satisfaction was noted with anti-helical donor site scars. Although noticeable differences in shape and symmetry were reported, these had negligible effects across psychological domains. Conclusions Preliminary results suggest high levels of patient satisfaction, with minimal physical and psychological donor site sequelae following auricular cartilage harvest in septorhinoplasty. Subsequent studies should involve the use of validated questionnaires, coupled with larger patient cohorts in order to provide further data for statistical analysis.

Peripheral histological clearance of cutaneous BCC and SCC excised using the wet blotting technique.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate identification of the peripheral margin of cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas plays a crucial role in ensuring complete excision of the skin cancer. The recommended margin of excision for cutaneous malignancies varies in the current guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess the success rate of peripheral margin clearance with a 4 mm peripheral margin of excision when the clinical margin of the lesion has been identified using the wet blotting technique. METHODS: The peripheral margin of each skin cancer was marked using the wet blotting technique and a 4-mm margin of excision rule was applied to all skin cancers regardless of their type and other clinical features. Data collection was performed from patients who were operated on over a period of 34 months (2011 to 2014). Information gathered included patient demographics, clinical details of the lesion and histopathological data. RESULTS: The total number of patients identified were 456. The case notes were reviewed and eventually 276 patients were included and 180 patients were excluded. The histology report showed 95-97% clearance of the peripheral margin in all BCCs and SCCs regardless of their clinical features and their location. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has shown that a standard rule of maintaining a 4 mm margin around all head and neck skin BCCs and SCCs, measured after the visible margin of the lesion had been accurately identified by the wet-blotting technique, can successfully achieve 95-97% peripheral clearance of all lesions, irrespective of the subtype, size and location.

Ossiculoplasty in intact stapes and malleus patients: a comparison of PORPs versus TORPs with malleus relocation and Silastic banding techniques.

OBJECTIVES: To compare hearing results in patients undergoing ossiculoplasty using either partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP) or total ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP) with Silastic banding and malleus relocation techniques in cases with malleus and stapes both present and mobile. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized clinical study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. METHODS: Five hundred eighty-five patients undergoing ossiculoplasty were enrolled in this study from April 1991 to May 2010. Comparative analyses were made between a group of 304 patients who underwent ossiculoplasty with partial prosthesis positioned from the malleus to the stapes head and 281 patients who underwent ossiculoplasty with total prosthesis positioned from the malleus to the stapes footplate. Preoperative and postoperative audiometric evaluation using conventional audiometry, that is, air-bone gap (ABG), bone-conduction thresholds, and air-conduction thresholds were assessed. RESULTS: In the PORP group, the mean postoperative ABG was 13.1 dB compared with 8.9 dB in the TORP group, (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-6.2 dB; p ≤ 0.001). Fifty-four percent of patients from the PORP group had a postoperative ABG of 10 dB or less, compared with 68.9% in the TORP group (mean difference, 14.6%; 95% CI, 6%-23%; p < 0.001). The postoperative ABG was closed to within 20 dB in 70.4% of cases in the PORP group compared with 86.9% in the TORP group (mean difference, 14.5%; 95% CI, 10%-23%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with an absent incus and intact stapes and malleus, ossicular reconstruction with TORP combined with our malleus relocation and Silastic banding technique results in significantly better hearing outcomes compared with reconstructions with PORP.